PS3 Online Play

  • 52 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for KeithTobberman
KeithTobberman

432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 KeithTobberman
Member since 2008 • 432 Posts

Hey, I am just wondering if PS3 online is cool. I heard it isn't as good as Xbox live, but is it still fun. Is a PS3 NOT WORTH getting if I am really into online play? Also, can you talk/chat through PS3 online?

 

-Thanks

Avatar image for stereointegrity
stereointegrity

12151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 stereointegrity
Member since 2007 • 12151 Posts
less lagg but lacks ingame chat and video...but has mostly all the same features and dedicated servers
Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts
It's about the same as XBL really.
Avatar image for Solid_Max13
Solid_Max13

3596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#4 Solid_Max13
Member since 2006 • 3596 Posts
don't let the fanboys get you down online is fine with the ps3 it doesn't have private chat but it works just as well as xbl
Avatar image for creeping-deth87
creeping-deth87

787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#5 creeping-deth87
Member since 2008 • 787 Posts
X-Box Live is infinitely better than PSN. Yeah, you have to pay for it, but there is no better alternative for online console gaming. Anyone who says otherwise either hasn't tried XBL or is a blatant fanboy.
Avatar image for KeithTobberman
KeithTobberman

432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 KeithTobberman
Member since 2008 • 432 Posts

Thanks for the information. Do you mean there is no private chat with PS3, or not talking between players at all?

 

-Thanks

Avatar image for tmntPunchout
tmntPunchout

3770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 tmntPunchout
Member since 2007 • 3770 Posts

X-Box Live is infinitely better than PSN. Yeah, you have to pay for it, but there is no better alternative for online console gaming. Anyone who says otherwise either hasn't tried XBL or is a blatant fanboy.creeping-deth87

I say otherwise.. how is it infinitely better in terms of online play?

Avatar image for creeping-deth87
creeping-deth87

787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#8 creeping-deth87
Member since 2008 • 787 Posts

[QUOTE="creeping-deth87"]X-Box Live is infinitely better than PSN. Yeah, you have to pay for it, but there is no better alternative for online console gaming. Anyone who says otherwise either hasn't tried XBL or is a blatant fanboy.tmntPunchout

I say otherwise.. how is it infinitely better in terms of online play?

Let's just say I tried SOCOM, and I gotta say, if that's an online-only multiplayer game, I don't think I'll ever touch a ps3 game that tries to do single and multi player. PSN is a laggy mess.

Avatar image for KeithTobberman
KeithTobberman

432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 KeithTobberman
Member since 2008 • 432 Posts

Haha, but can you chat in game with all players live Live?

-Thanks

Avatar image for jakarai
jakarai

4289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 jakarai
Member since 2008 • 4289 Posts

Haha, but can you chat in game with all players live Live?

-Thanks

KeithTobberman

Yes. PSN is great for a free service. It's basically like gaming on PC.

Avatar image for Thessassin
Thessassin

1819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 Thessassin
Member since 2007 • 1819 Posts
[QUOTE="tmntPunchout"]

[QUOTE="creeping-deth87"]X-Box Live is infinitely better than PSN. Yeah, you have to pay for it, but there is no better alternative for online console gaming. Anyone who says otherwise either hasn't tried XBL or is a blatant fanboy.creeping-deth87

I say otherwise.. how is it infinitely better in terms of online play?

Let's just say I tried SOCOM, and I gotta say, if that's an online-only multiplayer game, I don't think I'll ever touch a ps3 game that tries to do single and multi player. PSN is a laggy mess.

u do know that the reason socom got a low score was because of crap servers?

also you can talk to ppl in game and u can private chat and have a video conversation. but you cant do the private chat or cideo conv while in game. u can still send text messages in game tho.

Avatar image for chessboxer1
chessboxer1

953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#12 chessboxer1
Member since 2004 • 953 Posts
Both are pretty much the same, except one is free the other isn't.
Avatar image for loftus42
loftus42

1086

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 loftus42
Member since 2008 • 1086 Posts
Psn is aa good free experience. The only thing it lacks, IMO, is in-game private chat, and in-game invites. Live is a better experience all around, And is more integrated. every game supports all the features. PSn is a little more fragmented. Some features are supported in some games, some are not. Both use dedicated servers, although Live is more P2P. Really you get what you pay for. If you don't like to pay to play on-line then PSn is a very suitable on-line package. But if you don't mind 50 bucks a year, Then Live is well worth the extra cost for its extras. Playing a game and talking privatley to a buddy is cool, while in-game invites are another cool feature. But with PSn you can somewhat get around these extras and have a nice time.
Avatar image for Tiefster
Tiefster

14639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#14 Tiefster
Member since 2005 • 14639 Posts
If you like online I wouldn't suggest either console but that's just me. From experience though PSN is a solid network for online gaming. It lacks in a few departments but its perfectly fine.
Avatar image for loudharley
loudharley

1852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 loudharley
Member since 2005 • 1852 Posts
Xbox live has more features,its user friendly and works very well.Psn is an average service,nothing great about it but it isnt awful either.I guess u get what u pay for.
Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts
As a gamer jumping online to play they are the same, except for cross game chat or cross game invite for the 360. And actually from going from pc gaming to playing solely on the ps3 for the past year it has really been a blessing. Just the other day I played Left4Dead on Steam, and had more lag than I have experienced on Socom at any time, and remembering back to BF2 days on pc psn has been a gem and wonderful to play on. So don't let fanboys tell you that psn is aweful because its not.
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
[QUOTE="tmntPunchout"]

[QUOTE="creeping-deth87"]X-Box Live is infinitely better than PSN. Yeah, you have to pay for it, but there is no better alternative for online console gaming. Anyone who says otherwise either hasn't tried XBL or is a blatant fanboy.creeping-deth87

I say otherwise.. how is it infinitely better in terms of online play?

Let's just say I tried SOCOM, and I gotta say, if that's an online-only multiplayer game, I don't think I'll ever touch a ps3 game that tries to do single and multi player. PSN is a laggy mess.

lol, so you are basing the entire PSN quality over one game which is known for having crappys servers? Well I played GUN for X360 and that proves that X360 cant do graphics better than PS2 :?

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#18 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts
All it's really lacking at this point is in game voice chat and mandatory Trophies. Which are both coming at some point. It may be a little fragmented but there's also a couple of things it does better than Live.
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts

All it's really lacking at this point is in game voice chat and mandatory Trophies. Which are both coming at some point. It may be a little fragmented but there's also a couple of things it does better than Live.Floppy_Jim

I actually like how not too many people use mics. It means less random convos. I hate when playing a game and then sumone starts talking about how he went on a date with this hotty like any of us care. Or when 2 friends join a game and they use the game as their personal telephone call and discuss their weekend plans. Sure u can mute it, but i just like it when i dont have to :P

Avatar image for ChrnoTrigger
ChrnoTrigger

2155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 ChrnoTrigger
Member since 2008 • 2155 Posts

Haha, but can you chat in game with all players live Live?

-Thanks

KeithTobberman

 

Don't listen to the fanboys here. You get the exact same features as Xbox Live, but for free. The only thing that's missing is private chat (talking to a friend 1 on 1 while in a game) you can still talk to people in game, just not privately with them. 

Avatar image for Krigon
Krigon

5591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Krigon
Member since 2005 • 5591 Posts

[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]All it's really lacking at this point is in game voice chat and mandatory Trophies. Which are both coming at some point. It may be a little fragmented but there's also a couple of things it does better than Live.II_Seraphim_II

I actually like how not too many people use mics. It means less random convos. I hate when playing a game and then sumone starts talking about how he went on a date with this hotty like any of us care. Or when 2 friends join a game and they use the game as their personal telephone call and discuss their weekend plans. Sure u can mute it, but i just like it when i dont have to :P

Indeed that gets annoying. Especially when there are "rooms"/squads which you can enter/join to have just chat with that person and they use the main channel instead.

 

Avatar image for creeping-deth87
creeping-deth87

787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#22 creeping-deth87
Member since 2008 • 787 Posts
[QUOTE="creeping-deth87"][QUOTE="tmntPunchout"]

I say otherwise.. how is it infinitely better in terms of online play?

II_Seraphim_II

Let's just say I tried SOCOM, and I gotta say, if that's an online-only multiplayer game, I don't think I'll ever touch a ps3 game that tries to do single and multi player. PSN is a laggy mess.

lol, so you are basing the entire PSN quality over one game which is known for having crappys servers? Well I played GUN for X360 and that proves that X360 cant do graphics better than PS2 :?

I'm sorry but that's a very poor rebuttal. Gun never tried to be a graphical powerhouse. SOCOM certainly tried to be a great online multiplayer game, and it failed completely. I'm not talking about its flop status on System Wars, I'm saying that based solely on my time with it.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26712 Posts
[QUOTE="KeithTobberman"]

Haha, but can you chat in game with all players live Live?

-Thanks

jakarai

Yes. PSN is great for a free service. It's basically like gaming on PC.

No it's not. :? 

Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="creeping-deth87"]

Let's just say I tried SOCOM, and I gotta say, if that's an online-only multiplayer game, I don't think I'll ever touch a ps3 game that tries to do single and multi player. PSN is a laggy mess.

creeping-deth87

lol, so you are basing the entire PSN quality over one game which is known for having crappys servers? Well I played GUN for X360 and that proves that X360 cant do graphics better than PS2 :?

I'm sorry but that's a very poor rebuttal. Gun never tried to be a graphical powerhouse. SOCOM certainly tried to be a great online multiplayer game, and it failed completely. I'm not talking about its flop status on System Wars, I'm saying that based solely on my time with it.

No Socom may need a bit more tweaking for its servers which by the way are basically running smooth now. But NOT one review ever stated it had bad gameplay, infact most made the case that the gameplay was there and definitly fun.

And from my addiction to it I can tell you that its gameplay is awesome. Right along with its community, competitiveness, and the sheer magic that takes place from losing to winning just because of good communication and team work. There is not a game right now that I can remotely think of that gives this kind of feel and pulls it off quite nicely at that.

Matter of fact as it stands cod5 is almost a after thought to me about purchasing it, and Socom has already put R2 on pause from purchasing it aswell. So I can clearly say its fun as heck :)

Oh yea think next week should be another patch for Socom's servers aswell as adding features and some tweaks to the controls like d-pad lean and peek :) Which I love the motion control for that actually.

Avatar image for Solid_Max13
Solid_Max13

3596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#25 Solid_Max13
Member since 2006 • 3596 Posts
Played warhawk a lot of ppl on there talk same as R2
Avatar image for rumtumtugger
rumtumtugger

645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 rumtumtugger
Member since 2004 • 645 Posts

Hey, I am just wondering if PS3 online is cool. I heard it isn't as good as Xbox live, but is it still fun. Is a PS3 NOT WORTH getting if I am really into online play? Also, can you talk/chat through PS3 online?

 

-Thanks

KeithTobberman

General Gaming? Has it been deleted?

Avatar image for g0ddyX
g0ddyX

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 g0ddyX
Member since 2005 • 3914 Posts
PS3 Online is fine
Avatar image for g0ddyX
g0ddyX

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 g0ddyX
Member since 2005 • 3914 Posts
PS3 Online is fine
Avatar image for 6matt6
6matt6

9726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 6matt6
Member since 2005 • 9726 Posts
[QUOTE="KeithTobberman"]

Haha, but can you chat in game with all players live Live?

-Thanks

jakarai

Yes. PSN is great for a free service. It's basically like gaming on PC.

That was a joke right?

Avatar image for KeithTobberman
KeithTobberman

432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#30 KeithTobberman
Member since 2008 • 432 Posts
Thanks again, great replies.
Avatar image for -General_Ram-
-General_Ram-

998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 -General_Ram-
Member since 2008 • 998 Posts
If you need the very best online a console can offer, then go 360. Plain and simple.
Avatar image for VoodooHak
VoodooHak

15989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 VoodooHak
Member since 2002 • 15989 Posts

PSN if functional the same way broadcast TV is functional. Totally respectable. But some of us don't mind paying to get more features.

Cross game invites, solid community infrastructure (gamerzones, rep, feedback),secure, closed network that actively checks for modded boxes,community Calendar.

Not only that, but we have things like the community developer program (who have created the dynamically updated widgets you see in many of our sigs), visible and accessible community managers and full-featured integration with Xbox.com

So no, it's not the same. 

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

PSN is just fine. THe only problem I have with it is theres no game invites. Insted you have to manually find the guy or girl. PLus its free. Which is a blessing if your out of work or just dont have the money for live.

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts
[QUOTE="tmntPunchout"]

[QUOTE="creeping-deth87"]X-Box Live is infinitely better than PSN. Yeah, you have to pay for it, but there is no better alternative for online console gaming. Anyone who says otherwise either hasn't tried XBL or is a blatant fanboy.creeping-deth87

I say otherwise.. how is it infinitely better in terms of online play?

Let's just say I tried SOCOM, and I gotta say, if that's an online-only multiplayer game, I don't think I'll ever touch a ps3 game that tries to do single and multi player. PSN is a laggy mess.

I love how you used a bad example of an online only game and complety ignored a great example of a online only game ala warhawk. You fail buddy.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#35 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

don't let the fanboys get you down online is fine with the ps3 it doesn't have private chat but it works just as well as xblSolid_Max13

This. If your main focus is online play, then you can't go wrong. And it's free. If you are looking for a more community focused approach, the XBL is where it's at. 

Avatar image for CreepyBacon
CreepyBacon

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 CreepyBacon
Member since 2005 • 3183 Posts
Take everything you know from online gaming and strip it down to "random dude v random dude" cause that's about all you get.
Avatar image for creeping-deth87
creeping-deth87

787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#37 creeping-deth87
Member since 2008 • 787 Posts
[QUOTE="creeping-deth87"][QUOTE="tmntPunchout"]

I say otherwise.. how is it infinitely better in terms of online play?

finalfantasy94

Let's just say I tried SOCOM, and I gotta say, if that's an online-only multiplayer game, I don't think I'll ever touch a ps3 game that tries to do single and multi player. PSN is a laggy mess.

I love how you used a bad example of an online only game and complety ignored a great example of a online only game ala warhawk. You fail buddy.

If I haven't played Warhawk, why the HELL would I talk about it?

Avatar image for kerpal_cz
kerpal_cz

196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 kerpal_cz
Member since 2008 • 196 Posts

Don't listen to the fanboys here. You get the exact same features as Xbox Live, but for free. The only thing that's missing is private chat (talking to a friend 1 on 1 while in a game) you can still talk to people in game, just not privately with them. 

ChrnoTrigger

Wrong.

Private chat is one thing, but cross game chat is another. If a bunch of my friends are playing 4 different games, on live I can talk to them all and invite them into something new. Another nice thing about live is gamerscore. You can bring up someone's gamertag (They don't have to be friends, it saves the last bunch of people you played with) and check out what games they have, all of their achievements, etc.  PSN has a very simplified version of this, it doesn't have the depth. 

Some games like Halo or Forza 2 have replay features, where I can upload screens, or edit replays from online races or games I've played. I don't recall PS3 doing this.  

Avatar image for Master_SONY
Master_SONY

200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Master_SONY
Member since 2008 • 200 Posts

PS3 Online is fineg0ddyX

This one said it best.

If you want to play games online...PS3 does it perfectly. 

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts
[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"][QUOTE="creeping-deth87"]

Let's just say I tried SOCOM, and I gotta say, if that's an online-only multiplayer game, I don't think I'll ever touch a ps3 game that tries to do single and multi player. PSN is a laggy mess.

creeping-deth87

I love how you used a bad example of an online only game and complety ignored a great example of a online only game ala warhawk. You fail buddy.

If I haven't played Warhawk, why the HELL would I talk about it?

Better question is why would you judge the PSN just on 1 game.

Avatar image for Broman6015
Broman6015

1381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 Broman6015
Member since 2007 • 1381 Posts
[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"][QUOTE="creeping-deth87"]

 

Let's just say I tried SOCOM, and I gotta say, if that's an online-only multiplayer game, I don't think I'll ever touch a ps3 game that tries to do single and multi player. PSN is a laggy mess.

creeping-deth87

I love how you used a bad example of an online only game and complety ignored a great example of a online only game ala warhawk. You fail buddy.

If I haven't played Warhawk, why the HELL would I talk about it?

You really shouldnt have said anything at all then. You said PSN was a laggy mess, but if you would have played Warhawk (or any game through PSN for that matter) you would know that PSN is not as unstabble as people claim it to be. You're right about socom, but you shouldnt use it to judge PSN as a whole.

Avatar image for creeping-deth87
creeping-deth87

787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#42 creeping-deth87
Member since 2008 • 787 Posts
[QUOTE="creeping-deth87"][QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]

I love how you used a bad example of an online only game and complety ignored a great example of a online only game ala warhawk. You fail buddy.

finalfantasy94

If I haven't played Warhawk, why the HELL would I talk about it?

Better question is why would you judge the PSN just on 1 game.

Why would I judge PSN off an online-only sequel to what was considered the best online shooting experience on the PS2 last generation? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

Take everything you know from online gaming and strip it down to "random dude v random dude" cause that's about all you get. CreepyBacon

When I play gears online. All I face is random people. unless I invite someone in a game or setup a game with friends. You can set up games on PS3 games to. You just cant invite people automaticly. You gatta do it the long way.

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts
[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"][QUOTE="creeping-deth87"]

If I haven't played Warhawk, why the HELL would I talk about it?

creeping-deth87

Better question is why would you judge the PSN just on 1 game.

Why would I judge PSN off an online-only sequel to what was considered the best online shooting experience on the PS2 last generation? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

If you saw the reviews or just listended to peoples comments you would know this wasint the best game to try out the PS3 online. Also if im right this isint the same team that made the good socom games.

Avatar image for KeithTobberman
KeithTobberman

432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#46 KeithTobberman
Member since 2008 • 432 Posts

Thanks so much again for the replies.Does anyone know any stats like the number of people that play the most popular xbox live game vs the number that play the most popular PS3 online game? I know when I played Halo 3 a lot online, it was the number one game for live and had over half a million at a time.

-Thanks

Avatar image for Nocturnal_Speed
Nocturnal_Speed

1663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Nocturnal_Speed
Member since 2008 • 1663 Posts

dude look at what games/exclusives you prefer over another (console) and I'm sure that will solve your problem all in one. Don't base "Internet" on a console that you'll drop a couple of bones on. :|

Research is your best friend

Avatar image for KeithTobberman
KeithTobberman

432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#48 KeithTobberman
Member since 2008 • 432 Posts
I know research is great, that is what I use forums for, haha. Thanks though.
Avatar image for swamplord666
swamplord666

1873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 swamplord666
Member since 2007 • 1873 Posts
in terms of how well they function, they are equal. in terms of whats more pleasing, XBL is much better. terms of price... well PSN is free and Xbox live is not. You can have a perfectly normal and fun game with no lag with the ps3. If you want to have more functions the Xbox live is better it's like getting a phone free with contract or buying an Iphone with contract: they both do their thing equally well, but the Iphone is classier.
Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts
PS3 online is very good, don't believe those who say that XBL is 100 times better. When it comes to games it depends because some games have dedicated servers but others don't and the service has nothing to affect. So, yes, if you're onto online gaming you can go for it.