PS3 exclusives are still the best looking console games by far (56k warning)

[QUOTE="killzoneded"]

[QUOTE="blitzcloud"]Normally, games that are in the 90+ on metacritic means players will ultimately enjoy them regardless the genre they like. 80s means normally that you should be inclined to like the genre. 70s, you should like the genre quite a bit or the saga itself. 60s, all of 70, plus there's some faults. 50s, same as before, with too many faults.

Actually the 90+ are games only casuals will enjoy, usually are linear and 5-7 hours cinematic titles with basic gameplay

FYI , uncharted 2 has a 'horde' mode toocampzor

Oh, I forgot about that. Point is - both games provide a lot of content.

[QUOTE="killzoneded"]

This generation sadly is true for most games

The moment Fallout Vegas went better it scored lower

The moment Mass Effect2 got more casual than ME1, scored higher

And games like Gears or U2 last an afternoon with just shooting stuff, boring as it gets

waltefmoney

Fallout New Vegas was a buggy and unoptimized mess. Buggier than it's predecessor. That's why it scored lower.

Mass Effect 2 was an improvement over the first in almost every way. It makes sense the better game would score better.

Both Gears and Uncharted have multiplayer, Gears has horde mode. They provide a lot of content.

That is my point, that polish level matters more inscores more than the actual core game, which is a joke for a real gamer like me

I definatly prefer a great game than a polished one, but the scores are nearly always inversly proportional

Vegas was better than Fallout 3 and ME1 was better than ME2, so the biggest scoring ones are the worst ones

as for Gears and U2, they do have multi, but is not the same as the single player campaign and i dont play online, so for me are one day rent titles

[QUOTE="UC3Drake"]

[QUOTE="killzoneded"]

Actually the 90+ are games only casuals will enjoy, usually are linear and 5-7 hours cinematic titles with basic gameplay

jakandsig

That is my point, that polish level matters more inscores more than the actual core game, which is a joke for a real gamer like me

I definatly prefer a great game than a polished one, but the scores are nearly always inversly proportional

Vegas was better than Fallout 3 and ME1 was better than ME2, so the biggest scoring ones are the worst ones

as for Gears and U2, they do have multi, but is not the same as the single player campaign and i dont play online, so for me are one day rent titles

killzoneded

ME2 is so much better than ME1. I agree about New Vegas being better than Fallout 3 though.

As for Gears 2 and Uncharted 2, both have great campaigns with lots of replayability.

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

[QUOTE="killzoneded"]

This generation sadly is true for most games

The moment Fallout Vegas went better it scored lower

The moment Mass Effect2 got more casual than ME1, scored higher

And games like Gears or U2 last an afternoon with just shooting stuff, boring as it gets

killzoneded

Fallout New Vegas was a buggy and unoptimized mess. Buggier than it's predecessor. That's why it scored lower.

Mass Effect 2 was an improvement over the first in almost every way. It makes sense the better game would score better.

Both Gears and Uncharted have multiplayer, Gears has horde mode. They provide a lot of content.

That is my point, that polish level matters more inscores more than the actual core game, which is a joke for a real gamer like me

I definatly prefer a great game than a polished one, but the scores are nearly always inversly proportional

Vegas was better than Fallout 3 and ME1 was better than ME2, so the biggest scoring ones are the worst ones

as for Gears and U2, they do have multi, but is not the same as the single player campaign and i dont play online, so for me are one day rent titles

[QUOTE="blitzcloud"]

[QUOTE="killzoneded"]

Which is fine, since the best games this generation are the 7.5-9.0 scoring ones and the worst the 9+ ones, for me at least that dont like 5 hour repeatitivegames and only rent them

killzoneded

Actually the 90+ are games only casuals will enjoy, usually are linear and 5-7 hours cinematic titles with basic gameplay

[QUOTE="jakandsig"][QUOTE="UC3Drake"]Wow, nice way to be subtle -_-. Also, (Mario), (GTA4), MGS4, UC2, and (Zelda) have basic gameplay? I can agree about UC2, but dude, really?

[QUOTE="blitzcloud"]Normally, games that are in the 90+ on metacritic means players will ultimately enjoy them regardless the genre they like. 80s means normally that you should be inclined to like the genre. 70s, you should like the genre quite a bit or the saga itself. 60s, all of 70, plus there's some faults. 50s, same as before, with too many faults.

Actually the 90+ are games only casuals will enjoy, usually are linear and 5-7 hours cinematic titles with basic gameplay

[QUOTE="UC3Drake"]

[QUOTE="killzoneded"]

That is my point, that polish level matters more inscores more than the actual core game, which is a joke for a real gamer like me

I definatly prefer a great game than a polished one, but the scores are nearly always inversly proportional

Vegas was better than Fallout 3 and ME1 was better than ME2, so the biggest scoring ones are the worst ones

as for Gears and U2, they do have multi, but is not the same as the single player campaign and i dont play online, so for me are one day rent titles

sts106mat

as for Gears and U2, they do have multi, but is not the same as the single player campaign and i dont play online, so for me are one day rent titles

killzoneded

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="killzoneded"]

Actually the 90+ are games only casuals will enjoy, usually are linear and 5-7 hours cinematic titles with basic gameplay

jakandsig

This generation the games with the most shallow, repeatitve, cinematic,linear and short gameplay get all the best scores and attention

It is the generation of the casual gamer

Crysis 2 on Xbox 360 is console graphics king hands down

i agree

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="killzoneded"]

Actually the 90+ are games only casuals will enjoy, usually are linear and 5-7 hours cinematic titles with basic gameplay

jakandsig

This generation the games with the most shallow, repeatitve, cinematic,linear and short gameplay get all the best scores and attention It is the generation of the casual gamer

killzoneded

You mean like vast, open worlds, volumetric dynamic lighting, and amazing foliage that's miles better?