PS3 hardcore VS xbox 360 hardcore games

Either way,Wii wins.

Michael0134567

clap clap i applaud u sir....e.... with a lots of lulz

.

ebrezzy1

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I don't honestly think you have played UC because you think it's similar to Gears. I'm not calling you a liar or anything, but I'm not sure where you got this idea from. How does THIS Remind you of Gears? How does it feel like Gears? That statement makes no sense.

I don't care if you like Xbox more, I don't care if Loosingends or anyone else thinks PS3 is bad or it's games are "rubbish" as you Brits say, it doesn't bother me at all.

You and him have a different opinion, why would I care about wether or not you two like PS3 or not? He can legitmently hate PS3, it doensn't effect my enjoyment of the system at all.

You shouldn't let it bother you either when someone doesn't favor 360.

ShadowMoses900

The cover systems are even different you know, Gears is faster paced, UC is slower paced, I wouldn't say Gears has a better one nesseccarily, but it's handled differently. But I'm an UC fanboy, I admit it, so of course I'm going to think UC is the best. I still don't see how you can compare the two games though, it's not "the closest", it's just not similar at all.

It's Uncharted vs nothing, because there is nothing on 360 like it, Tomb Raider you might be able to compare to UC as it does look pretty similar to it, certainly you won't compare Tomb Raider to Gears now would you? No because that would be silly. Same goes with comparing Gears to UC, it just doesn't make sense. PS3 doesn't really offer any strict TPS that I can think of off hand like Gears, so its Gears vs nothing. Well maybe Army of Two, but that game is only so-so IMO.

LoosingENDS is a troll, your in SW, it's full of them. Why do you come here then if you don't like trolls and fanboys?

Is it meloosingENDS

Wonderbook is hardcore?Badosh

.

Tikeio

^ Most appropriate response.

.

Tikeio

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

Either way,Wii wins.

themajormayor

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

Either way,Wii wins.

Michael0134567

consoles are for only casual gamers

I agree Loosing. I honestly have no idea how ps3 gamerd can be happy with the piss poor offering they have in 2012 comapred to 360 AAA exclusives. HAlo 4 alone destroys ps3 whole lineup, not to mention witcher 2 and forza etc...reach3

I agree Loosing. I honestly have no idea how ps3 gamerd can be happy with the piss poor offering they have in 2012 comapred to 360 AAA exclusives. HAlo 4 alone destroys ps3 whole lineup, not to mention witcher 2 and forza etc...reach3

Only blinded PS3 fanboys would not agree anyway

[QUOTE="reach3"]I agree Loosing. I honestly have no idea how ps3 gamerd can be happy with the piss poor offering they have in 2012 comapred to 360 AAA exclusives. HAlo 4 alone destroys ps3 whole lineup, not to mention witcher 2 and forza etc...loosingENDS

Only blinded PS3 fanboys would not agree anyway

hardcore ps3 exclusives.silversix_

:lol:

hardcore ps3 games, doesnt exist

yep 360 is filled with hardcore games like Halo, Forza, Gears and ermm uuhh hhhmmm other games available on PC & PS3 !!

ohh and there's Kinect with huge hardcore titles such as....... nevermind !!!

wow, 22 pages! You guys get trolled too easily.

Now tell me, who is the biggest troll between these 2:

wow, 22 pages! You guys get trolled too easily.

Now tell me, who is the biggest troll between these 2:

Gue1

^ 360 hardcore games

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="reach3"]I agree Loosing. I honestly have no idea how ps3 gamerd can be happy with the piss poor offering they have in 2012 comapred to 360 AAA exclusives. HAlo 4 alone destroys ps3 whole lineup, not to mention witcher 2 and forza etc...reach3

Only blinded PS3 fanboys would not agree anyway

Last of Us graphics are definatly terrible, it is because they now have a bit bigger scale than Uncharted 5 foot coriddors and PS3 hardware is too weak and the visual quality went down a huge lot from Uncharted

Also PS3 has no RPG like Witcher 2 or shooter like Halo 4 at all, not only this year, but in general

They just dont compete at all, it is boring

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Only blinded PS3 fanboys would not agree anyway

loosingENDS

Last of Us graphics are definatly terrible, it is because they now have a bit bigger scale than Uncharted 5 foot coriddors and PS3 hardware is too weak and the visual quality went down a huge lot from Uncharted

Also PS3 has no RPG like Witcher 2 or shooter like Halo 4 at all, not only this year, but in general

They just dont compete at all, it is boring

You really really need help.Witcher 2 is also on PC you keep forgetting that moron.Also I am calling you out on Something whats your PSN.Sure you didn't take a picture of a family members PS3 collection and calling it your own.

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] exactly. They are too busy hyping a half hour game and vaporware for 2013 :lol: They don't have any AAA exclusive to compete in 2012 with 360. Its quite sad. The Ps3's hardware looks ancient by comparison to 360's exclusives. The last of us (more 2013 vaporware) looks like trash. Compared to Witcher 2 Halo 4 etc...Promised_Trini

Last of Us graphics are definatly terrible, it is because they now have a bit bigger scale than Uncharted 5 foot coriddors and PS3 hardware is too weak and the visual quality went down a huge lot from Uncharted

Also PS3 has no RPG like Witcher 2 or shooter like Halo 4 at all, not only this year, but in general

They just dont compete at all, it is boring

You really really need help.Witcher 2 is also on PC you keep forgetting that moron.Also I am calling you out on Something whats your PSN.Sure you didn't take a picture of a family members PS3 collection and calling it your own.

LOL, i love how you now resort to personal insults to cover for the fact that PS3 does NOT have Witcher 2 and the only way to play it on consoles is xbox 360 !!!!!!

PS3 has nothing, that is the point and is a joke system with zero games to play

I dont see how that has anything to do with Witcher 2 beeing on PC

Keep up the desparate posts

COWS: "My POS3 is amaaaaaazing !!!, PC has Witcher 2 !!!!!!"

LOLOLOL

reach3 and loosingENDS are a disgusting bunch of guys...

reach3 and loosingENDS are a disgusting bunch of guys...

GamerwillzPS

And cows hiding behind PC are a laughable bunch of guys

[QUOTE="Promised_Trini"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Only blinded PS3 fanboys would not agree anyway

loosingENDS

Last of Us graphics are definatly terrible, it is because they now have a bit bigger scale than Uncharted 5 foot coriddors and PS3 hardware is too weak and the visual quality went down a huge lot from Uncharted

Also PS3 has no RPG like Witcher 2 or shooter like Halo 4 at all, not only this year, but in general

They just dont compete at all, it is boring

reach3 and loosingENDS are a disgusting bunch of guys...

GamerwillzPS

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

reach3 and loosingENDS are a disgusting bunch of guys...

reach3

Are you saying that Lens of Truth is wrong? Wow.

Dumb hardcore Xbox fanboys never get listened to.

Allstar Combat VS Gears Judgement

Wonderbook VS Fable Journey

LBP Karting VS Forza Horizon

Ni no Kuni VS Witcher 2

Nothing VS Halo 4

.

Is it me or PS3 is 10.000.000 times more kiddy and casual in its game lineup than xbox 360 ?

http://nexus404.com/Blog/2011/12/05/sony-targeting-ps3-at-casual-audiences-in-2012-sony-announces-plans-to-target-younger-gamers-families-with-ps3-in-2012/

"Sony Targeting PS3 At Casual Audiences "

loosingENDS

You forgot Demon Souls, which by itself is more hardcore then all 360 games in existance...

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Allstar Combat VS Gears Judgement

Wonderbook VS Fable Journey

LBP Karting VS Forza Horizon

Ni no Kuni VS Witcher 2

Nothing VS Halo 4

.

Is it me or PS3 is 10.000.000 times more kiddy and casual in its game lineup than xbox 360 ?

http://nexus404.com/Blog/2011/12/05/sony-targeting-ps3-at-casual-audiences-in-2012-sony-announces-plans-to-target-younger-gamers-families-with-ps3-in-2012/

"Sony Targeting PS3 At Casual Audiences "

tenaka2

You forgot Demon Souls, which by itself is more hardcore then all 360 games in existance...

Demons Souls is not a 2012 game and Dark SOuls is 10.000.000.000 times more hardcore, better and bigger

And looks and plays best on 360, as usual

.

Tikeio

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

You forgot Demon Souls, which by itself is more hardcore then all 360 games in existance...

loosingENDS

Demons Souls is not a 2012 game and Dark SOuls is 10.000.000.000 times more hardcore, better and bigger

And looks and plays best on 360, as usual

Good to see you back on form after the Steel Battalion mega flop, did keep you quiet for a while though. Let me remind you again.

I expect 9-9.5/10 for Ryse, Fable Journey, Project Draco, Steel Batallion and 8-9/10 for Star Wars, Haunt, Codename D

loosingENDS

Oh my god,the fanboys.

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="reach3"]I agree Loosing. I honestly have no idea how ps3 gamerd can be happy with the piss poor offering they have in 2012 comapred to 360 AAA exclusives. HAlo 4 alone destroys ps3 whole lineup, not to mention witcher 2 and forza etc...reach3

Only blinded PS3 fanboys would not agree anyway

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Only blinded PS3 fanboys would not agree anyway

parkurtommo

[QUOTE="parkurtommo"][QUOTE="reach3"] exactly. They are too busy hyping a half hour game and vaporware for 2013 :lol: They don't have any AAA exclusive to compete in 2012 with 360. Its quite sad. The Ps3's hardware looks ancient by comparison to 360's exclusives. The last of us (more 2013 vaporware) looks like trash. Compared to Witcher 2 Halo 4 etc...reach3

Indeed, but i love that they think we are the same person, shows how desparate they are to believe their own fantasies that somehow not two people on the planet can possibly like xbox 360 more than the POS3, the Waitstation !!!

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="parkurtommo"] Reach 3 is Loosey confirmed.parkurtommo

Sure, only one person on the planet has and likes his 360 and has two accounts here

Makes sense

LOL

[QUOTE="reach3"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

reach3 and loosingENDS are a disgusting bunch of guys...

GamerwillzPS

Are you saying that Lens of Truth is wrong? Wow.

Dumb hardcore Xbox fanboys never get listened to.

^ 360 hardcore games

KiZZo1

Well,it is hardcore,can't argue with that :lol:

This thread takes mind bending to a whole new level. Where Are the spidey pics btw?danish-death

Keep going :)

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="reach3"] Says the guy who said Battlefield 3 looks better on ps3 LOLdelta3074

Are you saying that Lens of Truth is wrong? Wow.

Dumb hardcore Xbox fanboys never get listened to.

Battlefield 3 looks better on PS3 and it ironically has less jaggies because of the MLAA implementation which was what reach3 was complaining about on his other thread.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-face-off-battlefield-3?page=2

"Flashlights beamed into the player's face have some tremendous banding issues on the Xbox 360, giving a noticeably pixelised look that is absent on both the PC and PlayStation 3 versions of the game."

"In previous DICE titles, we've seen the Xbox 360 outperform the PlayStation 3 versions: not to any degree that would impact a purchasing decision, but certainly in a noticeable manner. However, it's clear from the developer's GDC and SIGGRAPH presentations that embracing the many-core architecture of the consoles and mastering the PS3's Cell SPUs in particular has been a priority for the Frostbite 2 tech team and with the new engine we see a much stronger approach in utilising the Sony platform's satellite processors for graphics-intensive work."

"clearly perform better on the PlayStation 3 - as good a sign as any that DICE has aggressively optimised for the strengths of each platform."

"PlayStation 3 implements MLAA - a technology that actively seeks out jaggies and applies smoothing where appropriate. DICE hasn't confirmed what's being used on Xbox 360, but it certainly looks very much like NVIDIA's FXAA - an intelligent blur to all intents and purposes, that doesn't have the same edge-smoothing prowess as MLAA"

reach3 getting owned since when he was born! :lol:

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Are you saying that Lens of Truth is wrong? Wow.

Dumb hardcore Xbox fanboys never get listened to.

Gue1

Battlefield 3 looks better on PS3 and it ironically has less jaggies because of the MLAA implementation which was what reach3 was complaining about on his other thread.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-face-off-battlefield-3?page=2

"Flashlights beamed into the player's face have some tremendous banding issues on the Xbox 360, giving a noticeably pixelised look that is absent on both the PC and PlayStation 3 versions of the game."

"In previous DICE titles, we've seen the Xbox 360 outperform the PlayStation 3 versions: not to any degree that would impact a purchasing decision, but certainly in a noticeable manner. However, it's clear from the developer's GDC and SIGGRAPH presentations that embracing the many-core architecture of the consoles and mastering the PS3's Cell SPUs in particular has been a priority for the Frostbite 2 tech team and with the new engine we see a much stronger approach in utilising the Sony platform's satellite processors for graphics-intensive work."

"clearly perform better on the PlayStation 3 - as good a sign as any that DICE has aggressively optimised for the strengths of each platform."

"PlayStation 3 implements MLAA - a technology that actively seeks out jaggies and applies smoothing where appropriate. DICE hasn't confirmed what's being used on Xbox 360, but it certainly looks very much like NVIDIA's FXAA - an intelligent blur to all intents and purposes, that doesn't have the same edge-smoothing prowess as MLAA"

reach3 getting owned since when he was born! :lol:

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Are you saying that Lens of Truth is wrong? Wow.

Dumb hardcore Xbox fanboys never get listened to.

Gue1

Battlefield 3 looks better on PS3 and it ironically has less jaggies because of the MLAA implementation which was what reach3 was complaining about on his other thread.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-face-off-battlefield-3?page=2

"Flashlights beamed into the player's face have some tremendous banding issues on the Xbox 360, giving a noticeably pixelised look that is absent on both the PC and PlayStation 3 versions of the game."

"In previous DICE titles, we've seen the Xbox 360 outperform the PlayStation 3 versions: not to any degree that would impact a purchasing decision, but certainly in a noticeable manner. However, it's clear from the developer's GDC and SIGGRAPH presentations that embracing the many-core architecture of the consoles and mastering the PS3's Cell SPUs in particular has been a priority for the Frostbite 2 tech team and with the new engine we see a much stronger approach in utilising the Sony platform's satellite processors for graphics-intensive work."

"clearly perform better on the PlayStation 3 - as good a sign as any that DICE has aggressively optimised for the strengths of each platform."

"PlayStation 3 implements MLAA - a technology that actively seeks out jaggies and applies smoothing where appropriate. DICE hasn't confirmed what's being used on Xbox 360, but it certainly looks very much like NVIDIA's FXAA - an intelligent blur to all intents and purposes, that doesn't have the same edge-smoothing prowess as MLAA"

reach3 getting owned since when he was born! :lol:

Funny, in the pics 360 looks way better, it totally destroys the PS3 version in both AA and shadows, shaders etc

Way to own them loosing :) Look at the shadows on his face, the belt around his chest, his hair, the cage in the back. 360 version is much better in every way.

reach3

I can't tell the difference they both look terrible.