PS3 vs. 360 vs. Wii in All Major Categories... The Winner Is...

Hermit here who still prefers the PC and has no big loyalties to any console but I've had a chance to play all three systems and here's my conclusion.

GRAPHICS

1. PS3... Best 1080p support. Always HDMI-ready. Best graphics for exclusives (think MGS4 vs. Halo 3). No contest.

2. 360... Quasi-HDTV. Not as much high res support as PS3 and HDMI wasn't even standard on the earlier 360 models.

3. WII... Feels like playing last gen's Xbox.

GAME SELECTION

1. 360... No contest. So much more selection and variety than the other consoles. Even more JRPGs than PS3. Wierd.

2. WII... Not as much multi-platform support but getting there. Big early push of Nintendo franchise titles.

3. PS3... Still behind with its "released before it was ready" launch. Quickly catching up to Wii with franchise exclusives starting to appear.

ONLINE GAMING

1. 360... Still the king of online gaming even though it costs the most. Most add-ons, biggest servers, headsets standard.

2. PS3... Quickly getting there with each PSN patch, but trying to play catchup with Xbox Live.

3. WII... No talking, no typing, not much communication online. Slow online community with non-Nintendo franchises.

MULTIMEDIA

1. PS3... Blu-Ray, HDTV movie trailers online, various memory cards support, was meant to be a multimedia device.

2. 360... Picked the loser of HDTV disc wars. Still has DVD functionality and Windows behind it.

3. WII... Gaming console first and foremost.

SOCIAL GAMING

1. WII... The type of system to bring to your family reunion or college dormitory.

2. 360... Gets a boost with huge online community.

3. PS3... Pretty lonely console.

COST

1. WII... So much cheaper, no higher-priced models, very few extra purchases required.

2. 360... A step below PS3 on price but mostly through lack of Blu-Ray and ridiculous ommission of HDD this generation.

3. PS3... If you want the best (MGS4 bundle and HDMI cables) you're looking at $600 easy.

SYSTEM POWER/SPECS

1. PS3... HDD standard, HDTV graphics standard, cell processor, etc.

2. 360... Not far behind PS3 but still lacks some of Sony's extras.

3. WII... Again, like playing a last gen system but Nintendo has gotten better.

CONTROLLER

1. WII... Standard controller support and let's face it, the Wii-Mote is more than a gimmick. With WiiFit and other creations, only system to have success with controllers that "think outside the box."

2. PS3... Tried and true PS3 design with rumble and Siraxis.

3. 360... New controller design not far behind PS3.

TRANSPORT/SIZE

1. WII... Smallest easiest to mount system.

2. 360... Smaller than PS3 and detachable HDD standard, etc.

3. PS3... Biggest bulkiest system.

TECHNICAL PROBLEMS/QUALITY ASSURANCE

1. WII... Least amount of problems reported.

2. PS3... Not far behind Wii now, but a lot of problem reported with earliest models of various PS3 designs.

3. 360... The dreaded red ring of death, need I say more.

BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY/RETRO GAMES ONLINE

1. WII... B/C is standard. Best selection online of classic games primarily because Nintendo owns the rights.

2. 360... B/C is standard for the most part. Next best selection of online classic games.

3. PS3... Most popular model doesn't have B/C. Poorest selection of online classic games.

VALUE

1. PS3... You can find Blu-Ray players for almost the same price as the system. Nuff said. Free online that is starting to look identical to Xbox Live. 3-5 years from now, PS3 will feel the least outdated of all the consoles.

2. 360... At the time of its release, would cost you nearly a thousand dollars to build a PC that plays Oblivion like that. Free DVD player.

3. WII... Lowest price, but also lowest system specs and extras.

POTENTIAL

1. PS3.. Why do I get the feeling that MGS4 is just the beginning? PS3 was way behind on its launch and we're going to see some mind-blowing games that take advantage of the specs and Blu-Ray. Tomorrow, PSN will almost be on par with Xbox Live with its features, and it's free! All it needs is the same size online community. PS3 was always projected as the longterm winner, and lately it's been showing.

2. WII... Nintendo suffered because no one really gave it a chance. Now that it's the #1 seller, third-party companies are jumping on the bandwagon as fast as they can. The Wii-Mote's potential is unlimited if used for more than just a casual game utility. When developers start developing exclusives that suit Wii's lower specs and games that add Wii-Mote functions that server as more than a few quick afterthoughts, we're going to see some great games!

3. 360... Sorry lemmings, but while 360 has the obvious headstart right now with software, I just don't see as much potential on the horizon. I don't see a Sega collapse like the Dreamcast, but sometimes being the first out the gate hurts your longrun potential. I can't wait for games like Fable 2 and the rumored KOTOR 3, but I'm much more excited about PS3 and the 3rd party companies that are now jumping on the Wii bandwagon.

TOTALS

WII - 5 3rd place votes, 2 2nd place votes, 6 1st place votes --- TOTAL OF 27 POINTS

PS3 - 5 3rd place votes, 3 2nd place votes, 5 1st place votes --- TOTAL OF 26 POINTS

360 - 3 3rd place votes, 8 2nd place votes, 2 1st place votes --- TOTAL OF 25 POINTS

Good post.

You are here by banned from System Wars forever.... good posts are not allowed on this board.

Fairly unbaised post - nice. Although may I ask, if early models of the 360 are punished for not including HDMI support, why are early models of the Sixaxis not punished for excluding rumble? It's a small point, but all helps consistency.

Otherwise, good post.

Pretty objective actually.

some of the stuff I can not agree with but I can see where you are coming from since personal tastes are different....I won't argue the point.

Still, put up that flame shield becaues on price, online and especially graphics, both Cows and Lemmings will flame you to death!

Good job, you're going to get flamed though, they'll complain because you said Wii-remote is more than a gimmick, and even though they've never used one, they'll still moan at you because "Teh 360 controll is awsum, it's got triggaz and teh crappy flat shoulder buttons!!!"bobbetybob

in game wii definately comes lastkaangonultas

The PS3 is obviously superior to both the X360 & Wii. With it's superior hardware & sleek metallic look, how can anybody settle for a console with such a laughable failure rate? (X360.) Or a console that relies solely on gimmicks to sell a unit or two. Honestly, the PS3 is the future of gaming, whoever disagrees with me is wrong.. just thought i'd point that out.Teh_Messiah

Yeah PS3 has those awesome things like home, six-axis, trophies, in game soundtracks, they aren'y gimmicks they stole from MS or Nintendo at all are they...oh wait. And how can someones opinion be wrong, your fanboy "facts" are completely wrong because you say 360 and Wii suck because one has bad failure rate, and one has gimmicks, doesn't matter, they still have much better games than PS3, are outselling PS3 and are generally looked at more favourably by the gaming community, PS3 is now known by most people as "That console with MGS4"

[QUOTE="kaangonultas"]in game wii definately comes lastps3weee

[QUOTE="ps3weee"][QUOTE="kaangonultas"]in game wii definately comes lastkaangonultas

That kind of comparison is kind of hard to judge though cause alot of those AA and AAA are spread over more than two platforms......If one of your competitor platforms has those games, then what's to stop me from buying the competitor platform, not yours?

Besides, if you trully judge it that way, then the true winner will always be the PC......

[QUOTE="ps3weee"][QUOTE="kaangonultas"]in game wii definately comes lastkaangonultas

In the end, it's all preference but if you want the best selection of quality franchise titles, Wii easily beats PS3. PS3 isn't far behind because even though it has a miserable output of franchise titles (heck, MGS4 just saved it!) it's still fun playing the multi-plats like COD4 and Oblivion. I dont' care who has the most AA/AAA, up until now, PS3 has mostly been a multi-plat system. I buy a console and want to experience new and interesting games. Wii has done that more than PS3 so far.

360 had the obvious head start but right now the battle between Wii and PS3 is multi-plat support vs. excusives. Wii is trying to bring more developers into the fold and encourage them to port weaker spec, Wii-Mote versions now that it's the obvious #1 best seller... PS3 is trying to create more franchise exclusives like MGS4 that point out why people should use the PlayStation brand name.

[QUOTE="kaangonultas"][QUOTE="ps3weee"][QUOTE="kaangonultas"]in game wii definately comes lastStryderK

That kind of comparison is kind of hard to judge though cause alot of those AA and AAA are spread over more than two platforms......If one of your competitor platforms has those games, then what's to stop me from buying the competitor platform, not yours?

Besides, if you trully judge it that way, then the true winner will always be the PC......

[QUOTE="ps3weee"][QUOTE="kaangonultas"]in game wii definately comes lastkaangonultas

No, it doesn't.

It has 0 AAAAEs, 4 AAAEs and 7 AAEs.

The PS3 has 1 AAAAE, 0 AAAEs and 4 AAEs.

The 360 has 0 AAAAEs, 4 AAAEs and 10 AAEs.

The Wii is second.

In terms of amount you are getting for the wii is the worst deal.

The manufactoring cost/retail dollar ratio goes to the PS3 then 360 then Wii.

The wii also has no analog triggers and doesin't work well with some traditional genre's such as fighting games. though the diffrences make it a weired mish mash between a mouse and 1/3 of an N64 controller. IMO it shoulden't be in that catagory at all for it's pro's and con's.

Xbox 360 has more games that run at higher resolutions compared to the PS3, it doesin't matter if HD support is better what matters is the product.

Other than that i have no issues with this comparason.

All it shows is it's a very tight race.

Very objective post. Can't argue with it at all.

In terms of amount you are getting for the wii is the worst deal.

The manufactoring cost/retail dollar ratio goes to the PS3 then 360 then Wii.

The wii also has no analog triggers and doesin't work well with some traditional genre's such as fighting games. though the diffrences make it a weired mish mash between a mouse and 1/3 of an N64 controller. IMO it shoulden't be in that catagory at all for it's pro's and con's.

Xbox 360 has more games that run at higher resolutions compared to the PS3, it doesin't matter if HD support is better what matters is the product.

Other than that i have no issues with this comparason.

All it shows is it's a very tight race.

insanejedi

Good point on the value. I added that category. Value is a big contribution nowadays in the console wars with so many systems trying to throw in multimedia functionality or PC-caliber graphics at a console price. The totals are even tighter now.

MCP - can you refer back to my question on the first page please? I'm just wondering how you rated past models when comparing the HDMI element of PS3 and 360, and then the rumble element of PS3 and 360 controllers.

Thanks man - otherwise, keep up the good work!

MCP - can you refer back to my question on the first page please? I'm just wondering how you rated past models when comparing the HDMI element of PS3 and 360, and then the rumble element of PS3 and 360 controllers.

Thanks man - otherwise, keep up the good work!

_Mastastica_

You have a legitimate issue. PS3 was the last system I thoroughly tried so I wasn't thinking much about it. Originally I was going to put PS3 and 360 at 2nd place tie on controller since they're so similar these days. Probably bias from having played the same controller through the PS1-PS2 years, but I still prefer it to Xbox. Just like the smaller, easier to hold, symmetrical design. (And this is from someone with big hands!)

In terms of amount you are getting for the wii is the worst deal.

The manufactoring cost/retail dollar ratio goes to the PS3 then 360 then Wii.

The wii also has no analog triggers and doesin't work well with some traditional genre's such as fighting games. though the diffrences make it a weired mish mash between a mouse and 1/3 of an N64 controller. IMO it shoulden't be in that catagory at all for it's pro's and con's.

Xbox 360 has more games that run at higher resolutions compared to the PS3, it doesin't matter if HD support is better what matters is the product.

Other than that i have no issues with this comparason.

All it shows is it's a very tight race.

insanejedi

But you can use the Gamecube controller if you so want, which helps for fighters, and it works really well for any kind of shooter or game that uses the pointer, and for driving games as the wii wheel proved. It has that choice of GC or Wii controller which is good for if you just want a more traditional experience once in a while.

I agree

[QUOTE="ps3weee"][QUOTE="kaangonultas"]in game wii definately comes lastkaangonultas

However, unlike PS3, pretty much all of Wii's good games are only available on Wii.

And people complain so much about having the "least number" but between all the good Nintendo games and the good third party games (boom blox, blast works, Z+W, NMH, Trauma Center, MoH H2, Okami, etc.) there is more than enough for any reasonable gamer, let alone gamers that consider Wii a secondary console, to keep busy with.

i agree with everything except controller. ps3 controller sucks, but then agaoin it's all down to what you're used tocrunchUK

Same here. I never liked the Sony designed controllers.

Every thing else on the list I agree with.

Sounds fairly unbiased..

Only thing I can complain about is that the game seletction is worth about the same as all the other criterias togheter..

[QUOTE="_Mastastica_"]

MCP - can you refer back to my question on the first page please? I'm just wondering how you rated past models when comparing the HDMI element of PS3 and 360, and then the rumble element of PS3 and 360 controllers.

Thanks man - otherwise, keep up the good work!

The__MCP

You have a legitimate issue. PS3 was the last system I thoroughly tried so I wasn't thinking much about it. Originally I was going to put PS3 and 360 at 2nd place tie on controller since they're so similar these days. Probably bias from having played the same controller through the PS1-PS2 years, but I still prefer it to Xbox. Just like the smaller, easier to hold, symmetrical design. (And this is from someone with big hands!)

OK that's fair enough. Although I disagree with you (the 360 controller for me is perfectly contoured and fits my chubby hands nicely) it's an opinion and I can't fault you for your logic.

CONTROLLER

1. WII... Standard controller support and let's face it, the Wii-Mote is more than a gimmick. With WiiFit and other creations, only system to have success with controllers that "think outside the box."

2. PS3... Tried and true PS3 design with rumble and Siraxis.

3. 360... New controller design not far behind PS3.

The__MCP

Only one i don't Agree with. Over all though, great post. You really seemed to stay unbiased, which was nice.

Good job, you're going to get flamed though, they'll complain because you said Wii-remote is more than a gimmick, and even though they've never used one, they'll still moan at you because "Teh 360 controll is awsum, it's got triggaz and teh crappy flat shoulder buttons!!!"bobbetybob

You called it. However youre only half right. I have a wii and hate motion control. Super Paper Mario and SSBB are the only wii games i've ever really enjoyed (sorry never got around to SMG, sure i'd love it though)

This is mainly becuase the two previous titles i mentioned used little to no motion control. Maybe its fun for others but i'm not a fan at all. I personally hope the next generation steers clear of motion. Or atleast makes it accurate. God, I remember Wario Ware: smooth moves, 25% of the time i felt like i was doing the correct move, only it wouldnt register.

[QUOTE="kaangonultas"][QUOTE="ps3weee"][QUOTE="kaangonultas"]in game wii definately comes lastDanm_999

No, it doesn't.

It has 0 AAAAEs, 4 AAAEs and 7 AAEs.

The PS3 has 1 AAAAE, 0 AAAEs and 4 AAEs.

The 360 has 0 AAAAEs, 4 AAAEs and 10 AAEs.

The Wii is second.

Its official you cant read he said aa not aae .And is gamespot your mentor or something??

[QUOTE="kaangonultas"][QUOTE="ps3weee"][QUOTE="kaangonultas"]in game wii definately comes lastDanm_999

No, it doesn't.

It has 0 AAAAEs, 4 AAAEs and 7 AAEs.

The PS3 has 1 AAAAE, 0 AAAEs and 4 AAEs.

The 360 has 0 AAAAEs, 4 AAAEs and 10 AAEs.

The Wii is second.

I can accept most of you're opinions other then Wii > PS3 for online community and Wii/360 > PS3 for BC.

you gave an example of the MGS4 bundle under price yet used the 40gb for the BC. Not to mention that 360 BC is just flat out a joke.

no big deal though, not a bad post all together TC ^^b

I have a urge to toss a Frisbee at you're pic though :P

I can accept most of you're opinions other then Wii > PS3 for online community and Wii/360 > PS3 for BC.

you gave an example of the MGS4 bundle under price yet used the 40gb for the BC. Not to mention that 360 BC is just flat out a joke.

no big deal though, not a bad post all together TC ^^b

I have a urge to toss a Frisbee at you're pic though :P

FragTycoon

I didn't put Wii > PS3 for online community. Or did you mean Wii is better than PS3? I have to disagree if that's the case. I just prefer the talk options, better friend/score tracking of XBLive and PSN. Feels more like a community. Wii feels more like a random anonymous online match, kind of like the online games options with Hearts and other basic Windows games.

I only put PS3 last in B/C because it seems like the model they are pushing the most does not have B/C as the standard feature. 360 is not standard B/C like Wii (which is why Wii is rated highest) but at least it offers it on all its systems, albeit minus a lot of the forgettable games. I'm also rating on which classics are available. With all those PS1/PS2 libraries, it's amazing that PSN hasn't done more like Nintendo's Virtual Console. They already offer Gran Turismo Prologue and a few other PS3 games, time to sack up, and sign some licensing agreements to get some of their better classic games online.

[QUOTE="The__MCP"][QUOTE="_Mastastica_"]

MCP - can you refer back to my question on the first page please? I'm just wondering how you rated past models when comparing the HDMI element of PS3 and 360, and then the rumble element of PS3 and 360 controllers.

Thanks man - otherwise, keep up the good work!

_Mastastica_

You have a legitimate issue. PS3 was the last system I thoroughly tried so I wasn't thinking much about it. Originally I was going to put PS3 and 360 at 2nd place tie on controller since they're so similar these days. Probably bias from having played the same controller through the PS1-PS2 years, but I still prefer it to Xbox. Just like the smaller, easier to hold, symmetrical design. (And this is from someone with big hands!)

OK that's fair enough. Although I disagree with you (the 360 controller for me is perfectly contoured and fits my chubby hands nicely) it's an opinion and I can't fault you for your logic.

Yeah, controller is all opinion. I think Xbox still struggles a little with their button, analog stick placement every few years just so they can try and at least look a little different than the PlayStation controllers but I think PS perfected the smaller symmetrical model a long time ago and the only different direction to go is what Nintendo did with an entirely new system.

wow TC that's accurate as hell... I believe all 3 are pretty close, but I would just say even though the only system I own is a Wii I don't consider it the best of the 3.bball_freak_2

Well.... even though Wii scored highest I would still rather have a 360 or PS3. It's personal preference i guess. But as you can see, all 3 are pretty tight in their scores. With so many systems having their own unique pros and cons, I think it really boils down to what types of games you enjoy. If you're a heavy online or RPG gamer, the 360. If you want to really take advantage of that new giant HDTV you broke the bank for and prefer more adult games, the PS3. If you just want some basic games, basic fun, don't care too much about the specs, the Wii.

I wouldn't compare Halo 3 graphics vs MGS4's. Halo 3 was a little letdown in graphics. You should compare MGS 4 with Gears of War. Yup, MGS 4 still looks better, but the "no contest" part sould be ommited.

Just a little advice. Great post.

The PS3 is obviously superior to both the X360 & Wii. With it's superior hardware & sleek metallic look, how can anybody settle for a console with such a laughable failure rate? (X360.) Or a console that relies solely on gimmicks to sell a unit or two. Honestly, the PS3 is the future of gaming, whoever disagrees with me is wrong.. just thought i'd point that out.Teh_Messiah

Yawn...

The PS3 is obviously superior to both the X360 & Wii. With it's superior hardware & sleek metallic look, how can anybody settle for a console with such a laughable failure rate? (X360.) Or a console that relies solely on gimmicks to sell a unit or two. Honestly, the PS3 is the future of gaming, whoever disagrees with me is wrong.. just thought i'd point that out.Teh_Messiah

I'd rather have a 360. And I'll agree that the black is cool, but I think that the design/shape of the PS3 is ugly. The early foreman grill pictures may have had something to do with this, although I doubt it. I just don't think it looks that good. And I like the 360's library more than the PS3s. PS3 is definitely 2nd to the 360 for me. Wii is in a class all its own.

The PS3 is obviously superior to both the X360 & Wii. With it's superior hardware & sleek metallic look, how can anybody settle for a console with such a laughable failure rate? (X360.) Or a console that relies solely on gimmicks to sell a unit or two. Honestly, the PS3 is the future of gaming, whoever disagrees with me is wrong.. just thought i'd point that out.Teh_Messiah

You created an account just to say that? That's sad...

Whatever. Anyone who reads that can come up with valid points why you are wrong. For instance, innoviation of the WiiMote asside, most sites rate the 360's controller the best...

The PS3 is obviously superior to both the X360 & Wii. With it's superior hardware & sleek metallic look, how can anybody settle for a console with such a laughable failure rate? (X360.) Or a console that relies solely on gimmicks to sell a unit or two. Honestly, the PS3 is the future of gaming, whoever disagrees with me is wrong.. just thought i'd point that out.Teh_Messiah

:lol: