stop saying ps3 needs a price cut and learn math (note the 360 is an arcade)
PrinceofSarcasm
I don't know what your math teacher taught you but $400 > $300 > $200.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
What about DS3 ADD $50.00 to that, add HD cables $10.00,What about blu ray movies, you need blu-Ray films to take full advantage of the blu-Ray player that's another $30.00 down the toilet.. and for god sake Are you 8 years old? You can't even spell Cheaper..:roll:foreverflame890
ds3 comes with the ps3 bundled now, add the HD cables to the 360 too ................. also were not talking about movies but speaking of with at a full $ 150 -300 (anything less is a lower profile) blu ray player to the 360 then a $ 30.00 movie down the toilet for them.
also are you 8 you cant add:roll:
[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]stop saying ps3 needs a price cut and learn math (note the 360 is an arcade)
Blackbond
I don't know what your math teacher taught you but $400 > $300 > $200.
[QUOTE="Kickinurass"][QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"] if you had giant image adding the total prices together of the current gen consoles would you deny that to..................I guess thats a yesPrinceofSarcasm
That chart completely ignores the 20 gig harddrive offered by Microsoft.
Why? because it completely destroys Sony's argument.
this isnt a sony argument its a chart adding together the total price of each gaming products. And the hard drive isnt even standerd in some 360 models. Weird thing is, the chart goes on about HD and all, but doesn't include the fact that you need to buy an HDMI/Composite cord separate from the ps3, and include that in the price, when my ps3 was purchased for me, the person who purchased me the machine (my ex), got suckered into buying the official sony cord (She bought my ps3 from the sony store) for $59.95... Of course, I have the 60gb edition..so, it cost way more than they do now anyways, but, regardless, a fair comparison chart would include the cord to make use of those bluray movies.Is it alright to feel depressed that a company of Sony's legacy released such a horrid, senseless statement?Verge_6Yep, it disappoints me too.
I tried using the wifi for online with my PS3, downloading anything sucked! Hard wiring is faster. Whats the point if I can get it done quicker? Just to say it's there? I could run to the sink and fill a pot of water then dump it in the toilet to flush it, why should I if there's a flush handle. Job finished faster.cainetao11
its wireless G same as the 360s
Okay, here we go.
Xbox 360 Arcade: $199
20 GB HDD + 3 months of Live through MS: $30
12 month Xbox Live Gold: $40 on Amazon
Final cost: $270
So, we have an Xbox 360, with a hard drive and 17 months of Live (12 month cards give you an extra month for free and you get one month free with a new Live account creation)
If you're really desperate for wireless play, I found a nice wireless router that can be set up for use as a bridge for $35. So, we've got a final cost of $305 which is still $95 less than the cheapest PS3. Try to refute the math all you want, the bottom line is, the most anyone will have to spend to play Xbox 360 games is $199 and that's it. You can add all of the add ons you want to justify the PS3's high price, but it doesn't matter. None of them are required and only serves to weaken your argument.
The_Game21x
So you have to use a wireless bridge? Thats crap. What if you wanna play at a friends house? I dont want to bring a wireless bridge. Wifi should have been standard. Wifi is standard in about every piece of electronic equipment other than the xbox. That is hardly the reason for the ps3's price tag. You can get computer wifi network cards for under $20. The only reason m$ didnt include it was to overcharge you for it. Its all about profits.
You should also include either the charging kid for the joystick or a years supply of batteries in your math. The ps3 comes with a charging cable and if you want another one you don't have to buy some official Sony cable. Any generic $2 one will work.
[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"][QUOTE="bez2083"] At the end of the day people will spend their money however they choose to. Does a PS3 offer more bells and whistles than a 360? Yes. Do a great deal of those affect the GAMING experience? No. Play your console and stop worrying about how the next man spends his dollar.bez2083
this is system wars comparing and arguing is what happens.
Yes, but not repeat recently failed arguments and comparisons. It was done before. Like 3 days ago, in fact. Why will your version "succeed" where the original failed? whats wrong about that chart[QUOTE="cainetao11"]It's all personal preference. If you add up the chart, yes 360 is costlier. I would only add up the chart if I felt I needed all that. I also had to buy a $50 HDMI cable in order to enjoy the almighty power of blu ray games or movies on my PS3. Why are no Sony fans addressing this when it is brought up repeatedly? If Blu Ray is such a selling point for the PS3 why not allow HD play back out of the box? I enjoy my PS3 and my 360, but not including the cost of what I think should be a basic component included(other blu ray players include HD cables)in this chart is stupid.Mr_Ditters
You know you can get an hdmi cable for like $4 right?
When I bought my PS3 the average price was 25-30 dollars. Monster cable was 49.99 That was May of '07.http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=106346&catId=100245&tid=100008&p=5&title=Computers%27+energy+costs
Take notes cows ownage straight from the Tag Champs Partner in Dreamsvisions.
Your PS3 uses a lot more energy then an Xbox 360. If you didn't know the energy difference is $57 between the two. Which is also $7 more then the difference of a yearly subscription of LIVE. So you're XBL jacks up the price past the PS3 theory has been debunked.
Wifi is not required to game online. Quite honestly I'd feel embarrassed to do any serious gaming over wireless anyways. I'm definately not going to be able to play a fighting game online over wireless.
You can get refurbished HDD's directly from MS for $30
I mean serioulsy this argument is so old its 2006 old and if you people hadn't realized the consumers around the world obviously aren't taking the bit so I don't know why you are?
Any and all hopes of " But but teh XBL fees!" Throw them out the window. That price has been negated. At the end of the day a consumer can play pretty much the same library of games for half the price. Oh its true its damn true.
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]Okay, here we go.
Xbox 360 Arcade: $199
20 GB HDD + 3 months of Live through MS: $30
12 month Xbox Live Gold: $40 on Amazon
Final cost: $270
So, we have an Xbox 360, with a hard drive and 17 months of Live (12 month cards give you an extra month for free and you get one month free with a new Live account creation)
If you're really desperate for wireless play, I found a nice wireless router that can be set up for use as a bridge for $35. So, we've got a final cost of $305 which is still $95 less than the cheapest PS3. Try to refute the math all you want, the bottom line is, the most anyone will have to spend to play Xbox 360 games is $199 and that's it. You can add all of the add ons you want to justify the PS3's high price, but it doesn't matter. None of them are required and only serves to weaken your argument.
Mr_Ditters
So you have to use a wireless bridge? Thats crap. What if you wanna play at a friends house? I dont want to bring a wireless bridge. Wifi should have been standard. Wifi is standard in about every piece of electronic equipment other than the xbox. That is hardly the reason for the ps3's price tag. You can get computer wifi network cards for under $20. The only reason m$ didnt include it was to overcharge you for it. Its all about profits.
You should also include either the charging kid for the joystick or a years supply of batteries in your math. The ps3 comes with a charging cable and if you want another one you don't have to buy some official Sony cable. Any generic $2 one will work.
Do you have to use the wireless bridge? nope, but the option is there if you want it. You can speculate as to why MS didn't include wi-fi in the Xbox 360 (because that's all you can do) but it doesn't really matter. Quite frankly, I'm glad I have the option to buy it if I want it.
And okay, fine, add the $18 play and charge kit to that. It's still some $77 cheaper than a Playstation 3. That's more than enough to get a game to go alongside the one comes bundled with the Arcade 360 to begin with.
[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]show people a chart of just add ons and they take it to the extremeBlackbondAdd ons aren't required to play games. Hence why they are called add-ons and not requirements. And yet people treat them as such.
[QUOTE="foreverflame890"]What about DS3 ADD $50.00 to that, add HD cables $10.00,What about blu ray movies, you need blu-Ray films to take full advantage of the blu-Ray player that's another $30.00 down the toilet.. and for god sake Are you 8 years old? You can't even spell Cheaper..:roll:PrinceofSarcasm
ds3 comes with the ps3 bundled now, add the HD cables to the 360 too ................. also were not talking about movies but speaking of with at a full $ 150 -300 (anything less is a lower profile) blu ray player to the 360 then a $ 30.00 movie down the toilet for them.
also are you 8 you cant add:roll:
360 Pro and Elite both have the cables to do HD right out of the box.. with the Elite coming with HDMI cables.[QUOTE="cainetao11"]I tried using the wifi for online with my PS3, downloading anything sucked! Hard wiring is faster. Whats the point if I can get it done quicker? Just to say it's there? I could run to the sink and fill a pot of water then dump it in the toilet to flush it, why should I if there's a flush handle. Job finished faster.PrinceofSarcasm
its wireless G same as the 360s
Awesome! Point is the same, why brag about something if it doesn't out do it's counterpart? Hard wiring is faster and more reliable. That's why both mine are hard wired.[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]show people a chart of just add ons and they take it to the extremeVerge_6Add ons aren't required to play games. Hence why they are called add-ons and not requirements. Dude, add-ons ARE requirements...duh.
Verge with so many of these topic I really want some kind of hand axe with an econ book on the end so I could behead these arguments with lol. I mean seriously this crap is 2006 and we are in 2009. What do people think we're stupid and weak minded lol?
[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]show people a chart of just add ons and they take it to the extremeBlackbondAdd ons aren't required to play games. Hence why they are called add-ons and not requirements. all Im saying is that to get the same experience that you get with the ps3 you must get these addons which up the 360 price above the ps3
[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]show people a chart of just add ons and they take it to the extremeVerge_6Add ons aren't required to play games. Hence why they are called add-ons and not requirements. Dude, add-ons ARE requirements...duh. to make the 360 near equal in capabilities they are.
Dude, add-ons ARE requirements...duh.[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="Blackbond"] Add ons aren't required to play games. Hence why they are called add-ons and not requirements.Blackbond
Verge with so many of these topic I really want some kind of hand axe with an econ book on the end so I could behead these arguments with lol. I mean seriously this crap is 2006 and we are in 2009. What do people think we're stupid and weak minded lol?
All the posters I've seen so far that actually think the whole "add on a bunch of unneeded items to the 360" thing is legit are ones that joined up recently. Their first exposure to it was from Sony most likely, and now we're seeing the results.[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="Blackbond"] Add ons aren't required to play games. Hence why they are called add-ons and not requirements.PrinceofSarcasmDude, add-ons ARE requirements...duh. to make the 360 near equal in capabilities they are. Capabilities not needed to game. At all. I thought that was the point of a game console. Oh, wait, they have to be movie-players and third-rate internet browsing machines with built-in inferior wi-fi adapters as well nowadays, don't they?
[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]show people a chart of just add ons and they take it to the extremePrinceofSarcasmAdd ons aren't required to play games. Hence why they are called add-ons and not requirements. all Im saying is that to get the same experience that you get with the ps3 you must get these addons which up the 360 price above the ps3
If someone wanted the capabilities of a PS3, why would they get a 360?
And if they wanted the capabilities of a 360, why would they add on a whole bunch of stuff just to make their system equal to a PS3, when that isn't what they want?
[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]show people a chart of just add ons and they take it to the extremePrinceofSarcasmAdd ons aren't required to play games. Hence why they are called add-ons and not requirements. all Im saying is that to get the same experience that you get with the ps3 you must get these addons which up the 360 price above the ps3How does a wi-fi give you a different experience? Do you honestly believe that you can't hook a cable up to the 360 to get online? Are you cows THAT gullible and thoughtless?
[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]show people a chart of just add ons and they take it to the extremePrinceofSarcasmAdd ons aren't required to play games. Hence why they are called add-ons and not requirements.
all Im saying is that to get the same experience that you get with the ps3 you must get these addons which up the 360 price above the ps3
My lord you sound exactly like a Sony exec lol? But to get the same experience you need! This and that this and that a couple of those and some of these.
Obviously the way the PS3 is selling people don't want the same experience. Video game consoles were created to play games. You don't need add-ons to play games and the sooner you understand that then well yeah.
I don't need all that crap to play my games. Did you need to buy a 1080P tv for blu-ray? A dual shock 3? HDMI Cables? for your PS3?
Did you need to buy a gaming rig to go along side your PS3 to get the 360 expereince? No you didn't.
I like how you didn't address my energy cost statement as well.
all Im saying is that to get the same experience that you get with the ps3 you must get these addons which up the 360 price above the ps3[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"][QUOTE="Blackbond"] Add ons aren't required to play games. Hence why they are called add-ons and not requirements.sonicmj1
If someone wanted the capabilities of a PS3, why would they get a 360?
And if they wanted the capabilities of a 360, why would they add on a whole bunch of stuff just to make their system equal to a PS3, when that isn't what they want?
Truth. Plain, simple.[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="Verge_6"] Dude, add-ons ARE requirements...duh.Verge_6
Verge with so many of these topic I really want some kind of hand axe with an econ book on the end so I could behead these arguments with lol. I mean seriously this crap is 2006 and we are in 2009. What do people think we're stupid and weak minded lol?
All the posters I've seen so far that actually think the whole "add on a bunch of unneeded items to the 360" thing is legit are ones that joined up recently. Their first exposure to it was from Sony most likely, and now we're seeing the results. As a former RadioShack and Toys R Us employee, I have a wealth of experience adding useless items to a sale to make it "complete".[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"][QUOTE="Blackbond"] Add ons aren't required to play games. Hence why they are called add-ons and not requirements.T-Aldousall Im saying is that to get the same experience that you get with the ps3 you must get these addons which up the 360 price above the ps3How does a wi-fi give you a different experience? Do you honestly believe that you can't hook a cable up to the 360 to get online? Are you cows THAT gullible and thoughtless?
to get close to the the functionality of the ps3 you must buy the 360 addons. A liveless 360 with no hardrive (or with a 20gb one) cant compare in overall functions to the ps3.
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="Blackbond"]All the posters I've seen so far that actually think the whole "add on a bunch of unneeded items to the 360" thing is legit are ones that joined up recently. Their first exposure to it was from Sony most likely, and now we're seeing the results. As a former RadioShack and Toys R Us employee, I have a wealth of experience adding useless items to a sale to make it "complete". You're talking to an Office Depot employee here. I'm no stranger to it either.Verge with so many of these topic I really want some kind of hand axe with an econ book on the end so I could behead these arguments with lol. I mean seriously this crap is 2006 and we are in 2009. What do people think we're stupid and weak minded lol?
bez2083
You can get a 20GB HDD and 3 months of LIVE Gold for 30 bucks.DonPerianwhat if you plan to download things and game online... lets say for 3 years
to get close to the the functionality of the ps3 you must buy the 360 addons. A liveless 360 with no hardrive (or with a 20gb one) cant compare in overall functions to the ps3.
PrinceofSarcasm
360 = $200
20GB HDD = $30
XBL - $50 yearly/PS3 energy cost is $57 more then 360's yearly meaning that the price is negated.
Pay attention to the links and information posted.
[QUOTE="DonPerian"]You can get a 20GB HDD and 3 months of LIVE Gold for 30 bucks.PrinceofSarcasmwhat if you plan to download things and game online... lets say for 3 years
Cost of XBL for three years $150
Cost of playing PS3 for three years compared to 360. $171
Oh wait someone saved $21 with his 360 didn't they.
[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]to get close to the the functionality of the ps3 you must buy the 360 addons. A liveless 360 with no hardrive (or with a 20gb one) cant compare in overall functions to the ps3.
Blackbond
360 = $200
20GB HDD = $30
XBL - $50 yearly/PS3 energy cost is $57 more then 360's yearly meaning that the price is negated.
Pay attention to the links and information posted.
different ps3 skus use less power then others. This is comparing the new and most energy efficient ps3 to the arcadeto get close to the the functionality of the ps3 you must buy the 360 addons. A liveless 360 with no hardrive (or with a 20gb one) cant compare in overall functions to the ps3.
PrinceofSarcasm
So why doesn't the PS3 have to match the 360's functionality? It can't serve as a Windows Media Center Extender. It can't stream Netflix movies from the web. It can't allow you to chat with 8 of your friends at once while you all play different games. Devices for each of these ought to be added to the price tag, by the criteria you have established.
Or we could take this to its logical conclusion. A major element of the functionality of a console is the games it plays. A 360 can't play PS3 games like Metal Gear Solid 4 or Uncharted, right? So the only way to make them equivalent would be to buy a PS3. Otherwise, their functionality is not identical. Obviously, a PS3 is also not equivalent to a 360, because it can't play 360 games like Halo 3 or Gears of War 2. Should we add the cost of a 360 to the PS3's price tag?
There's a reason we don't do things this way.
[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]to get close to the the functionality of the ps3 you must buy the 360 addons. A liveless 360 with no hardrive (or with a 20gb one) cant compare in overall functions to the ps3.
PrinceofSarcasm
360 = $200
20GB HDD = $30
XBL - $50 yearly/PS3 energy cost is $57 more then 360's yearly meaning that the price is negated.
Pay attention to the links and information posted.
different ps3 skus use less power then others. This is comparing the new and most energy efficient ps3 to the arcadeFine then would you like me to use my older data then? Either way you lose. Each model of the 360 that came out alongside the PS3 sku at the given time is more energy efficent.
Thread Link
You know you've seen it. It happens like clock work every now and then when something big goes down prior. The whole notion that 360 is more expensive then the PS3 in the long run. Remember this key word. The long run.
Now when you walk into a store that sells video games and you go ahead and look at Xbox 360's you'll see.
So then you ask yourself. Where oh where do these people find the logic that a system that has two SKU's under $399 is more expensive then one that is $399?
Well here is your answers.
Apparently when you buy a 360 YOU MUST BUY
Yada yada you get the picture.
Bottom line I'm sure you get the picture. Most people have grown out of this and have become more educated on the subject finally realizing that YES YOU DON'T NEED all of that stuff nor do you need it to play games. Hell you might as well say a Hermit needs a PC that can max everything.
On to the next. Now we get the, but but teh XBL costs $50 a year and over a 5 year span its $250!!! Man holy hell. Now things are getting outrageous. People confusing intial cost of hardware with a service that is applicable to the system. Then we have to hear about PSN is free blah blah blah yada yada then we have to here but teh XBL is better! yada yada yada. And then we have to hear about PC gaming provides it free! Even though these people who supposively have high end PC's to play PC/360 titles still praise PSN at then end of the ball game.
Anyways....
If you're really so consumed over this whole price thing and all you do is rely on this argument over and over and over like its RROD I would like to provide you with some interesting data concerning THE REAL HIDDEN COST of these consoles :twisted:
No BlackBond isn't going to do what he normally does. Which is trap the otherside within their own logic with claims such as.....
Because hell I'm not subscribing to Qore. I'm not buying HDMI cables for my PS3, and I'm not going to even watch Blu-Ray movies.
But BlackBond doesn't have no HDTV
Essentially what I'm saying is I don't need a HDTV, QORE, or HDMI to enjoy PS3 (I need games lol cause I don't have any PS3 ones yet haha)
BACK TO MY POINT
You want to complain about the costs of XBL then oh you're so going to love this....
PS3 COSTS $247 A YEAR TO RUN
Link
Now I know I know. But BlackBond that doesn't mean anything. Because we don't know about the 360's power consumption. But don't worry B^2 is gonna take care of you.
Electricity Cost Xbox 360 Electricity Cost Other PS3 360 yearly cost $16.69 x 12 = $200.28 PS3 yearly cost $19.30 x 12 = $231.60 Energy cost different $231.60 - $200.28 = $31.28 link Give or take the minor differences between the two sources of data I'm sure you still see where I am going with this. The difference in power cost does make a differnce over the course of the year. But BlackBond even with the power cost XBL $50 a year minus PS3 $31.28 of increased energy cost over the 360 is only $18.72. Indeed, but really people you are going to complain about an insignificant $18.72 a year? That sounds kind of silly to me. Silly because you will be using your PS3 to charge your controllers not to mention the time you spend watching Blu-Ray movies. Makes it a little interesting now when you factor your PS3 usage into charging that controller and watching your Blu-Ray huh? Now considering the price of entry into buying each system, the gap between them, combined with the difference between XBL going against the increased cost of energy consumption by the PS3. Yeah I think its time to throw this silly argument out the window. But then again even though the energy costs pretty much cancels out XBL costs, PSN doesn't cancle out XBL's superiorty over it....But yeah I won't really touch on that. Bottom line there is no room to really complain on this subject anymore. The small difference in money of $18.72 over even 5 years is less then the price difference of both products. And if you're one of the people that say you don't pay for your own electricity then I guess someone else is going to say that their parents whoever are paying for their XBL. Money is money no matter where it comes from. BlackBond has spoken EDIT: I know I said I'd leave the movie watching data out of this but now I decided to add it. Which really makes things a lot worse for the PS3. Part of the reason why I didn't include it. You saw the difference in the gaming side of things. Now check this. PS3 uses +50 Watss of power when watching DVDs Blu-Ray consumes +60 Watts of power over DVD and Blu-Ray movies power consumption is equal to that of playing your Xbox 360. link This thread is finished.
Watts 173.83
Hours Per Day Used 4.0
Kilowatt Hour Cost ($) 0.08
Days Used 300.00
Your Daily Cost Will Be $0.06
Your Monthly Cost Will Be $16.69
Watts 201.07
Hours Per Day Used 4.0
Kilowatt Hour Cost ($) 0.08
Days Used 300.00
Your Daily Cost Will Be $0.06
Your Monthly Cost Will Be $19.30
what if you plan to download things and game online... lets say for 3 years[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"][QUOTE="DonPerian"]You can get a 20GB HDD and 3 months of LIVE Gold for 30 bucks.Blackbond
Cost of XBL for three years $150
Cost of playing PS3 for three years compared to 360. $171
Oh wait someone saved $21 with his 360 didn't they.
so you going to pretend the 360 doesn't use electricity too50$ + 360 electricity bill > then newer efficent 399 ps3s electricity bill
[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]to get close to the the functionality of the ps3 you must buy the 360 addons. A liveless 360 with no hardrive (or with a 20gb one) cant compare in overall functions to the ps3.
PrinceofSarcasm
360 = $200
20GB HDD = $30
XBL - $50 yearly/PS3 energy cost is $57 more then 360's yearly meaning that the price is negated.
Pay attention to the links and information posted.
different ps3 skus use less power then others. This is comparing the new and most energy efficient ps3 to the arcade .... I'm a massive ps3 fan, but, do you work for sony? That's a pretty incorrect and bold statement to make without identifying proof.ha the only why lems can fight back is by searching the web for power consumption charts:lol:
live + 360 power consumption still is greater then > the ps3s power consumption (newer models are even more efficient)
How are they more efficient? Do you have evidential claims done by professionals to that effect?ha the only why lems can fight back is by searching the web for power consumption charts:lol:
live + 360 power consumption still is greater then > the ps3s power consumption (newer models are even more efficient)
PrinceofSarcasm
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment