PS3 can do physics better than Xbox360

  • 58 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Impex
Impex

5532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#51 Impex
Member since 2005 • 5532 Posts

wow, I remember people arguing over this way back IN 2005which is when this article CushVA

Oh God... :lol:

Avatar image for jack244
jack244

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 jack244
Member since 2003 • 282 Posts

wow, I remember people arguing over this way back IN 2005which is when this article CushVA

It's funny! Even better is the fact that 1 week later Ageia retracted their comments about 360 not being able to handle the full engine with liquid physics.

For those that missed the link, here it is again.

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1856641,00.asp

Avatar image for -KinGz-
-KinGz-

5232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#53 -KinGz-
Member since 2006 • 5232 Posts

[QUOTE="JiveT"]Incredible water effects in BIOSHOCK say hi! KTHXBYE.ssjgoku808
PC has better KTHXBYE.

Read the tittle KTHXBYE.

Avatar image for -KinGz-
-KinGz-

5232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#54 -KinGz-
Member since 2006 • 5232 Posts

[QUOTE="JiveT"]Incredible water effects in BIOSHOCK say hi! KTHXBYE.reddemon502



Just to let you know, Bioshock doesnt use fluid effects, its just different shaders. Fluid effects (like waves and stuff) are not a flat surface, like the water effects in Bioshock, which are clearly flat surfaces, so stop being a fanboy.

PS. there is nothing special about bioshock, just another fps w/ no multiplayer.

Bioshock hater, don't take him seriously.

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts

*notices article date* Holy CRAP. This was written back when we all thought the Killzone 2 CGI trailer was real, the PS3 wouldn't retail at more than $400, said console would get multiple AAA exclusives at launch, etc etc. MY how things change...

Avatar image for _Peoples_Champ_
_Peoples_Champ_

4695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 _Peoples_Champ_
Member since 2002 • 4695 Posts

[QUOTE="CushVA"]wow, I remember people arguing over this way back IN 2005which is when this article jack244

It's funny! Even better is the fact that 1 week later Ageia retracted their comments about 360 not being able to handle the full engine with liquid physics.

For those that missed the link, here it is again.

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1856641,00.asp

Ok,jack 244 wins against the original poster.

Way to go original poster (thread starter) You've been owned as owned.

Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7054 Posts

Well explained by a third party source. I think we have a winner.

Redfingers

I think we have a loser. How many times are people going to badly abuse themselves in this thread?

From the same people 3 days later:

The summary of the information below is that AGEIA would like to go on record that we do not have data to support performance comparisons for the PS3 or Xbox360 that would impact any of our physics features," Keane said in an email, which was also sent to other news organizations. "Specifically, statements that the Xbox360 cannot run fluid simulations are not correct. In addition, conclusions about relative performance should not have been stated or implied in our presentations."

In an interview, Keane acknowledged that the original claims regarding the Xbox 360, as reported by ExtremeTech, were a part of the presentation. However, the Ageia employees that presented at the European GDC did not develop the presentation, and did not provide the information in its proper context, Keane said. The slide has since been removed, he added.

"We really have no clue," Keane said in an interview, regarding the capabilities of the Xbox 360 and its ability to process the Ageia physics SDK, known as Novodex.

How many times has this link been referenced already in this thread? LMAO.

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1856641,00.asp

Avatar image for myke2010
myke2010

2747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 myke2010
Member since 2002 • 2747 Posts
[QUOTE="Redfingers"]

Well explained by a third party source. I think we have a winner.

SUD123456

I think we have a loser. How many times are people going to badly abuse themselves in this thread?

From the same people 3 days later:

The summary of the information below is that AGEIA would like to go on record that we do not have data to support performance comparisons for the PS3 or Xbox360 that would impact any of our physics features," Keane said in an email, which was also sent to other news organizations. "Specifically, statements that the Xbox360 cannot run fluid simulations are not correct. In addition, conclusions about relative performance should not have been stated or implied in our presentations."

In an interview, Keane acknowledged that the original claims regarding the Xbox 360, as reported by ExtremeTech, were a part of the presentation. However, the Ageia employees that presented at the European GDC did not develop the presentation, and did not provide the information in its proper context, Keane said. The slide has since been removed, he added.

"We really have no clue," Keane said in an interview, regarding the capabilities of the Xbox 360 and its ability to process the Ageia physics SDK, known as Novodex.

How many times has this link been referenced already in this thread? LMAO.

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1856641,00.asp

LOL, that is priceless. Seriously, the vast majority of PC devs already consider Ageia a joke, why would anyone quote these people for anything.