Ps3 power is overrated

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for aia89
aia89

2828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 aia89
Member since 2009 • 2828 Posts

when the Ps3 came out, everyone thought it was so much more powerful than the 360, like x2 times more powerful. the polygon crap was funny, of course Sony spread lots of lies as always. the CPU is indeed the only advantage the Ps3 has over the 360, but somehow "we" are still blaming it on the LAZY devs when it comes to the inferior multiplats. when you have so many games that perform better on the Ms system, then it's not the devs' fault, but Sony's for making an arguably crazy hardware, a pain to develop games on.

So, why does the Ps3 have such beautiful looking games? the power of the cell? I don't think so. it's the power of the talented devs, which is something that Ms seems to lack. remember the ps2 how weak it was compared to the other systems? yet they were able to impress us with God of War 2, no one could ever imagine that the ps2 could push such graphics.

So when people say that the ps3 is like a Ferrari and the 360 like an average car, they're kidding themselves. over 90% of the games are multiplats, hence overall the 360 is winning in the graphics department, except for the exclusives' that they don't seem to care for much.

the techno buffalo guy said that the bluray is a big advantage for the ps3 and that dvd9 is even limiting the overall quality of the graphics on the 360.. I don't know how a support can make better graphics, but he may have a point.

thoughts?

Avatar image for Leo-Magic
Leo-Magic

3025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Leo-Magic
Member since 2005 • 3025 Posts
you know fanboy always likes dreaming, so dont blame them.
Avatar image for TheMISCMan48
TheMISCMan48

315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 TheMISCMan48
Member since 2010 • 315 Posts

No......it isnt.

Avatar image for Basinboy
Basinboy

14558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#5 Basinboy
Member since 2003 • 14558 Posts

[QUOTE="aia89"]

the techno buffalo guy

krunkfu2

Шут? Is that short for Шутка or something?

Avatar image for SwagSurf
SwagSurf

3022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 SwagSurf
Member since 2009 • 3022 Posts

Has there been a console game that has surpassed UC2's graphics?

Avatar image for aia89
aia89

2828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 aia89
Member since 2009 • 2828 Posts

Has there been a console game that has surpassed UC2's graphics?

SwagSurf
that's the privilege of having great devs like ND
Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

Has there been a console game that has surpassed UC2's graphics?

SwagSurf

just cause 2 easily matches it graphically.

Avatar image for J-WOW
J-WOW

3105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 J-WOW
Member since 2010 • 3105 Posts
[QUOTE="SwagSurf"]

Has there been a console game that has surpassed UC2's graphics?

I think not, altho KZ2 is graphicly better than U2 but people think U2 has the better graphics becuz its pretty-er
Avatar image for KevinButlerVP
KevinButlerVP

2378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 KevinButlerVP
Member since 2010 • 2378 Posts

[QUOTE="SwagSurf"]

Has there been a console game that has surpassed UC2's graphics?

washd123

just cause 2 easily matches it graphically.

not on consoles
Avatar image for SwagSurf
SwagSurf

3022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 SwagSurf
Member since 2009 • 3022 Posts

[QUOTE="SwagSurf"]

Has there been a console game that has surpassed UC2's graphics?

washd123

just cause 2 easily matches it graphically.

Only on PC ;)

Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

not on consolesKevinButlerVP

even on the consoles.

sorry uncharted 2 isnt untouchable graphically.

its a visual masterpiece but graphically not so much

Avatar image for italygamer
italygamer

668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 italygamer
Member since 2009 • 668 Posts

bluray has nothing to do with graphics. the gfx card does.

bluray has something to do with.. let's see.. more data in one disc?

Avatar image for chaplainDMK
chaplainDMK

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 chaplainDMK
Member since 2008 • 7004 Posts

[QUOTE="SwagSurf"]

Has there been a console game that has surpassed UC2's graphics?

washd123

just cause 2 easily matches it graphically.

Yeah... well... no... On PC yeah, but on consoles Uncharted 2 is probably the best looking. Just Cause 2 ain't anyhwere close. Best multiplat maybe (but i'd give that to Dirt 2 or something alot earlier)
Avatar image for Sollet
Sollet

8287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 Sollet
Member since 2003 • 8287 Posts

[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"]

not on consoleswashd123

even on the consoles.

sorry uncharted 2 isnt untouchable graphically.

its a visual masterpiece but graphically not so much

uc2's praise isn't just the graphics.. just a heads up... It does have over 150 awards under it's belt.
Avatar image for Frozzik
Frozzik

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Frozzik
Member since 2006 • 3914 Posts

[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"]

not on consoleswashd123

even on the consoles.

sorry uncharted 2 isnt untouchable graphically.

its a visual masterpiece but graphically not so much

I thin kthis is where alot of gamers stumble. A game can look amazing whilst not having great technical graphics. I own UC2, it sure is a pretty game but if you look close you start to see its faults. Textures for a start, some are truly awful but so long as you don't look close ( which you have no reason to anyway) the game looks lovely.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#17 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50069 Posts
Yeah, the PS3's graphical capability its pretty overrated. But it's normally the fanboys that hype it so it's not that big of a deal, just rather amusing to me.
Avatar image for J-WOW
J-WOW

3105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 J-WOW
Member since 2010 • 3105 Posts
[QUOTE="Frozzik"]

[QUOTE="washd123"]

[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"]

not on consoles

even on the consoles.

sorry uncharted 2 isnt untouchable graphically.

its a visual masterpiece but graphically not so much

I thin kthis is where alot of gamers stumble. A game can look amazing whilst not having great technical graphics. I own UC2, it sure is a pretty game but if you look close you start to see its faults. Textures for a start, some are truly awful but so long as you don't look close ( which you have no reason to anyway) the game looks lovely.

thats basicely every game, when you zoom in real close to a surface the texture look ugly
Avatar image for genaroll
genaroll

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 genaroll
Member since 2010 • 710 Posts
[QUOTE="washd123"]

[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"]

not on consolesSollet

even on the consoles.

sorry uncharted 2 isnt untouchable graphically.

its a visual masterpiece but graphically not so much

uc2's praise isn't just the graphics.. just a heads up... It does have over 150 awards under it's belt.

Honestly that award thing is old now.Gears 2 has over 150 awards too and got a goty edition.Its a good game,but not because off awards seeing as how even people on youtube do that.
Avatar image for CarnageHeart
CarnageHeart

18316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 CarnageHeart
Member since 2002 • 18316 Posts
I agree with the TC. Below is a repost of what I said in the recent Gears 3 thread. --- I think the fact that the graphics of the PS3 have continued to improve while those of the X360 have stayed relatively stagnant isn't due to hardware, but the fact that Sony has a lot of talented first and second parties who are good at pushing the hardware and willing to share programming tips with each other whereas MS's talent pool is smaller and more diffuse (its not clear the guys behind Crackdown 2 got tech tips from the guys behind Halo Reach or Alan Wake). --- *Shrugs* I remember after the release of Gears 1, many were confidently asserting that Gears level graphics were beyond the PS3 due to its lack of ram.
Avatar image for Frozzik
Frozzik

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Frozzik
Member since 2006 • 3914 Posts

[QUOTE="Frozzik"]

[QUOTE="washd123"]

even on the consoles.

sorry uncharted 2 isnt untouchable graphically.

its a visual masterpiece but graphically not so much

J-WOW

I thin kthis is where alot of gamers stumble. A game can look amazing whilst not having great technical graphics. I own UC2, it sure is a pretty game but if you look close you start to see its faults. Textures for a start, some are truly awful but so long as you don't look close ( which you have no reason to anyway) the game looks lovely.

thats basicely every game, when you zoom in real close to a surface the texture look ugly

Some more than others. That was just one example and i'm done arguing with people today so i'll leave it there.

Avatar image for Ravenlore_basic
Ravenlore_basic

4319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#22 Ravenlore_basic
Member since 2003 • 4319 Posts

:lol:

when the Ps3 came out, everyone thought it was so much more powerful than the 360, like x2 times more powerful. the polygon crap was funny, of course Sony spread lots of lies as always. the CPU is indeed the only advantage the Ps3 has over the 360, but somehow "we" are still blaming it on the LAZY devs when it comes to the inferior multiplats. when you have so many games that perform better on the Ms system, then it's not the devs' fault, but Sony's for making an arguably crazy hardware, a pain to develop games on.

So, why does the Ps3 have such beautiful looking games? the power of the cell? I don't think so. it's the power of the talented devs, which is something that Ms seems to lack. remember the ps2 how weak it was compared to the other systems? yet they were able to impress us with God of War 2, no one could ever imagine that the ps2 could push such graphics.

So when people say that the ps3 is like a Ferrari and the 360 like an average car, they're kidding themselves. over 90% of the games are multiplats, hence overall the 360 is winning in the graphics department, except for the exclusives' that they don't seem to care for much.

the techno buffalo guy said that the bluray is a big advantage for the ps3 and that dvd9 is even limiting the overall quality of the graphics on the 360.. I don't know how a support can make better graphics, but he may have a point.

thoughts?

aia89

:) :D

If it helps you to sleep at night.... But what you said is full of contradictions. :lol:

Yes it is powerful, and yes it does take a lot to get Cell and RSX to work great together, and yes Developers do not spend enough time, or resources to get the best out of it, and yes it will take time for Developers to use PS3 as far as it can go.

Stil, Xbox 360 has been out 1 year more!!! Xbox 360 is easier to develop for AND uses DirectX9c MADE from Microsoft itself for the Xbox 360... .... and YET it has take till Halo: Reach to get where it is at?!!who's fault is that?????

Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

uc2's praise isn't just the graphics.. just a heads up... It does have over 150 awards under it's belt.Sollet

and thats completely irrelevant to the discussion

Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

I think we've all known the PS3 is not 2x more powerful than the 360 ever since we saw how awesome the launch titles looked. Its all hype, if you believed it then its your own fault.

Avatar image for mattuk69
mattuk69

3050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 mattuk69
Member since 2009 • 3050 Posts

PC>PS3>360 i have them all and can say without a doubt the 360 could run UC2 and Killzone 2.

Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

thats basicely every game, when you zoom in real close to a surface the texture look uglyJ-WOW

you dont have to zoom in with Uc2 to see bad textures or bad geometry

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

61997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 61997 Posts

Overrated? I absolutely agree. It's still damn impressive though, with some of the stuff devs have released.

I've always been an advocate of the idea that 360 and PS3 are relatively similar in terms of performance.

A|lso, here's a pic the topic reminded me of:

Avatar image for markinthedark
markinthedark

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 markinthedark
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts

uncharted 2:

uncharted 2

Fight Night Round 4:

fight night round 4

multiplat is teh graphics kingz

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#29 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Yeah, the PS3's graphical capability its pretty overrated. But it's normally the fanboys that hype it so it's not that big of a deal, just rather amusing to me.Stevo_the_gamer
Those are my thoughts as well.

Avatar image for shroofnayef
shroofnayef

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 shroofnayef
Member since 2010 • 355 Posts

[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"]

not on consoleswashd123

even on the consoles.

sorry uncharted 2 isnt untouchable graphically.

its a visual masterpiece but graphically not so much

Even on PC and consoles JC2 is no where near U2

PC version

Image 34

Avatar image for TintedEyes
TintedEyes

4769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 TintedEyes
Member since 2009 • 4769 Posts
lol heard it all before, but it does have graphics better than anything 360 has put out, that could be the reason
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#32 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

Well, it´s not more powerfull than 360 and many ppl think it is. So yeah, it´s overrated.

Avatar image for shroofnayef
shroofnayef

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 shroofnayef
Member since 2010 • 355 Posts
[QUOTE="Frozzik"]

[QUOTE="J-WOW"][QUOTE="Frozzik"]

I thin kthis is where alot of gamers stumble. A game can look amazing whilst not having great technical graphics. I own UC2, it sure is a pretty game but if you look close you start to see its faults. Textures for a start, some are truly awful but so long as you don't look close ( which you have no reason to anyway) the game looks lovely.

thats basicely every game, when you zoom in real close to a surface the texture look ugly

Some more than others. That was just one example and i'm done arguing with people today so i'll leave it there.

lolwut? U2's textures are some of the best on consoles...:?. If you say U2's textures are low res when you zoom in, then imagine 360 games...
Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
No doubt its overrated by Sony. Its still the most capable console available.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

61997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 61997 Posts

Even on PC and consoles JC2 is no where near U2

PC version

shroofnayef

Why was that image at 720p?

Here are some better shots (not mine, so I don't take credit):

Avatar image for shroofnayef
shroofnayef

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 shroofnayef
Member since 2010 • 355 Posts

[QUOTE="J-WOW"] thats basicely every game, when you zoom in real close to a surface the texture look uglywashd123

you dont have to zoom in with Uc2 to see bad textures or bad geometry

:lol:. JC2 (on both Pc and consoles), and i guess all 360 titles since you said U2 has bad textures and geometry, are the one with terrible geometry and textures. U2 has phenominal textures (Save for KZ3, the best texture work on consoles) and great geometry
Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

[QUOTE="washd123"]

[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"]

not on consolesshroofnayef

even on the consoles.

sorry uncharted 2 isnt untouchable graphically.

its a visual masterpiece but graphically not so much

Even on PC and consoles JC2 is no where near U2

PC version

Image 34

Just Cause 2 looks mostly the same on the PC, the only difference would be the water effects looking better. And the usuall higher res and more AA. Just Cause 2 is a very good looking game for being an open world game, but just not at the lvl of uncharted 2 when it comes to graphics.

Avatar image for markinthedark
markinthedark

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 markinthedark
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts

You're comparing a boxing game to a shooter?

chaplainDMK

im comparing graphics of 2 different games. Fight Night Round 4 is certainly the best looking game ive seen this gen... i assumed thats what this thread was about.

if you wanna talk technical graphics... then thats a whole different can of worms... and rage pretty much takes that cake.

Avatar image for shroofnayef
shroofnayef

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 shroofnayef
Member since 2010 • 355 Posts
[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="shroofnayef"]

Even on PC and consoles JC2 is no where near U2

Why was that image at 720p? Here are some better shots (not mine, so I don't take credit

Those images are still no where near U2 graphically
Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

Those images are still no where near U2 graphicallyshroofnayef

graphically yeah they are. not to mention the fact that just cause 2 is about 5x the size of uncharted 2.

Avatar image for shroofnayef
shroofnayef

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 shroofnayef
Member since 2010 • 355 Posts
[QUOTE="markinthedark"]

[QUOTE="chaplainDMK"]

You're comparing a boxing game to a shooter?

im comparing graphics of 2 different games. Fight Night Round 4 is certainly the best looking game ive seen this gen... i assumed thats what this thread was about.

if you wanna talk technical graphics... then thats a whole different can of worms... and rage pretty much takes that cake.

Again, FNR4's only special graphical aspect is the 2 character models...other than that everything else looks mediocre at best and cant compare to the likes of U2, KZ2, GOW3, etc, etc
Avatar image for markinthedark
markinthedark

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 markinthedark
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts

FNR4's only special graphical aspect is the 2 character models...other than that everything else cant even compare to the likes of U2, KZ2, GOw3, etc, etcshroofnayef

yes but the 2 character models is pretty much all that you see... thus i contend its the best looking game this gen.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

61997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 61997 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="shroofnayef"]

Even on PC and consoles JC2 is no where near U2

shroofnayef

Why was that image at 720p? Here are some better shots (not mine, so I don't take credit

Those images are still no where near U2 graphically

I edited some more in and... Really? I think they're more impressive. Especially considering it's completely sandbox.

You also didn't answer my question of why it was at 720p. Did you take it from your computer at 720p? Or did you just use a console shot?

Avatar image for shroofnayef
shroofnayef

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 shroofnayef
Member since 2010 • 355 Posts
[QUOTE="washd123"]

[QUOTE="shroofnayef"]

Those images are still no where near U2 graphically

graphically yeah they are. not to mention the fact that just cause 2 is about 5x the size of uncharted 2.

No, they arent...Since you said U2 textures are bad, then JC2 doesnt even have have texture detail whatsoever when compared to U2's "bad textures" :roll:
Avatar image for SwagSurf
SwagSurf

3022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 SwagSurf
Member since 2009 • 3022 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="shroofnayef"]

Even on PC and consoles JC2 is no where near U2

shroofnayef

Why was that image at 720p? Here are some better shots (not mine, so I don't take credit

Those images are still no where near U2 graphically

Almost anything from the year 2005 to now, PC games have better graphics. So far on Consoles, UC2 is still king, but Crysis 2, Rage, KZ3, and the other games might change that.

Avatar image for shroofnayef
shroofnayef

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 shroofnayef
Member since 2010 • 355 Posts

[QUOTE="shroofnayef"]FNR4's only special graphical aspect is the 2 character models...other than that everything else cant even compare to the likes of U2, KZ2, GOw3, etc, etcmarkinthedark

yes but the 2 character models is pretty much all that you see... thus i contend its the best looking game this gen.

U2's, GOW3's, KZ3's, etc character models have more poly and texture detail than those character models.
Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

No, they arent...Since you said U2 textures are bad, then JC2 doesnt even have have texture detail whatsoever when compared to U2's "bad textures" :roll:shroofnayef

theyre roughly about the same, yet just cause 2 is 5x bigger.

Avatar image for shroofnayef
shroofnayef

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 shroofnayef
Member since 2010 • 355 Posts
[QUOTE="SwagSurf"]

[QUOTE="shroofnayef"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Why was that image at 720p? Here are some better shots (not mine, so I don't take credit

Those images are still no where near U2 graphically

Almost anything from the year 2005 to now, PC games have better graphics. So far on Consoles, UC2 is still king, but Crysis 2, Rage, KZ3, and the other games might change that.

? The only titles on Pc that have better graphics than U2 are Crysis/ Warhead, and Metro 2033...Also, KZ3 looks better than U2, and C2 isnt impressive at all, espicially when footage was released about it at gamescom...The only one that could challenge U2 is Rage, and as of now, U2's graphical aspects are still substantially better than Rage's