PS3 online is weak(er)?

  • 88 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Respawn-d
Respawn-d

2936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Respawn-d
Member since 2010 • 2936 Posts
Its just the lems trying to justify what they pay every monthKevinButlerVP
pretty much this
Avatar image for Respawn-d
Respawn-d

2936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Respawn-d
Member since 2010 • 2936 Posts

not enough ppl know what network address translation is.

Avatar image for Respawn-d
Respawn-d

2936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Respawn-d
Member since 2010 • 2936 Posts

[QUOTE="shadow8585"]

[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"]Its just the lems trying to justify what they pay every monthTrapMuzik92

Once a YEAR, me and 25 million other XBL members gladly shell out $50. No justification is needed. We got the COD maps way before you right? I talk to my friends while im gaming no matter what we're playing. My online network is integrated into my console and all my games. My downloads are at least twice as fast. The level of competition on XBL is a higher standard than PSN. My netflix has never stopped mid-movie to buffer. XBL is leading the way. Ill give PSN credit, theyre only about a year behind, but they will always be that 1 year behind for the foreseeable future. Ya we pay, but its not even an inconvenience as its automatically charged to my card. ill gladly take my girlfriend out one less night per year to enjoy a better service year round

Edit: spelling

u tell him

Where do you get this 2x download speed from.?

Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#54 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts

Everyone knows that playstation network died right after PC gaming died. :lol:

Okay, serious now.:

PSn has decent speed (downloading of updates could be a bit faster, but eh, you can't get everything, can you? ). In terms of lag, it depends on the game. On Call of Duty 4 for PS3, I lagged a lot. But I lagged the same amount when I played on the 360. Whereas Killzone 2, I pretty much never lag. It all depends on the netcode.

Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#55 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts

[QUOTE="TrapMuzik92"][QUOTE="shadow8585"] Once a YEAR, me and 25 million other XBL members gladly shell out $50. No justification is needed. We got the COD maps way before you right? I talk to my friends while im gaming no matter what we're playing. My online network is integrated into my console and all my games. My downloads are at least twice as fast. The level of competition on XBL is a higher standard than PSN. My netflix has never stopped mid-movie to buffer. XBL is leading the way. Ill give PSN credit, theyre only about a year behind, but they will always be that 1 year behind for the foreseeable future. Ya we pay, but its not even an inconvenience as its automatically charged to my card. ill gladly take my girlfriend out one less night per year to enjoy a better service year round

Edit: spelling

Respawn-d

u tell him

Where do you get this 2x download speed from.?

Probably pulled it out of his a......active and functioning brain. :)
Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#56 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts

[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"]Its just the lems trying to justify what they pay every monthRespawn-d
pretty much this

Seriously now?

You need to understand that PSn was trash, and I mean dog **** from when PS3 launched until Summer 2008 (or whenever the 2.4 update released). Seriously, I couldn't even reply to a message (or even read it for that matter) or add a friend, when in game, unless it was a game in the select few category, like Resistance.

That is why you see lemmings trash on PSN. Right now? Yes, it's fanboyism, but XBL is still superior to PSN. Just not as much as lemmings make it to be.

If you doubt this, then look at cows whenever XBL features are rumored to come to PS3. Without those features, cows claim "it's okay... we don't need cross game chat. not worth $50 a year..." And when it's rumored for PS3 (wasn't it supposed to be included in the most recent update? or was it the one before that? I lost track), you see cows jumping in with "lawl we got cross game chat. it matters now!"

Avatar image for RavenLoud
RavenLoud

2874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 RavenLoud
Member since 2009 • 2874 Posts

[QUOTE="Strider_91"]PS3 fanboys moan about the price of XBL that is all.. Xbox fanboys moan about a lot of the features in comparison... Probably something to do with that. Persistantthug

I admit to having a bias that favors the PS3....but the PRICE of XBOX LIVE isn't what I abhor....it's having to pay at all.

It makes absolutely no sense to me at all. I paid $60 for BATTLEFIELD BAD COMPANY 2 primarilly for the MULTIPLAYER....Dice put that feature in to work by default. Why do I have to pay again? Why?

XBOX LIVE is a rip off and I will never buy a subscription to play random games online....never, and it isn't price, its general principle.

I agree with this. However, if it becomes 1 cent per day or something maybe I'll just suck it up :P Live is the superior service, but it's price is not justified. (IMO) I'll admit this: now that the RRoD has been largely reduced with the newer models, the ONLY thing that keeps me from buying a 360 is the aforementioned "principle". I simply do not support this uncanny P2P thing. If only people would stand up to it like PC gamers with G4WL. MS's strategy has been clear, make games cathered toward MP, release console earlier, roll people in, which will bring those people's friends in, and HEAVILY focus on online play. This creates a "magical" environment where you're almost addicted to it. No matter how many times your 360 RRoD, you will suck it up because all your friends have one, and you all paid for Live to play with each other with most of your games focusing on the online. Also, admit it or not, but the fact that Live is P2P makes people want to play their 360s more. They feel that they must get the worth out of their money. Now, I'm not sure that I support this general approach, but overall, MS did do a few good things. Good single player games are very abondant on the 360 too.
Avatar image for GeneralHawx
GeneralHawx

1853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#58 GeneralHawx
Member since 2009 • 1853 Posts

PSN is just slow when downloading demos and updates. It's a pain in the rear to watch a 350MB file take 15-20mins to download on PSN and they have to wait another 5-10 mins for it to install as well. With XBL, you can download the same file in about 10mins or less and it doesn't have to do an install. The PSN updates for the PS3 are even worse. I still haven't update my PS3 with the latest version, after all the problems it cause. I'm going to wait a few more weeks and then try it. I also like XBL interface system better then PSN as well. Does anyone still use HOME? What a waste of time.

XanderZane
not everyone takes a while to dl files my demos take less than 5 mins if it's under 350mb and the update took me approx 10 mins, its all about connection and speed my friend I get 6-9mbps
Avatar image for Grawse
Grawse

4342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 Grawse
Member since 2010 • 4342 Posts

My only problem with PSN is what happens to the people that buy the games? Not sure how many copies MAG has sold, but it has to be more than 10k that play at peak hours. Killzone 2 has been under 2k people for months. I know those aren't unique users but more people should be playing than that!

Avatar image for RavenLoud
RavenLoud

2874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 RavenLoud
Member since 2009 • 2874 Posts

My only problem with PSN is what happens to the people that buy the games? Not sure how many copies MAG has sold, but it has to be more than 10k that play at peak hours. Killzone 2 has been under 2k people for months. I know those aren't unique users but more people should be playing than that!

Grawse
Maybe it'll increases after the exams :wink: Anyway, my post included my belief that 360 users play more online because they feel that they must put that 40$/year to use in addition to a strong focus on multiplayer on 360 exclusives. MAG is becoming a niche thing with it's own community, now that most of the pros are all leveled up and rocking, it's becoming harder and harder for newcomers to make a place for themselves. That's usually what happens. Maybe if they could nerf SVER even more :P KZ2 online is awesome, but let's admit that the majority of the community left for BFBC2 or MW2 (even for UC2). There is just too much of a saturation in the FPS market, not to mention the fact that it requires great amount of skill to aim. This drove many people off at it's release. The community never really recovered from it.
Avatar image for wooooode
wooooode

16666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 wooooode
Member since 2002 • 16666 Posts
Live just has more features like party chat and such but for playing games they run almost identical.
Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#62 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts
I was on XBL a lot last-gen, good times. Now I'm on Silver because PSN is perfectly fine and free. If you like playing games online then its the sensible option of the two, unless you've simply got to have Halo multiplayer in your diet.
Avatar image for sireclaborn
sireclaborn

1305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 sireclaborn
Member since 2008 • 1305 Posts

[QUOTE="shadow8585"]

[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"]Its just the lems trying to justify what they pay every monthlafiro93

Once a YEAR, me and 25 million other XBL members gladly shell out $50. No justification is needed. We got the COD maps way before you right? I talk to my friends while im gaming no matter what we're playing. My online network is integrated into my console and all my games. My downloads are at least twice as fast. The level of competition on XBL is a higher standard than PSN. My netflix has never stopped mid-movie to buffer. XBL is leading the way. Ill give PSN credit, theyre only about a year behind, but they will always be that 1 year behind for the foreseeable future. Ya we pay, but its not even an inconvenience as its automatically charged to my card. ill gladly take my girlfriend out one less night per year to enjoy a better service year round

Edit: spelling

And there are so many more things we get early to, but all they can say is "i am not getting that"

Also its about 40$ a year and if you cant pay 40$ a year! then you need to get off your ass and get a job.

you both and the other 25 million can justify your answer all you want but the fact is. your paying for something everyone gets for free...why are u paying again? that cheap 40-50 can easily go to another game to add in your collection but your both too busy throwing cash as M$ (for no real reason) to see that.....
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
Microsoft have been doing online gaming Far, Far longer than SONY of course it's going to be faster and more streamlined, anybody that thinks SONY can Match in 5 minutes what MS has been perfecting for years is completely deluded, which, people seem to forget that MS created the first universal web browser, XBL may be a paid subscription, but it IS faster than PSN, it IS more streamlined than PSN and it DOES have more features than PSN, that makes XBL better to anyone with a reasonable amount of common sense, stuf you get free is never as good as the stuff you pay for, Period, you get what you pay for
Avatar image for Persistantthug
Persistantthug

1420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Persistantthug
Member since 2009 • 1420 Posts

Microsoft have been doing online gaming Far, Far longer than SONY of course it's going to be faster and more streamlined, anybody that thinks SONY can Match in 5 minutes what MS has been perfecting for years is completely deluded, which, people seem to forget that MS created the first universal web browser, XBL may be a paid subscription, but it IS faster than PSN, it IS more streamlined than PSN and it DOES have more features than PSN, that makes XBL better to anyone with a reasonable amount of common sense, stuf you get free is never as good as the stuff you pay for, Period, you get what you pay fordelta3074

There, I disagree with alot of your premise. Is XBL faster than PSN? Not with online GAMEPLAY it isn't....not when XBOX LIVE uses mostly P2P and much of PSN uses moreDedicated servers...so that "you get what you pay for" theory goes right out the window, because only SOME aspects of XBL are better than PSN...not all.

Overall, though, even though I'm a PS3 fan, I will give the edge to XBL, because I'm a reasonable person. Yes, XBL is SLIGHTLY better than PS3 because of a few extra features, but it isn't LIGHTYEARS better.

Btw...some of those extra XBL features like CROSS GAME CHAT, I find useless....mostly for teenage teeny boppers...but we'll save that for another time.

Avatar image for BURSTIIIFIRE
BURSTIIIFIRE

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 BURSTIIIFIRE
Member since 2007 • 2025 Posts

[QUOTE="delta3074"]Microsoft have been doing online gaming Far, Far longer than SONY of course it's going to be faster and more streamlined, anybody that thinks SONY can Match in 5 minutes what MS has been perfecting for years is completely deluded, which, people seem to forget that MS created the first universal web browser, XBL may be a paid subscription, but it IS faster than PSN, it IS more streamlined than PSN and it DOES have more features than PSN, that makes XBL better to anyone with a reasonable amount of common sense, stuf you get free is never as good as the stuff you pay for, Period, you get what you pay forPersistantthug

Btw...some of those extra XBL features like CROSS GAME CHAT, I find useless....mostly for teenage teeny boppers...but we'll save that for another time.

huh? only "teenage teeny boppers" like chatting? I am 19 and have some friends over 20 and we party chat all the time...it just seems like to me that you either have never tried XBL or have no friends which are gamers.

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#68 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

on the people saying PSN is slow on downloads what you forget to factor in is ISP's actually can drop your bandwidth allowances at peak times if they see fit.So everyone has share and decent speeds on the network.

Heck MGS 1 only took around 5min to download on my console but i did download it a bit later on at bout 9pm.Its not necessarily the PSN at fault in some cases but more the end users connection.

Avatar image for lucky_star
lucky_star

2307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 lucky_star
Member since 2003 • 2307 Posts
Its just the lems trying to justify what they pay every monthKevinButlerVP
This is pretty much what its all about. Good post sir. /THREAD
Avatar image for Sollet
Sollet

8287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#70 Sollet
Member since 2003 • 8287 Posts
Microsoft have been doing online gaming Far, Far longer than SONY of course it's going to be faster and more streamlined, anybody that thinks SONY can Match in 5 minutes what MS has been perfecting for years is completely deluded, which, people seem to forget that MS created the first universal web browser, XBL may be a paid subscription, but it IS faster than PSN, it IS more streamlined than PSN and it DOES have more features than PSN, that makes XBL better to anyone with a reasonable amount of common sense, stuf you get free is never as good as the stuff you pay for, Period, you get what you pay fordelta3074
MS did NOT create the first universal web browser. Mosaic was the first universal web browser available, 1993 however in 1995 MS bought it's source code for 2 million dollars and from there they modified it and Explorer was born.
Avatar image for jwsoul
jwsoul

5472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#71 jwsoul
Member since 2005 • 5472 Posts

PSN is just slow when downloading demos and updates. It's a pain in the rear to watch a 350MB file take 15-20mins to download on PSN and they have to wait another 5-10 mins for it to install as well. With XBL, you can download the same file in about 10mins or less and it doesn't have to do an install. The PSN updates for the PS3 are even worse. I still haven't update my PS3 with the latest version, after all the problems it cause. I'm going to wait a few more weeks and then try it. I also like XBL interface system better then PSN as well. Does anyone still use HOME? What a waste of time.

XanderZane
THIS is compltely true and is really why XBox Live is still slightly superiour then again you are paying for it arent you.
Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

[QUOTE="Zoso-8"]Sounds like a bunch of opinions to me. You could just as easily say that it's a bonus PS3 users don't have mics, because let's be honest...who wants to listen to a bunch of screaming XBL kids?mitu123

Or how about people who communicate in team based games, like Socom, Killzone 2, Uncharted 2, the list goes on.

And you think private chat is a plus when trying to play team based games? My buddy says on xbL its hard to do anything team based on BC2 now because of party chat, everyone is in their on little world and not communicating outside of their own little group. I would say there is more wrong with the use of party chat than there is right as far as a gaming community goes.
Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts
Microsoft have been doing online gaming Far, Far longer than SONY of course it's going to be faster and more streamlined, anybody that thinks SONY can Match in 5 minutes what MS has been perfecting for years is completely deluded, which, people seem to forget that MS created the first universal web browser, XBL may be a paid subscription, but it IS faster than PSN, it IS more streamlined than PSN and it DOES have more features than PSN, that makes XBL better to anyone with a reasonable amount of common sense, stuf you get free is never as good as the stuff you pay for, Period, you get what you pay fordelta3074
What the heck does a web browser got to do with online gaming? SOE has been doing online games on the pc for a long time aswell. Not only doing games online but also running MMO games online with huge amount of players so don't waste your time thinking Sony doesn't know what its doing as far as the gaming side goes. Maybe MS has interface down, but as far as straight online gaming performance, Sony holds its own.
Avatar image for T-razor1
T-razor1

1164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#74 T-razor1
Member since 2002 • 1164 Posts

My favorite thing to hear 360 fans say is that they can d'l a 2 gig game/demo/video in 5-10 min, but on ps3 it takes at least 24 hours.

:lol:

Pug-Nasty

Let me ask you something. Do you own a 360? Because if you did you would know this to be the truth instead of laughing and assuming that all 360 owners are delusional. Of course saying it takes 24 hours may be an exaggeration but you get the picture.I have an EXTREMELY fast connection with fiber optic verizon FIOS on a WIRED connection. Having a speedy connection like that makes downloading 2gig files over Xbox Live the rule NOT the exception. It's just amazing that with the same speedy connection when I download something on PSN it's as slow as a turtle moving in mud.

It's actually quite embarrassing for Sony because the difference is that bad. I can't tell you how many times I had to leave the PS3 while I waited for the download to finish to go do something else that by the time it finished downloading I was no longer interested in even playing on the PS3 anymore...NO JOKE. My day can get pretty busy once in a while so I don't have time for bulls***! It's the LITTLE THINGS like this that just adds up why I gladly pay the 3 bucks and change per month for LIVE and another reason why most of my gaming time is on the 360.

So please stop with this whole "it's your internet/network causing problems" because that's just insulting my intelligence.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

PSN is just slow when downloading demos and updates. It's a pain in the rear to watch a 350MB file take 15-20mins to download on PSN and they have to wait another 5-10 mins for it to install as well. With XBL, you can download the same file in about 10mins or less and it doesn't have to do an install. The PSN updates for the PS3 are even worse. I still haven't update my PS3 with the latest version, after all the problems it cause. I'm going to wait a few more weeks and then try it. I also like XBL interface system better then PSN as well. Does anyone still use HOME? What a waste of time.

XanderZane
yeah, i've never really figured that out. playing online on PSN works great, but for some reason, updates and downloads for me on the system are slooooow. don't know why. internet speed is great, both my 360 and PS3 are wired to the modem. otherwise, as far as just online play goes, they both do fine. i prefer the XBL interface and chat function, but that's just my preference.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"][QUOTE="mitu123"]

Sounds like a bunch of opinions to me. You could just as easily say that it's a bonus PS3 users don't have mics, because let's be honest...who wants to listen to a bunch of screaming XBL kids?Zoso-8
Or how about people who communicate in team based games, like Socom, Killzone 2, Uncharted 2, the list goes on.

And you think private chat is a plus when trying to play team based games? My buddy says on xbL its hard to do anything team based on BC2 now because of party chat, everyone is in their on little world and not communicating outside of their own little group. I would say there is more wrong with the use of party chat than there is right as far as a gaming community goes.

nah, i disagree. party chat is a great function to have. i find it questionable that you would criticize it, as you have no experience with XBL.
Avatar image for eyebrowless
eyebrowless

1344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#77 eyebrowless
Member since 2006 • 1344 Posts
xbox live just seems more reliable, and has a better interface imo
Avatar image for vincent380
vincent380

2244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#78 vincent380
Member since 2003 • 2244 Posts
Interface i will agree Live does look better . As for speeds i wouldnt know i dont have a 360, but i have seen the layout and i really do like it. It makes the PSN layout look very blah. As for downloads PSN can be slow sometimes when downloading certain things i will also admit that. other than that though PSN isnt that bad in general when playing online, plus its free cant go wrong with that.
Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#79 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

[QUOTE="Pug-Nasty"]

My favorite thing to hear 360 fans say is that they can d'l a 2 gig game/demo/video in 5-10 min, but on ps3 it takes at least 24 hours.

:lol:

T-razor1

Let me ask you something. Do you own a 360? Because if you did you would know this to be the truth instead of laughing and assuming that all 360 owners are delusional. Of course saying it takes 24 hours may be an exaggeration but you get the picture.I have an EXTREMELY fast connection with fiber optic verizon FIOS on a WIRED connection. Having a speedy connection like that makes downloading 2gig files over Xbox Live the rule NOT the exception. It's just amazing that with the same speedy connection when I download something on PSN it's as slow as a turtle moving in mud.

It's actually quite embarrassing for Sony because the difference is that bad. I can't tell you how many times I had to leave the PS3 while I waited for the download to finish to go do something else that by the time it finished downloading I was no longer interested in even playing on the PS3 anymore...NO JOKE. My day can get pretty busy once in a while so I don't have time for bulls***! It's the LITTLE THINGS like this that just adds up why I gladly pay the 3 bucks and change per month for LIVE and another reason why most of my gaming time is on the 360.

So please stop with this whole "it's your internet/network causing problems" because that's just insulting my intelligence.

Used to, sold it. Your FIOS connection is not the rule, but the exception. Most people don't have internet speeds that fast, or even available to them. I'm stuck with Road Runner, which sucks, until Verizon gets their butts out here.

I get really good speeds, considering my connection (which is about 15mbs/s) and can't complain. I've also DMZ'd my ps3, so there's no firewall crap blocking it. I had some issues with it before that, but after figuring that out everything was good.

From what I understand, wiring the connection (which I do) is supposed to make ports not matter, but I find that doesn't seem to be the case for me.

The fact is, the debate about which service is better will never be settled until one can provide more than the other (plus everything the other does) for the same price. Right now you can't pay for cross-game invites/chat on the ps3, and you can't play for free on Xbox Live.

Avatar image for XboximusPrime
XboximusPrime

5405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 XboximusPrime
Member since 2009 • 5405 Posts

I dont understand why we need to do a DL and a Install when Downloading stuff on PSN. Why cant they just do both at the same time, like Live does? seems ass backwards to me.

Anyway, I dont always play online, but when i do, I perfer Xbox Live.

In fact, I hardly ever play online anymore.

Avatar image for lafiro93
lafiro93

2076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 lafiro93
Member since 2010 • 2076 Posts

i got verizon fios i get no lag at all. it depends on ur internet conn

SILVER_X_AMMO

Yes, Verizon Fios + Xbox live = Best experience :D

Avatar image for hexashadow13
hexashadow13

5157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 hexashadow13
Member since 2010 • 5157 Posts
It's just lems justifying to pay. Seriously, that's it. No excuses work. THAT IS FREAKING IT. PC has the best online anyway. :P
Avatar image for ShadowriverUB
ShadowriverUB

5515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 ShadowriverUB
Member since 2009 • 5515 Posts

It's just lems justifying to pay. Seriously, that's it. No excuses work. THAT IS FREAKING IT. PC has the best online anyway. :Phexashadow13

PC have access to Internet, same as PS3 and 360, and PS3 can utilize more resources then 360 from it.

Live is only ONE Internet service (some people forgeting that) and force you to pay fo other services ignoring the fact taht those services are free for 360 as hardware with Internet access

Avatar image for Vari3ty
Vari3ty

11111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Vari3ty
Member since 2009 • 11111 Posts

[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"]Its just the lems trying to justify what they pay every monthshadow8585

Once a YEAR, me and 25 million other XBL members gladly shell out $50. No justification is needed. We got the COD maps way before you right? I talk to my friends while im gaming no matter what we're playing. My online network is integrated into my console and all my games. My downloads are at least twice as fast. The level of competition on XBL is a higher standard than PSN. My netflix has never stopped mid-movie to buffer. XBL is leading the way. Ill give PSN credit, theyre only about a year behind, but they will always be that 1 year behind for the foreseeable future. Ya we pay, but its not even an inconvenience as its automatically charged to my card. ill gladly take my girlfriend out one less night per year to enjoy a better service year round

Edit: spelling

COD maps? Who would want that load of garbage anyway... yeah really something to brag about. :roll:

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#85 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Zoso-8"]Sounds like a bunch of opinions to me. You could just as easily say that it's a bonus PS3 users don't have mics, because let's be honest...who wants to listen to a bunch of screaming XBL kids?GreyFoXX4

Or how about people who communicate in team based games, like Socom, Killzone 2, Uncharted 2, the list goes on.

And you think private chat is a plus when trying to play team based games? My buddy says on xbL its hard to do anything team based on BC2 now because of party chat, everyone is in their on little world and not communicating outside of their own little group. I would say there is more wrong with the use of party chat than there is right as far as a gaming community goes.

If they are working as a team they are, it's better than no communication at all.

Also, you can only talk in squads in BC2 anyways, party chat isn't even required, but comminucation in any team based game pretty much is.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#86 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

I dont understand why we need to do a DL and a Install when Downloading stuff on PSN. Why cant they just do both at the same time, like Live does? seems ass backwards to me.

XboximusPrime

Yeah, that never made sense for me either, and wastes time too.

Avatar image for Sokol4ever
Sokol4ever

6717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#87 Sokol4ever
Member since 2007 • 6717 Posts

[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"]Its just the lems trying to justify what they pay every monthshadow8585

Once a YEAR, me and 25 million other XBL members gladly shell out $50. No justification is needed. We got the COD maps way before you right? I talk to my friends while im gaming no matter what we're playing. My online network is integrated into my console and all my games. My downloads are at least twice as fast. The level of competition on XBL is a higher standard than PSN. My netflix has never stopped mid-movie to buffer. XBL is leading the way. Ill give PSN credit, theyre only about a year behind, but they will always be that 1 year behind for the foreseeable future. Ya we pay, but its not even an inconvenience as its automatically charged to my card. ill gladly take my girlfriend out one less night per year to enjoy a better service year round

Edit: spelling

1. Gladly shell out 50$ for what should be free? Please send me another 50$ since you're so kind.

2. You got COD maps? True. So did I get to enjoy exclusive Joker on PS3, Bioshock DLC to name a few. As for those COD maps - I still get to play them.

3. It's only integrated to those games that support online, which PS3 does as well.

4. My downloads are same on both PS3 and Xbox 360. Yours in only a opinion.

5. Level of competition is same on both consoles, again, pointless opinion from your side.

6. Netflix? Try the real thing - Blu-ray and soon 3D. Oh.. by the way, we got Netflix as well...

7. XBL is leading the way? 1 year head start and it's diminishing. In case you haven't noticed - PS3 had been outselling the competition for over a year now. Think world wide, not just one country that assumes it's the world.

Overall: Nice try to justify your pay. ;)

Avatar image for Ryan_Som
Ryan_Som

2474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#88 Ryan_Som
Member since 2009 • 2474 Posts

[QUOTE="shadow8585"]

[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"]Its just the lems trying to justify what they pay every monthSokol4ever

Once a YEAR, me and 25 million other XBL members gladly shell out $50. No justification is needed. We got the COD maps way before you right? I talk to my friends while im gaming no matter what we're playing. My online network is integrated into my console and all my games. My downloads are at least twice as fast. The level of competition on XBL is a higher standard than PSN. My netflix has never stopped mid-movie to buffer. XBL is leading the way. Ill give PSN credit, theyre only about a year behind, but they will always be that 1 year behind for the foreseeable future. Ya we pay, but its not even an inconvenience as its automatically charged to my card. ill gladly take my girlfriend out one less night per year to enjoy a better service year round

Edit: spelling

1. Gladly shell out 50$ for what should be free? Please send me another 50$ since you're so kind.

2. You got COD maps? True. So did I get to enjoy exclusive Joker on PS3, Bioshock DLC to name a few. As for those COD maps - I still get to play them.

3. It's only integrated to those games that support online, which PS3 does as well.

4. My downloads are same on both PS3 and Xbox 360. Yours in only a opinion.

5. Level of competition is same on both consoles, again, pointless opinion from your side.

6. Netflix? Try the real thing - Blu-ray and soon 3D. Oh.. by the way, we got Netflix as well...

7. XBL is leading the way? 1 year head start and it's diminishing. In case you haven't noticed - PS3 had been outselling the competition for over a year now. Think world wide, not just one country that assumes it's the world.

Overall: Nice try to justify your pay. ;)

Your awesome rebuttal skills have just earned you 26 interwebz. Spend them wisely, sir. ;)