PS3 haters owned ( Oblivion related )

  • 70 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#51 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18123 Posts
So much better on PC. Look at the colors, the sharpness, the lights in the windows... If image quality was the only thing this game had going for it the PC would be the only system worth playing it on. There's so much more to this game than image quality. If the texture of floors and the depth of the kings shirt sways you one way or the other with this game, then that's sad. If you want superior image quality get a PC. If you want to play the game, get your console or PC of choice and freaking play. It don't matter. Edit: Full res bitmaps (I've brightened all the pics up because my gamma is lower than most): ob0ob1Horses
Avatar image for flood
flood

1470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 flood
Member since 2002 • 1470 Posts
[QUOTE="flood"][QUOTE="heretrix"][QUOTE="trasherhead"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

well what would you rather have

Slightly improved Graphics......or Nights of the Nine AND Shivering Isles

heretrix


isn't nights of the nine in the ps3 version? im pretty sure it is. shivering isles will be downloadble in time.
anyway, stop bringing this up. its not ownage and you just make everyone that likes the ps3 look bad.

Knights of the Nine comes with the PS3 version and there has been no date set for Shivering Isles. But the developers did say that  they were having a problem figuring out how putting Shivering Isles on the PS3 would work. They said it was an issue with the ram or something limiting they way SI could be DL to the PS3. I'm paraphrasing here BTW and I'm sure they can figure something out.....Also missing is a few DL quests that they put out sometime last year...

And the PS3 doesn't get the Horse Armor......Pwned!

LOL.



hey im sorry man, but your claims are just pure lies.

bethesda has stated as a fact, that the reason they havent realeased content for oblivion on the PS3 is they havent woprked out how to use the PSn yet. no ram issues...i dont know where you pulled that fibb from.......

i loved the 360 version immensely....and yet it didnt have any DL content weel into its first year...unless you count horse armor.
so for the Ps3 version to have knights of the nine in the box, is actually very cool.

im playing the PS3 version now, and yes it has some graphical fidelities that do set it a bit above the 360 version...im sure dev time has the most to do with that. now while this may erk 360 owners.....lying is no way to react.

http://ps3.qj.net/Bethesda-PS3-technical-limitations/pg/49/aid/81701

Next time you decide to call someone a liar, use google. It will prevent you from looking like a clown.

"In fact, according to a show from 1up.com, Bethesda claimed that unlike the PC and 360 versions, there won't be much of anything, including horse armor. 1up had a few words with Bethesda. While they're hard at work to bring Oblivion out this 2007, they had a few gripes with the PS3. Bethesda had this to say:

It's a technical limitation. They just don't have enough memory to load every piece of downloadable content. They tried it, did some work-arounds, but the performance isn't there. They hope to have some, but they're going to have some, but they're going to have to pick and choose..."

too bad you cant read either. the bethesda rep didnt claim the memory was the issue, he claimed the DL content wont be there intially. the author of the blog you used for your info is the one who made the infferrence about memory. it was a huge assumption on his part, and a mistake on yours for using it to form an opinion. in the future try not to quote blogs, as they are usually wrong
Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#53 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts
tiny differences that only a complete fanboy would even bother argueing about...i'd take a game that lasts a lot longer over a game that hardleys looks any better thank you!!!!
Avatar image for ddldave
ddldave

886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 ddldave
Member since 2006 • 886 Posts
don't be mad the ps3 version is better, is that all lemings can say? "but but but the ps3 has an extra year in development!" boohoo, watch the next game where the ps3 will look better they'll say the same thing. quit crying, you're in denial, one thing showing that you're a 360 fanboy
Avatar image for Haseokicksass
Haseokicksass

4604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#55 Haseokicksass
Member since 2006 • 4604 Posts

well what would you rather have

Slightly improved Graphics......or Nights of the Nine AND Shivering Isles 

hockeyruler12

 

Free knights of gthe nine and bettr graphics.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#56 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
[QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

well what would you rather have

Slightly improved Graphics......or Nights of the Nine AND Shivering Isles

XaosII

Why compromise when you can get both on the PC version...



With Qarl's texture mod and 2048x2048 LOD textures.
Avatar image for OhhSnap50893
OhhSnap50893

27110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#57 OhhSnap50893
Member since 2006 • 27110 Posts
Then why did it score better on the 360?
Avatar image for 2largeadults
2largeadults

1608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 2largeadults
Member since 2007 • 1608 Posts
Then why did it score better on the 360?OhhSnap50893
Downloadable content. But if you are talking which one is more graphically appealing, straight from the GameSpot review: "The graphics are slightly better, the load times are shorter, and there is a bit of new content in the form of the Knights of the Nine add-on, which is available as a separate purchase on other platforms"
Avatar image for OhhSnap50893
OhhSnap50893

27110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#59 OhhSnap50893
Member since 2006 • 27110 Posts
[QUOTE="OhhSnap50893"]Then why did it score better on the 360?2largeadults
Downloadable content.

Making it better on the 360.
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#60 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts
hey im sorry man, but your claims are just pure lies.

bethesda has stated as a fact, that the reason they havent realeased content for oblivion on the PS3 is they havent woprked out how to use the PSn yet. no ram issues...i dont know where you pulled that fibb from.......

i loved the 360 version immensely....and yet it didnt have any DL content weel into its first year...unless you count horse armor.
so for the Ps3 version to have knights of the nine in the box, is actually very cool.

im playing the PS3 version now, and yes it has some graphical fidelities that do set it a bit above the 360 version...im sure dev time has the most to do with that. now while this may erk 360 owners.....lying is no way to react. flood

http://ps3.qj.net/Bethesda-PS3-technical-limitations/pg/49/aid/81701

Next time you decide to call someone a liar, use google. It will prevent you from looking like a clown.

"In fact, according to a show from 1up.com, Bethesda claimed that unlike the PC and 360 versions, there won't be much of anything, including horse armor. 1up had a few words with Bethesda. While they're hard at work to bring Oblivion out this 2007, they had a few gripes with the PS3. Bethesda had this to say:

It's a technical limitation. They just don't have enough memory to load every piece of downloadable content. They tried it, did some work-arounds, but the performance isn't there. They hope to have some, but they're going to have some, but they're going to have to pick and choose..."



too bad you cant read either.

the bethesda rep didnt claim the memory was the issue, he claimed the DL content wont be there intially. the author of the blog you used for your info is the one who made the infferrence about memory.

it was a huge assumption on his part, and a mistake on yours for using it to form an opinion.

in the future try not to quote blogs, as they are usually wrongflood
Nice try. You called me a liar, which was inferring that I had made what I said up. It doesn't matter if it was correct or not, I proved that I didn't make it up. Like I said google before you accuse someone a liar. Also I CLEARLY said I was paraphrasing, which anybody with a half a brain would know not to take as 100 percent accurate. So as it stands you were still completely off base by calling me a liar. Call me wrong anytime you want, but a liar? Who the hell are you or anybody else here for me to lie to?

Avatar image for Fruity_Fantasy
Fruity_Fantasy

778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Fruity_Fantasy
Member since 2007 • 778 Posts
Cows have too much time on their hands if they have to make pointless threads like this. I wish MGS4 would come out or another FF game so they would be semi busy for a couple weeks.
Avatar image for Supafly1
Supafly1

4441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Supafly1
Member since 2003 • 4441 Posts
Sorry, but doesn't the PS3 use normal shadows and not soft shadows on characters? Just wanting to clear it up since in the video comparison you could clearly see the shadow difference between the two versions.
Avatar image for palaric8
palaric8

2246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 palaric8
Member since 2006 • 2246 Posts

well what would you rather have

Slightly improved Graphics......or Nights of the Nine AND Shivering Isles 

hockeyruler12
im a lemming btw,but the expansion is coming out for the ps3 too ,later of course.
Avatar image for bezaire2005
bezaire2005

3635

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 bezaire2005
Member since 2005 • 3635 Posts

Fact: cows are so desparate that they need to resort to taking pride in the fact that a game released a half a year after the 360 version has slightly better graphics...

well done.

Avatar image for palaric8
palaric8

2246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 palaric8
Member since 2006 • 2246 Posts

Fact: cows are so desparate that they need to resort to taking pride in the fact that a game released a half a year after the 360 version has slightly better graphics...

well done.

bezaire2005
lemmings get even lower.
Avatar image for Beba_FH
Beba_FH

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Beba_FH
Member since 2006 • 118 Posts

A year of extra development time. :lol:

Cows must be pretty desperate if this is lemming ownage. Ninja-Vox

Tell me how long the 360 version was in development now?

Avatar image for Beba_FH
Beba_FH

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Beba_FH
Member since 2006 • 118 Posts

Sorry, but doesn't the PS3 use normal shadows and not soft shadows on characters? Just wanting to clear it up since in the video comparison you could clearly see the shadow difference between the two versions.Supafly1

what video were you watching

Avatar image for Virus214
Virus214

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Virus214
Member since 2007 • 2052 Posts
it's so sad this is what gaming has become. You guys compare graphics...of the same freakin game. And its not even like HUGE details, its like "LOL LOOK HOW NICER HIS SHIRT IS". Its so pathetic.mtcoola
i second that
Avatar image for bindip
bindip

2585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#69 bindip
Member since 2005 • 2585 Posts

[QUOTE="Truth_Hurts_U"]You just proved how bad they PS3 version looks. No HDR makes that game look like crap.mrboo15

 

:roll:

Here you go again, talking crap with nothing to back it up other then your own words from your deluded head, quite sad really.

HDR is a BIG part of Oblivion and if it was missing from the PS3, 

it would of mensioned in reviews all over the place but the only thing we have heard about missing HDR is from Lemmings deluded heads. 

a year for oblivion to come on the ps3 and it looks better what do u expect ???? Of course its going to look better. But what would do want. wait for an extra year for a better looking verison about 5% better looking (WOW LOOK AT THE RED SHIRT ITS SHARPER) or play a turly awsome game and be done with ???

Avatar image for Aerosmith_Lova
Aerosmith_Lova

684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#70 Aerosmith_Lova
Member since 2006 • 684 Posts
Well they've had an extra year to work on it, if oblivion on ps3 would be worse, that would be sad