RAGE is id's Homage to The Legend of Zelda (1up) Runs at 60 FPS on 360!!!

[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

Glad to see 360 version seems to be fine. I know a year ago people were worried it would suffer because of DVD limitation or something. Curious on how PS3 version looks and runs.

Well it is still suffering, just not in the frames per second department. They had to lower the textures a bit. Besides, the game is a shooter available on the PC, why on Earth would you get it for a console?

[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

Glad to see 360 version seems to be fine. I know a year ago people were worried it would suffer because of DVD limitation or something. Curious on how PS3 version looks and runs.

Well it is still suffering, just not in the frames per second department. They had to lower the textures a bit. Besides, the game is a shooter available on the PC, why on Earth would you get it for a console?

for me its not legend of zelda that comes to mind when i saw this game last year, its fallout.

this game is like a fallout with more color in it

for me its not legend of zelda that comes to mind when i saw this game last year, its fallout.

this game is like a fallout with more color in it

mlbslugger86

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"] So you're just going to quote what's true for most PC games? Forgetting the fact that not everyone has a gaming rig/is a PC gamer.

Well, with all the perks/customization that PCs offer in terms of video games, I just think that is is a little stupid for a person that considers themself to be a gamer to not own a gaming PC. Not a PC that has all the latest stuff, but it isn't expensive/difficult to build one that can play every game available at or better looking than its console counter part (again, this is not a graphics thing. My main points are the use of m/kb, free online, mods, cheaper games, and Steam).

Nice. This game + GTX 480 = gaming bliss.

psn8214

Nice. This game + GTX 480 = gaming bliss.

psn8214

Nice. This game + GTX 480 = gaming bliss.

60 FPS?

since when did frame rate matter. teh speshul shados n textures maek duh gaem nowadais.

not going to get it either way. also, would this game be considered a competitor of Crysis and Crytek in general?

idk...

just nothing in it really interests me.

there have always been exceptions but by and large i'm not a super fan of them.

Blizzard - played Star Craft thought it was neat, just didn't go crazy for it.. not really excited for the sequel.

Valve - played Portal (same as SC)

Id - played Doom (same as other two).

idk... just i can see the quality.. just nothing in there that i want.

60 FPS?

since when did frame rate matter. teh speshul shados n textures maek duh gaem nowadais.

not going to get it either way. also, would this game be considered a competitor of Crysis and Crytek in general?

HavocV3

Carmack and his team have always been good devs. My only concern is the textures. im not going to make quick judgements, but i saw on pic where the textures where questionable,(altough it could have been DOF just bluring it out or something) but the rest of the game looks great. :) i will be buying this.

[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="arto1223"]

Well, with all the perks/customization that PCs offer in terms of video games, I just think that is is a little stupid for a person that considers themself to be a gamer to not own a gaming PC. Not a PC that has all the latest stuff, but it isn't expensive/difficult to build one that can play every game available at or better looking than its console counter part (again, this is not a graphics thing. My main points are the use of m/kb, free online, mods, cheaper games, and Steam).

savagetwinkie

The console version of BF BC 2 had its share of problems too, so dont go off and rage because the devs dont take their time anymore ironing out the problems before release..

Rage certainly doesn't look as good as i was expecting the next id game to, graphically. But, if i remember correctly, John Carmack said that Doom 4 is going to be the game that will actually make id tech 5 shine.

[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

Glad to see 360 version seems to be fine. I know a year ago people were worried it would suffer because of DVD limitation or something. Curious on how PS3 version looks and runs.

arto1223

Well it is still suffering, just not in the frames per second department. They had to lower the textures a bit. Besides, the game is a shooter available on the PC, why on Earth would you get it for a console?

Graphics arnt that great.Infact its hardly anything,PC users have seen far better graphically games than this.Beisdes it looks a booring bio shock clone.

Maybe I'm missing something? How is this game a homage to Legend of Zelda? Nothing I see in this game reminds me of Zelda. Mad Max yes...Borderlands...yes....but Zelda?

I would like to know how the PlayStation 3 version is doing, though. :(

I would like to know how the PlayStation 3 version is doing, though. :(

Hexagon_777

Both run and look identical at 60fps,but ps3 is most stable of all the 3 versions.

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]I would like to know how the PlayStation 3 version is doing, though. :(Bus-A-Bus

Thank you. That is the second time that you've been helpful towards me today. :P

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]I would like to know how the PlayStation 3 version is doing, though. :(Hexagon_777

Thank you. That is the second time that you've been helpful towards me today. :P

No prob mate,anytime ;)

I'm getting this on the PS3.

I'm getting this on the PS3.

Nintendo_Ownes7

As will I. It has to be great, though. :o

An example of paying homage without being too mcuh of clone. Take note, Darksiders.

how will this game run with a Nvidia GeForce EVGA GTS 250 512MB graphics card? at least as good as the 360 or still surpassing it? depending on texture settings and all that of course...

this game does look very interesting.

how will this game run with a Nvidia GeForce EVGA GTS 250 512MB graphics card? at least as good as the 360 or still surpassing it? depending on texture settings and all that of course...

this game does look very interesting.

Prince_Denspion

[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

Glad to see 360 version seems to be fine. I know a year ago people were worried it would suffer because of DVD limitation or something. Curious on how PS3 version looks and runs.

arto1223

Well it is still suffering, just not in the frames per second department. They had to lower the textures a bit. Besides, the game is a shooter available on the PC, why on Earth would you get it for a console?

[QUOTE="Prince_Denspion"]

how will this game run with a Nvidia GeForce EVGA GTS 250 512MB graphics card? at least as good as the 360 or still surpassing it? depending on texture settings and all that of course...

this game does look very interesting.

04dcarraher

nice! I'll be picking this game up as well. I'll follow up more on it as i'm just learning about it lol.

What's the fps in the PS3 version? themyth01