"PS3" Better graphics than 360

  • 105 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Dr_DudeMan
Dr_DudeMan

2794

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#101 Dr_DudeMan
Member since 2006 • 2794 Posts
[QUOTE="Dr_DudeMan"][QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"][QUOTE="aceReborn"][QUOTE="DOC105"]Personally I think the PS3 has better graphics than the 360. Because the PS3 produces lighter graphics, in the game call of duty I have noticed that it's worthless playing the game on 360 because you can't see anything, but I hope by this or next year (as many people predict) the PS3 should have better graphics than 360. I think the only game that can show that is Metal Gear Solid 4. Do you agree? And by the way why doesn't any game take advantage of the blue rays capacity? Teufelhuhn
Ps3 version is brighter because the dynamic range of the lightning effects are lower, and to compensate, the devs makes the ps3 version brighter. Or to put it in another way, on the scale from dark to light, the 360 version has more steps to work with, and can hence have a wider dynamic range with smoother transitions. On a capable and well calibrated display, the increased dynamic range of the 360 version makes it look more natural than the ps3 version.



I haven't programmed anything for the PS3, but if the RSX based off a 7800 than its perfectly capable of rendering to R16G16B16A16F (64-bit) floating-point formats (in fact its probably capable of R32G32B32A32F). Most 360 games, on the other hand, use a specialized R10G10B10A2F (32-bit) format thats customized for the Xenos (although its still cabable of FP16 or INT16 formats). So, unless you have intimate knowledge of the format of the render-targets used by COD3's dev team, I'm not sure where you're pulling this from.

LOL! You are very wrong about both the RSX and Xenos there...and I dont even feel like getting into it. Go read the tech specs for the 7800 at nvidia's site, and then the tech specs for xenos at the ati site. That should clear up most of your misconceptions.



Oh, of course. How stupid of me. The 7800 doesn't support a format that's been available since 5xxx era. :roll: Why do you even bother to post if you can't argue about this stuff?

I could argue this, I just choose not to because I have argued it a million times on system wars and t3h kiddies never listen.
Avatar image for tricyclon123
tricyclon123

436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 tricyclon123
Member since 2007 • 436 Posts

LOL. PS3 version looks almost as Wii


dimar19

WOW, is PS3 version THAT BAD LOOKING ??? 360 is 10 times better

And PS3 Oblivion has washed out colors, and no AA or HDR, plus it looks more realistic just because the pic is taken a different time of day, in the afternoon, play the game and you will know what i mean

Avatar image for chubz256
chubz256

171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 chubz256
Member since 2005 • 171 Posts
[QUOTE="Dr_DudeMan"][QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]The 360's "power" is much easier to tap into than the PS3's, just like last gen. This is no big secret. If the PS3 actually starts producing better-looking games, its going to be after programmers have had a while to really exploit the system's capabilities. Teufelhuhn
I dont understand where these cows come from. An inferior gpu, will never look as good as a superior gpu.



System performance is dependent on the entire architecture of the system, not just the GPU.  There's lots of ways that the Cell's SPE's could be put to use for helping out the GPU.  But I'm sure you know that already.  :wink:

Graphics processors are probably more important than CPUs, actually they are. With graphics processors, it will determine your final look of the game. The CPU just handles everything else that doesn't involve visuals. Cell would only help a tiny bit because while it has 6 free SPEs, GPUs have 32 or 48 pipes(similar to SPEs). Plus, having 6 SPEs, you wouldn't just dedicate everyone to graphics, so 6 SPEs are completely useless. Xenos is way ahead of RSX. And if you dedicate all 6 SPEs for graphics, you would add those 6 along with the 32 pipes in RSX which equals a total of 38 pipes for graphics, Xenos has 48 unified pipes, even if all SPEs were used for visuals Xenos would still have way more pipes( 48>38 ), plus Xenon will be free to do other stuff while Cell is only doing visuals. It just doesn't work out.
Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#104 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts

[QUOTE="dimar19"]LOL. PS3 version looks almost as Wii


tricyclon123

WOW, is PS3 version THAT BAD LOOKING ??? 360 is 10 times better

And PS3 Oblivion has washed out colors, and no AA or HDR, plus it looks more realistic just because the pic is taken a different time of day, in the afternoon, play the game and you will know what i mean

Excluding the AA and HDR thing. Why are people saying this? Have the devs said this? Did any websites say it? Have you played the PS3 version of Oblivion and know this for fact? It's kind of funny to tell people to go play the game and "find out" when it hasn't launched.
Avatar image for tricyclon123
tricyclon123

436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 tricyclon123
Member since 2007 • 436 Posts
[QUOTE="tricyclon123"]

[QUOTE="dimar19"]LOL. PS3 version looks almost as Wii


Ibacai

WOW, is PS3 version THAT BAD LOOKING ??? 360 is 10 times better

And PS3 Oblivion has washed out colors, and no AA or HDR, plus it looks more realistic just because the pic is taken a different time of day, in the afternoon, play the game and you will know what i mean

Excluding the AA and HDR thing. Why are people saying this? Have the devs said this? Did any websites say it? Have you played the PS3 version of Oblivion and know this for fact? It's kind of funny to tell people to go play the game and "find out" when it hasn't launched.

It is from your OWN pics comparisson, the one when you get out of the first dungeon, you are owned

Avatar image for Nedemis
Nedemis

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#106 Nedemis
Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts
Personally I think the PS3 has better graphics than the 360. Because the PS3 produces lighter graphics, in the game call of duty I have noticed that it's worthless playing the game on 360 because you can't see anything, but I hope by this or next year (as many people predict) the PS3 should have better graphics than 360. I think the only game that can show that is Metal Gear Solid 4. Do you agree? And by the way why doesn't any game take advantage of the blue rays capacity? DOC105

better get your eyes checked.  That,  or learn how to adjust the contrast and brightness levels of your TV....:|