PS3 was suppose to have better graphics than XBOX 360.

It may still get a game, i can't help but feel game designers don't both as much with ps3 as xbox for some reason, but if you compare the exclusives each console has i recon the ps3 exclusives come out on top, e.g. mgs4 better than halo 3

if killzone 2 keeps up to expectations then the ps3 will have game with better graphics

RE5 and KZ2 are very comparable.

I think people just going to get over the fact that the graphical differences between the two are neglible if the 360 can still run RE2, which is comparable to KZ2.

[QUOTE="Tragic_Kingdom7"]

RE5 and KZ2 are very comparable.

I think people just going to get over the fact that the graphical differences between the two are neglible if the 360 can still run RE2, which is comparable to KZ2.

ZoomZoom2490

What are graphics about? :roll:

Also the word comparable doesn't mean both games look exactly the same.

But seriously, what are graphics about?

[QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]How come you aren't using you're real accout? are you bored? take a look at KZ2 btw :) Zeuxo

You cant really compare between the 2.

In order to run Crysis on everything "high" (not to mention ultra), u need at least a 1200$ worth of machinary.

PS3 is only 400$.

[QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="Zeuxo"]Killzone2 looks good but nothing special like Crysisrybe1025

[QUOTE="Zeuxo"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]How come you aren't using you're real accout? are you bored? take a look at KZ2 btw :) 1xcalibur1

You cant really compare between the 2.

In order to run Crysis on everything "high" (not to mention ultra), u need at least a 1200$ worth of machinary.

PS3 is only 400$.

I can set console targeted games such as Grid, FarCry2, UT3's graphic details to high and 720p res on Geforce 8700GT GDDR3 i.e. less than 100USD gfx card. With Crysis, aim for console level 720p res and set graphics to high. Sub-100 USD Radeon HD 46x0 (includes 320 shaders i.e. same as Radeon HD 38x0) can handle this.

Last-gen, XBOX had better graphics in almost all multi-platform games(Exclusives are all about opinions) becasue it came out 1 year later after PS2 and so did PS3 but how come it dosent have better graphics?

Zeuxo

RE5 and KZ2 are very comparable.

I think people just going to get over the fact that the graphical differences between the two are neglible if the 360 can still run RE2, which is comparable to KZ2.

Last-gen, XBOX had better graphics in almost all multi-platform games(Exclusives are all about opinions) becasue it came out 1 year later after PS2 and so did PS3 but how come it dosent have better graphics?

Zeuxo

it never was "supposed" to have better graphics

that was just a BS myth started by Sony and all the media ate it up

Last-gen, XBOX had better graphics in almost all multi-platform games(Exclusives are all about opinions) becasue it came out 1 year later after PS2 and so did PS3 but how come it dosent have better graphics?

Zeuxo

PS3 is like the Sega Saturn, which was more powerful than the PS1, but the development platform was too different from what most devs already knew with existing technology.Blue-Sky

By more powerful, you must mean 2D. The PS1 was more powerful in 3D than the Saturn in polygon tests. I could go into threoriticals for both, but we both know Sony's was higher, and EA said back at both system's launch that they were happy to get 360,000 polys per second in a game (Sony said the PS1 could do 500,000 polys per second) while EA was struggling to get 60,000 out of the Saturn.

Of course, the architecture held the Saturn back, and there were some standout titles.

You are right though, Sega did have dual processors that made developing games on the Saturn harder than on PS1. Instead of using familiar C series coding, developers had to use Assembly. The Dual processors were fantastic in 2D, but hard to use for 3D (Which when Sega started the Saturn, they didn't know the industry was about to take a full 3D turn so swifly, and it has been speculated that the extra processor in the Saturn was thrown in late to compete with the PSX's 3D powers.) Ironically, although the PSX couldn't do 2D as well as the Saturn, Castlevania : SOTN was better on PSX.

So, when comparing the Saturn to the PS3, yes, the Saturn and PS3 were/are harder to develop for. However, the Saturn and PS3 don't compare when looking at modern comparison's to technology. The Saturn wasn't ready for the onslaught in 3D tech.

The PS2 was harder to code for than the Saturn anyways, and that worked out okay for Sony, strangly enough. There were a ton of PS2-Saturn comparison's back in the day before the PS2 hit it's sales stride.

[QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="Zeuxo"]Killzone2 looks good but nothing special like Crysisrybe1025

[QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="rybe1025"]Well look at it this way it looks like RE5 will be the graphics king so whichever console has the better version wins.rybe1025

[QUOTE="1xcalibur1"]

[QUOTE="Zeuxo"]

I can set console targeted games such as Grid, FarCry2, UT3's graphic details to high and 720p res on Geforce 8700GT GDDR3 i.e. less than 100USD gfx card. With Crysis, aim for console level 720p res and set graphics to high. Sub-100 USD Radeon HD 46x0 (includes 320 shaders i.e. same as Radeon HD 38x0) can handle this.

ronvalencia

[QUOTE="Zeuxo"]

Last-gen, XBOX had better graphics in almost all multi-platform games(Exclusives are all about opinions) becasue it came out 1 year later after PS2 and so did PS3 but how come it dosent have better graphics?

planbfreak4eva

[QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]How come you aren't using you're real accout? are you bored? take a look at KZ2 btw :) Zeuxo

I think the graphics are so similar between both consoles that people who buy one or the other are doing so for other reasons. The graphics battle is a tie. Other factors come into play.

And besides, the system with the better graphics does not always win. N64 had better graphics, Xbox had better graphics, and both systems finished 2nd behind Sony's platform that gen. Graphics, quite simply, do not matter that much so I laugh when fanboys argue about it.

[QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]How come you aren't using you're real accout? are you bored? take a look at KZ2 btw :) Zeuxo

It's still better looking than any Xbox 360 title out there, which is what this thread is all about. What does Crysis have to do with anything ?

[QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]How come you aren't using you're real accout? are you bored? take a look at KZ2 btw :) Zeuxo

[QUOTE="Zeuxo"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]How come you aren't using you're real accout? are you bored? take a look at KZ2 btw :) StealthKnife

[QUOTE="Zeuxo"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]How come you aren't using you're real accout? are you bored? take a look at KZ2 btw :) Gamer4Iife

It's still better looking than any Xbox 360 title out there, which is what this thread is all about. What does Crysis have to do with anything ?

[QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="Zeuxo"]Killzone2 looks good but nothing special like Crysisrybe1025

[QUOTE="rybe1025"][QUOTE="WalterPaladines"] I didnt know Crysis was on the 360 :roll: Killzone 2 looks better than anything on consoles /end threadS3CR3T_SPY2

RE5 has nothing on Killzone 2 mate. So there are some good character models...

Thats nice, though the actual environments are not brilliant, just nice, there are hardly any effects going on at all.

Its just like how gears 2 went, you show some stills and say it looks incredible, then it comes out and we all find it has nothing on KZ2. Its not difficult to have good textures when theres no effects going on and all the death animations look like they were pulled from RE4.

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="1xcalibur1"] [QUOTE="planbfreak4eva"][QUOTE="Zeuxo"]

Last-gen, XBOX had better graphics in almost all multi-platform games(Exclusives are all about opinions) becasue it came out 1 year later after PS2 and so did PS3 but how come it dosent have better graphics?

Steppy_76

Actually, back in the day, most multiplat titles looked the same or even better on the PS2 than on Xbox because games were built around the PS2, which was the lead developing platform.metalgear-solid

[QUOTE="Steppy_76"][QUOTE="ronvalencia"]uncharted and mgs4 look better than gears 2...and now uncharted 2 and killzone 2 will look even better...and now many multiplats look better on ps3 than 360...in the beggining it was other way around...planbfreak4eva

[QUOTE="planbfreak4eva"][QUOTE="Steppy_76"]Really, "many" multiplats look better on the PS3? According to whom? PS3 multiplats now look the same as 360 in many cases but still worse in far more than they look better. Also, you'll have a hard time convincing most people that MGS4 looks better than Gears, and even a hard time with Uncharted(though Uncharted is at least closer). What is it with cows overestimating games graphics?jeezers

[QUOTE="jeezers"][QUOTE="planbfreak4eva"]some multiplats on ps3 look better..some look the same..and some are better on 360...burnout paradise is better on ps3..proven already...and other games...gta iv looks better on 360...so some look better,some look the same..some look worse...but ps3 cought up...and uncharted is better looking...do some research..and mgs4 is better aswell..if u look at overall..texture, lights, animation of the person etc...mgs4 and uncharted look better...the endplanbfreak4eva

[QUOTE="planbfreak4eva"][QUOTE="jeezers"] MGS4 looks better than gears2 HA! wat a nub XDjeezers

[QUOTE="jeezers"][QUOTE="planbfreak4eva"]you talking about me..or urself...ha..read some reviews..and actually play both games..and u will see the difference..and if u analise every detail of the game..all graphical aspects...mgs4 looks better...thats why there is internet..TO DO RESEARCH...so go make some..unles you want embaress urself even morePhazevariance

Intellivision graphics > Atari 2600

NES graphics > Colecovision

N64 graphics > PS1

SNES graphics > Genesis

PS2 graphics > Dreamcast

GC graphics > PS2

I find it strange that Sony actually tried to make PS3 have superior graphical capabilities and failed. Wii doesn't count. Nintendo wasn't trying to outdo the competition with graphics, physics. And as great as Killzone 2 looks, I'm sure it could be done on 360 with a lot less effort.

I find it strange that Sony actually tried to make PS3 have superior graphical capabilities and failed.

AvIdGaMeR444

Had sony made the PS3 without blue ray,you can bet it would have easily surpassed the 360 in graphics cuz then sony wouldnt have to cut corners with their GPU,ram etc.

[QUOTE="planbfreak4eva"][QUOTE="jeezers"] MGS4 looks better than gears2 HA! wat a nub XDjeezers

[QUOTE="WalterPaladines"][QUOTE="Zeuxo"]Killzone2 looks good but nothing special like Crysisrybe1025

Intellivision graphics > Atari 2600

NES graphics > Colecovision

N64 graphics > PS1

SNES graphics > Genesis

PS2 graphics > Dreamcast

GC graphics > PS2

I find it strange that Sony actually tried to make PS3 have superior graphical capabilities and failed. Wii doesn't count. Nintendo wasn't trying to outdo the competition with graphics, physics. And as great as Killzone 2 looks, I'm sure it could be done on 360 with a lot less effort.

AvIdGaMeR444

[QUOTE="rybe1025"][QUOTE="WalterPaladines"] I didnt know Crysis was on the 360 :roll: Killzone 2 looks better than anything on consoles /end threadSoulja_West

I don't know.. i think there around the same area, although KZ2 has many more effects than RE5 when it comes down to playing those games. Both games will probably equally impress, because the presentation is just sooo good in RE5 and Killzone 2.

[QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

Intellivision graphics > Atari 2600

NES graphics > Colecovision

N64 graphics > PS1

SNES graphics > Genesis

PS2 graphics > Dreamcast

GC graphics > PS2

I find it strange that Sony actually tried to make PS3 have superior graphical capabilities and failed. Wii doesn't count. Nintendo wasn't trying to outdo the competition with graphics, physics. And as great as Killzone 2 looks, I'm sure it could be done on 360 with a lot less effort.

Sgt_Hale

I don't know.. i think there around the same area, although KZ2 has many more effects than RE5 when it comes down to playing those games. Both games will probably equally impress, because the presentation is just sooo good in RE5 and Killzone 2.

Adrian_Cloud

From what I've played of the RE5 Demo, It seems like it'll be a good game... more of the same of RE4, with an even bigger focus on combat... but that's not a bad thing. However it's not the best looking game ever... MOF it's got quite a few problems. The shelves you can push in front of the door or window seem to be straight out of RE4... Also objects that litter the area seem lifeless and boxy. Characters are great though.

[QUOTE="Adrian_Cloud"]

I don't know.. i think there around the same area, although KZ2 has many more effects than RE5 when it comes down to playing those games. Both games will probably equally impress, because the presentation is just sooo good in RE5 and Killzone 2.

GundamGuy0

From what I've played of the RE5 Demo, It seems like it'll be a good game... more of the same of RE4, with an even bigger focus on combat... but that's not a bad thing. However it's not the best looking game ever... MOF it's got quite a few problems. The shelves you can push in front of the door or window seem to be straight out of RE4... Also objects that litter the area seem lifeless and boxy. Characters are great though.

I don't mean to sound like a fanboy, but nothing on 360 compares to Uncharted, MGS4, KZ2, Heavy Rain and Gran Turismo 5.

And from what I've heard, God of War 3 looks better than all of those games combined...Well, guess we'll have to wait for December 14th for that one.

RE5 looks good but...KZ2 looks better. And the vids we've seen aren't even the final build, they still have 3 months of polish left...o.0.

[QUOTE="Sgt_Hale"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

Intellivision graphics > Atari 2600

NES graphics > Colecovision

N64 graphics > PS1

SNES graphics > Genesis

PS2 graphics > Dreamcast

GC graphics > PS2

I find it strange that Sony actually tried to make PS3 have superior graphical capabilities and failed. Wii doesn't count. Nintendo wasn't trying to outdo the competition with graphics, physics. And as great as Killzone 2 looks, I'm sure it could be done on 360 with a lot less effort.

xion1234