Beyond two souls just got 94% more creepy
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Karpetburnz"]Isnt the next Xbox gonna be sold like cable box? LOL PS4 is where the games are at. none of this Kinect Bullsh!t.StrongDeadlift
Right :roll:
Sony is NOT, NEVER was, NEVER did caught up with the whole Motion Sensing garbage, like MS did. Hence why the Move never was solely focused on. Their focus has always been the core gaming market, always has always been, simply because that's where Sony excels at. Sony acknowledges this which is why they always have a continuing relationship with developers.
[QUOTE="NineTailedGoku"]
[QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"]
bold is where I stopped readingStrongDeadlift
Funny how they showed nothing but core games as well.
So the 20 minutes Media Molecule spent showing you how to sculpt clay penises, as well as
.........THIS:
is a core game now? :lol:
Cows gonna cow :lol: Mooooooooo :cool:
:lol:
MASSIVE ownage..the bandodger is going to be really butthurt now :cool:The light on the controller is not Move is to identify players while they log in..:lol: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=515732 The only thing sony showed with the camera was a move demo,but move it self is not included,unlike KInect which the xbox 720 need even to launch a game.LOL. Right. Customers are just screaming to have a color coded light to show log-in. And multi-coloured health bars on the front of your controller pointed away from you is going to be an awesome advance over an onscreen healthbar. The enhanced 6 axis capability is just a coincidence. Another coincidence is that the new 3d eye can track the new DS4.[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]
Right :roll:
SUD123456
The only thing they haven't said is whether the camera is being built in or will be a seperate accessory. Without the camera it is going to be motion sensing light. With the camera it is going to be move 2.0. And there will be the option of a seperate move controller.
I actually like this business strategy better than MS because we presumably wom't have to pay the cost of the camera in every unit. On the otherhand a built in kinect is going to be cheaper than buying a seperate move camera, so a lot may still depend on pricing.
But lets not kid ourselves that one is uber core and the other is uber casual. Sony is building some of the enabling technology into every system, they just have not gone whole hog and bundled the camera (that we know of yet).
Is not move it was stated move still work with this,the DS is not move maybe you have a link to prove it please share it.I didnt claim that, I read the article. I would wager that they know the true specs anyway, they just cant directly talk about them yet1: he proves he doesn't know nothing about next xbox
2: he says rumors specs that could be wrong or could be right and IF thats the case i hope MS goes back and reconsider that
3: Tc claims they went choose to go console excluive on ps4 because of rumors... SAD
k2theswiss
[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]
[QUOTE="Karpetburnz"]Isnt the next Xbox gonna be sold like cable box? LOL PS4 is where the games are at. none of this Kinect Bullsh!t.M8ingSeezun
Right :roll:
Sony is NOT, NEVER was, NEVER did caught up with the whole Motion Sensing garbage, like MS did. Hence why the Move never was solely focused on. Their focus has always been the core gaming market, always has always been, simply because that's where Sony excels at. Sony acknowledges this which is why they always have a continuing relationship with developers.
:roll: Please. Go watch the E3 press conference where they revealed the Move. They spent just as much time talking about it as Mircorosft did in 2009-2010. The only difference was, one of them was a successful commercial monster that outsold the Ipad launch, while the other one was a failure. That has more to do with the fact that like almost every endeavor Sony has attempted this generation they dont support it and send it out to die. It was a failed project just like the PSPGo, the Xperia Play, etc....
Thats the only reason Sony "doesnt focus on it" now ;)
Do you have a quota of how frequently to make an idiot out of yourself on a daily basis? :lol:""PS4: DualShock 4 is not a Move controller, says Sonys Michael Denny PS4 will be bundled with a dual camera bar that tracks Sonys new DualShock 4 controller, but dont get it mixed up with Move says Michael Denny, vice president of Sony Worldwide Studios Europe. Denny has elaborated a little further on what the new controller can do, and what its light strip is capable of."" All i care all it matter.. http://www.vg247.com/2013/02/25/ps4-dualshock-4-is-not-a-move-controller-says-sonys-michael-denny/ So no is not Kiect for PS4..https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiNGZMx2vhY&feature=player_detailpage#t=1047s
"And this new controller was designed in tandem with a second peripheral, a stereo camera that can sense the depth of the area in front of it, and can track the 3d position of the controller via its 'light bar'"
idiot
:roll:
StrongDeadlift
[QUOTE="NineTailedGoku"]
[QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"]
bold is where I stopped readingStrongDeadlift
Funny how they showed nothing but core games as well.
So the 20 minutes Media Molecule spent showing you how to sculpt clay penises, as well as
.........THIS:
is a core game now? :lol:
Cows gonna cow :lol: Mooooooooo :cool:
:lol:
Is that the the DS for PS4.? Oh no wait is move which also works with the PS4,so 1 game means all games will be casual sh** point to the console without a single casual game.? Hell even PC which is held as the house for hardcore has tons of casuals games. And you call me idiot...:lol:[QUOTE="ReadingRainbow4"]No emotionally attached to a plastic object like you:cool: cry me some moretelly is full of jelly.
Tessellation
You're beyond emotionally attached to a plastic object breh.
No emotionally attached to a plastic object like you:cool: cry me some more[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="ReadingRainbow4"]
telly is full of jelly.
ReadingRainbow4
You're beyond emotionally attached to a plastic object breh.
are those tears? keep them coming :cool:Thank you SonyDid anybody else catch this?
Its from The Witness blog, it explains how the game ended up on PS4.
"I dont have good communication with anyone at Microsoft right now, but all our technical people like the PS4 specs a lot more than the leaked Durango specs, and we like the positioning of the PS4 (its about games) more than what we perceive Microsofts positioning is going to be."
AdamPA1006
Lems, be sad.
[QUOTE="AdamPA1006"]all our technical people like the PS4 specs a lot more than the leaked Durango specsCherokee_Jack
Meaning they know as much as we do.
Or the specs are real.[QUOTE="ReadingRainbow4"][QUOTE="Tessellation"]No emotionally attached to a plastic object like you:cool: cry me some moreTessellation
You're beyond emotionally attached to a plastic object breh.
are those tears? keep them coming :cool:No just laughter.
[QUOTE="Karpetburnz"]Isnt the next Xbox gonna be sold like cable box? LOL PS4 is where the games are at. none of this Kinect Bullsh!t.StrongDeadlift
Right :roll:
That's NO different from showing an Eyetoy and PS2, the greatest console ever. You sir, are an idiot.
[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]
[QUOTE="Karpetburnz"]Isnt the next Xbox gonna be sold like cable box? LOL PS4 is where the games are at. none of this Kinect Bullsh!t.NineTailedGoku
Right :roll:
YET Sony said their focus is CORE gamers. Funny how that works.
or Just MS is better than them at it and they gave up? thats why 720 is in strong position next gen, casuals spend money.
Except rumblings out developers is that while the PS4 is more powerful, the gap is marginal and similar to the ps3 vs 360. Its brute strength vs raw efficiency.[QUOTE="AdamPA1006"]
Did anybody else catch this?
Its from The Witness blog, it explains how the game ended up on PS4.
"I dont have good communication with anyone at Microsoft right now, but all our technical people like the PS4 specs a lot more than the leaked Durango specs, and we like the positioning of the PS4 (its about games) more than what we perceive Microsofts positioning is going to be."
Innovazero2000
They are speculating just like anybody else, they don't know any more then the lot at the moment. What MS does as far as positioning goes will greatly influence my decision. I do like what the PS4 is offering though, curious to see the pricing.
No its not lol. PS4 architecture is totally different and the system has CLEAR spec advantages over the lolango leaked specs. Putting it at a clear advantage.[QUOTE="Karpetburnz"]Isnt the next Xbox gonna be sold like cable box? LOL PS4 is where the games are at. none of this Kinect Bullsh!t.StrongDeadlift
Right :roll:
You do know that their not going to pack it with the PS4..If you look at the PS3 they are killing the 360 with their first party games ..NONE of it was a eye toy game unlike MIcrsoft who makes game for Kinect and force it into people throat. I feel bad for Lemming they have nothing to fight back with that are facts..
[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"][QUOTE="Karpetburnz"]Isnt the next Xbox gonna be sold like cable box? LOL PS4 is where the games are at. none of this Kinect Bullsh!t.stayhigh1
Right :roll:
You do know that their not going to pack it with the PS4.. Do you have a link to this? Why else would they build the technology into their controller and not ship the console with the camera? :lol:
If you look at the PS3 they are killing the 360 with their first party games
"Killing" in what way? Sales? :lol:
Games? Halo 4 and Forza came out last year. The ONLY PS3 exclusive that was in the top 60 PS3 games on Metacritic last year was Journey. In fact, Journey was the only AA+ Sony had last year.
..NONE of it was a eye toy game
:roll: Right
unlike MIcrsoft who makes game for Kinect and force it into people throat.
You're forced to buy Kinect? News to me, Ive never used the device in my life ;)
I feel bad for Lemming they have nothing to fight back with that are facts..
The fact that you dont know what the word "fact" means makes me worry for our public school system :?
Except rumblings out developers is that while the PS4 is more powerful, the gap is marginal and similar to the ps3 vs 360. Its brute strength vs raw efficiency.[QUOTE="Innovazero2000"]
[QUOTE="AdamPA1006"]
Did anybody else catch this?
Its from The Witness blog, it explains how the game ended up on PS4."I dont have good communication with anyone at Microsoft right now, but all our technical people like the PS4 specs a lot more than the leaked Durango specs, and we like the positioning of the PS4 (its about games) more than what we perceive Microsofts positioning is going to be."
Douevenlift_bro
They are speculating just like anybody else, they don't know any more then the lot at the moment. What MS does as far as positioning goes will greatly influence my decision. I do like what the PS4 is offering though, curious to see the pricing.
No its not lol. PS4 architecture is totally different and the system has CLEAR spec advantages over the lolango leaked specs. Putting it at a clear advantage. sorry I don't take bias answers without knowledge of architectures seriously. Regardless...everybody is still guessing.[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]
[QUOTE="Karpetburnz"]Isnt the next Xbox gonna be sold like cable box? LOL PS4 is where the games are at. none of this Kinect Bullsh!t.NineTailedGoku
Right :roll:
YET Sony said their focus is CORE gamers. Funny how that works.
Just because they said it doesn't mean they will follow what they said. It's all marketing and they are trying to get people on board which is working.
[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]No its not lol. PS4 architecture is totally different and the system has CLEAR spec advantages over the lolango leaked specs. Putting it at a clear advantage. sorry I don't take bias answers without knowledge of archetectures seriously. Regardless...everybody is still guessing. This. These idiots dont even realize that both systems are based off of the same technology. Both systems are using 8 AMD Jaguar cores, and GCN based GPUs based on 7970m.[QUOTE="Innovazero2000"] Except rumblings out developers is that while the PS4 is more powerful, the gap is marginal and similar to the ps3 vs 360. Its brute strength vs raw efficiency.
They are speculating just like anybody else, they don't know any more then the lot at the moment. What MS does as far as positioning goes will greatly influence my decision. I do like what the PS4 is offering though, curious to see the pricing.
Innovazero2000
[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"] This. These idiots dont even realize that both systems are based off of the same technology. Both systems are using 8 AMD Jaguar cores, and GCN based GPUs based on 7970m. tormentosNon are base on 7970m... The xbox 720 GPU is 12CU with an 8core jaguar,8BG of DDR3 and 32MB of ESRAM. The PS4 is 18CU unified and enhance for computing purposes as well,8 core Jaguar,8GB of GDDR5. Now the GPU don't have the same power the PS4 one is stronger and from the same line,which mean the difference will be notice. The PS4 has a separate chip to handle the OS,the xbox 720 is say to use 2 cores for OS,that means the PS4 has more resources for graphics vs a console that already is under power. The 720 is say to have 3GB of ram reserve for OS and system,the PS4 is rumored to use only 512MB.. There are some serious differences between the 2 systems,if it end like this ^^^ the PS4 will walk over the 720 with ease.
You do not know what the Xbox is based on, outside of it being based on the same architecture in the PS4. AMD Jaguar and GNC (most likely both willl be GNC2)
The PS3 gpu IS based on a 7970m with two fewer CUs. The 7970m uses 20.
One of the PS4 rumors said that they removed 2 CUs from it.
And again you are being rediculous with the GDDR5 nonsense. GDDR5 is based on DDR3. It is modified DDR3 for higher bandwidth with a tradeoff of latency, and it is compatable with DDR3. For this reason, it is the easiest component in the system for Microsoft to upgrade. There is no fundamental change that needs to take place in the way games are programmed for them to switch it. It is not like the PS3's XDR and GDDR2 memory which require two different programming languages and are not compatable with eachother. You are a fool if you believe Mircorosft is not going to have it in their platform.
Non are base on 7970m... The xbox 720 GPU is 12CU with an 8core jaguar,8BG of DDR3 and 32MB of ESRAM. The PS4 is 18CU unified and enhance for computing purposes as well,8 core Jaguar,8GB of GDDR5. Now the GPU don't have the same power the PS4 one is stronger and from the same line,which mean the difference will be notice. The PS4 has a separate chip to handle the OS,the xbox 720 is say to use 2 cores for OS,that means the PS4 has more resources for graphics vs a console that already is under power. The 720 is say to have 3GB of ram reserve for OS and system,the PS4 is rumored to use only 512MB.. There are some serious differences between the 2 systems,if it end like this ^^^ the PS4 will walk over the 720 with ease.[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"] This. These idiots dont even realize that both systems are based off of the same technology. Both systems are using 8 AMD Jaguar cores, and GCN based GPUs based on 7970m. StrongDeadlift
You do not know what the Xbox is based on, outside of it being based on the same architecture in the PS4. AMD Jaguar and GNC (most likely both willl be GNC2)
The PS3 gpu IS based on a 7970m with two fewer CUs. The 7970m uses 20.
One of the PS4 rumors said that they removed 2 CUs from it.
And again you are being rediculous with the GDDR5 nonsense. GDDR5 is based on DDR3. It is modified DDR3 for higher bandwidth with a tradeoff of latency, and it is compatable with DDR3. For this reason, it is the easiest component in the system for Microsoft to upgrade. There is no fundamental change that needs to take place in the way games are programmed for them to switch it. It is not like the PS3's XDR and GDDR2 memory which require two different programming languages and are not compatable with eachother. You are a fool if you believe Mircorosft is not going to have it in their platform.
They have set them self a powertarget lower than the PS4 ever since the first rumored dev kits. If they make drastic changes like adding CU's to the GPU and changing the DDR3 to GDDR5, the costs will go up and the console will not come out until late 2014. And if we add they're Kinect 2.0 development priority, the X720 will be more expencive than the PS4 if they use the same hardware. I would guess that the easiest upgrade would be to add an own 1+GB of VRAM on the GPU. Also, they have known that the PS4 would have GDDR5 RAM for some time now, we would probably have seen some changes in dev kits about now if they were releasing a console this year with drasticly changed specs.[QUOTE="NineTailedGoku"]
[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]
Right :roll:
sirk1264
YET Sony said their focus is CORE gamers. Funny how that works.
Just because they said it doesn't mean they will follow what they said. It's all marketing and they are trying to get people on board which is working.
No, they'll probably follow what they say, if the past three Playstation consoles are anything to go by.You do not know what the Xbox is based on, outside of it being based on the same architecture in the PS4. AMD Jaguar and GNC (most likely both willl be GNC2)No is not is based on the 7870 with 2 CU disable.. GDDR5 is based on DDR 3 but is way faster,and its latency issues were resolve in fact GDDR5 now use tech to cope with latency,it has been posted here already several times,if DDR3 was better for GPU,sellers would still be using it,but no the standard for GPU is GDDR5 the precursor was DDR3,so yeah GPU developers dropped DDR3 for a reason. The fact that ESRAM exist basically kill your argument,please show me links to the xbox 720 using GDDR5,the fact that GDDR5 is based on DDR3 doesn't mean they are compatible,else we would have a barrage of GDDR5 cards running as system memory on PC's every where. Changing ram mean that MS has to change the board and even the design,i am not saying the can't upgrade but to do so the Durango would be delay like for 9 months to a year.The PS3 gpu IS based on a 7970m with two fewer CUs. The 7970m uses 20.
One of the PS4 rumors said that they removed 2 CUs from it.
And again you are being rediculous with the GDDR5 nonsense. GDDR5 is based on DDR3. It is modified DDR3 for higher bandwidth with a tradeoff of latency, and it is compatable with DDR3. For this reason, it is the easiest component in the system for Microsoft to upgrade. There is no fundamental change that needs to take place in the way games are programmed for them to switch it. It is not like the PS3's XDR and GDDR2 memory which require two different programming languages and are not compatable with eachother. You are a fool if you believe Mircorosft is not going to have it in their platform.
StrongDeadlift
[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]You do not know what the Xbox is based on, outside of it being based on the same architecture in the PS4. AMD Jaguar and GNC (most likely both willl be GNC2)No is not is based on the 7870 with 2 CU disable.. GDDR5 is based on DDR 3 but is way faster,and its latency issues were resolve in fact GDDR5 now use tech to cope with latency,it has been posted here already several times,if DDR3 was better for GPU,sellers would still be using it,but no the standard for GPU is GDDR5 the precursor was DDR3,so yeah GPU developers dropped DDR3 for a reason. The fact that ESRAM exist basically kill your argument,please show me links to the xbox 720 using GDDR5,the fact that GDDR5 is based on DDR3 doesn't mean they are compatible,else we would have a barrage of GDDR5 cards running as system memory on PC's every where. Changing ram mean that MS has to change the board and even the design,i am not saying the can't upgrade but to do so the Durango would be delay like for 9 months to a year. Assuming any of the specs were right to begin with. Lord know how old those durango specs are, the final build could be more powerful.The PS3 gpu IS based on a 7970m with two fewer CUs. The 7970m uses 20.
One of the PS4 rumors said that they removed 2 CUs from it.
And again you are being rediculous with the GDDR5 nonsense. GDDR5 is based on DDR3. It is modified DDR3 for higher bandwidth with a tradeoff of latency, and it is compatable with DDR3. For this reason, it is the easiest component in the system for Microsoft to upgrade. There is no fundamental change that needs to take place in the way games are programmed for them to switch it. It is not like the PS3's XDR and GDDR2 memory which require two different programming languages and are not compatable with eachother. You are a fool if you believe Mircorosft is not going to have it in their platform.
tormentos
What if the 720 is weaker than the PS4? And what if its pike PS2 to XBOX? Would cow be hypocritcal and bash the 720 like its the weakest thing since pong?KaszillaHypocrital.? The xbox and the PS2 were not launch at the same time,so is not like MS beat sony head to head,they simple make a better machine that landed almost 2 years latter,20 months to be exact.
Marketing spin blah blah blah...but as I've said in several threads tonight...the biggest thing I liked about the Sony presser was that it was mostly about the games/game developers and social stuff directly related to games. Even at E3 2012, I thought Sony's presser was by far the most game centric, eventhough none of them were great. It seems to me that they figured out the key to sucess for PS4 is focusing on games and gamers.
MS is pushing this whole entertainment box/casual aspect and unless we see a complete 180 marketing wise, I'm sure the same will hold true for Durango.
[QUOTE="Tessellation"] its probably stripped down version for the console,remember that the xbox 360 OS is based on windows 2000 which used 64MB and If durango uses a stripped down version probably around 1GB(windows 8 uses 2GB for x64) + kinnect = 2GB and there isn't latest specs they are still the same ones from 2012, its just that VG Leaks divided them in different articles..tormentosI still think that it will be 2GB,it could be more if Kinect is a heavy hit,there are rumors about siri like stuff and other things as well,it may be it maybe be not. I also think the PS4 will use like 1GB or 1.5,and not the 512 rumored.
I would assume they would use a custom Windows 8 RT kernal, very low foot print at 512mb.
I know the Ps4 is more powerful, but I think the goal like the 360 was to be very competitive in power with a unique archtecture, and come in at a lower price. Kinect being included has to be expensive though, then again so is the DDR5 in the ps4.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment