PS3 better than 360??

PS3>360

Come on, we all know that already. Halo is the biggest bugget game for the 360 and it looks average.

Show me a 360 gameplay video that has a lot of things going on at the same time like Lair. Show me a game that that can be compared to Heavenly Sword, Uncharted and Ratchet and Clank. Even Resistance has more things going on at the same time than any other 360 game.

Please SHOW ME. I don't want you to post game Tittles or Screenshots. I want gameplay videos.

I will honestly tell you if i'm impress with what I see.

*Sigh* I just can't get enough air these days....

Anywho fine thats your opinion.....

Why does anyone here need to "impress" you with some gameplay videos? :?

I don't think anyone cares.

ps3 is the better sytem due to it having more high tech features.

but the 360 is whre the games are at.

Why bother? You're the same fanboy who compared people who like Halo to kids who like Power Rangers. Any video that is provided, be it Kameo, Dead Rising, or Halo 3, will be dismessed by you in one way or another. So, in short, spare us your trolling and keep it in your blog.Verge_6

Please show gameplay videos of some REAL games. I've seen videos those games and I was not impressed. Besides, there is nothing impressive about Zombies walking all over the place. They probably don't have any AI until you get real close to them.

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]Why bother? You're the same fanboy who compared people who like Halo to kids who like Power Rangers. Any video that is provided, be it Kameo, Dead Rising, or Halo 3, will be dismessed by you in one way or another. So, in short, spare us your trolling and keep it in your blog.sm66612

Please show gameplay videos of some REAL games. I've seen videos those games and I was not impressed. Besides, there is nothing impressive about Zombies walking all over the place. They probably don't have any AI until you get real close to them.

Thank you for proving my point. And the Lair soldiers do?

Gears of War, a game from 2006, looks better than everything, except UT3, on the PS3.taikthebate

See, I'm not talking about just graphics. I want something that looks good and has a lot of things going on at the same time.

PS3>360

Come on, we all know that already. Halo is the biggest bugget game for the 360 and it looks average.

Show me a 360 gameplay video that has a lot of things going on at the same time like Lair. Show me a game that that can be compared to Heavenly Sword, Uncharted and Ratchet and Clank. Even Resistance has more things going on at the same time than any other 360 game.

Please SHOW ME. I don't want you to post game Tittles or Screenshots. I want gameplay videos.

I will honestly tell you if i'm impress with what I see.

sm66612

isn't it past ur bed time?

Opinion FTL. Impex

Loss approved.

[QUOTE="sm66612"]

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]Why bother? You're the same fanboy who compared people who like Halo to kids who like Power Rangers. Any video that is provided, be it Kameo, Dead Rising, or Halo 3, will be dismessed by you in one way or another. So, in short, spare us your trolling and keep it in your blog.Verge_6

Please show gameplay videos of some REAL games. I've seen videos those games and I was not impressed. Besides, there is nothing impressive about Zombies walking all over the place. They probably don't have any AI until you get real close to them.

Thank you for proving my point. And the Lair soldiers do?

When I was thinking about about Lair, I was not talking about the soldiers in the ground. I was thinking about all those Dragons and Explosion everywhere. Now that you mention it, there is a lot more soldiers in Lair than Zombies in Dead Rising. I'm even more impressed now.

[QUOTE="taikthebate"]Gears of War, a game from 2006, looks better than everything, except UT3, on the PS3.sm66612

See, I'm not talking about just graphics. I want something that looks good and has a lot of things going on at the same time.

[QUOTE="taikthebate"]Gears of War, a game from 2006, looks better than everything, except UT3, on the PS3.sm66612

See, I'm not talking about just graphics. I want something that looks good and has a lot of things going on at the same time.

Halo 3.

[QUOTE="sm66612"]

[QUOTE="taikthebate"]Gears of War, a game from 2006, looks better than everything, except UT3, on the PS3._en1gma_

See, I'm not talking about just graphics. I want something that looks good and has a lot of things going on at the same time.

Halo 3.

Can you give me a link to that video please. Thanks!

Lets keep this thead nice and clean.

It's all just a matter of opinion. SaintBlaze

Yes, I want to know your opininon and see what you are talking about.

[QUOTE="_en1gma_"][QUOTE="sm66612"]

[QUOTE="taikthebate"]Gears of War, a game from 2006, looks better than everything, except UT3, on the PS3.sm66612

See, I'm not talking about just graphics. I want something that looks good and has a lot of things going on at the same time.

Halo 3.

Can you give me a link to that video please. Thanks!

Lets keep this thead nice and clean.

No video.

Does anyone have the link that says how huge the battles in Halo 3 are going to be?

[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="sm66612"]

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]Why bother? You're the same fanboy who compared people who like Halo to kids who like Power Rangers. Any video that is provided, be it Kameo, Dead Rising, or Halo 3, will be dismessed by you in one way or another. So, in short, spare us your trolling and keep it in your blog.sm66612

Please show gameplay videos of some REAL games. I've seen videos those games and I was not impressed. Besides, there is nothing impressive about Zombies walking all over the place. They probably don't have any AI until you get real close to them.

Thank you for proving my point. And the Lair soldiers do?

When I was thinking about about Lair, I was not talking about the soldiers in the ground. I was thinking about all those Dragons and Explosion everywhere. Now that you mention it, there is a lot more soldiers in Lair than Zombies in Dead Rising. I'm even more impressed now.

You mean the soldiers that have about the same textures of a late PS1 game, when you're zoomed in the most, and resemble tinhy dots most of the time? Easily impressed, I see. Also, if you want a bunch of stuff going on, Ace Combat 6 says 'hi'.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/21605.html

B-53s carpet-bombing buildings, fighters engaging other fighters, transport planes dropping APCs for a ground attack, chips launching SAMS and AA fire, gunships attacking landingstrips...all at teh same time.

[QUOTE="sm66612"][QUOTE="_en1gma_"][QUOTE="sm66612"]

[QUOTE="taikthebate"]Gears of War, a game from 2006, looks better than everything, except UT3, on the PS3._en1gma_

See, I'm not talking about just graphics. I want something that looks good and has a lot of things going on at the same time.

Halo 3.

Can you give me a link to that video please. Thanks!

Lets keep this thead nice and clean.

No video.

Does anyone have the link that says how huge the battles in Halo 3 are going to be?

Only video please.

Only video please.sm66612

What, the dev's word isn't good enough for you? :roll:

[QUOTE="sm66612"]Only video please.Verge_6

What, the dev's word isn't good enough for you? :roll:

Obviously not for trolls...

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]

[QUOTE="sm66612"]Only video please._en1gma_

What, the dev's word isn't good enough for you? :roll:

Obviously not for trolls...

I honestly wonder what this guy's previous account was...

Why is it that in System Wars everyone has to have the same tried and false arguement? "Come on, it's so true,""There's no denying it now,""It's so obvious!"

Setting it up this way is not a good way to debate? There are no definites, and it makes your arguement look flacid.

Blargh.

[QUOTE="sm66612"][QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="sm66612"]

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]Why bother? You're the same fanboy who compared people who like Halo to kids who like Power Rangers. Any video that is provided, be it Kameo, Dead Rising, or Halo 3, will be dismessed by you in one way or another. So, in short, spare us your trolling and keep it in your blog.Verge_6

Please show gameplay videos of some REAL games. I've seen videos those games and I was not impressed. Besides, there is nothing impressive about Zombies walking all over the place. They probably don't have any AI until you get real close to them.

Thank you for proving my point. And the Lair soldiers do?

When I was thinking about about Lair, I was not talking about the soldiers in the ground. I was thinking about all those Dragons and Explosion everywhere. Now that you mention it, there is a lot more soldiers in Lair than Zombies in Dead Rising. I'm even more impressed now.

You mean the soldiers that have about the same textures of a late PS1 game, when you're zoomed in the most, and resemble tinhy dots most of the time? Easily impressed, I see. Also, if you want a bunch of stuff going on, Ace Combat 6 says 'hi'.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/21605.html

B-53s carpet-bombing buildings, fighters engaging other fighters, transport planes dropping APCs for a ground attack, chips launching SAMS and AA fire, gunships attacking landingstrips...all at teh same time.

Thanks for the link.

First of all, if your going to make fun of textures, you should have chosen a better looking game. The ground texture was really bad but the buildings were cool though. The game looked really slow paced. What was up with the sound? It sounded weak. Only one enemy at a time? The max that I saw was 3-4 jets. "Where was the Carpet-Bombing" part?

A game that I could comapare it to is Warhawk. Warhawk destroys Ace Combat 6 and I'm not even including the ground Combat in Warhawk.

NEXT!

Thanks for the link.

First of all, if your going to make fun of textures, you should have chosen a better looking game. The ground texture was really bad but the buildings were cool though. The game looked really slow paced. What was up with the sound? It sounded weak. Only one enemy at a time? The max that I saw was 3-4 jets. "Where was the Carpet-Bombing" part?

A game that I could comapare it to is Warhawk. Warhawk destroys Ace Combat 6 and I'm not even including the ground Combat in Warhawk.

NEXT!

sm66612

I rest my case. You simply came here to troll. I think we can ask for a thread-lock now. The video link was provided just to make you stop spouting 'only videos'. Read this;

http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/acecombat6/news.html?sid=6172444&mode=recent

This shoots down every single downplay you placed on AC6. Sit down.

This is another Chad Wardenn thread. The only thing missing is the Jim Jones "We Fly High" nonsense playing in the background. I own both consoles. They are both great. The PS3 is lacking in quality titles, but the PS2 back library more than makes up for it. For those who are trashing Halo 3, what was the budget for Lair? Lair is looking to be yet another SCEA big budget flop. As an owner of both consoles, here is my take: Both the PS3 and 360 are great gaming platforms. The 360 has a vastly superior library so far. I guess you can beeyotch about the $50 per year price tag for a Live account if you want. LBP looks like it will appeal to people who like to play with stuffed animals. Heavenly Sword better by fokking sweet. That's all I know.joe_g_patton

Did you even read my first post? We are talking about technical stuff and not about a "vastly superior game library."

[QUOTE="sm66612"]Thanks for the link.

First of all, if your going to make fun of textures, you should have chosen a better looking game. The ground texture was really bad but the buildings were cool though. The game looked really slow paced. What was up with the sound? It sounded weak. Only one enemy at a time? The max that I saw was 3-4 jets. "Where was the Carpet-Bombing" part?

A game that I could comapare it to is Warhawk. Warhawk destroys Ace Combat 6 and I'm not even including the ground Combat in Warhawk.

NEXT!

Verge_6

I rest my case. You simply came here to troll. I think we can ask for a thread-lock now. The video link was provided just to make you stop spouting 'only videos'. Read this;

http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/acecombat6/news.html?sid=6172444&mode=recent

This shoots down every single downplay you placed on AC6. Sit down.

Your logic is amazing! Why would I read about something when I could see it with my own eyes. I want you to read every preview and not the Review of Lair or any other PS3 game and tell me that again. I have read nothing but good stuff from the previews of Lair and you guys keep making fun of it.

Why are you trying to close this thread anyways. It's perfectly clean. Are you threatened by something?

you mean this? http://www.gametrailers.com/player/12169.html (keep in mind this is a review video not a PR hype video)

I still don't think any PS3 game has meet up with this http://www.gametrailers.com/player/8497.html (complex reltime lighting effects not seen/possible on ps3???)

hell I don't even have to bother mentioning gears. The 360 in it's first 10 months had better looking games than the ps3 in it's first 10 month.

Most of what we seen conserning graphics on the ps3 is always before the game is released, but once the game comes out we learn it was all pretty much hype. When it comes to multiplats the 360's always look slightly better, or atleast comparible. The only exception being Oblivion which doesn't look any better, but loads game objects quicker and at further distances (due to 4.2 gigs of the game being on the HDD.)

Some facts about hardware.

Media Disc drives: The ps3's blu-ray no doubt give developers room to put a ton of stuff into their game, but unfortunately the disc speed is gimped to a speed even slower than DVD-9 so developers can't load information any faster than they can on the 360, nor can they save prossessing power by using uncompressed assets. This means the only advantage you get from blu-ra is longer HD cut scenes which cost alot of time and money. Today most developers are switching to cut scenes that use the in-game engine (similar to machinima). This looks fairly with cutting edge graphics, and saves alot of cash, and time.

HDD: I don't know the speed of the HDD for either but I'm guessing they used 4200 rpm which is still quite alot faster than a disc drive. The difference of this can be seen in the two versions of Oblivion since the entire game is practically loaded on the ps3 HDD. Since MS is so hell bent on supporting the Core developers have to work both options. I really don't see why 360 HDD users can't load up 4.2 gigs for their version of Oblivion though?? I guess Bethesda figured the game ran fine as is (and it pretty much does).

CPU: really the two cpu's are apples and bannanas trying to compare them spec for spec is down right idiotic. While the cell does destroy Xenon for a few specific prossesses hardly any of those are used for game type programming. While the cell does work well with traditional AI, game AI is nothing like that, and the cell is no more better than running game AI statements then Xenon. If you go with general computing the Cell has an advantage but as far as the needs of game computing go there's not much difference.

RAM: While both have a total of 512mb, the ps3's uses 256 of much faster ram. Of course splitting up the types of ram does gimp that advantage quite a bit, and it also causes problems on the development side of things also since you can only load 256mb onto a single resource. The basic difference is having 2 toy boxes vs 1 toy box. With the 1 toy box you can just throw everything in there no worries, and with the ps3 you'll need to organize things a bit more to keep it from crashing.

GPU - Well RSX can push more polygons, but Xenos can push more verticies, and most people don't even know what I'm talking about here so I'll just say this. They are pretty much the same, and the only thing that makes one have an advantage over the other is API's. Personally being a PC gamer I like DX API's, but Sony has made great improvements over their API's in past generations.

you mean this? http://www.gametrailers.com/player/12169.html (keep in mind this is a review video not a PR hype video)

I still don't think any PS3 game has meet up with this http://www.gametrailers.com/player/8497.html (complex reltime lighting effects not seen/possible on ps3???)

hell I don't even have to bother mentioning gears. The 360 in it's first 10 months had better looking games than the ps3 in it's first 10 month.

Most of what we seen conserning graphics on the ps3 is always before the game is released, but once the game comes out we learn it was all pretty much hype. When it comes to multiplats the 360's always look slightly better, or atleast comparible. The only exception being Oblivion which doesn't look any better, but loads game objects quicker and at further distances (due to 4.2 gigs of the game being on the HDD.)

Some facts about hardware.

Media Disc drives: The ps3's blu-ray no doubt give developers room to put a ton of stuff into their game, but unfortunately the disc speed is gimped to a speed even slower than DVD-9 so developers can't load information any faster than they can on the 360, nor can they save prossessing power by using uncompressed assets. This means the only advantage you get from blu-ra is longer HD cut scenes which cost alot of time and money. Today most developers are switching to cut scenes that use the in-game engine (similar to machinima). This looks fairly with cutting edge graphics, and saves alot of cash, and time.

HDD: I don't know the speed of the HDD for either but I'm guessing they used 4200 rpm which is still quite alot faster than a disc drive. The difference of this can be seen in the two versions of Oblivion since the entire game is practically loaded on the ps3 HDD. Since MS is so hell bent on supporting the Core developers have to work both options. I really don't see why 360 HDD users can't load up 4.2 gigs for their version of Oblivion though?? I guess Bethesda figured the game ran fine as is (and it pretty much does).

CPU: really the two cpu's are apples and bannanas trying to compare them spec for spec is down right idiotic. While the cell does destroy Xenon for a few specific prossesses hardly any of those are used for game type programming. While the cell does work well with traditional AI, game AI is nothing like that, and the cell is no more better than running game AI statements then Xenon. If you go with general computing the Cell has an advantage but as far as the needs of game computing go there's not much difference.

RAM: While both have a total of 512mb, the ps3's uses 256 of much faster ram. Of course splitting up the types of ram does gimp that advantage quite a bit, and it also causes problems on the development side of things also since you can only load 256mb onto a single resource. The basic difference is having 2 toy boxes vs 1 toy box. With the 1 toy box you can just throw everything in there no worries, and with the ps3 you'll need to organize things a bit more to keep it from crashing.

GPU - Well RSX can push more polygons, but Xenos can push more verticies, and most people don't even know what I'm talking about here so I'll just say this. They are pretty much the same, and the only thing that makes one have an advantage over the other is API's. Personally being a PC gamer I like DX API's, but Sony has made great improvements over their API's in past generations.

jrhawk42

you mean this? http://www.gametrailers.com/player/12169.html (keep in mind this is a review video not a PR hype video)

I still don't think any PS3 game has meet up with this http://www.gametrailers.com/player/8497.html (complex reltime lighting effects not seen/possible on ps3???)

hell I don't even have to bother mentioning gears. The 360 in it's first 10 months had better looking games than the ps3 in it's first 10 month.

Most of what we seen conserning graphics on the ps3 is always before the game is released, but once the game comes out we learn it was all pretty much hype. When it comes to multiplats the 360's always look slightly better, or atleast comparible. The only exception being Oblivion which doesn't look any better, but loads game objects quicker and at further distances (due to 4.2 gigs of the game being on the HDD.)

Some facts about hardware.

Media Disc drives: The ps3's blu-ray no doubt give developers room to put a ton of stuff into their game, but unfortunately the disc speed is gimped to a speed even slower than DVD-9 so developers can't load information any faster than they can on the 360, nor can they save prossessing power by using uncompressed assets. This means the only advantage you get from blu-ra is longer HD cut scenes which cost alot of time and money. Today most developers are switching to cut scenes that use the in-game engine (similar to machinima). This looks fairly with cutting edge graphics, and saves alot of cash, and time.

HDD: I don't know the speed of the HDD for either but I'm guessing they used 4200 rpm which is still quite alot faster than a disc drive. The difference of this can be seen in the two versions of Oblivion since the entire game is practically loaded on the ps3 HDD. Since MS is so hell bent on supporting the Core developers have to work both options. I really don't see why 360 HDD users can't load up 4.2 gigs for their version of Oblivion though?? I guess Bethesda figured the game ran fine as is (and it pretty much does).

CPU: really the two cpu's are apples and bannanas trying to compare them spec for spec is down right idiotic. While the cell does destroy Xenon for a few specific prossesses hardly any of those are used for game type programming. While the cell does work well with traditional AI, game AI is nothing like that, and the cell is no more better than running game AI statements then Xenon. If you go with general computing the Cell has an advantage but as far as the needs of game computing go there's not much difference.

RAM: While both have a total of 512mb, the ps3's uses 256 of much faster ram. Of course splitting up the types of ram does gimp that advantage quite a bit, and it also causes problems on the development side of things also since you can only load 256mb onto a single resource. The basic difference is having 2 toy boxes vs 1 toy box. With the 1 toy box you can just throw everything in there no worries, and with the ps3 you'll need to organize things a bit more to keep it from crashing.

GPU - Well RSX can push more polygons, but Xenos can push more verticies, and most people don't even know what I'm talking about here so I'll just say this. They are pretty much the same, and the only thing that makes one have an advantage over the other is API's. Personally being a PC gamer I like DX API's, but Sony has made great improvements over their API's in past generations.

jrhawk42

Thanks for the links.

Where do I begin? I already talked about Dead Rising so i'll skip that. Since you think that you know about technical stuff, I wasn't a smart idea to show Dead Rising.

Moving on to Condemned. That game looks really good to the common gamer. If you payed attention, the game hides a lot of bad textures in the dark. If you watch the part where he climbs a ladder, he gets close and personal with the bad textures. You could even see bad textures when he's hitting the bad guys with a stick.

Besides, I'm wasn't talking about textures. I was talking about things going on at the same time. Condemned is a perfect example of the rest of the 360 games. *Walk into a small room and kill 1-2 bad guys* Can you at least show me something that I can compare to Resistance. With the amount of things going on at the same time. I would prefer to see something exclusive.

You are forgetting that there is not a horror game currently out for the PS3 unless you count a really bad port of FEAR.

You are also forgetting that Condemned 2 is coming out for the PS3 which is going to look better than Condemned of course.

you mean this? http://www.gametrailers.com/player/12169.html (keep in mind this is a review video not a PR hype video)

I still don't think any PS3 game has meet up with this http://www.gametrailers.com/player/8497.html (complex reltime lighting effects not seen/possible on ps3???)

hell I don't even have to bother mentioning gears. The 360 in it's first 10 months had better looking games than the ps3 in it's first 10 month.

Most of what we seen conserning graphics on the ps3 is always before the game is released, but once the game comes out we learn it was all pretty much hype. When it comes to multiplats the 360's always look slightly better, or atleast comparible. The only exception being Oblivion which doesn't look any better, but loads game objects quicker and at further distances (due to 4.2 gigs of the game being on the HDD.)

Some facts about hardware.

Media Disc drives: The ps3's blu-ray no doubt give developers room to put a ton of stuff into their game, but unfortunately the disc speed is gimped to a speed even slower than DVD-9 so developers can't load information any faster than they can on the 360, nor can they save prossessing power by using uncompressed assets. This means the only advantage you get from blu-ra is longer HD cut scenes which cost alot of time and money. Today most developers are switching to cut scenes that use the in-game engine (similar to machinima). This looks fairly with cutting edge graphics, and saves alot of cash, and time.

HDD: I don't know the speed of the HDD for either but I'm guessing they used 4200 rpm which is still quite alot faster than a disc drive. The difference of this can be seen in the two versions of Oblivion since the entire game is practically loaded on the ps3 HDD. Since MS is so hell bent on supporting the Core developers have to work both options. I really don't see why 360 HDD users can't load up 4.2 gigs for their version of Oblivion though?? I guess Bethesda figured the game ran fine as is (and it pretty much does).

CPU: really the two cpu's are apples and bannanas trying to compare them spec for spec is down right idiotic. While the cell does destroy Xenon for a few specific prossesses hardly any of those are used for game type programming. While the cell does work well with traditional AI, game AI is nothing like that, and the cell is no more better than running game AI statements then Xenon. If you go with general computing the Cell has an advantage but as far as the needs of game computing go there's not much difference.

RAM: While both have a total of 512mb, the ps3's uses 256 of much faster ram. Of course splitting up the types of ram does gimp that advantage quite a bit, and it also causes problems on the development side of things also since you can only load 256mb onto a single resource. The basic difference is having 2 toy boxes vs 1 toy box. With the 1 toy box you can just throw everything in there no worries, and with the ps3 you'll need to organize things a bit more to keep it from crashing.

GPU - Well RSX can push more polygons, but Xenos can push more verticies, and most people don't even know what I'm talking about here so I'll just say this. They are pretty much the same, and the only thing that makes one have an advantage over the other is API's. Personally being a PC gamer I like DX API's, but Sony has made great improvements over their API's in past generations.

jrhawk42

Serious Sam can be played on 360 with backwards compatibility, and it has lots of things going on at the same time, with waves of dozens, maybe hundreds of monsters. So obviously, its the best game ever and 360 > PS3.Corvin

I guess you win? LMAO! Serious Sam is awesome for PC.

I have a feeling that you guys don't know what I'm talking about because you have never experienced it. Can anyone who owns a PS3 and 360 show me some stuff. Thanks!

ROFL i was so gona put that in my sig, but then i dont have any space....

Not a single sentence makes any sense in that post, the opinion fails on so many levels that i can not be bothered explaining.

Seriously, before youembarrassurself even further, go ahead and time RAM OPERATION in google. Knowledge is a key to an intelligent discussion.

Also that video has condemned lagging evey second scene they switch it soon as it does though...ssjgoku808

ok since people are going to be fanboys about the vids lets look at this from a logical perspective.

The ps3 support 1 billion verticies, and the 360 supports 1.5 billion. That means from a graphical perspective you're looking at 500million independent triangles for the 360 vs 333.3 million on the ps3. So that means the 360 can support roughly 33% more polygons meaning more characters, and better detailed character. The only advantage that RSX has is that it lack so many other resource consuming options on the GPU that they don't have to worry about including them.

Now from the texture side since both use 512 ram there's no advantage to one or the other when it comes to the details of the textures, or the amount of textures that can be supported. The ps3 marketing team my try to convince you that it's blu-ray lets developers use hi-resolution textures, but really it's the ram that would limit this not the media.

http://www.xbox.com/en-AU/support/xbox360/manuals/xbox360specs.htm

sorry sony doesn't have a link for their specs, and I think scanning my spec sheet would probably just lead to other users creating their own spec sheets filled w/ all kinds of BS.

PS3>360

Come on, we all know that already. Halo is the biggest bugget game for the 360 and it looks average.

Show me a 360 gameplay video that has a lot of things going on at the same time like Lair. Show me a game that that can be compared to Heavenly Sword, Uncharted and Ratchet and Clank. Even Resistance has more things going on at the same time than any other 360 game.

Please SHOW ME. I don't want you to post game Tittles or Screenshots. I want gameplay videos.

I will honestly tell you if i'm impress with what I see.

sm66612

Hmm, so you are one who wants to know how the game looks, not about the game in general. I can give you a video of the best-looking game ever, but it could be a crap game ... would you still like it though?

[QUOTE="sm66612"]

PS3>360

Come on, we all know that already. Halo is the biggest bugget game for the 360 and it looks average.

Show me a 360 gameplay video that has a lot of things going on at the same time like Lair. Show me a game that that can be compared to Heavenly Sword, Uncharted and Ratchet and Clank. Even Resistance has more things going on at the same time than any other 360 game.

Please SHOW ME. I don't want you to post game Tittles or Screenshots. I want gameplay videos.

I will honestly tell you if i'm impress with what I see.

daqua_99

Hmm, so you are one who wants to know how the game looks, not about the game in general. I can give you a video of the best-looking game ever, but it could be a crap game ... would you still like it though?

Whatever is the game u gona show to TC, he still gone deny it and say it is crap, and the ps3 is so much better anyway. I dont think there is any point proving anything to cows this days, they are blind, deaf and dumb.