PS3 could be recalled?

  • 64 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for latinrage69
latinrage69

2649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 latinrage69
Member since 2003 • 2649 Posts

Though it proably wont get past this point...it'll be funny if it actually happens. I like Joystiq's spin on this:

Massive damage dealt to PS3, lawsuit demands

killaj2786

ZOMG!!! TEH GIANT ENEMY CRAB!!!11! quick! someone get me a pot of boiling water, a nutcracker, a fork and some butter! i'm gonna take that son of a b---- down if it's the last thing i do! mmmkay!

Avatar image for needlesmcgirk
needlesmcgirk

627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 needlesmcgirk
Member since 2006 • 627 Posts
Yeah, Microsoft has never been involved in any kind of legal battles.
Avatar image for Einhanderkiller
Einhanderkiller

13259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#53 Einhanderkiller
Member since 2003 • 13259 Posts
These guys are just patent trolls. They either have something against Sony or are just trying to get some money, because, with this patent, they could've sued companies like Intel and AMD years ago.
Avatar image for tango90101
tango90101

5977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 tango90101
Member since 2006 • 5977 Posts

Interesting but there won't be a recall. These types of suits always start off saying give me all profits, stop making the infringing device, and pay me billions in penalties.

But they want to settle so they setup the worse scenario possible if it goes to court and sony loses. Look at RIM (Blackberry) and the lawsuit they lost. They actually had to turn off their service, but then they quickly settled paying millions to the company they stole their idea from.

*IF* this company wins it will just mean Sony will ose more money.

mikasa

I agree to a point.

they will stand to make much more money off of forcing sony to pay royalties on their hardware. a recall will not be good for either side, but it IS an option on the table.

Avatar image for skektek
skektek

6530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#55 skektek
Member since 2004 • 6530 Posts

Arstechnica has a better writeup on this.

"The patent in question was filed in November 1989 and issued in late 1991 back in the days when the Intel 486 and the Motorola 68040 were the bleeding edge of personal computing while the NES and the Sega Genesis represented the pinnacle of console gaming."

"Searches of corporate filings in California, where the company is based, and Delaware, where the complaint says it is incorporated, turned up no trace of Parallel Processing Corporation. In fact, there are no references to the company at all on the Internet aside from mentions of this story, leading us to assume that this is not a technology company, but a partnership organized just for the purposes of litigating this case."

There is a name for this, it's called PATENT TROLLING.If you read the patent you will see that it is very broad and could be applied to any multicore CPU. That means that Sun, Intel, AMD and IBM (including the Xenon, the Xbox 360's processor).

Avatar image for MTBare
MTBare

5176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 MTBare
Member since 2006 • 5176 Posts
If Sony sees that company have any chance of winning they'll settle out of court with a nice big sum of money. That smaller company obviously did that to scare Sony.
Avatar image for FonkeyMunky7
FonkeyMunky7

439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 FonkeyMunky7
Member since 2007 • 439 Posts
[QUOTE="asdasd"]

This company pattented parallel processing.. in '91...? Why dont they sue intel and AMD, because their chips have parallel processing too. Patents last 17 years, that means this one is about to run out. Looks like they're just tryin to make some quick cash.

Hell, I have an idea. Im going to patent air! Then I can sue everyone

xDonRobx

I beat you to it :P

You better sue him for thinking about patenting your already patented air.

Avatar image for Redfingers
Redfingers

4510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Redfingers
Member since 2005 • 4510 Posts

http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2195328/sony-sued-cell-cpu

well, i knew it just a matter of time for sony to face ANOTHER lawsuit in connection with the gaming devices.....

with sony's history of losses and settlements, one has to wonder just how much time the ps3 really has.....

SCE just can't continue to drain sony like this...

tango90101

Question: was Resistance: Fall of Man ever recalled due to the lawsuit?

Then stop speaking forever.

Avatar image for skektek
skektek

6530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#59 skektek
Member since 2004 • 6530 Posts
[QUOTE="mikasa"]

Interesting but there won't be a recall. These types of suits always start off saying give me all profits, stop making the infringing device, and pay me billions in penalties.

But they want to settle so they setup the worse scenario possible if it goes to court and sony loses. Look at RIM (Blackberry) and the lawsuit they lost. They actually had to turn off their service, but then they quickly settled paying millions to the company they stole their idea from.

*IF* this company wins it will just mean Sony will ose more money.

tango90101

I agree to a point.

they will stand to make much more money off of forcing sony to pay royalties on their hardware. a recall will not be good for either side, but it IS an option on the table.

No, its not a viable option. I can't think of single example where an injunction was issued and not stayed simply because injunctions harm entirely innocent third parties (in this case PS3 owners).

Avatar image for mikasa
mikasa

4060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 mikasa
Member since 2003 • 4060 Posts
[QUOTE="tango90101"][QUOTE="mikasa"]

Interesting but there won't be a recall. These types of suits always start off saying give me all profits, stop making the infringing device, and pay me billions in penalties.

But they want to settle so they setup the worse scenario possible if it goes to court and sony loses. Look at RIM (Blackberry) and the lawsuit they lost. They actually had to turn off their service, but then they quickly settled paying millions to the company they stole their idea from.

*IF* this company wins it will just mean Sony will ose more money.

skektek

I agree to a point.

they will stand to make much more money off of forcing sony to pay royalties on their hardware. a recall will not be good for either side, but it IS an option on the table.

No, its not a viable option. I can't think of single example where an injunction was issued and not stayed simply because injunctions harm entirely innocent third parties (in this case PS3 owners).

Look at RIM (Blackberry). I *Think* they had to turn off service for all but the politicians. RIM quickly setteled.

Avatar image for tango90101
tango90101

5977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 tango90101
Member since 2006 • 5977 Posts
[QUOTE="tango90101"][QUOTE="mikasa"]

Interesting but there won't be a recall. These types of suits always start off saying give me all profits, stop making the infringing device, and pay me billions in penalties.

But they want to settle so they setup the worse scenario possible if it goes to court and sony loses. Look at RIM (Blackberry) and the lawsuit they lost. They actually had to turn off their service, but then they quickly settled paying millions to the company they stole their idea from.

*IF* this company wins it will just mean Sony will ose more money.

skektek

I agree to a point.

they will stand to make much more money off of forcing sony to pay royalties on their hardware. a recall will not be good for either side, but it IS an option on the table.

No, its not a viable option. I can't think of single example where an injunction was issued and not stayed simply because injunctions harm entirely innocent third parties (in this case PS3 owners).

prolly not, but who really knows....

but it IS an option....

Avatar image for tango90101
tango90101

5977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 tango90101
Member since 2006 • 5977 Posts
[QUOTE="tango90101"]

http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2195328/sony-sued-cell-cpu

well, i knew it just a matter of time for sony to face ANOTHER lawsuit in connection with the gaming devices.....

with sony's history of losses and settlements, one has to wonder just how much time the ps3 really has.....

SCE just can't continue to drain sony like this...

Redfingers

Question: was Resistance: Fall of Man ever recalled due to the lawsuit?

Then stop speaking forever.

not even REMOTELY the same...:roll:

next time, ignore the submit button...

Avatar image for danielsmith2020
danielsmith2020

2244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 danielsmith2020
Member since 2003 • 2244 Posts
I'll say what I've said on other forums about this news the patent in question covers almost all multi-core processors, this lawsuit if succesful would screw AMD, Intel, sony and microsoft. The patent is so general it's insane.
Avatar image for Little_Dong
Little_Dong

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Little_Dong
Member since 2007 • 89 Posts

If they get recalled and Sony has a bunch of PS3s what good would it do them if their is no good games for them?

I guess they can play MGS4 which looks dumb IMO but then they would have to wait

Avatar image for ramey70
ramey70

4002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 ramey70
Member since 2006 • 4002 Posts
Gamespot System Wars: The one place on the internet where everyone is a corporate CEO, lawyer, and software developer. Good times.
Avatar image for Kinitari
Kinitari

3472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 Kinitari
Member since 2005 • 3472 Posts
Gamespot System Wars: The one place on the internet where everyone is a corporate CEO, lawyer, and software developer. Good times.ramey70


Geez... I dont know what your problem is...

I think Sony needs to file a 5662 - for those of you NOT familiar with this legal term, it's a process that would make the PS3 invulnerable to all hammer attacks for up to 7 years. If any attacks by a hammer (or any blunt object attempting to impound the PS3) occured, the attackee would be liabe for up to a $65,446.55 fine.

This is serious stuff.