This topic is locked from further discussion.
Do you think an argument can be made that PS3 is the best of all time?rotaredomSure, but why don't you try making one? It could actually get this thread going somewhere.
maybe, I think that argument cant really be made until after this generation is over,.
I personally feel that the nintendo 64 still holds that crown, followed by PS1 and then SNES and Genesis tied for 3rd.
The PS2 and PS1 dominated the PS3 in every way. Along with SNES and possible the N64. There is no way its the best console ever.
No best are SNES/N64 IMO
KingBowser91
i agree, N64 is the best console ever, even if it dose get an nostalgia boost, the multiplayer is still one of the best.
this gen they set all cards on online, but they forget its funnyer to play with friends then random swearing people online
Well, it is the best console of all time in terms of features and performance but in terms of games it isn't. In 5 or 10 years that might be a lot different.
EDIT: My PS3 can play (and upscale) all ps2 and ps1 games so I guess it could be conidered the best console ever.
IMO the PC is and always be the best gaming system.
absolutely not. No system this gen will go down as the best console in history, or even top 3 for that matter. There would have to be something drastic over the next couple years for that to happen. The wii will go down as one of the more successful and innovative but certaintly not the best. The 360 is better than the og XBOX but it's not better tha top systems from previous generations. And for the PS3, it's not better than the ps1 or ps2, so by that theory alone, there is no way it could be number 1
ps3 is the opposite of everything ps1 and ps2 represented and is the worst console of all time.
MerisYaki
Could not agree with you more buddy.
Considering the quality of teh PS1 and 2,has their ever been a worse successor console in the history of the industry?
[QUOTE="MerisYaki"]
ps3 is the opposite of everything ps1 and ps2 represented and is the worst console of all time.
GabeNewellsPie
Could not agree with you more buddy.
Considering the quality of teh PS1 and 2,has their ever been a worse successor console in the history of the industry?
game boy> virtual boy still its a close call[QUOTE="MerisYaki"]
ps3 is the opposite of everything ps1 and ps2 represented and is the worst console of all time.
GabeNewellsPie
Could not agree with you more buddy.
Considering the quality of teh PS1 and 2,has their ever been a worse successor console in the history of the industry?
if you guys both think the ps3 is the worst console of all time, then i'm led to believe you both started gaming last generation.
most dissapointing console of all time, i'll give you, but worst, it's not even up for discussion
if you think it is then sure its the best console of all time, for you atleast, me? id say that the n64 or ps2 are the best, thats the wonders of freedom, your entitles to your opinion, no one can come in and say "your wrong"
Do you think an argument can be made that PS3 is the best of all time?rotaredomnope. well maybe in 15 years or so when the 6-12 year olds reflect back. but alot of those might go with 360 so again .....nope to me nothing can beat the nes. dreamcast, ps1 , was pretty far second and third
Why are people saying it is the worst ever, that goes to the wii. Sure it has its good games, but not enough to balance the crap that comes to it. Atleast the PS2 could balance the crap to good games decently.
Camer999
At least wii have more variety in games than the FPS. Oh yeah the Wii's controls for a FPS made the dual analog obselete! oh man
[QUOTE="MerisYaki"]
ps3 is the opposite of everything ps1 and ps2 represented and is the worst console of all time.
Could not agree with you more buddy.
Considering the quality of teh PS1 and 2,has their ever been a worse successor console in the history of the industry?
ps3 just got real compation this gen. and they got to cocky or just didnt care about anything but the hd movie format war. they could have paid some cash and kept gta4, ff13, dmc 4, tekken 6, ace combat,vf5, re5, next mgs, to stay only ps games but they invested it on blue ray drives instead. thats why they won in the past they had 3rd party devs just throwing them bone after bone. this gen they dont have the biggest user base. so they either pay or it goes to xbox also. ms is the one hungrey now. paying for extras on those great games. giving their fans more bang out of those games.Short answer: NO
Long answer: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Throw away all the bad consoles from history that had absolutely no financial support, or developer support, and what you're left with is all the most popular gaming consoles of all time. Atari, Nintendo, Sega, Playstation, Xbox, and the like.
Virtual Boy, PSP, and Atari Jaguar being the worst of all these big names, and everything else being better than the PS3.
PS3 doesn't have all the best games, or a library that stands up to the greatest consoles (N64, SNES, and Dreamcast)
Edit: Actually the Atari 5200 sucked ass too, and so did the 7800, but Atari might be too old to compare really.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment