"ZOMGZ CONDUIT GRAFFICZ R HORRIBLE!"? I dont know what your trying to

[QUOTE="Dingerious"]

[QUOTE="110million"] :lol: Horrible damage control, you realize Halo 1 is almost 8 years old now? You want to compare it to a game THAT old? Banjo_Kongfooie

So is Wii's hardware. The comparison would work.

It's not really needed. Conduit may or may not look as good as Halo 2, but it's easily in the same league, which is all you can expect from a Wii title.

You wanted to compare The Conduit to Halo 2 and failed, then to Halo 1, and failed again. It was you who said we should.

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"][QUOTE="Dingerious"]

So is Wii's hardware. The comparison would work.

It's not really needed. Conduit may or may not look as good as Halo 2, but it's easily in the same league, which is all you can expect from a Wii title.

Dingerious

Calm down, slick. Being in the same league of graphics as the xbox isn't a bad thing when your hardware is in the same league as well.

[QUOTE="110million"][QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]Well I think its best to compare Conduit 1 to Halo 1 then compare sequels if you ask meBanjo_Kongfooie

so what bungie was rich? im sure them being rich doesnt affect xbox's hardware. just admit the fact that wii isnt even capable of producing graphics like xbox

I love that people are saying that it's a horrible game JUST because of the graphics (and its not really the graphics that are bad, its the artstyle. the technical graphics are pretty good). This game is all aboutcontrols (COMPLETELY customizable). and the A.I. seems decent enough. overall, I think it will be an ok game. I'mpredicting about a 7.5 average (I would laugh so hard if this game got AA-AAA).

Sword-Demon

I think it's deserving of A, maybe AA unless they muck something up horrible.

[QUOTE="GearsOfWarLover"][QUOTE="spliffstar12"] how much do you wanna bet the conduit flops? the game looks so generic and **** i doubt it will even score above a 6.5

spliffstar12

:( im never wanted..... o wells I still believe that the conduit is +1.0 better than red steel

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"][QUOTE="Dingerious"]

So is Wii's hardware. The comparison would work.

It's not really needed. Conduit may or may not look as good as Halo 2, but it's easily in the same league, which is all you can expect from a Wii title.

lundy86_4

You wanted to compare The Conduit to Halo 2 and failed, then to Halo 1, and failed again. It was you who said we should.

[QUOTE="Dingerious"]

[QUOTE="swazidoughman"]

Bad technical graphics and bad art style.

swazidoughman

Not sure how you could call the technical side bad by any means.

Because it could be (and is) done better than that just fine on the Xbox in 2004 (halo 2)

It's 2009 btw.

So you're criticizing HVS for their technical prowess on Wii, the only system with hardware comparable to last generation's xbox? That's just silly.

This game is all aboutcontrols (COMPLETELY customizable). and the A.I. seems decent enough.

Sword-Demon

A really well-designed game probably wouldn't need to have its controls modified in the first place.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"] HAHAHAHHAHA....................... Not. Seriously next time dont hide it and say it flat out and even if halo wins ITS A FIRST PARTY TITLE compare that to Legend of Zelda twillight Princess or the even better graphically SMGBanjo_Kongfooie

You wanted to compare The Conduit to Halo 2 and failed, then to Halo 1, and failed again. It was you who said we should.

First page, and I quote "Im sick of people saying stuff like this Lets compare Halo 2 to it right now and reach the bottom of this.", as said by yourself.

[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"]

I love that people are saying that it's a horrible game JUST because of the graphics (and its not really the graphics that are bad, its the artstyle. the technical graphics are pretty good). This game is all aboutcontrols (COMPLETELY customizable). and the A.I. seems decent enough. overall, I think it will be an ok game. I'mpredicting about a 7.5 average (I would laugh so hard if this game got AA-AAA).

lundy86_4

I think it's deserving of A, maybe AA unless they muck something up horrible.

I think GS should be consistent with their ratings and rate the conduit against other games in the same genre on the system (WaW). There's really nothing in WaW that the Conduit isn't doing better, so there's no reason for it to score less than an 8.5.

I do fully expect GS to flop the game. I'm just saying there's no reason, from what we know, why they should.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"]

I love that people are saying that it's a horrible game JUST because of the graphics (and its not really the graphics that are bad, its the artstyle. the technical graphics are pretty good). This game is all aboutcontrols (COMPLETELY customizable). and the A.I. seems decent enough. overall, I think it will be an ok game. I'mpredicting about a 7.5 average (I would laugh so hard if this game got AA-AAA).

Dingerious

I think it's deserving of A, maybe AA unless they muck something up horrible.

I think GS should be consistent with their ratings and rate the conduit against other games in the same genre on the system (WaW). There's really nothing in WaW that the Conduit isn't doing better, so there's no reason for it to score less than an 8.5.

I do fully expect GS to flop the game. I'm just saying there's no reason, from what we know, why they should.

I'm hoping they don't flop it, because if it's good, I may give it a whirl when I buy a Wii.

[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"]

This game is all aboutcontrols (COMPLETELY customizable). and the A.I. seems decent enough.

A really well-designed game probably wouldn't need to have its controls modified in the first place.

a halflife mod looks better then conduit (natural selection)

ndy86_4"]

I love that people are saying that it's a horrible game JUST because of the graphics (and its not really the graphics that are bad, its the artstyle. the technical graphics are pretty good). This game is all aboutcontrols (COMPLETELY customizable). and the A.I. seems decent enough. overall, I think it will be an ok game. I'mpredicting about a 7.5 average (I would laugh so hard if this game got AA-AAA).

Sword-Demon

I think it's deserving of A, maybe AA unless they muck something up horrible.

