PS3 exclusives offer better Single Player experiences than 360 exclsuives

[QUOTE="4dr1el"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] I already know you can't read: you can't write, so why would I expect you to be able to read? I think I've already made it clear that the PS3 only has movies, not games, so I won't bother beating a dead horse (as that's something reserved explicitly for Cows), and it's okay that you're jealous that CDPR never bothered to give the poor little PS3 a glance--they know that it's just a blu-ray player and nothing more. Porting as divine a game as The Witcher 2 onto the PS3 would not only be technically impossible (since it isn't a movie but rather one of the best RPGs ever made) but a slap in the face to fans of the series.princeofshapeir

Wait, didnt you said you wouldnt waste more time with me? humm, I really must be rusting your jimmies...

Q_Q more

yup, you should get with the times. metal pants are a hit thing now in europe. and since all you americans envy european class you must used them too

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]

Well, that's the problem: only two of those titles (Red Dead Redemption and Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3) are actually games. The other titles in that stack are movies.

I also find it quite amusing that you'd call BS on my ownership of a PS3 simply because I own the popular PS3 titles. In a Cow's mind, if you have the decency to admit the PS3 is nothing more than a Blu-Ray player yet own a PS3, you can't actually own one; to people like you, criticizing something and owning it are mutually exclusive.

princeofshapeir

I don't even own that account. :lol:

Just a Google Image. You're trying so hard to spot the slightest error such as spelling, grammar, and even URL, and then you use them as "ownage". That shows everybody that you're out of argument and began to go on something stupid.

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I call BS, doesn't look legitiment to me. Anyone could have taken that off the internet and copied their name to it. Fake, total fake.

The_Game21x

I noticed it too but didn't want to say anything. :P

As an English major, I cringed.

What game has an engine that feels like it was designed by semi-inept elephants?

princeofshapeir

The Witcher 1. It run like sh1t. And my PC can play Crysis 1 well enough mind you

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

GamerwillzPS

I don't even own that account. :lol:

Just a Google Image. You're trying so hard to spot the slightest error such as spelling, grammar, and even URL, and then you use them as "ownage". That shows everybody that you're out of argument and began to go on something stupid.

Not it's not. Also not that many people brought an N64 and OoT, a lot of people already had N64 when they brough tit or brought it with a different game.StatusShuffle

k.

Name me one PSX game that outdoes the fame OoT put forth on gaming.

Also when people think of N64 they think of OoT.

When people think of PS3 they think of blu-ray, Multiplats, and maybe GT5.

PS3 offers better everything compared to the 360. PS3 is the ultimate compliment to the master PC gaming race.

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]

What game has an engine that feels like it was designed by semi-inept elephants?

4dr1el

The Witcher 1. It run like sh1t

And my PC can play Crysis 1 well enough mind you4dr1el

[QUOTE="StatusShuffle"]Not it's not. Also not that many people brought an N64 and OoT, a lot of people already had N64 when they brough tit or brought it with a different game.Slashless

k.

Name me one PSX game that outdoes the fame OoT put forth on gaming.

Also when people think of N64 they think of OoT.

When people think of PS3 they think of blu-ray, Multiplats, and maybe GT5.

I honestly think of Uncharted when someone mentions PS3. And I'm not even that big of an Uncharted fan mind you. I prefer Demon's Souls, MGS4 and GoW3 over the Uncharted games on the PS3

[QUOTE="Slashless"]

[QUOTE="StatusShuffle"]is that why the N64 had 33 million to 100+ million to the PSX? Because OoT was so good people accidentally brought more playstations?StatusShuffle

What do console sales have to do with that?

There were numerous reasons people had PSX's

People pretty much bought an N64 for OoT.

OoT is certainly more memorable nowadays than anything on the PSX

[QUOTE="Slashless"]

[QUOTE="StatusShuffle"]Not it's not. Also not that many people brought an N64 and OoT, a lot of people already had N64 when they brough tit or brought it with a different game.4dr1el

k.

Name me one PSX game that outdoes the fame OoT put forth on gaming.

Also when people think of N64 they think of OoT.

When people think of PS3 they think of blu-ray, Multiplats, and maybe GT5.

I honestly think of Uncharted when someone mentions PS3. And I'm not even that big of an Uncharted fan mind you. I prefer Demon's Souls, MGS4 and GoW3 over the Uncharted games on the PS3

When I think PS3 I think The Dark Knight; it's easily the best Blu-Ray movie I've watched on my PS3. MGS4 would be a good movie if it had coherent writing, and the Uncharted series would be good movies if only it didn't rip off the Indiana Jones series and have one-dimensional characters.

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] You might want to consider better image hosting sites like imgur.princeofshapeir

I don't even own that account. :lol:

Just a Google Image. You're trying so hard to spot the slightest error such as spelling, grammar, and even URL, and then you use them as "ownage". That shows everybody that you're out of argument and began to go on something stupid.

How on earth can you prove that those games are movies? You can't. You still haven't proved anything. All you said is "They are movies! They are movies! They are movies!". No point being proven.

It's all down to your deluded opinion. You must suck at games if that's what you are really thinking.

[QUOTE="4dr1el"] And my PC can play Crysis 1 well enough mind youprinceofshapeir

I can play it at medium-high (oh wait, I forgot the full stop!) here ya (you) go - .

Love how Shadow puts Uncharted series on single and multiplayer lists, while Halo and Gears are just on the multiplayer. Singleplayer modes on Halo and Gears are awesome dude, and dont forget local coop modes.

PAL360

No. The SP expereinces in Halo and Gears are forgettable one time experiences that no one ever touches again. Is Halo or Gears worthy buying without XBL? No of course not, that's because they have mediocre SP at best. People only buy them so they can play online.

Uncharted has both great SP and great MP, that's why it get's both. Of course you don't know this because you have never played UC before. So my opinion overrides yours.

[QUOTE="4dr1el"]

[QUOTE="Slashless"]

k.

Name me one PSX game that outdoes the fame OoT put forth on gaming.

Also when people think of N64 they think of OoT.

When people think of PS3 they think of blu-ray, Multiplats, and maybe GT5.

princeofshapeir

I honestly think of Uncharted when someone mentions PS3. And I'm not even that big of an Uncharted fan mind you. I prefer Demon's Souls, MGS4 and GoW3 over the Uncharted games on the PS3

When I think PS3 I think The Dark Knight; it's easily the best Blu-Ray movie I've watched on my PS3. MGS4 would be a good movie if it had coherent writing, and the Uncharted series would be good movies if only it didn't rip off the Indiana Jones series and have one-dimensional characters.

Its "ripoff" or "rip-off" not rip off

source

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ripoff

:P

And Indiana Jones is a ripoff of various adventure novels and Lawrence of Arabia.

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Love how Shadow puts Uncharted series on single and multiplayer lists, while Halo and Gears are just on the multiplayer. Singleplayer modes on Halo and Gears are awesome dude, and dont forget local coop modes.

ShadowMoses900

No. The SP expereinces in Halo and Gears are forgettable one time experiences that no one ever touches again. Is Halo or Gears worthy buying without XBL? No of course not, that's because they have mediocre SP at best. People only buy them so they can play online.

Uncharted has both great SP and great MP, that's why it get's both. Of course you don't know this because you have never played UC before. So my opinion overrides yours.

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

I don't even own that account. :lol:

Just a Google Image. You're trying so hard to spot the slightest error such as spelling, grammar, and even URL, and then you use them as "ownage". That shows everybody that you're out of argument and began to go on something stupid.

GamerwillzPS

How on earth can you prove that those games are movies? You can't. You still haven't proved anything. All you said is "They are movies! They are movies! They are movies!". No point being proven.

It's all down to your deluded opinion. You must suck at games if that's what you are really thinking.

I'm getting kind of tired of repeating myself, but Cows are poor listeners (in addition to being mentally deficient and illiterate), so I'll repeat myself--just for you.

1. MGS4 and the Uncharted series, the only notable titles on the PS3, are lauded purely because of their story, graphics, set pieces, quicktime events, and cutscenes.

2. The gameplay in each title is so below the standard of what's acceptable in a modern video game that it's practically nonexistent: it's filler meant to get you from cutscene A to cutscene B.

3. The PS3's main feature is its use of Blu-Ray, a technology now synonymous with home theatre and movies.

4. The average length of an Uncharted movie is three hours--suspiciously, that's also the length of a fairly long movie.

5. Heavy Rain.

Thus, it's reasonable to conclude that the PS3 only has movies, not real games.

[QUOTE="StatusShuffle"]Not it's not. Also not that many people brought an N64 and OoT, a lot of people already had N64 when they brough tit or brought it with a different game.Slashless

k.

Name me one PSX game that outdoes the fame OoT put forth on gaming.

Also when people think of N64 they think of OoT.

When people think of PS3 they think of blu-ray, Multiplats, and maybe GT5.

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]

[QUOTE="4dr1el"]

I honestly think of Uncharted when someone mentions PS3. And I'm not even that big of an Uncharted fan mind you. I prefer Demon's Souls, MGS4 and GoW3 over the Uncharted games on the PS3

4dr1el

When I think PS3 I think The Dark Knight; it's easily the best Blu-Ray movie I've watched on my PS3. MGS4 would be a good movie if it had coherent writing, and the Uncharted series would be good movies if only it didn't rip off the Indiana Jones series and have one-dimensional characters.

Its "ripoff" or "rip-off" not rip off

source

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ripoff

:P

And Indiana Jones is a ripoff of various adventure novels and Lawrence of Arabia.

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Love how Shadow puts Uncharted series on single and multiplayer lists, while Halo and Gears are just on the multiplayer. Singleplayer modes on Halo and Gears are awesome dude, and dont forget local coop modes.

ShadowMoses900

No. The SP expereinces in Halo and Gears are forgettable one time experiences that no one ever touches again. Is Halo or Gears worthy buying without XBL? No of course not, that's because they have mediocre SP at best. People only buy them so they can play online.

Uncharted has both great SP and great MP, that's why it get's both. Of course you don't know this because you have never played UC before. So my opinion overrides yours.

So, Halo and Gears are not worth getting for their singleplayer, but Uncharted is worth getting for its multiplayer? :lol:

Dude, Halo and Gears have great campaigns, especially Gears 3. Easly worth getting to play alone, even better if you want to play with friends in local coop.

1. MGS4 and the Uncharted series, the only notable titles on the PS3, are lauded purely because of their story, graphics, set pieces, quicktime events, and cutscenes.

princeofshapeir

Funny, I can swear they are praised because of their gameplay aswell... and whats up with the QTE bullsh1t? If you really played the games you know there are no QTE on MGS4 and they're barely noticeable on Uncharted games. wtf (what the fvck) you're talking about? You're really trolling or you're just really stupid?

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Love how Shadow puts Uncharted series on single and multiplayer lists, while Halo and Gears are just on the multiplayer. Singleplayer modes on Halo and Gears are awesome dude, and dont forget local coop modes.

Michael0134567

No. The SP expereinces in Halo and Gears are forgettable one time experiences that no one ever touches again. Is Halo or Gears worthy buying without XBL? No of course not, that's because they have mediocre SP at best. People only buy them so they can play online.

Uncharted has both great SP and great MP, that's why it get's both. Of course you don't know this because you have never played UC before. So my opinion overrides yours.

Did I say they don't exist? No.

But they are mediocre. They are forgettable, try to play Halo 3 campaign by yourself again, boring. ODST-boring. Reach-boring. Only Halo CE and Halo 2 have good campaigns.

No one buys Halo for the campaign, would you have gotten Halo 3 or Reach if they had no MP? No of course not. Those games have crap SP. Just because you replay them doesn't matter, that's just because you probably don't have better SP games to play.

You obviously don't have a PS3, if you did you would agree with me.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

Btw Shadow it's not really fair to compare my threads with yours.

For starters I always derail mine while you're serious all the way through.

You little punk.

waltefmoney

My threads always rustle some jimmies, that's why I win.

This thread will beat yours, I think it will go on for days. Just watch.

No one is going to remember your thread after this.

If that happens I'm leaving Gamespot forever. No joke.

Guess you're going to leave now. Bye.

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

No. The SP expereinces in Halo and Gears are forgettable one time experiences that no one ever touches again. Is Halo or Gears worthy buying without XBL? No of course not, that's because they have mediocre SP at best. People only buy them so they can play online.

Uncharted has both great SP and great MP, that's why it get's both. Of course you don't know this because you have never played UC before. So my opinion overrides yours.

ShadowMoses900

Did I say they don't exist? No.

But they are mediocre. They are forgettable, try to play Halo 3 campaign by yourself again, boring. ODST-boring. Reach-boring. Only Halo CE and Halo 2 have good campaigns.

No one buys Halo for the campaign, would you have gotten Halo 3 or Reach if they had no MP? No of course not. Those games have crap SP. Just because you replay them doesn't matter, that's just because you probably don't have better SP games to play.

You obviously don't have a PS3, if you did you would agree with me.

I got the first 3 Halo games for the campaign alone. Same for the first two Gears games. Im not even a big fan of Halo competitive mp and cant wait for Halo 4, just to play its campaign. You lack logic, my friend...

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] I'm not out of arguments. I've made my point several times already and have supplied evidence that I own a PS3 and all of the movies worth owning for it. What more do you want? I mean, it's not like you guys are bringing up new arguments--you keep insinuating that I'm wrong without actually supplying any warrant to refute my claims.princeofshapeir

How on earth can you prove that those games are movies? You can't. You still haven't proved anything. All you said is "They are movies! They are movies! They are movies!". No point being proven.

It's all down to your deluded opinion. You must suck at games if that's what you are really thinking.

I'm getting kind of tired of repeating myself, but Cows are poor listeners (in addition to being mentally deficient and illiterate), so I'll repeat myself--just for you.

1. MGS4 and the Uncharted series, the only notable titles on the PS3, are lauded purely because of their story, graphics, set pieces, quicktime events, and cutscenes.

2. The gameplay in each title is so below the standard of what's acceptable in a modern video game that it's practically nonexistent: it's filler meant to get you from cutscene A to cutscene B.

3. The PS3's main feature is its use of Blu-Ray, a technology now synonymous with home theatre and movies.

4. The average length of an Uncharted movie is three hours--suspiciously, that's also the length of a fairly long movie.

5. Heavy Rain.

Thus, it's reasonable to conclude that the PS3 only has movies, not real games.

Seems like you don't know what to expect from a quality campaign then, or maybe you've never played one.

All of the "movies" crap you've been spouting out are what QUALITY campaigns are all about. Hell, even Gears of War have cutscenes! So are they movies too?!

Now don't be silly. Use some logic. If you don't like movies, then you should stick with multiplayer in the rest of your life.

What do you define as "fame"? All the game was is a big tunnel of hype train, most people think M64 or MK or something else before they think of OoT. Also what "Fame" did it put foruth on gaming? You got to tell me what your words mean or I might end up not getting what you are trying to tell me, use complete sentences.StatusShuffle

Pretty simple (I thought)

What PSX game still gets the amount of discussion, reference, acclaim, industry comparison, and all around monumental status OoT has.

Dodging the question two times in a row isn't helping. Just list a game. Can you?

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Love how Shadow puts Uncharted series on single and multiplayer lists, while Halo and Gears are just on the multiplayer. Singleplayer modes on Halo and Gears are awesome dude, and dont forget local coop modes.

PAL360

No. The SP expereinces in Halo and Gears are forgettable one time experiences that no one ever touches again. Is Halo or Gears worthy buying without XBL? No of course not, that's because they have mediocre SP at best. People only buy them so they can play online.

Uncharted has both great SP and great MP, that's why it get's both. Of course you don't know this because you have never played UC before. So my opinion overrides yours.

So, Halo and Gears are not worth getting for their singleplayer, but Uncharted is worth getting for its multiplayer? :lol:

Dude, Halo and Gears have great campaigns, especially Gears 3. Easly worth getting to play alone, even better if you want to play with friends in local coop.

I admit Gears does have a decent campaign as far as most 360 exclusives go, Gears 3 is pretty long too. But they are still one time things, playing with co-op is a MP experience, not a SP one, which you only play through once and never touch again because it's all about the MP.

UC has great SP and MP, if you played it you would see why. Second best MP of last year, Killzone was 1st.

[QUOTE="4dr1el"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]

When I think PS3 I think The Dark Knight; it's easily the best Blu-Ray movie I've watched on my PS3. MGS4 would be a good movie if it had coherent writing, and the Uncharted series would be good movies if only it didn't rip off the Indiana Jones series and have one-dimensional characters.

princeofshapeir

Its "ripoff" or "rip-off" not rip off

source

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ripoff

:P

And Indiana Jones is a ripoff of various adventure novels and Lawrence of Arabia.

nah, you're just feeling humiliated because you felt on your own trap

At least I know how to speak your language (you're going to say I dont but the fact you're understanding all my replies says alot). I'm pretty sure you dont know how to speak mine. And I find ironic an american is calling illiterate another person when the majority of americans are dumb as sh1t

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"] So because you don't enjoy the single player,they don't exist?And I have played through the campaigns more than once.PAL360

Did I say they don't exist? No.

But they are mediocre. They are forgettable, try to play Halo 3 campaign by yourself again, boring. ODST-boring. Reach-boring. Only Halo CE and Halo 2 have good campaigns.

No one buys Halo for the campaign, would you have gotten Halo 3 or Reach if they had no MP? No of course not. Those games have crap SP. Just because you replay them doesn't matter, that's just because you probably don't have better SP games to play.

You obviously don't have a PS3, if you did you would agree with me.

I got the first 3 Halo games for the campaign alone. Same for the first two Gears games. You lack logic, my friend.

For the campaign alone? You are doing it wrong.

You don't know where to look if you are looking for quality campaigns.

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]

1. MGS4 and the Uncharted series, the only notable titles on the PS3, are lauded purely because of their story, graphics, set pieces, quicktime events, and cutscenes.

4dr1el

Funny, I can swear they are praised because of their gameplay aswell... and whats up with the QTE bullsh1t? If you really played the games you know there are no QTE on MGS4 and they're barely noticeable on Uncharted games. wtf (what the fvck) you're talking about? You're really trolling or you're just really stupid?

There's no need for displacement.

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

No. The SP expereinces in Halo and Gears are forgettable one time experiences that no one ever touches again. Is Halo or Gears worthy buying without XBL? No of course not, that's because they have mediocre SP at best. People only buy them so they can play online.

Uncharted has both great SP and great MP, that's why it get's both. Of course you don't know this because you have never played UC before. So my opinion overrides yours.

ShadowMoses900

So, Halo and Gears are not worth getting for their singleplayer, but Uncharted is worth getting for its multiplayer? :lol:

Dude, Halo and Gears have great campaigns, especially Gears 3. Easly worth getting to play alone, even better if you want to play with friends in local coop.

I admit Gears does have a decent campaign as far as most 360 exclusives go, Gears 3 is pretty long too. But they are still one time things, playing with co-op is a MP experience, not a SP one, which you only play through once and never touch again because it's all about the MP.

UC has great SP and MP, if you played it you would see why. Second best MP of last year, Killzone was 1st.

Are you serious? :|

Btw, didnt you say that without live those games were worthless? Well, you can play Halo and Gears mp without live.

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

No. The SP expereinces in Halo and Gears are forgettable one time experiences that no one ever touches again. Is Halo or Gears worthy buying without XBL? No of course not, that's because they have mediocre SP at best. People only buy them so they can play online.

Uncharted has both great SP and great MP, that's why it get's both. Of course you don't know this because you have never played UC before. So my opinion overrides yours.

ShadowMoses900

Did I say they don't exist? No.

But they are mediocre. They are forgettable, try to play Halo 3 campaign by yourself again, boring. ODST-boring. Reach-boring. Only Halo CE and Halo 2 have good campaigns.

No one buys Halo for the campaign, would you have gotten Halo 3 or Reach if they had no MP? No of course not. Those games have crap SP. Just because you replay them doesn't matter, that's just because you probably don't have better SP games to play.

You obviously don't have a PS3, if you did you would agree with me.

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Did I say they don't exist? No.

But they are mediocre. They are forgettable, try to play Halo 3 campaign by yourself again, boring. ODST-boring. Reach-boring. Only Halo CE and Halo 2 have good campaigns.

No one buys Halo for the campaign, would you have gotten Halo 3 or Reach if they had no MP? No of course not. Those games have crap SP. Just because you replay them doesn't matter, that's just because you probably don't have better SP games to play.

You obviously don't have a PS3, if you did you would agree with me.

GamerwillzPS

I got the first 3 Halo games for the campaign alone. Same for the first two Gears games. You lack logic, my friend.

For the campaign alone? You are doing it wrong.

You don't know where to look if you are looking for quality campaigns.

Dude, im only a fan of 3 series when it comes to play online. Battlefield, Left4Dead and Gears horde mode. With a few exceptions, im a single player only gamer.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

So, Halo and Gears are not worth getting for their singleplayer, but Uncharted is worth getting for its multiplayer? :lol:

Dude, Halo and Gears have great campaigns, especially Gears 3. Easly worth getting to play alone, even better if you want to play with friends in local coop.

PAL360

I admit Gears does have a decent campaign as far as most 360 exclusives go, Gears 3 is pretty long too. But they are still one time things, playing with co-op is a MP experience, not a SP one, which you only play through once and never touch again because it's all about the MP.

UC has great SP and MP, if you played it you would see why. Second best MP of last year, Killzone was 1st.

Are you serious? :|

Btw, im pretty sure that, in one of your posts, you said that without live those games were worthless. Well, you can play Halo and Gears mp without live.

Yes and the general consensus agrees with me. How many awards did UC get for it's SP and MP? A LOT. How many awards did Gears get? Lol next to nothing. But what do you know? You have never played Uncharted before, thus your opinion on it means nothing.

I rate the top best MP games of last year as this:

1. Killzone 3

2. Uncharted3

3. Gears 3 or MW3

Gears 3 has great MP, but it's SP is not that great. But it's much better than Halo, I think Gears is the best 360 exclusive out there.

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I admit Gears does have a decent campaign as far as most 360 exclusives go, Gears 3 is pretty long too. But they are still one time things, playing with co-op is a MP experience, not a SP one, which you only play through once and never touch again because it's all about the MP.

UC has great SP and MP, if you played it you would see why. Second best MP of last year, Killzone was 1st.

ShadowMoses900

Are you serious? :|

Btw, im pretty sure that, in one of your posts, you said that without live those games were worthless. Well, you can play Halo and Gears mp without live.

Yes and the general consensus agrees with me. How many awards did UC get for it's SP and MP? A LOT. How many awards did Gears get? Lol next to nothing. But what do you know? You have never played Uncharted before, thus your opinion on it means nothing.

I rate the top best MP games of last year as this:

1. Killzone 3

2. Uncharted3

3. Gears 3 or MW3

Gears 3 has great MP, but it's SP is not that great. But it's much better than Halo, I think Gears is the best 360 exclusive out there.

I dont remember Uncharted 3 and Killzone 3 winning awards for their multiplayer modes.

http://www.gamespot.com/best-of-2011-special/awards/index.html?page=16

http://www.gamespot.com/best-of-2011-special/awards/index.html?page=15

Gears 3 at least was nominated for both, compatitive and coop mp. I dont see Uncharted 3 there.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Are you serious? :|

Btw, im pretty sure that, in one of your posts, you said that without live those games were worthless. Well, you can play Halo and Gears mp without live.

PAL360

Yes and the general consensus agrees with me. How many awards did UC get for it's SP and MP? A LOT. How many awards did Gears get? Lol next to nothing. But what do you know? You have never played Uncharted before, thus your opinion on it means nothing.

I rate the top best MP games of last year as this:

1. Killzone 3

2. Uncharted3

3. Gears 3 or MW3

Gears 3 has great MP, but it's SP is not that great. But it's much better than Halo, I think Gears is the best 360 exclusive out there.

I dont remember Uncharted 3 and Killzone 3 winning awards for their multiplayer modes.

PS Magiazine and some other publications gave them awards. And in my award list that's how it goes, Killzone 3 followed by UC3 for MP.

Still doesn't change the fact that UC is amazing both online and offline, Gears is only good for online and a one time SP experience. You playing it more than once is an isolated case. I played it once and never wanted to touch it again, it's all about the MP.

The fact that you included HD remasters and think Uncharted 1 is a good single player exclusive while laughing at Fable (which I agree is meh but besides the point) invalidates me to take your position seriously.

[QUOTE="StatusShuffle"]What do you define as "fame"? All the game was is a big tunnel of hype train, most people think M64 or MK or something else before they think of OoT. Also what "Fame" did it put foruth on gaming? You got to tell me what your words mean or I might end up not getting what you are trying to tell me, use complete sentences.Slashless

Pretty simple (I thought)

What PSX game still gets the amount of discussion, reference, acclaim, industry comparison, and all around monumental status OoT has.

Dodging the question two times in a row isn't helping. Just list a game. Can you?

What's the criteria for a game to be multiplayer focused, or singleplayer focused?Stevo_the_gamer

Multiplayer focused: Favours the PS3
Single Player focused: Favours the PS3

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]What's the criteria for a game to be multiplayer focused, or singleplayer focused?ActicEdge

Multiplayer focused: Favours the PS3
Single Player focused: Favours the PS3

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]What's the criteria for a game to be multiplayer focused, or singleplayer focused?Stevo_the_gamer

Multiplayer focused: Favours the PS3
Single Player focused: Favours the PS3

Don't be mad just because you support the inferior console :|

Don't be mad just because you support the inferior console :|

ActicEdge

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

Don't be mad just because you support the inferior console :|

Stevo_the_gamer

Fuucck you if you disagree lemming. If it doesn't favour the PS3 its not a valid option end of story.

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

Don't be mad just because you support the inferior console :|

ActicEdge

Fuucck you if you disagree lemming. If it doesn't favour the PS3 its not a valid option end of story.

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

Don't be mad just because you support the inferior console :|

ActicEdge

Fuucck you if you disagree lemming. If it doesn't favour the PS3 its not a valid option end of story.

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="4dr1el"]

Its "ripoff" or "rip-off" not rip off

source

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ripoff

:P

And Indiana Jones is a ripoff of various adventure novels and Lawrence of Arabia.

4dr1el

Nah, you're just feeling humiliated because you fellin your own trap.

At least I know how to speak your language (you're going to say I dont but the fact thatyou're understanding all my replies says alot). I'm pretty sure you dont know how to speak mine. And I find itironic thatan American is calling another person illiteratewhen the majority of Americans are dumb as sh1t.

Edits in bold.