Ps3 strongest console out.

[QUOTE="fixer293"][QUOTE="NielsNL"]

By the way, your sig, I just read Dracula and that quote is definately not from it. Renfield and Dracula never actually talk to each other in the book. (well they do, but it is suggested that they do, the actual conversation isn't in the book).

acemasta21

Schapert report, october 2008, you are owned

[QUOTE="acemasta21"][QUOTE="fixer293"]

http://www.qj.net/Terminal-Reality-explains-why-PS3-graphics-for-Ghostbusters-is-softer-than-Xbox-360-s/pg/49/aid/132259

/thread

dommeus

Yeah, the great graphics of Ghostbusters ...makes me forget about Uncharted 2 or Killzone 2 totally .

[QUOTE="acemasta21"][QUOTE="fixer293"] watch the movie....ownedfixer293

Schapert report, october 2008, you are owned

Sorry I can't help it.... But have any reason on why it's the "best"?

Yeah, the great graphics of Ghostbusters ...makes me forget about Uncharted 2 or Killzone 2 totally .

zekere

[QUOTE="fixer293"]

[QUOTE="acemasta21"] Read the date of your links REALLY OWNED!!!!acemasta21

Schapert report, october 2008, you are owned

http://journal.pcvsconsole.com/?thread=19237

trolling is bad for you

[QUOTE="acemasta21"][QUOTE="fixer293"]

Schapert report, october 2008, you are owned

fixer293

http://journal.pcvsconsole.com/?thread=19237

trolling is bad for you

Then why do it?

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="acemasta21"] the site says ps3 has less ram what a dumb site are you serious HAHA o well acemasta21

ps3s Cell makes up for it 7 processors to calculate games and the RSX to play them so the ps3 uses 85% of the cell and 15% of the RSX please dont tell me the 360s stronger seriously

[QUOTE="acemasta21"][QUOTE="fixer293"]

Schapert report, october 2008, you are owned

fixer293

ready for this fanboy ps3 only uses 15% of its GPU and it uses 85% of CPU also you do know that the RSX is 4 years old older than 360s GPU this was on purpose the cell broadband engine is whats used to make games run on ps3 7 processors and that ps3s CPU is 3x more powerful than the 360s CPU reply to this seriously just try i just explained to you how ps3s stronger your boring sigh*

http://www.hardcoreware.net/reviews/review-348-1.htm

you realise everything a console does requires RAM don't you it can have the greatest chip on the planet but without RAM it is useless, and the 360 has an extra 73mb of ram to work with,which is quite a lot, listen mate, i have provided proof for my argument you have provided nothing but OPINIONS without any proof to back them up, no offence but you obviously know nothing about how a console works cos your percentage figures are just plain wrong, any given game would use way more than 15% of the GPU, the cell supports the RSX when it comes to graphics not the other way around, you are just talking rubbish basically and you should shut up.delta3074

Nice article on RAM:

http://talkplaystation.com/ps3s-ram-and-rsx-explained/

[QUOTE="delta3074"]you realise everything a console does requires RAM don't you it can have the greatest chip on the planet but without RAM it is useless, and the 360 has an extra 73mb of ram to work with,which is quite a lot, listen mate, i have provided proof for my argument you have provided nothing but OPINIONS without any proof to back them up, no offence but you obviously know nothing about how a console works cos your percentage figures are just plain wrong, any given game would use way more than 15% of the GPU, the cell supports the RSX when it comes to graphics not the other way around, you are just talking rubbish basically and you should shut up.NielsNL

Nice article on RAM:

http://talkplaystation.com/ps3s-ram-and-rsx-explained/

[QUOTE="dommeus"][QUOTE="acemasta21"] again a 360 fanboy pulling out the multiplat card sigh* 360 cant run mgs4 nor mag acemasta21

Of course a game outat the end of 2007doesn't look as goodas game out years later.

MAG looks great considering that it is a massive online game.With a larger world, hundred of people playingandloads going on with physics then your going to get lower graphics. Saying that this would be a good time for the PS3 to show its POWER.

instead of insulting someone, how about back up your claims as I have.fixer293

[QUOTE="fixer293"]instead of insulting someone, how about back up your claims as I have.acemasta21

http://www.lazygamer.co.za/xbox-360/ps3-compares-poorly-to-the-360-on-fallout-3-according-to-the-playstation-magazine

http://www.product-reviews.net/2008/07/05/call-of-duty-4-larger-burden-on-sony-ps3-than-xbox-360/

yeah

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"]you realise everything a console does requires RAM don't you it can have the greatest chip on the planet but without RAM it is useless, and the 360 has an extra 73mb of ram to work with,which is quite a lot, listen mate, i have provided proof for my argument you have provided nothing but OPINIONS without any proof to back them up, no offence but you obviously know nothing about how a console works cos your percentage figures are just plain wrong, any given game would use way more than 15% of the GPU, the cell supports the RSX when it comes to graphics not the other way around, you are just talking rubbish basically and you should shut up.fixer293

Nice article on RAM:

http://talkplaystation.com/ps3s-ram-and-rsx-explained/

[QUOTE="fixer293"][QUOTE="NielsNL"]

Nice article on RAM:

http://talkplaystation.com/ps3s-ram-and-rsx-explained/

acemasta21

Hahaha. An article that says the 360 and PS3 are evenly matched...game over man, game over.

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"]you realise everything a console does requires RAM don't you it can have the greatest chip on the planet but without RAM it is useless, and the 360 has an extra 73mb of ram to work with,which is quite a lot, listen mate, i have provided proof for my argument you have provided nothing but OPINIONS without any proof to back them up, no offence but you obviously know nothing about how a console works cos your percentage figures are just plain wrong, any given game would use way more than 15% of the GPU, the cell supports the RSX when it comes to graphics not the other way around, you are just talking rubbish basically and you should shut up.fixer293

Nice article on RAM:

http://talkplaystation.com/ps3s-ram-and-rsx-explained/

Try reading the article. It's full of facts that can be checked.

[QUOTE="fixer293"][QUOTE="NielsNL"]

Nice article on RAM:

http://talkplaystation.com/ps3s-ram-and-rsx-explained/

acemasta21

http://www.product-reviews.net/2008/07/05/call-of-duty-4-larger-burden-on-sony-ps3-than-xbox-360/

Gamer Over.

AND im out lates.

http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/272861

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="acemasta21"]

ps3s Cell makes up for it 7 processors to calculate games and the RSX to play them so the ps3 uses 85% of the cell and 15% of the RSX please dont tell me the 360s stronger seriously

acemasta21

[QUOTE="fixer293"][QUOTE="NielsNL"]

Nice article on RAM:

http://talkplaystation.com/ps3s-ram-and-rsx-explained/

NielsNL

Try reading the article. It's full of facts that can be checked.

[QUOTE="acemasta21"][QUOTE="fixer293"] An article from a PS website....yeah that's not bias /sarcasm.fixer293

http://www.product-reviews.net/2008/07/05/call-of-duty-4-larger-burden-on-sony-ps3-than-xbox-360/

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]

[QUOTE="fixer293"] An article from a PS website....yeah that's not bias /sarcasm.fixer293

Try reading the article. It's full of facts that can be checked.

[QUOTE="acemasta21"][QUOTE="delta3074"]you realise everything a console does requires RAM don't you it can have the greatest chip on the planet but without RAM it is useless, and the 360 has an extra 73mb of ram to work with,which is quite a lot, listen mate, i have provided proof for my argument you have provided nothing but OPINIONS without any proof to back them up, no offence but you obviously know nothing about how a console works cos your percentage figures are just plain wrong, any given game would use way more than 15% of the GPU, the cell supports the RSX when it comes to graphics not the other way around, you are just talking rubbish basically and you should shut up.Shattered007

Gamer Over.

AND im out lates.

http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/272861

you realise everything a console does requires RAM don't you it can have the greatest chip on the planet but without RAM it is useless, and the 360 has an extra 73mb of ram to work with,which is quite a lot, listen mate, i have provided proof for my argument you have provided nothing but OPINIONS without any proof to back them up, no offence but you obviously know nothing about how a console works cos your percentage figures are just plain wrong, any given game would use way more than 15% of the GPU, the cell supports the RSX when it comes to graphics not the other way around, you are just talking rubbish basically and you should shut up.Shattered007

72mb is dedicated to the OS. Update v1.8 brought it down from 96mb.

[QUOTE="Dante2710"][QUOTE="ThatsSimtastic"] Cool, I don't see why you guys keep on making these threads, it's as if your trying to prove to yourself you've made the right decision in buying a ps3 or something.. ??acemasta21

Gamer Over.

AND im out lates.

http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/272861

of course you will agree with a PLAYSTATION website.....fanboy much

fixer293

The article contains FACTS! Not OPINIONS! Man you're annoying. You could at least try to reason like a grown-up. Stop calling people fanboys when clearly it's the pot telling the kettle it's black.

[QUOTE="acemasta21"][QUOTE="delta3074"]yes but the 360 has 73mb more to work with when creating games, i have proved this, so you are owned whether you like it or not, and the ps3 only has 512mb not 520mb, and even if it did have 520, that still leaves the 360 with an extra 65mb of RAM to work with, RAM is the most important part of a console and i'm sorry but the ps3 has less usable RAM,PERIOD, i want to see proof of your arguments, i have provided mine, so it's your turn, but then you can't can you? because you know you are talking rubbish, good luck trying to convince everyone else, cos in my mind you have no credibility, here again is my proof for everyone to see http://technabob.com/blog/2007/03/26/ps3-system-uses-3x-more-memory-than-xbox-360/ http://www.destructoid.com/ps3-development-of-red-faction-didn-t-go-so-smoothly-109816.phtmldelta3074

You also don't know a lot about consoles if you think the speed of the RAM doesn't matter..

[QUOTE="Shattered007"] ps3 has 520 MB sigh read my last message and you shut upNielsNL

72mb is dedicated to the OS. Update v1.8 brought it down from 96mb.

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="acemasta21"] look up XDR sigh***NielsNL

You also don't know a lot about consoles if you think the speed of the RAM doesn't matter..

[QUOTE="Shattered007"][QUOTE="acemasta21"]

Gamer Over.

AND im out lates.

http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/272861

acemasta21

Whats your xbl tag?

[QUOTE="acemasta21"][QUOTE="Shattered007"] Did you really just post a fourm for you proof? Wow, YoUs WiNS SyStEm WarS!!!ThatsSimtastic

Whats your xbl tag?

[QUOTE="acemasta21"]

Gamer Over.

AND im out lates.

http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/272861

Shattered007

Thats what i was going to say. Its only a forum from 2005 with people discussing what they think the PS3 is going to have. How does that prove anything. I could show you load of forum thread with people saying the 360 RAM is better but it doesn't make it true or false. Have you got any good evidence to back up your claims?

**offline**