Im going to try to make this thread so it looks liek i am neither a Lemming or a cow, because in reality im actually Neutral between the two.
Lots of people seem to think that PSN is a very bad service. But in fact it really isnt. While it isnt as robust as LIVE, PSN does give you the basic components for Online play at no pennys charge to you. While it does not have a Unified Freinds syestem (hopefully fixed in the future) Its does let you have a freinds list, play games online, get demos of games, buy add on content, and the ability to purchase Downloadable games. However, it does not give you the ability to purchase TV shows and Movies like Live does. and I admit the Interface is much better than PSNs. but the two former arent necessary to online gaming, tehre more of a added perk to that 50 dollar a year price tag. and I do like the fact that they recieve updateds on demos and such a little faster than PSN (being that PSN is only updated on Thursdays)
But people really need to realize that the reason why Live seems to be better is mainly because its a older service and has had 5 years to mature and grow, while PSN has had only 1 year. THeres even talk cirsulating that PSN is about to get its own Video/Music Distribution service, however it would take time for them to match lives all ready large librarey.
Basically, your paying your 50 dollars a year right now for Online play and a Video Distribution service, while with PSN, your paying nothing for the same thing minus the Video Distribution and the unified freind service.
It basically boils down to do you want to pay a yearly fee for something Fantastic, or not paying for something thats almost as fantastic.
Log in to comment