ps3 cant even handle sonic

Unfortunately, the very next level drops the psychic hedgehog into a nondescript forest setting that doesn't look any better than Sonic's ugly town, and it goes on from there. Compounding the issue is a very sketchy frame rate that slows the entire game down at seemingly random intervals. Considering the main appeal of Sonic is that he's supposed to be able to run fast, all the sluggishness really takes away from the game's already ugly presentation

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/sonicthehedgehog/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=gssummary

http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/sonicthehedgehog/index.html?q=sonic

no mention of framerate problems on xbox 360.

remember sega said sonic would be better on ps3? ALL pr BS lol.

This game just sucks. Period. Nothing to see here.
TekkenMaster606

lol, ps3 cant even handle sucky graphics game like sonic without framerate issues proves ps3 hardware sucks, plus sega took more development time on ps3.

Who cares. Only 2D Sonic games are good.

Hyping a 3D Sonic should be a sin.

Don't blame the PS3, blame the developers.bsin94

it's not the developer it's ps3, why is oblivion downgraded? why is splinter cell downgraded? the darkness? f.e.a.r? tony hawk? call of duty 3? hmm because ps3 hardware less powerful than xbox 360 and devs did the best they can with weak ps3 hardware they could.

sega is more of a sony fan than microsoft anyway and still sucks lol.

Who cares. Only 2D Sonic games are good.

Hyping a 3D Sonic should be a sin.

Shad0ki11

3d sonics are good, they just need to fix the camera and let you move it through walls or see through walls during difficult jumps.

Don't blame the PS3, blame the developers.bsin94

Yeah we know how well that worked with the sheep.

It's pretty common practice that it takes a while to learn a new platform. Just because one system happens to be friendlier than another to develop for means nothing to the publishers that say. 'Quit whining programming geeks and get back to work...'



Built from the ground up, graphically not that great...



Few years later. Teh 128-Bit Emotion Engine powaz! Big improvement.
TekkenMaster606

*epic yawn*

It's pretty common practice that it takes a while to learn a new platform. Just because one system happens to be friendlier than another to develop for means nothing to the publishers that say. 'Quit whining programming geeks and get back to work...'



Built from the ground up, graphically not that great...



Few years later. Teh 128-Bit Emotion Engine powaz! Big improvement.
TekkenMaster606

Can you imagin what Tekken 6 is gonna look like by ways of this comparison? -drools- I can't wait to start playing Tekken: DR in 720p. Wish I had the 1080p but 720 is gonna have to do. Better than the SDTV I got.

Doesn't matter version, the fact is, the game sucks and I'm sure that this is something that cows and lemmings can agree on.

If it makes you feel any better, go ahead and enjoy your Sonic game. A game that only score .2 higher then the PS3 version. A bad game is still going to be  a bad game on another platform.bsin94

at e3 2006 sega said ps3 version would be better. SEGA LIED,

[QUOTE="bsin94"]If it makes you feel any better, go ahead and enjoy your Sonic game. A game that only score .2 higher then the PS3 version. A bad game is still going to be a bad game on another platform.mcdonaldsfdfd

at e3 2006 sega said ps3 version would be better. SEGA LIED,

sega knows ps3 hardware better than 360 and it still runs/look better on 360 lol.

[QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"]

[QUOTE="bsin94"]If it makes you feel any better, go ahead and enjoy your Sonic game. A game that only score .2 higher then the PS3 version. A bad game is still going to be a bad game on another platform.TekkenMaster606

at e3 2006 sega said ps3 version would be better. SEGA LIED,

this means all devs hype their games to be better on new platforms before platform release and it's not always true.

sega knows ps3 hardware better than 360 and it still runs/look better on 360 lol.

mcdonaldsfdfd

[QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"]

sega knows ps3 hardware better than 360 and it still runs/look better on 360 lol.

TekkenMaster606

hmmm, RSX is based on 6800 and arcade vf5 uses a geforce 6800 .

plus sega have closer relations to sony than microsoft, that's why fifth phantom saga was announced for ps3 before sega announced any 360 game so that means they been working with cell before 360.

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"]

sega knows ps3 hardware better than 360 and it still runs/look better on 360 lol.

mcdonaldsfdfd

hmmm, RSX is based on 6800 and arcade vf5 uses a geforce 6800 .

plus sega have closer relations to sony than microsoft, that's why fifth phantom saga was announced for ps3 before sega announced any 360 game so that means they been working with cell before 360.

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"]

sega knows ps3 hardware better than 360 and it still runs/look better on 360 lol.

mcdonaldsfdfd

hmmm, RSX is based on 6800 and arcade vf5 uses a geforce 6800 .

plus sega have closer relations to sony than microsoft, that's why fifth phantom saga was announced for ps3 before sega announced any 360 game so that means they been working with cell before 360.

[QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"]

sega knows ps3 hardware better than 360 and it still runs/look better on 360 lol.

bsin94

hmmm, RSX is based on 6800 and arcade vf5 uses a geforce 6800 .

plus sega have closer relations to sony than microsoft, that's why fifth phantom saga was announced for ps3 before sega announced any 360 game so that means they been working with cell before 360.

sega knows sony's dev tools better than microsoft's and btw. the  7900 gtx is based on 7800 GTX is based on 6800 ultra architecture it's all same architecture just improved over the years more pixel/vertex pipelines added and die shrinks.

[QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"]

sega knows ps3 hardware better than 360 and it still runs/look better on 360 lol.

TekkenMaster606

hmmm, RSX is based on 6800 and arcade vf5 uses a geforce 6800 .

plus sega have closer relations to sony than microsoft, that's why fifth phantom saga was announced for ps3 before sega announced any 360 game so that means they been working with cell before 360.

that's why ps2 got shinobi right?

[QUOTE="bsin94"][QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"]

sega knows ps3 hardware better than 360 and it still runs/look better on 360 lol.

mcdonaldsfdfd

hmmm, RSX is based on 6800 and arcade vf5 uses a geforce 6800 .

plus sega have closer relations to sony than microsoft, that's why fifth phantom saga was announced for ps3 before sega announced any 360 game so that means they been working with cell before 360.

sega knows sony's dev tools better than microsoft's and btw. the 7900 gtx is based on 7800 GTX is based on 6800 ultra architecture it's all same architecture just improved over the years more pixel/vertex pipelines added and die shrinks.

sega knows how to program for ps3 than xbox 360, and no ps3 is not harder to develop for, because it has a standard pc like architecture even epicgames said ps3 has pc like architecture and said it was easy., while xbox 360 isnt like pc epicgames never mentioned 360 being easier than ps3. plus i think people use ps3 harder to dev for to make up for ps3 ram limitation flaws.mcdonaldsfdfd

[QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"][QUOTE="bsin94"][QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"]

sega knows ps3 hardware better than 360 and it still runs/look better on 360 lol.

bsin94

hmmm, RSX is based on 6800 and arcade vf5 uses a geforce 6800 .

plus sega have closer relations to sony than microsoft, that's why fifth phantom saga was announced for ps3 before sega announced any 360 game so that means they been working with cell before 360.

sega knows sony's dev tools better than microsoft's and btw. the 7900 gtx is based on 7800 GTX is based on 6800 ultra architecture it's all same architecture just improved over the years more pixel/vertex pipelines added and die shrinks.

sega knows how to program for ps3 than xbox 360, and no ps3 is not harder to develop for, because it has a standard pc like architecture even epicgames said ps3 has pc like architecture and said it was easy., while xbox 360 isnt like pc epicgames never mentioned 360 being easier than ps3. plus i think people use ps3 harder to dev for to make up for ps3 ram limitation flaws.

no, sonic was better on xbox 360 because ps3 has ram limitations cell processor cpu can only access 256 mb ram, this less ram=downgraded graphics and framerates.

Unfortunately, the very next level drops the psychic hedgehog into a nondescript forest setting that doesn't look any better than Sonic's ugly town, and it goes on from there. Compounding the issue is a very sketchy frame rate that slows the entire game down at seemingly random intervals. Considering the main appeal of Sonic is that he's supposed to be able to run fast, all the sluggishness really takes away from the game's already ugly presentation

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/sonicthehedgehog/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=gssummary

http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/sonicthehedgehog/index.html?q=sonic

no mention of framerate problems on xbox 360.

remember sega said sonic would be better on ps3? ALL pr BS lol.

mcdonaldsfdfd

[QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"]sega knows how to program for ps3 than xbox 360, and no ps3 is not harder to develop for, because it has a standard pc like architecture even epicgames said ps3 has pc like architecture and said it was easy., while xbox 360 isnt like pc epicgames never mentioned 360 being easier than ps3. plus i think people use ps3 harder to dev for to make up for ps3 ram limitation flaws.bsin94

no, ps3 uses an off the shelf gpu 6800 ultra based devs have years of experience with, plus split system memory set up like pc, pc doesnt use unified memory like xbox 360, the only thing non pc like is the spu's.

epicgames has said playstation 3 is easier to develop for than xbox 360..i will not believe any other dev, because tim sweeney knows wtf he's talking about.

I remember when cows were hyping Sonic... It was good news to them... It was suppose to run smoother and look better on PS3. Till E32006... When reports of PS3 crashing at the mercy of this craptastic game. All hype from the "Cows" pretty much dies from there on out.

We all know PS3 is weak. It's not GOD. and Only hardcore "Cows" believe other wise.

I remember when cows were hyping Sonic... It was good news to them... It was suppose to run smoother and look better on PS3. Till E32006... When reports of PS3 crashing at the mercy of this craptastic game. All hype from the "Cows" pretty much dies from there on out.

We all know PS3 is weak. It's not GOD. and Only hardcore "Cows" believe other wise.

Truth_Hurts_U

[QUOTE="Truth_Hurts_U"]

I remember when cows were hyping Sonic... It was good news to them... It was suppose to run smoother and look better on PS3. Till E32006... When reports of PS3 crashing at the mercy of this craptastic game. All hype from the "Cows" pretty much dies from there on out.

We all know PS3 is weak. It's not GOD. and Only hardcore "Cows" believe other wise.

Doomshine

no, if you read www.playstation.com ps3 forums, alot of ps3's are freezing up people are reporting...so it's ps3 problems not dev.

[QUOTE="Doomshine"][QUOTE="Truth_Hurts_U"]

I remember when cows were hyping Sonic... It was good news to them... It was suppose to run smoother and look better on PS3. Till E32006... When reports of PS3 crashing at the mercy of this craptastic game. All hype from the "Cows" pretty much dies from there on out.

We all know PS3 is weak. It's not GOD. and Only hardcore "Cows" believe other wise.

mcdonaldsfdfd

no, if you read www.playstation.com ps3 forums, alot of ps3's are freezing up people are reporting...so it's ps3 problems not dev.

[QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"][QUOTE="Doomshine"][QUOTE="Truth_Hurts_U"]

I remember when cows were hyping Sonic... It was good news to them... It was suppose to run smoother and look better on PS3. Till E32006... When reports of PS3 crashing at the mercy of this craptastic game. All hype from the "Cows" pretty much dies from there on out.

We all know PS3 is weak. It's not GOD. and Only hardcore "Cows" believe other wise.

Doomshine

no, if you read www.playstation.com ps3 forums, alot of ps3's are freezing up people are reporting...so it's ps3 problems not dev.

lol,there's more than that freezing...my 360's only frooze 2 times ever since february 2006 and ive dropped it on the ground from like 5ft high...knocking it off entertainment center.

sonic sucks as much on the x360. It had bad frametate and constant loading. So nothing new here.joeychew

ps3 made a bad 360 game even worse ahah

[QUOTE="bsin94"][QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"]sega knows how to program for ps3 than xbox 360, and no ps3 is not harder to develop for, because it has a standard pc like architecture even epicgames said ps3 has pc like architecture and said it was easy., while xbox 360 isnt like pc epicgames never mentioned 360 being easier than ps3. plus i think people use ps3 harder to dev for to make up for ps3 ram limitation flaws.mcdonaldsfdfd

no, ps3 uses an off the shelf gpu 6800 ultra based devs have years of experience with, plus split system memory set up like pc, pc doesnt use unified memory like xbox 360, the only thing non pc like is the spu's.

epicgames has said playstation 3 is easier to develop for than xbox 360..i will not believe any other dev, because tim sweeney knows wtf he's talking about.

[QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"]

[QUOTE="bsin94"][QUOTE="mcdonaldsfdfd"]sega knows how to program for ps3 than xbox 360, and no ps3 is not harder to develop for, because it has a standard pc like architecture even epicgames said ps3 has pc like architecture and said it was easy., while xbox 360 isnt like pc epicgames never mentioned 360 being easier than ps3. plus i think people use ps3 harder to dev for to make up for ps3 ram limitation flaws.F-Minus

no, ps3 uses an off the shelf gpu 6800 ultra based devs have years of experience with, plus split system memory set up like pc, pc doesnt use unified memory like xbox 360, the only thing non pc like is the spu's.

epicgames has said playstation 3 is easier to develop for than xbox 360..i will not believe any other dev, because tim sweeney knows wtf he's talking about.

john carmack hasnt even worked with ps3 yet man.

http://media.ps3.ign.com/media/748/748505/vid_1122054.html?mu=http%3A%2F%2Fxfersf06.ign.com%2F%5E1107526513%2Fmovies%2Fstreamingmovies.ign.com%2Fdocroot%2Fps3%2Farticle%2F614%2F614943%2Fsonycon_demos_unreal_02_wmvlow.wmv%3Fposition%3Dfront

Somehow the video isn't working to me. But seams reasonable that knowledge is aplicable to code for the Cell, which doesn't mean it's easy or easier.

However her's the Carmack interview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PFUw29U4J8
F-Minus

carmack isnt making ps3 game, tim has more experience so his word saying ps3 is easy>>>john carmacks word.

OMG 360 cant even handle GUN!!1gsx1100

even though it's a playstation 2 port, it still runs and looks better on 360  than ps2.