I think GS should be consistent with their ratings and rate the conduit against other games in the same genre on the system (WaW). There's really nothing in WaW that the Conduit isn't doing better, so there's no reason for it to score less than an 8.5.

I do fully expect GS to flop the game. I'm just saying there's no reason, from what we know, why they should.

[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"]

I think it's deserving of A, maybe AA unless they muck something up horrible.

Banjo_Kongfooie

I think GS should be consistent with their ratings and rate the conduit against other games in the same genre on the system (WaW). There's really nothing in WaW that the Conduit isn't doing better, so there's no reason for it to score less than an 8.5.

I do fully expect GS to flop the game. I'm just saying there's no reason, from what we know, why they should.

He said he doesn't want it to flop as there is no reason. You just have selective reading habits.

[QUOTE="angelkimne"]My problem with it is the developer, actually.Banjo_Kongfooie

take care

Wow the TC got kind of owned in this thread. Pretty hard.

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"][QUOTE="Dingerious"]

Calm down, slick. Being in the same league of graphics as the xbox isn't a bad thing when your hardware is in the same league as well.

rorskarch

SMG looks better than anything on the xbox

[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"]

This game is all aboutcontrols (COMPLETELY customizable). and the A.I. seems decent enough.

A really well-designed game probably wouldn't need to have its controls modified in the first place.

[QUOTE="rorskarch"][QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"] Wii > Xbox in graphicsSword-Demon

SMG looks better than anything on the xbox

No it doesn't, it's still a good game though.

[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"]

This game is all aboutcontrols (COMPLETELY customizable). and the A.I. seems decent enough.

A really well-designed game probably wouldn't need to have its controls modified in the first place.

[QUOTE="Dingerious"]

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"] HAHAHAHHAHA....................... Not. Seriously next time dont hide it and say it flat out and even if halo wins ITS A FIRST PARTY TITLE compare that to Legend of Zelda twillight Princess or the even better graphically SMGBanjo_Kongfooie

Calm down, slick. Being in the same league of graphics as the xbox isn't a bad thing when your hardware is in the same league as well.

you were saying?

The Xbox and the Wii have about the same specs. They should be able to produce the same graphics. Nonstop-Madness

They should, but the developers suck.

I love that people are saying that it's a horrible game JUST because of the graphics (and its not really the graphics that are bad, its the artstyle. the technical graphics are pretty good). This game is all aboutcontrols (COMPLETELY customizable). and the A.I. seems decent enough. overall, I think it will be an ok game. I'mpredicting about a 7.5 average (I would laugh so hard if this game got AA-AAA).

Sword-Demon

It has horrid ai that turns the game into a shooting gallery, terrible artstyle, bad technical graphics, terrible storyline, generic, and high voltages track record is complete garbage. But at least it has customizable controls.....

The game looks alright i guess for wii standards.....but nothing to brag about. I guess this is the poor man's halo 2GearsOfWarLover

[QUOTE="GearsOfWarLover"]The game looks alright i guess for wii standards.....but nothing to brag about. I guess this is the poor man's halo 2out0v0rder

How is it a poor mans FPS?

It's the sequel to a game that set the standard for modern console FPS (an evolution of goldeneye in a way).

[QUOTE="110million"][QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]Well I think its best to compare Conduit 1 to Halo 1 then compare sequels if you ask meBanjo_Kongfooie

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"][QUOTE="110million"] :lol: Horrible damage control, you realize Halo 1 is almost 8 years old now? You want to compare it to a game THAT old? speedsix

Worst thing was... He asked to compare them.

[QUOTE="GearsOfWarLover"]The game looks alright i guess for wii standards.....but nothing to brag about. I guess this is the poor man's halo 2out0v0rder

[QUOTE="out0v0rder"][QUOTE="GearsOfWarLover"]The game looks alright i guess for wii standards.....but nothing to brag about. I guess this is the poor man's halo 2swazidoughman

How is it a poor mans FPS?

It's the sequel to a game that set the standard for modern console FPS (an evolution of goldeneye in a way).

[QUOTE="swazidoughman"]

[QUOTE="out0v0rder"] whats funny is halo2 is the poor mans fpsDibdibdobdobo

How is it a poor mans FPS?

It's the sequel to a game that set the standard for modern console FPS (an evolution of goldeneye in a way).

[QUOTE="Dibdibdobdobo"][QUOTE="swazidoughman"]

How is it a poor mans FPS?

It's the sequel to a game that set the standard for modern console FPS (an evolution of goldeneye in a way).

mitu123

Goldeneye, probably the most local multiplayer fun I have ever had, next to Halo CE.

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="Dibdibdobdobo"] Wrong, Wrong, Wrong. The Evolution of FPS on Consoles was more down to Perfect Dark than Halo. If we go on about what brought FPS into the mainstream on Consoles then its Golden Eye(check sales). So many people so misinformed on here its unreal.lundy86_4

Goldeneye, probably the most local multiplayer fun I have ever had, next to Halo CE.

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]MasterC5

The game is ugly and the gameplay looks straight out of the 90s, a bad FPS out of the 90s I mind you.

Im back from a date with my Girlfriend and I can say I didnt read any of your comments and I have better things to do so you can insult me all you want. Im sick of this considering Conduit looks so fun and you all fail to realise it so good day kids Im still on but I dont even know if I might post today because this hate happy now Im not going to fight hate with hate so I will just wait for it to stop Banjo_Kongfooie

Ok, we didn't need toknow you were on a date with your GF, so good for you. I don't think anybody insulted you, mostly people were insulting the game.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

The game looks ugly, there's no denying it. However that doesn't mean it won't be a good game.

Banjo_Kongfooie