yeah, have fun enjoying that game i got for xmas
This topic is locked from further discussion.
4.5/5.0
http://videogames.yahoo.com/gamereview?cid=1951274558&tab=reviews&page=1&eid=517506
"On the PS3, Vegas exhibits few graphical improvements over the 360 version"
Seems like Ubisoft are turning over a new leaf. Takes time to make a good port for a Ps3, unlike these lazy devs like FEAR.
RazMaTaz-1
"On the PS3, Vegas exhibits few graphical improvements over the 360 version. Nothing wrong with that, of course -- it still stands out as one of the best-looking shooters around"
Sounds to me like they're actually saying that it doesn't have any graphical improvements over the 360 version.
As you can see no matter if a game is scored lower or higher, multiplatform games will always score slighty higher for the Xbox 360 than the PS3 version, for whatever reason. PS3 owners I hope you enjoy this game, it's a great game, but too bad you don't get to make custom faces and I hope you and your team mates have mics because it really helps. Andit just sucks that you always get multiplatform games at a later time while 360 has moved on to another great game. This is waiting.
i actually feel bad for cows cuz they have to wait 9 months for a same game with better graphicsgamergeekgeek
We must be patient to get the good stuff :)
Well, the cows can believe whatever they want to believe, but the lemmings pull the same card out on the hermits everytime.
Bu, bu, you had to wait!
It's all good, us PC gamers are enjoying the most number of AAAs, AAs, and other things like, oh, the best graphics, free online, etc while waiting on YOUR games. :lol:
As for the whole wait excuse is concerned. Good games are still good games, regardless of the timeframe. I swear, the way people talk about 'But, I played it long ago...' makes me feel like someone is dying of an incurable disease because they have to rush and play everything as soon as it releases.
TekkenMaster606
Nobody is saying it's not a good game, but please - less of the fanboy, you're a better poster than that.
What we are saying (and by 'we' I refer to those with enough of a brain to buy any console as long as it has good games, and not limit ourselves to one) is that to come on here and show off a game is a little pointless when it is being shown off to the ones that have completed it and got bored of it already. I know it's a great game, it was a great game on 360 and willbe equally as good on PS3, but the 'we have already played it' argument is a direct retaliation to the ones coming here and shouting 'HA, LOOK WHAT WE GOT' to the people that have been playing it for months. It is still a tremendous game no matter when it comes out - but it can't be used to show off over people. It's like buying the exact same car as someone else and walking up to them and going 'OH MY GOD IN YOUR FACE, look what I got hahaha noob!' and the other guy just looks and says... 'Yeah... I know.' It's still a great car, but it's not something to show off over the other person because it's exactly the same.
the ps3 version was completed by like january, but shelved until a little bit from now
so it is ownage that it looks better graphically
tlhbo
the ps3 version was completed by like january, but shelved until a little bit from now
so it is ownage that it looks better graphically
tlhbo
mestizoman
And the award for not reading the thread goes to...
THIS NOOB RIGHT HERE!
Lmao, "On the PS3, Vegas exhibits few graphical improvements over the 360 version" was a dig at it, not praise. They didn't say "exhibits A few" but instead "exhibits few" did you not read the nextsentence?4.5/5.0
http://videogames.yahoo.com/gamereview?cid=1951274558&tab=reviews&page=1&eid=517506
"On the PS3, Vegas exhibits few graphical improvements over the 360 version"
Seems like Ubisoft are turning over a new leaf. Takes time to make a good port for a Ps3, unlike these lazy devs like FEAR.
RazMaTaz-1
Stuff like this cracks me up its so true that people hear only what they want to hear.
4.5/5.0
http://videogames.yahoo.com/gamereview?cid=1951274558&tab=reviews&page=1&eid=517506
"On the PS3, Vegas exhibits few graphical improvements over the 360 version"
Seems like Ubisoft are turning over a new leaf. Takes time to make a good port for a Ps3, unlike these lazy devs like FEAR.
RazMaTaz-1
i detect some sarcasm in there, i HOPE...and yea if any cow tries to use rainbow six vegas as ownage, theyre all self owned...cause of the crap they talk about ubisoft ports...thats what happens when people open their mouth too much, they end up painting themself in a corner and get eaten by their own words...cows:lol:
[QUOTE="RazMaTaz-1"]"On the PS3, Vegas exhibits few graphical improvements over the 360 version"
towel_
That means there wasn't much of an improvement at all. It doesn't "beat" the 360 version, according to that quote. The quote says the PS3 exhibited few graphical improvements over the 360. It doesn't say a few, or a few more, it says simply, few graphical improvements. Therefore, if there were any, they were minor and unnoticable. Good Try.
Hey look! a guy with reading comprehension! how did you get on this site?Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment