PS3 doesn't have any good looking open world games.

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

spacesheikh

EDIT: Isnt Rage supposed to look better on the ps3? Because of better quality textures. I guess you lost that one too.

Because system itself is very vertex limited.Infamous tries to hide it with agressive lod and reducing draw distance drastically so the buildings in back dont render thus saving lots of polygons.In games like GTA IV,where you can get in heli and see the whole city that trick is not working,while in games like IF where draw distance is 20 feet it surely does.

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

spacesheikh

Its not that Cell is not suited.If 360 had Cell open world games might look even better,the problem is gpu nature...Cell cant help it with that proble,vertex limited 8 alus.

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

lucky_star

EDIT: Isnt Rage supposed to look better on the ps3? Because of better quality textures. I guess you lost that one too.

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

spacesheikh

First thing first, Mag is not an open world game.

Second, Infamous Isn't a bad looking game.

thrid GTAIV was fine on PS3.

Fourth do you have any proof of that?

Again Prove it with some links, you made a claim now back it up

Again I want lots and lots of proof, due to the fact your making bold claims here man.

inFAMOUS 2? :?

inFAMOUS 2? :?

zarshack

Same "problem"...They chose design that fits the system.Small draw distance...just look at the video of IF2 and you will see.

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

Animal-Mother

First thing first, Mag is not an open world game.

Second, Infamous Isn't a bad looking game.

thrid GTAIV was fine on PS3.

Fourth do you have any proof of that?

Again Prove it with some links, you made a claim now back it up

Again I want lots and lots of proof, due to the fact your making bold claims here man.

Nice way to shut up TC's that don't know what they're talking about.

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

spacesheikh

[QUOTE="zarshack"]

inFAMOUS 2? :?

Same "problem"...They chose design that fits the system.Small draw distance...just look at the video of IF2 and you will see.

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="zarshack"]

inFAMOUS 2? :?

Indie_Hitman

Same "problem"...They chose design that fits the system.Small draw distance...just look at the video of IF2 and you will see.

Not that i care if it has problems or not...Like i said million times,every console has its pros.Look at Mafia 2 case and no grass.Know why?Why ps3 version of RDR also has grass density tuned down?Its because ps3 lacks bandwidth for transparacies,something that luckly 360 handles with huge bandwidth of eDRAM and because all those grass adds to vertices,8 alus is simply not enough for todays open world detailed environments.

LOL, and your proof that X360 has better looking open world games??? Let me guess Crackdown, bahahahahaha.darthogre

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

Kleeyook

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2.All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

spacesheikh

Which versions of inFAMOUS and MAG do you think look better? just curious

[QUOTE="darthogre"]LOL, and your proof that X360 has better looking open world games??? Let me guess Crackdown, bahahahahaha.spacesheikh

because theres more grass?, anyway those games dont look too different, sure you can tell the difference but are you saying that because they are worse they dont look good?, i think infamous other than the lack of AA had great artstyle and visuals.

[QUOTE="darthogre"]LOL, and your proof that X360 has better looking open world games??? Let me guess Crackdown, bahahahahaha.spacesheikh

Really? By how much? BTW Mafia II is not out yet. I know the demo was bad but still you can't judge it just yet.

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

spacesheikh

Why is Infamous alone side those other multiplatform games Infamous is exclusive.

Rockstar made GTA SA look as crappy on PS2 as on xbox,and we all know what was the more powerful console of the 2.

Cell >>>>>>>>>>>> Xenos as simple as that,in fact many think that is the reason why PS3 games look better Cell.

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

Eltormo

Why is Infamous alone side those other multiplatform games Infamous is exclusive.

Rockstar made GTA SA look as crappy on PS2 as on xbox,and we all know what was the more powerful console of the 2.

Cell >>>>>>>>>>>> Xenos as simple as that,in fact many think that is the reason why PS3 games look better Cell.

R* are very very capable developers.SA was probably one of the highlights of ps2 abilites as far as tech goes.Im sure you would do better with 250mhz cpu and 32mb of ram in the size of San Andreas...

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2.All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Storm_Marine

Which versions of inFAMOUS and MAG do you think look better? just curious

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

Eltormo

Why is Infamous alone side those other multiplatform games Infamous is exclusive.

Rockstar made GTA SA look as crappy on PS2 as on xbox,and we all know what was the more powerful console of the 2.

Cell >>>>>>>>>>>> Xenos as simple as that,in fact many think that is the reason why PS3 games look better Cell.

Also the Cell is a CPU and Xenos is a GPU. Just thought i'd let you know.

It has a few good looking open world games still not as good looking as 360´s ones.

Why? Because PS3 is not more powerfull than 360 :o They are about equal but 360 has the advantage of being easier to develop for....sounds simple to me!

Well TC it seems you have no proof as you decided to completely dodge my post.

Unless you wanna still back it up

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

spacesheikh

Why is Infamous alone side those other multiplatform games Infamous is exclusive.

Rockstar made GTA SA look as crappy on PS2 as on xbox,and we all know what was the more powerful console of the 2.

Cell >>>>>>>>>>>> Xenon as simple as that,in fact many think that is the reason why PS3 games look better Cell.

Also the Cell is a CPU and Xenos is a GPU. Just thought i'd let you know.

It had AA were the game suffer from jagies all the way,in fact it looked more jagified than the PS2 version,i owned both version in fact the xbox version was brigher,but it had the same porblem pop up,jagies and it looked pretty much identical,and GTA SA wasn't a port it was buil alone side the PS2 version,it was just hold 6 months well because sony had it exclusive first.

Also it was a typo it was suppose to say Xenon dude,don't get your hope hypes i know which is which,just like i know Cell is a much better CPU than the Xenon would ever be.

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

spacesheikh

assassin creed 2 and infamous 2 looks amazing

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

Animal-Mother

First thing first, Mag is not an open world game.

Second, Infamous Isn't a bad looking game.

thrid GTAIV was fine on PS3.

Fourth do you have any proof of that?

Again Prove it with some links, you made a claim now back it up

Again I want lots and lots of proof, due to the fact your making bold claims here man.

sorry infamous 1 is a great game but an ugly ugly game. infamous 2 is a amazing looking game tho.

also a question to the tc what open world game looks amzing on the 360 other than rdr being a little bit better. all oter games are the same even assassin creed 2. crackdown for example looks so ugly even worste than infamous 1. ps3 is getting infamous 2 soon which is claimed to be uncharted 2 graphics quality game

What are you talking about? Infamous is a great looking game.

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

pc-ps360

First thing first, Mag is not an open world game.

Second, Infamous Isn't a bad looking game.

thrid GTAIV was fine on PS3.

Fourth do you have any proof of that?

Again Prove it with some links, you made a claim now back it up

Again I want lots and lots of proof, due to the fact your making bold claims here man.

sorry infamous 1 is a great game but an ugly ugly game. infamous 2 is a amazing looking game tho

Because crackdown looks SOOOO amazing?

[QUOTE="Kleeyook"][QUOTE="spacesheikh"]

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

spacesheikh

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"][QUOTE="Kleeyook"] inFamous and MAG are PS3's exclusives. inFamous is looking very good. And MAG is a MMO FPS with 256 players at once. Do some research before trolling!Anjunaddict

Probably because it's all a matter of opinion. I think Infamous looks great.

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"][QUOTE="spacesheikh"] infamous is actually one of the worst looking AAA titles this gen.raynimrod

Probably because it's all a matter of opinion. I think Infamous looks great.

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

spacesheikh

Just because those games look worse on the PS3 doesnt mean they look bad in any way, in fact they still look fantastic on the PS3, just not as fantastic as their counterparts (in some cases).

[QUOTE="raynimrod"]

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"] Agreed. I don't know why people defend its graphics, they really are bad.Anjunaddict

Probably because it's all a matter of opinion. I think Infamous looks great.

Well unless you're providing technical details that prove infamous is a bad looking game, it's still a matter of opinion. Your comment here in relation to technical graphics is based on what you see and then think as a result, not factual data.

However, if you think it looks bad - whatever :)

It has a few good looking open world games still not as good looking as 360´s ones.

Why? Because PS3 is not more powerfull than 360 :o They are about equal but 360 has the advantage of being easier to develop for....sounds simple to me!

PAL360

which is better a brighter and more colorful graphics or sharper, bland and darker graphics

Infamous 2 looks great TC, and Just Cause 2.

well to answer you're question. infamous actually looks really good. not sure why you do not think it does but that is fine. infamous 2 looks even better. MAG is a step below battlefield BC2 a agree but i do not think you realize how big the domination maps are. plus BC2 looks the same on PS3. ive hdad both versions. if there is a difference its extremely small.

GTA4 is ugly now reguardless and yes RDR looks better on the 360 but its not like the PS3 version is ugly. and im surprised you didnt mention fallout 3 or oblivion. fallout is the same on both systems but oblivion looks better on PS3. burnout paradise is open world also. and again the PS3 version is smoother.

i do not blame devs for making the 360 the first choice to build the game and then porting to the PS3. its harder to develope for and PS3 oeners buy more exclusives. go play socom online and modern warfare 2 online on the PSN. socom has a crap ton of players and MW2 is just seady. but i am positive the reason some of these 3rd party titles do not sale is because the quality of sony's first party games.

it isnt like 3rd parties cant make great looking games, they just do not want to invest more money to do it. look at killzone 2. do you really think guerilla is one of the best developers in the world? no. they are not. if they can make a AAA game that still makes most games look horrible imagine what a capcom or a bungie could do?

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

It has a few good looking open world games still not as good looking as 360´s ones.

Why? Because PS3 is not more powerfull than 360 :o They are about equal but 360 has the advantage of being easier to develop for....sounds simple to me!

JohnF111

[QUOTE="spacesheikh"]

inFamous, GTA4, RDR, MAG, Mafia 2. All these games look worse on PS3. Or at least below average. There isn't a single open world game that seems to use the fabled "powar of teh cell".

Cows, please stop calling these developers "lazy". Rockstar and Sucker Punch are not "lazy". The cell is not designed for these open world environments.

That is because only linear games can take advantage of the cell processor. The SPU's are useful in scripted and controlled situations while the 360's cpu can handle any task on any of its three cores.

lucky_star

EDIT: Isnt Rage supposed to look better on the ps3? Because of better quality textures. I guess you lost that one too.

Whats with the TC today? Did a PS3 YLOD on him or something?

Below average? what is average in your opinion?:?

Infamous actually looks better than RDR, and Infamous 2 from what we have seen looks like the best open world game on consolesKevinButlerVP

lol certainly not

[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"]Infamous actually looks better than RDR, and Infamous 2 from what we have seen looks like the best open world game on consolesAnjunaddict

lol certainly not

[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"]Infamous actually looks better than RDR, and Infamous 2 from what we have seen looks like the best open world game on consolesAnjunaddict

lol certainly not

Hehe i just waited for someone to comment on that :D

:lol: @ draw distance