data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55107/55107665916bfded62d18963afe43a0f6e164a54" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33535/335359a567daf796f09095912c4a0aaea0c25745" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50656/506569a744f0785ebeedee731590f7fa12ab4f3d" alt=""
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="flood"][QUOTE="heretrix"][QUOTE="trasherhead"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]well what would you rather have
Slightly improved Graphics......or Nights of the Nine AND Shivering Isles
heretrix
And the PS3 doesn't get the Horse Armor......Pwned!
LOL.
http://ps3.qj.net/Bethesda-PS3-technical-limitations/pg/49/aid/81701
Next time you decide to call someone a liar, use google. It will prevent you from looking like a clown.
"In fact, according to a show from 1up.com, Bethesda claimed that unlike the PC and 360 versions, there won't be much of anything, including horse armor. 1up had a few words with Bethesda. While they're hard at work to bring Oblivion out this 2007, they had a few gripes with the PS3. Bethesda had this to say:
It's a technical limitation. They just don't have enough memory to load every piece of downloadable content. They tried it, did some work-arounds, but the performance isn't there. They hope to have some, but they're going to have some, but they're going to have to pick and choose..."
too bad you cant read either. the bethesda rep didnt claim the memory was the issue, he claimed the DL content wont be there intially. the author of the blog you used for your info is the one who made the infferrence about memory. it was a huge assumption on his part, and a mistake on yours for using it to form an opinion. in the future try not to quote blogs, as they are usually wrongwell what would you rather have
Slightly improved Graphics......or Nights of the Nine AND Shivering Isles
hockeyruler12
Free knights of gthe nine and bettr graphics.
[QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]well what would you rather have
Slightly improved Graphics......or Nights of the Nine AND Shivering Isles
XaosII
Why compromise when you can get both on the PC version...
Then why did it score better on the 360?OhhSnap50893Downloadable content. But if you are talking which one is more graphically appealing, straight from the GameSpot review: "The graphics are slightly better, the load times are shorter, and there is a bit of new content in the form of the Knights of the Nine add-on, which is available as a separate purchase on other platforms"
[QUOTE="OhhSnap50893"]Then why did it score better on the 360?2largeadultsDownloadable content. Making it better on the 360.
hey im sorry man, but your claims are just pure lies.
bethesda has stated as a fact, that the reason they havent realeased content for oblivion on the PS3 is they havent woprked out how to use the PSn yet. no ram issues...i dont know where you pulled that fibb from.......
i loved the 360 version immensely....and yet it didnt have any DL content weel into its first year...unless you count horse armor.
so for the Ps3 version to have knights of the nine in the box, is actually very cool.
im playing the PS3 version now, and yes it has some graphical fidelities that do set it a bit above the 360 version...im sure dev time has the most to do with that. now while this may erk 360 owners.....lying is no way to react. flood
http://ps3.qj.net/Bethesda-PS3-technical-limitations/pg/49/aid/81701
Next time you decide to call someone a liar, use google. It will prevent you from looking like a clown.
"In fact, according to a show from 1up.com, Bethesda claimed that unlike the PC and 360 versions, there won't be much of anything, including horse armor. 1up had a few words with Bethesda. While they're hard at work to bring Oblivion out this 2007, they had a few gripes with the PS3. Bethesda had this to say:
It's a technical limitation. They just don't have enough memory to load every piece of downloadable content. They tried it, did some work-arounds, but the performance isn't there. They hope to have some, but they're going to have some, but they're going to have to pick and choose..."
Nice try. You called me a liar, which was inferring that I had made what I said up. It doesn't matter if it was correct or not, I proved that I didn't make it up. Like I said google before you accuse someone a liar. Also I CLEARLY said I was paraphrasing, which anybody with a half a brain would know not to take as 100 percent accurate. So as it stands you were still completely off base by calling me a liar. Call me wrong anytime you want, but a liar? Who the hell are you or anybody else here for me to lie to?
too bad you cant read either.
the bethesda rep didnt claim the memory was the issue, he claimed the DL content wont be there intially. the author of the blog you used for your info is the one who made the infferrence about memory.
it was a huge assumption on his part, and a mistake on yours for using it to form an opinion.
in the future try not to quote blogs, as they are usually wrongflood
Fact: cows are so desparate that they need to resort to taking pride in the fact that a game released a half a year after the 360 version has slightly better graphics...
well done.
[QUOTE="Truth_Hurts_U"]You just proved how bad they PS3 version looks. No HDR makes that game look like crap.mrboo15
:roll:
Here you go again, talking crap with nothing to back it up other then your own words from your deluded head, quite sad really.
HDR is a BIG part of Oblivion and if it was missing from the PS3,
it would of mensioned in reviews all over the place but the only thing we have heard about missing HDR is from Lemmings deluded heads.
a year for oblivion to come on the ps3 and it looks better what do u expect ???? Of course its going to look better. But what would do want. wait for an extra year for a better looking verison about 5% better looking (WOW LOOK AT THE RED SHIRT ITS SHARPER) or play a turly awsome game and be done with ???
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment