PS3 has the better graphics than xbox

I agree, the PS3 does have better graphics than Xbox, the Xbox 360 is a different story.

Except it isn't the truth. KZ2 and UC do not look WAAAAAY better than GeOW2. At best, they look marginally better.It is not the truth to take relatively small differences and claim they are huge differences. Anyone that has both systems knows that the overall difference is marginal, with a slight edge to the PS3 exclusives. It isn't a big enough difference to make a purchasing decision either waySUD123456

[QUOTE="SUD123456"]Except it isn't the truth. KZ2 and UC do not look WAAAAAY better than GeOW2. At best, they look marginally better.It is not the truth to take relatively small differences and claim they are huge differences. Anyone that has both systems knows that the overall difference is marginal, with a slight edge to the PS3 exclusives. It isn't a big enough difference to make a purchasing decision either waydelta3074

Also, Dead space, and Mirrors edge. Also at one point the PS3 version of farcry 2 had like 17 devs on it verses the X360s four and for COD4 the PS3 got IWs best devs while the rest went to X360.

[QUOTE="SUD123456"]Except it isn't the truth. KZ2 and UC do not look WAAAAAY better than GeOW2. At best, they look marginally better.It is not the truth to take relatively small differences and claim they are huge differences. Anyone that has both systems knows that the overall difference is marginal, with a slight edge to the PS3 exclusives. It isn't a big enough difference to make a purchasing decision either waydelta3074

[QUOTE="Zilken989"]

Hey... I own an Xbox 360... and my fiancee owns a PlayStation 3. I must say that I've done some comparing for titles on both systems, such as Batman: Arkham Asylum, Bioshock, the F.E.A.R titles, Assassin's Creed and the SKATE games. I tested each system in two ways, one was with a regular Panasonic television, no HD or HDMI cords, just the three basic video and audio cables. Both systems looked fantastic, although the PS3 seemed to have a more 'muddy' look to its textures and general graphics, while the Xbox 360 seemed to have sharper images, although it didn't look as colourful. This stands true for all of the above titles. The second way was with a standard SONY HD television with all the correct High-Definition cables included. The results were remarkably the same, giving the Xbox much more crisp graphics, but with a lack of colour depth and colour-bit rates. This means that the Xbox 360 seemed to have a noticeable lack of colour changing, especially in dark games when someone fired a weapon or an explosion occured. The smoke looked odd against the black background. The PS3 had less-crisp textures, even when on an HDTV, although it gave more colours.

So it seems that the systems, to me, both have their ups-and-downs. The Xbox has more titles that are appealing to most gamers, while the PS3 has the potential of BLU-RAY quality products. The only question is, is which one do players prefer... I don't place either higher than the other, only that they both have issues of their own. This is also just my experience with the systems, so it's only an opinion based comment, here.

PAL360

This looks an umbiased post. I wonder why cows just dont accept that PS3 and 360 have about the same graphics capabilities :?

Liquid_DC,

What about games that have been developed for PS3 first, or games that have been ported from PS3 to 360? They'll still come out running & looking better on the 360. Sony bragged about games like Assassin's Creed & Virtua Fighter 5 can't be done on the 360, but they were proven wrong.

GT5 looks better than Forza 3 by far, so I agree with the title of this thread.

Liquid_DC,

What about games that have been developed for PS3 first, or games that have been ported from PS3 to 360? They'll still come out running & looking better on the 360. Sony bragged about games like Assassin's Creed & Virtua Fighter 5 can't be done on the 360, but they were proven wrong.

garland51

youre deffently right the ps3 has better graphics than the xbox and id hope so considering theres a 5 year age difference between them.

can't argue with the TC even though I'm an xbox fan.

I don't blame the xbox for not having as good graphics, its never had a game engine designed for it. When you look at all the Ps3 games you see all of them have 1st party engines made to take advantage of it. The 360 has none Halo 3 used a rev amped halo 2 engine, and multiplats have better graphics than the exclusive 360 games. people always fall back on Gears but the thing is- it uses an engine designed for all platforms not an engine utalizing every bit of the graphics card and CPU. all Ps3 exclusives do. I laugh when people say the 360 is near its limits they are truely clueless(not say ps3 is its still far from its limits as well) Sony has better looking games because it has 4 times as many 1st party devs and 3 time as much money as MS. the studio pushing the 360 forward is turn 10 and everyone thats human can hardly tell Forza from GT5 so the 360 has power loads of it and it can render on par with the Ps3. now all MS has to do is use better hardware. With that in the bag with the natal cam,constant improvemnt of live and games and the 360 would be flawless(in my opinion).

I don't blame the xbox for not having as good graphics, its never had a game engine designed for it. When you look at all the Ps3 games you see all of them have 1st party engines made to take advantage of it. The 360 has none Halo 3 used a rev amped halo 2 engine, and multiplats have better graphics than the exclusive 360 games. people always fall back on Gears but the thing is- it uses an engine designed for all platforms not an engine utalizing every bit of the graphics card and CPU. all Ps3 exclusives do. I laugh when people say the 360 is near its limits they are truely clueless(not say ps3 is its still far from its limits as well) Sony has better looking games because it has 4 times as many 1st party devs and 3 time as much money as MS. the studio pushing the 360 forward is turn 10 and everyone thats human can hardly tell Forza from GT5 so the 360 has power loads of it and it can render on par with the Ps3. now all MS has to do is use better hardware. With that in the bag with the natal cam,constant improvemnt of live and games and the 360 would be flawless(in my opinion).

mayceV

[QUOTE="mayceV"]

I don't blame the xbox for not having as good graphics, its never had a game engine designed for it. When you look at all the Ps3 games you see all of them have 1st party engines made to take advantage of it. The 360 has none Halo 3 used a rev amped halo 2 engine, and multiplats have better graphics than the exclusive 360 games. people always fall back on Gears but the thing is- it uses an engine designed for all platforms not an engine utalizing every bit of the graphics card and CPU. all Ps3 exclusives do. I laugh when people say the 360 is near its limits they are truely clueless(not say ps3 is its still far from its limits as well) Sony has better looking games because it has 4 times as many 1st party devs and 3 time as much money as MS. the studio pushing the 360 forward is turn 10 and everyone thats human can hardly tell Forza from GT5 so the 360 has power loads of it and it can render on par with the Ps3. now all MS has to do is use better hardware. With that in the bag with the natal cam,constant improvemnt of live and games and the 360 would be flawless(in my opinion).

Liquid_DC

GEOW 2 beats every thing until resently, lol.

Graphics aren't everything

[QUOTE="garland51"]

Liquid_DC,

What about games that have been developed for PS3 first, or games that have been ported from PS3 to 360? They'll still come out running & looking better on the 360. Sony bragged about games like Assassin's Creed & Virtua Fighter 5 can't be done on the 360, but they were proven wrong.

Liquid_DC

LOL, I just got to laugh. Look at Ghostbusters for example. It was first developed for PS3 first, & then it got ported over to 360, & look what happened. Plus who cares if VF 5 bombed on the 360, it came out to be running & looking better on the 360. I'm not just pulling things out of my dreams, look it up. Oblivion, the only reason it was better looking on the PS3 was because of extra development time.

certainly. the PS3 has much better graphics than the original xbox.

I used to think that xbox had the best graphics, but now that I have a ps3 and have played uncharted drake, I can say that xbox is behind the ps3 in the graphical department. Although Gears of War holds up pretty well, its just not on the same level. Even though this is true, xbox still has the better games, and only rabid sony fanboys will claim other wise.

blaznwiipspman1

just got my ps3 a few weeks ago and uncharted is one of the few games I have and I find the graphic crazy overrated here in SW, love the game but the 8 gamespot gave it was about right

Of course the PS3 has better graphics than the xbox, but better graphics than the 360....... hard to say, same stuff to me, and i don't like pixel counting

the ps3's 1080p exclusives have better graphics, obviously, but most of the games are just 720p upscaled, so they are the same as xbox. however, i did see a video saying that xbox's 1080p isnt as good as ps3, but it was from a massively biased source, so its not the most reliable piece of information.minxamo

1080p is 1080p

Assuming that both systems are pretty much equal and are outoputting the same quality realtime game graphics, the only difference in 1080p quality between two systems should be in Video playback, which the PS3 may be a bit better with because it is more of a stripped down HTPC than the 360 is

PS3 has better games. [spoiler] IMO [/spoiler] CakeBalls

no. I have both systems so my opinion >> ur biased opinion

man ps3 better then xbox?

of course, even wii has better graphics(well it has the ability if devs want to do it)

now the 360 on the other hand have the same in the graphics department

[QUOTE="Liquid_DC"]

[QUOTE="garland51"]

Liquid_DC,

What about games that have been developed for PS3 first, or games that have been ported from PS3 to 360? They'll still come out running & looking better on the 360. Sony bragged about games like Assassin's Creed & Virtua Fighter 5 can't be done on the 360, but they were proven wrong.

garland51

LOL, I just got to laugh. Look at Ghostbusters for example. It was first developed for PS3 first, & then it got ported over to 360, & look what happened. Plus who cares if VF 5 bombed on the 360, it came out to be running & looking better on the 360. I'm not just pulling things out of my dreams, look it up. Oblivion, the only reason it was better looking on the PS3 was because of extra development time.

if devs would actually use the ps3 in the right way you wouldnt see these crappy port like ghost buster(which was not lead platform on the ps3 in anyway, no matter what the devs said they lied)

NO MATTER WHAT ANYONE SAYS GHOST BUSTER WAS NOT BUILT FROM THE GROUND UP ON THE PS3 IN ANYWAY WHATS SO EVER! at least not the version that was shipped out. clearly the 360 was the original code.

ok and again the only reason vf5, has less jaggies(which is the only thing diffrent fromps3 and 360 version besides online play) is because of the 8 months extra they had to polish the game. ghost busters does not look ike killzone 2, nore does ac, so how the heck can u use thouse games to say ps3 is inferior? kz2 and uc, uc2 look better than everything on the 360 CASE CLOSED!

[QUOTE="garland51"]

[QUOTE="Liquid_DC"] FAIL! AC was only talked about during sony conference in 06, because activision figured the hype of the ps3 would help there game get attetion, the also used that ugly chick to get attention too. and guess what..............it worked. a broken game like ac went on to sell over 1 million for no reason but advertising, the game is and will forever be PURE CRAP! Also do u not remember that ac was shown in closed doors at e3 06....and do u remember what people where saying who attended e3.....that even thoigh it was touted as a ps3 exclusive, the game was being played and show on the 360............there for showing that the game was built from the 360 ground up and ported to the ps3. wit VF5 the game came out almost 8 months after the ps3 version was done. so they took the ps3 version and in that 8 months they polished the game up some more, and even added online play....and yet the game stil bombed on the 360. remember what appen with Oblivion on ps3, the textures looked WAAAAY beter on the ps3, because of the extra time, from a dev that didnt bs on the port. Vf5 was never a game that showed off the ps3 tech. Sony never ever said that AC and VF5 could never be done on any other system, ur just pulling stuff out of ur dreams. show me a link or it never happened. till this day, there is no game on the 360 that even comes close to UC1, dont even bring up kz2 in here.

Liquid_DC

LOL, I just got to laugh. Look at Ghostbusters for example. It was first developed for PS3 first, & then it got ported over to 360, & look what happened. Plus who cares if VF 5 bombed on the 360, it came out to be running & looking better on the 360. I'm not just pulling things out of my dreams, look it up. Oblivion, the only reason it was better looking on the PS3 was because of extra development time.

No GEOW looks better than UC and KZ2/UC edge it out that is like me saying because the GEOW 2 looks better than everything on the PS3(back in 08) that the 360 is more powerful. VF5 also has a higher res on the X360 version.

ok nevermidn i see u guys r josyt joking in this thread...I mean there are people in here atually saying that geow looks better than kz2 and uc? wow, i no this is a joke thread now. im upLiquid_DC

UC 1.... not KZ2/UC2.

Look at KZ2, MGS4, Uncharted 2 (and 1) no 360 games have better graphics than them. So Ya. But PC wins.chapnzaba

Yes X360>>MGS4 and UC1. and KZ2 barely edges out.

I've known this for a long time now.

[QUOTE="djsifer01"]I agree with you TC, except for the Games part. I dont know how any fan of good games can say the 360 has better games at this point and time. GOW1&2 in HD with trophies FTW!clone01

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="djsifer01"]I agree with you TC, except for the Games part. I dont know how any fan of good games can say the 360 has better games at this point and time. GOW1&2 in HD with trophies FTW!beekayjay

there are some games that easily could pass as CGI. but its mostly due to visuals and not all due to the graphics.

I don't blame the xbox for not having as good graphics, its never had a game engine designed for it. When you look at all the Ps3 games you see all of them have 1st party engines made to take advantage of it. The 360 has none Halo 3 used a rev amped halo 2 engine, and multiplats have better graphics than the exclusive 360 games. people always fall back on Gears but the thing is- it uses an engine designed for all platforms not an engine utalizing every bit of the graphics card and CPU. all Ps3 exclusives do. I laugh when people say the 360 is near its limits they are truely clueless(not say ps3 is its still far from its limits as well) Sony has better looking games because it has 4 times as many 1st party devs and 3 time as much money as MS. the studio pushing the 360 forward is turn 10 and everyone thats human can hardly tell Forza from GT5 so the 360 has power loads of it and it can render on par with the Ps3. now all MS has to do is use better hardware. With that in the bag with the natal cam,constant improvemnt of live and games and the 360 would be flawless(in my opinion).

You can pretty much tell exactly what people are going to say just by looking at their avatar...pretty amusing. For one thing which graphics look better is purely subjective. I could say UNO on live arcade has the best graphics, and I wouldn't be wrong, because that would be my opinion. If comparing the games on a TECHNICAL level however, I know that a lot of 360 games use AA and hdr in situations that the ps3 simply cannot. KZ2 doesn't even use real AA from what I've read.