ps3 cheaper then 360

  • 146 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for PrinceofSarcasm
PrinceofSarcasm

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 PrinceofSarcasm
Member since 2008 • 1743 Posts

stop saying ps3 needs a price cut and learn math (note the 360 is an arcade)

based on all the feedback I will add this. If you just want to pay for live for just 1 year and dont care about anything else like downloadable games, demos, booster packs THEN the 360 is a better deal till the year is up.

Ok a 199 360 is obviously cheaper then a 399 ps3 but to make it equal to the ps3 you will pay more in the long run especially with live as the years add up.

Avatar image for dotWithShoes
dotWithShoes

5596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 dotWithShoes
Member since 2006 • 5596 Posts
You know, If Sony said the world was flat.. would you believe that one too?
Avatar image for Dibdibdobdobo
Dibdibdobdobo

6683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 Dibdibdobdobo
Member since 2008 • 6683 Posts
[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]

stop saying ps3 needs a price cut and learn math (note the 360 is an arcade)

Cannot take post serious as "cheaper" isnt spelt right.
Avatar image for di_sgt_barber
di_sgt_barber

1082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 di_sgt_barber
Member since 2008 • 1082 Posts
This thread is 100% truth.
Avatar image for Nykid31
Nykid31

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Nykid31
Member since 2008 • 65 Posts
oldddddddddddddddddddddddd
Avatar image for joopyme
joopyme

2598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 joopyme
Member since 2008 • 2598 Posts

No.

It's not "cheeper", you might as well add stuff you dont really need in gaming such as, 5 cups a day coffee, toilet paper money, packs of cigs, pizza, you're desktop pc electricity for posting in gamespot, telephone bill for calling sick leave... etc. etc. etc...

Avatar image for PrinceofSarcasm
PrinceofSarcasm

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 PrinceofSarcasm
Member since 2008 • 1743 Posts
You know, If Sony said the world was flat.. would you believe that one too?dotWithShoes
if you had giant image adding the total prices together of the current gen consoles would you deny that to..................I guess thats a yes
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
A great value? Most certainly. Cheaper? Hell no. The cows have gobbled up Sony's PR work quite nicely.
Avatar image for joopyme
joopyme

2598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 joopyme
Member since 2008 • 2598 Posts

[QUOTE="dotWithShoes"]You know, If Sony said the world was flat.. would you believe that one too?PrinceofSarcasm
if you had giant image adding the total prices together of the current gen consoles would you deny that to..................I guess thats a yes

you can say it a better value for you than a 360(i do), than stating fact in an UNDENIABLY false manner...

Avatar image for gamerboydana
gamerboydana

242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 gamerboydana
Member since 2003 • 242 Posts
[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]

stop saying ps3 needs a price cut and learn math (note the 360 is an arcade)

Dibdibdobdobo
Cannot take post serious as "cheaper" isnt spelt right.

Cannot take post serious as "spelt" isn't spelled correctly. ;)
Avatar image for BigJerm1
BigJerm1

938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 BigJerm1
Member since 2004 • 938 Posts

"Cheep" is a noise that birds make. That giant chart is the same piece of trash that has been posted by Sony fanboys for the past week, and is completely false. Try again.

Avatar image for dotWithShoes
dotWithShoes

5596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 dotWithShoes
Member since 2006 • 5596 Posts
[QUOTE="dotWithShoes"]You know, If Sony said the world was flat.. would you believe that one too?PrinceofSarcasm
if you had giant image adding the total prices together of the current gen consoles would you deny that to..................I guess thats a yes

You know, I bought my 360 back before it had a price drop, I paid $349.97 for it. That's it. Didn't have to buy WiFi, didn't have to pay to get online, didn't need any fancy blu-ray movies... and well, my 360 has a HDMI port on it. Fancy that, my 360 still cost less than the current PS3's. Fancy this, my 360 could do HD right out of the box... Can the these new fangled PS'3s with all their fancy stuff with its WiFi, and BluRay? Can it do HD on my HDTV right out of the box?
Avatar image for RotaryRX7
RotaryRX7

7184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 RotaryRX7
Member since 2003 • 7184 Posts
You didn't honestly think this thread would be effective, did you? :|
Avatar image for Kickinurass
Kickinurass

3357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Kickinurass
Member since 2005 • 3357 Posts

[QUOTE="dotWithShoes"]You know, If Sony said the world was flat.. would you believe that one too?PrinceofSarcasm
if you had giant image adding the total prices together of the current gen consoles would you deny that to..................I guess thats a yes

That chart completely ignores the 20 gig harddrive offered by Microsoft.

Why? because it completely destroys Sony's argument.

Avatar image for PrinceofSarcasm
PrinceofSarcasm

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 PrinceofSarcasm
Member since 2008 • 1743 Posts

No.

It's not cheeper, you might as well add stuff you dont really need in gaming such as, 5 cups a day coffee, toilet paper money, packs of cigs, pizza, you're desktop pc electricity for posting in gamespot, telephone bill for calling sick leave... etc. etc. etc...

joopyme

so your saying live isnt required for gaming (guess if you dont like play others) and a hardrive is useless too because nobody buys stuff online these days like booster packs, downloadable games, ect right

Avatar image for dotWithShoes
dotWithShoes

5596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 dotWithShoes
Member since 2006 • 5596 Posts
[QUOTE="joopyme"]

No.

It's not cheeper, you might as well add stuff you dont really need in gaming such as, 5 cups a day coffee, toilet paper money, packs of cigs, pizza, you're desktop pc electricity for posting in gamespot, telephone bill for calling sick leave... etc. etc. etc...

PrinceofSarcasm

so your saying live isnt required for gaming (guess if you dont like play others) and a hardrive is useless too because nobody buys stuff online these days like booster packs, downloadable games, ect right

Don't know if he's saying it, but I'll say it.. no live isn't required for gaming. And guess what, you can STILL get a 360 with a hard drive for $100 less than the cheapest PS3.
Avatar image for PrinceofSarcasm
PrinceofSarcasm

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 PrinceofSarcasm
Member since 2008 • 1743 Posts

[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"][QUOTE="dotWithShoes"]You know, If Sony said the world was flat.. would you believe that one too?Kickinurass

if you had giant image adding the total prices together of the current gen consoles would you deny that to..................I guess thats a yes

That chart completely ignores the 20 gig harddrive offered by Microsoft.

Why? because it completely destroys Sony's argument.

this isnt a sony argument its a chart adding together the total price of each gaming products. And the hard drive isnt even standerd in some 360 models.
Avatar image for dotWithShoes
dotWithShoes

5596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 dotWithShoes
Member since 2006 • 5596 Posts
[QUOTE="Kickinurass"]

[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"] if you had giant image adding the total prices together of the current gen consoles would you deny that to..................I guess thats a yesPrinceofSarcasm

That chart completely ignores the 20 gig harddrive offered by Microsoft.

Why? because it completely destroys Sony's argument.

this isnt a sony argument its a chart adding together the total price of each gaming products. And the hard drive isnt even standerd in some 360 models.

A chart made by Sony, and the harddrive is standard on all 360 models except the Arcade/Core.. :)
Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#21 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

*sigh*

When will these price comparison threads finally stop?

Avatar image for Kickinurass
Kickinurass

3357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Kickinurass
Member since 2005 • 3357 Posts
[QUOTE="Kickinurass"]

[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"] if you had giant image adding the total prices together of the current gen consoles would you deny that to..................I guess thats a yesPrinceofSarcasm

That chart completely ignores the 20 gig harddrive offered by Microsoft.

Why? because it completely destroys Sony's argument.

this isnt a sony argument its a chart adding together the total price of each gaming products. And the hard drive isnt even standerd in some 360 models.

It was a chart created by Sony though. In fact, here's a thread on the whole thing.

And Microsoft offers Arcade owners the chance to buy a 20 gig harddrive for $20 dollars.

Avatar image for BigJerm1
BigJerm1

938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 BigJerm1
Member since 2004 • 938 Posts
[QUOTE="BigJerm1"][QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"] so your saying live isnt required for gaming (guess if you dont like play others) and a hardrive is useless too because nobody buys stuff online these days like booster packs, downloadable games, ect right

PrinceofSarcasm

Is Sony paying you to be naive and ignore facts, or is it just natural?

is microsoft is paying you to fail at math.

LOL. Let me do the math for you.

360 Arcade console: $199

20GB Hard Drive + 3 months of Xbox Live through MS: $29

12 more months of Live: $50

WiFi Adapter: Not even remotely required

BluRay Disc Player: It's a video game console. Not needed.

Total cost, including 15 months of Live: $278

What subject am I failing again? Pleas estop buying into Sony propoganda. It only makes you look foolish.

Avatar image for Toriko42
Toriko42

27562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 0

#25 Toriko42
Member since 2006 • 27562 Posts
Alright first of all, move people don't buy the Arcade. They get the pro which is 299.99... You don't need online either and a lot of people don't need Wifi adapters...
Avatar image for PrinceofSarcasm
PrinceofSarcasm

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 PrinceofSarcasm
Member since 2008 • 1743 Posts
[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"][QUOTE="joopyme"]

No.

It's not cheeper, you might as well add stuff you dont really need in gaming such as, 5 cups a day coffee, toilet paper money, packs of cigs, pizza, you're desktop pc electricity for posting in gamespot, telephone bill for calling sick leave... etc. etc. etc...

dotWithShoes

so your saying live isnt required for gaming (guess if you dont like play others) and a hardrive is useless too because nobody buys stuff online these days like booster packs, downloadable games, ect right

Don't know if he's saying it, but I'll say it.. no live isn't required for gaming. And guess what, you can STILL get a 360 with a hard drive for $100 less than the cheapest PS3.

Online has become a major part of gaming this gen so its included in a price comparison. Weather you use it or not doest change the fact that most 360 users and I'm guessing 98% of 360 users who come to this site.
Avatar image for gamerboydana
gamerboydana

242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 gamerboydana
Member since 2003 • 242 Posts
[QUOTE="gamerboydana"][QUOTE="Dibdibdobdobo"] Cannot take post serious as "cheaper" isnt spelt right.Firebird-5
Cannot take post serious as "spelt" isn't spelled correctly. ;)

Ignorant American.

OMG why would you say that?! you hurt my feelings!! im gonna go cry now! ;)

Avatar image for tonyleo01
tonyleo01

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 tonyleo01
Member since 2004 • 2257 Posts
the ps3 is cheaper only if you can get one for less than $200. If I have to pay anymore than that then it's more expensive than the 360. Thought that was pretty easy, yes?
Avatar image for world69star69
world69star69

1401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#29 world69star69
Member since 2005 • 1401 Posts
This thread is 100% truth.di_sgt_barber
Agreed!!
Avatar image for EmpCom
EmpCom

3451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 EmpCom
Member since 2005 • 3451 Posts
Ok Tc your right the 360 does cost more to own than the ps3 , there are more decent games to own for it for a start ,it costs more in electricity as its on alot more than the ps3,all those snacks and drinks for those gaming sessions mount up too.
Avatar image for Mr_Ditters
Mr_Ditters

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#31 Mr_Ditters
Member since 2008 • 1920 Posts

When I bought my 360, I needed wifi.

360 Feb 2008 $350

wifi $100

Charger for joystick $20

Xbl $50

= $520

RRod 5 months later.

For me the ps3 is cheaper.

Avatar image for thinicer
thinicer

3704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 thinicer
Member since 2006 • 3704 Posts

$199 gives you access to the entire library of Xbox 360 games. $399 gives you access to the entire library of PS3 games. If this is all you care about, as a consumer, then everything else is just noise.

Avatar image for dotWithShoes
dotWithShoes

5596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 dotWithShoes
Member since 2006 • 5596 Posts
[QUOTE="dotWithShoes"][QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"] so your saying live isnt required for gaming (guess if you dont like play others) and a hardrive is useless too because nobody buys stuff online these days like booster packs, downloadable games, ect right

PrinceofSarcasm
Don't know if he's saying it, but I'll say it.. no live isn't required for gaming. And guess what, you can STILL get a 360 with a hard drive for $100 less than the cheapest PS3.

Online has become a major part of gaming this gen so its included in a price comparison. Weather you use it or not doest change the fact that most 360 users and I'm guessing 98% of 360 users who come to this site.

Just because everyone jumps off a bridge to their death doesn't mean I'm going to. Gaming online is not required in the slightest bit. So that $50 Sony has decided that we 360 owners must pay, is pretty much not really something we must pay, but something we choose to pay. And guess what, WiFi is also NOT needed, again, some people may CHOOSE to buy a WiFi adapter, but its not REQUIRED to play online, so that again is something Sony has decided that we 360 owners must pay is pretty much not something we must pay, but some choose to. And the hard drive issue, EVERY single Xbox 360 costs the same or less than the lowest prices PS3. So ok? Why add a HDD into the mix? My pro came with a HD.. :)

Lets wonder about the PS3 now, can the $399 PS3 play last gen games like my 360 can? Nope. Can it do HD out of the box like my 360 can? Don't think so.
Avatar image for abdelmessih101
abdelmessih101

5230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 abdelmessih101
Member since 2007 • 5230 Posts

I can see why you guys are sick of these threads. :P

Which begs the question: why do you all keep coming back here when the forum is filled with this crap?

I can't stand this forum for more than a few hours once every few weeks. :P

Avatar image for deactivated-5e7be39d87e0b
deactivated-5e7be39d87e0b

4624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#35 deactivated-5e7be39d87e0b
Member since 2005 • 4624 Posts
Chart failed when they decided to attempt to make wi-fi a requirement. Sony needs to focus on what will move consoles off shelves because charts ain't it.
Avatar image for BigJerm1
BigJerm1

938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 BigJerm1
Member since 2004 • 938 Posts
Sony is campaigning like John McCain. Instead of telling us why we should buy a PS3, they're trying to make up BS charts to tell us why we shouldn't buy a 360. You saw how that worked out for the old man.....
Avatar image for PrinceofSarcasm
PrinceofSarcasm

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 PrinceofSarcasm
Member since 2008 • 1743 Posts
[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"][QUOTE="BigJerm1"]Is Sony paying you to be naive and ignore facts, or is it just natural?

BigJerm1

is microsoft is paying you to fail at math.

LOL. Let me do the math for you.

360 Arcade console: $199

20GB Hard Drive + 3 months of Xbox Live through MS: $29

12 more months of Live: $50

WiFi Adapter: Not even remotely required

BluRay Disc Player: It's a video game console. Not needed.Total cost, including 15 months of Live: $278What subject am I failing again? Pleas estop buying into Sony propoganda. It only makes you look foolish.

so u must own a 360 arcade with only a 20gb harddrive with no plans of playing on live for over one year. If not ps3 was the better deal

Avatar image for PrinceofSarcasm
PrinceofSarcasm

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 PrinceofSarcasm
Member since 2008 • 1743 Posts
Sony is campaigning like John McCain. Instead of telling us why we should buy a PS3, they're trying to make up BS charts to tell us why we shouldn't buy a 360. You saw how that worked out for the old man.....BigJerm1
can nobody add or is it that if something isnt there way it must be wrong
Avatar image for BigJerm1
BigJerm1

938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 BigJerm1
Member since 2004 • 938 Posts
[QUOTE="BigJerm1"][QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"] is microsoft is paying you to fail at math.PrinceofSarcasm

LOL. Let me do the math for you.

360 Arcade console: $199

20GB Hard Drive + 3 months of Xbox Live through MS: $29

12 more months of Live: $50

WiFi Adapter: Not even remotely required

BluRay Disc Player: It's a video game console. Not needed.Total cost, including 15 months of Live: $278What subject am I failing again? Pleas estop buying into Sony propoganda. It only makes you look foolish.

so u must own a 360 arcade with only a 20gb harddrive with no plans of playing on live for over one year. If not ps3 was the better deal

You could extend your Live subscription for 2 more years with the numbers I gave you, and you'd STILL pay less than you would for a PS3. You can own whatever kind of 360 you want. I only gave you the prices needed to get the full experience, which is vastly cheaper than the PS3. You seem to be ignorant of the facts. I pity you, but yet, it's funny to watch your ridiculous struggle with this. Sony lied to you. I know, it must be like your father grounding you, or finding out that you're actually your next door neighbor's child, but you'll make it through, I promise.

Avatar image for thepoop7
thepoop7

1391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 thepoop7
Member since 2003 • 1391 Posts
I have never been one to say old , or anything like that .... but this is an exception Old.
Avatar image for Kickinurass
Kickinurass

3357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Kickinurass
Member since 2005 • 3357 Posts

so u must own a 360 arcade with only a 20gb harddrive with no plans of playing on live for over one year. If not ps3 was the better deal

PrinceofSarcasm

Actually, by his math you cold get two more years of LIVE and still be under $400. But that's not the point - We have proved that the 360 cost less than the PS3, as $200 < $400.

Playing the add-on game, either one could come out on top.

The add-on argument is fundamentally flawed. No one ever considers homes without a WIFI network, meaning they have to go out and buy additional components. Everyone totes the benefits of Blu-ray but ignores the fact to get the full benefit of the format one needs an advanced entertainment system.The add-on argument was created specifically to attack the 360.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e7be39d87e0b
deactivated-5e7be39d87e0b

4624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#43 deactivated-5e7be39d87e0b
Member since 2005 • 4624 Posts
[QUOTE="BigJerm1"]Sony is campaigning like John McCain. Instead of telling us why we should buy a PS3, they're trying to make up BS charts to tell us why we shouldn't buy a 360. You saw how that worked out for the old man.....PrinceofSarcasm
can nobody add or is it that if something isnt there way it must be wrong

At the end of the day people will spend their money however they choose to. Does a PS3 offer more bells and whistles than a 360? Yes. Do a great deal of those affect the GAMING experience? No. Play your console and stop worrying about how the next man spends his dollar.
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#44 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38063 Posts
It's all personal preference. If you add up the chart, yes 360 is costlier. I would only add up the chart if I felt I needed all that. I also had to buy a $50 HDMI cable in order to enjoy the almighty power of blu ray games or movies on my PS3. Why are no Sony fans addressing this when it is brought up repeatedly? If Blu Ray is such a selling point for the PS3 why not allow HD play back out of the box? I enjoy my PS3 and my 360, but not including the cost of what I think should be a basic component included(other blu ray players include HD cables)in this chart is stupid.
Avatar image for PrinceofSarcasm
PrinceofSarcasm

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 PrinceofSarcasm
Member since 2008 • 1743 Posts
[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]

so u must own a 360 arcade with only a 20gb harddrive with no plans of playing on live for over one year. If not ps3 was the better deal

Kickinurass

Actually, by his math you cold get two more years of LIVE and still be under $400. But that's not the point - We have proved that the 360 cost less than the PS3, as $200 < $400.

Playing the add-on game, either one could come out on top.

The add-on argument is fundamentally flawed. No one ever considers homes without a WIFI network, meaning they have to go out and buy additional components. Everyone totes the benefits of Blu-ray but ignores the fact to get the full benefit of the format one needs an advanced entertainment system.The add-on argument was created specifically to attack the 360.

ok if you just want the very basic with no perks like wireless, demos, downloadable games, then 360 is the way to go but if you want your moneys worth get a ps3
Avatar image for PrinceofSarcasm
PrinceofSarcasm

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 PrinceofSarcasm
Member since 2008 • 1743 Posts

[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"][QUOTE="BigJerm1"]Sony is campaigning like John McCain. Instead of telling us why we should buy a PS3, they're trying to make up BS charts to tell us why we shouldn't buy a 360. You saw how that worked out for the old man.....bez2083
can nobody add or is it that if something isnt there way it must be wrong

At the end of the day people will spend their money however they choose to. Does a PS3 offer more bells and whistles than a 360? Yes. Do a great deal of those affect the GAMING experience? No. Play your console and stop worrying about how the next man spends his dollar.

this is system wars comparing and arguing is what happens.

Avatar image for foreverflame890
foreverflame890

551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#47 foreverflame890
Member since 2008 • 551 Posts
What about DS3 ADD $50.00 to that, add HD cables $10.00,What about blu ray movies, you need blu-Ray films to take full advantage of the blu-Ray player that's another $30.00 down the toilet.. and for god sake Are you 8 years old? You can't even spell Cheaper..:roll:
Avatar image for Mr_Ditters
Mr_Ditters

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#48 Mr_Ditters
Member since 2008 • 1920 Posts

It's all personal preference. If you add up the chart, yes 360 is costlier. I would only add up the chart if I felt I needed all that. I also had to buy a $50 HDMI cable in order to enjoy the almighty power of blu ray games or movies on my PS3. Why are no Sony fans addressing this when it is brought up repeatedly? If Blu Ray is such a selling point for the PS3 why not allow HD play back out of the box? I enjoy my PS3 and my 360, but not including the cost of what I think should be a basic component included(other blu ray players include HD cables)in this chart is stupid.cainetao11

You know you can get an hdmi cable for like $4 right?

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#49 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

Okay, here we go.

Xbox 360 Arcade: $199

20 GB HDD + 3 months of Live through MS: $30

12 month Xbox Live Gold: $40 on Amazon

Final cost: $270

So, we have an Xbox 360, with a hard drive and 17 months of Live (12 month cards give you an extra month for free and you get one month free with a new Live account creation)

If you're really desperate for wireless play, I found a nice wireless router that can be set up for use as a bridge for $35. So, we've got a final cost of $305 which is still $95 less than the cheapest PS3. Try to refute the math all you want, the bottom line is, the most anyone will have to spend to play Xbox 360 games is $199 and that's it. You can add all of the add ons you want to justify the PS3's high price, but it doesn't matter. None of them are required and only serves to weaken your argument.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e7be39d87e0b
deactivated-5e7be39d87e0b

4624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#50 deactivated-5e7be39d87e0b
Member since 2005 • 4624 Posts

[QUOTE="bez2083"][QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"] can nobody add or is it that if something isnt there way it must be wrongPrinceofSarcasm

At the end of the day people will spend their money however they choose to. Does a PS3 offer more bells and whistles than a 360? Yes. Do a great deal of those affect the GAMING experience? No. Play your console and stop worrying about how the next man spends his dollar.

this is system wars comparing and arguing is what happens.

Yes, but not repeat recently failed arguments and comparisons. It was done before. Like 3 days ago, in fact. Why will your version "succeed" where the original failed?