Here's the written review.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Just finished watching it. Verdict: + Awesome Gunplay + Great Puzzles + Plenty of Humor - Aging Formula Score: 9bleehumReason why you can't spell ignorant without IGN. I mean they ignore mention of a brand new platforming style (gravity boots), among other things just annoys me. Reviewers actually need to mention features that set it apart. Not tell me it is the same old because you use cool weapons. And R&C TOD was a bad game.
He really emphasised that the game doesnt do much different from the R&C series. With that, i think its going to score 7.5 or 8.0 here. Which is solid.
I wonder what the IGN equivalent of SW is like. Compared to here, seems like every system gets a new AAA title by the week.
[QUOTE="deleterguy"]I don't get why this is unexpected, it's an awesome franchise.darthogreLast one got 7.5 here on GS. It'll be intresting if it gets the same score (if I remember IGN gave that one an even higher score than 9.0)
GS rates it lower because it is essentially the same game we've played since its first debut on the PS2.
i knew they would still rinse and repeat the formula...without bringing back mp..... oh well I'm sold on the hope of disco ball, and the fact that i can color my guns. Muave with a hint of eggshell white. jg4xchampThe problem is the rinse and repeat formula really isn't true here. He basically said that you use the same weapons. Than brings in that the clank section is brand new, space exploration is brand new. My biggest agitation is that the 3rd aspect the gravity boots makes the platforming alot faster from what I've played. I knew reviewers were going to destroy this game not because it doesn't do anything new (which is basically the first R&C game that attempts to change the formula) but because it is the 6th game in the franchise. If insomniac hyped this as a reinvention of the formula the game would have a 9.6 score. Reason why I can't stand them because R&C TOD got a 9.5 and was the worst game in the series and this got a 9 which is the best in series.
I dont see why the aging formula is such a bad thing :?
The gameplay in many games never changes, so I see no problem with it being the same in R&C.
I think this game could have done great with a multiplayer component though. Anyone remember how fun R&C UYA MP was?
[QUOTE="deleterguy"]I don't get why this is unexpected, it's an awesome franchise.darthogreLast one got 7.5 here on GS. It'll be intresting if it gets the same score (if I remember IGN gave that one an even higher score than 9.0)The 7.5 was deserved. It was a bad game. I don't understand how scores come into the matter if the game is bad. I would give gta 4 a 7.5 too. R&C ACIT is a good game and deserves a good score.
Yeah, I recently just finished TOD and QFB.[QUOTE="HarlockJC"]Looks great...I still have not played any of the R&C this gen. I need to spend some time and go back to the first one and work my way to current. bleehum
OT: How long have you been a mod?
How was the story overall..DId you really need to play the first one to get what was going on with the second one? Just 1 dayLast one got 7.5 here on GS. It'll be intresting if it gets the same score (if I remember IGN gave that one an even higher score than 9.0)[QUOTE="darthogre"][QUOTE="deleterguy"]I don't get why this is unexpected, it's an awesome franchise.3rdbass
Yeah, they gave it a 9.4.
its understandable,back in 07.TOD was freakin amazing i expect a 8 here :(Except the one game that changes the formula is the one game that gets insulted.I dont see why the aging formula is such a bad thing :?
The gameplay in many games never changes, so I see no problem with it being the same in R&C.
I think this game could have done great with a multiplayer component though. Anyone remember how fun R&C UYA MP was?Alpha-Male22
[QUOTE="3rdbass"][QUOTE="darthogre"] Last one got 7.5 here on GS. It'll be intresting if it gets the same score (if I remember IGN gave that one an even higher score than 9.0)Ratchet_Fan8
Yeah, they gave it a 9.4.
its understandable,back in 07.TOD was freakin amazing i expect a 8 here :(Yeah, I see an 8.0 here also.
To be honest i was more hyped for this than any other game this year and it will finally be coming next week.. im buying 2 copies for sure.. its an amazing game
Last one got 7.5 here on GS. It'll be intresting if it gets the same score (if I remember IGN gave that one an even higher score than 9.0)The 7.5 was deserved. It was a bad game. I don't understand how scores come into the matter if the game is bad. I would give gta 4 a 7.5 too. R&C ACIT is a good game and deserves a good score.Thank god youre not a reviewer[QUOTE="darthogre"][QUOTE="deleterguy"]I don't get why this is unexpected, it's an awesome franchise.nhh18
[QUOTE="bleehum"]Yeah, I recently just finished TOD and QFB.[QUOTE="HarlockJC"]Looks great...I still have not played any of the R&C this gen. I need to spend some time and go back to the first one and work my way to current. HarlockJC
OT: How long have you been a mod?
How was the story overall..DId you really need to play the first one to get what was going on with the second one? Just 1 day Yeah, the 2nd is in direct connection with the 1sts story. Quest for Booty is only 4 hours or so, though.I played Ratchet and Clank: TOD, it was my first time playing any game in that series, and I thought it felt recycled to a degree. So I think if I had played the rest of the games in the series I would have probably not liked it at all. Now if you're someone that likes the formula of the game, recycled gameplay probably won't bother you too much.
I think 7.5-8.0 is a good review for the last one. So for this one, I'm thinking 8.0. However, with the inconsistent reviews GS has been giving out lately, it'll probably get a 9.0.
Well so far both PS3M Magazine Uk and IGN gave it a lower score of 9.0 than TOD which they gave 9.4 and 9.3 respectively. Well maybe we will see a 7.0 here if that trending is right. Ouch that would suck but I'm still getting the game as I loved the last one.
Last one got 7.5 here on GS. It'll be intresting if it gets the same score (if I remember IGN gave that one an even higher score than 9.0)The 7.5 was deserved. It was a bad game. I don't understand how scores come into the matter if the game is bad. I would give gta 4 a 7.5 too. R&C ACIT is a good game and deserves a good score. TOD wasnt a bad game. i enjoyed the game and put countless of hours into it. i've upgraded every single weapon to the max level, and collected all the skill points. imo it deserves atleast 8.5. ACIT should only be better.[QUOTE="darthogre"][QUOTE="deleterguy"]I don't get why this is unexpected, it's an awesome franchise.nhh18
[QUOTE="nhh18"]The 7.5 was deserved. It was a bad game. I don't understand how scores come into the matter if the game is bad. I would give gta 4 a 7.5 too. R&C ACIT is a good game and deserves a good score. TOD wasnt a bad game. i enjoyed the game and put countless of hours into it. i've upgraded every single weapon to the max level, and collected all the skill points. imo it deserves atleast 8.5. ACIT should only be better. R&C TOD was a sterile game interms of the R&C series. It really was lets not do anything to improve the series but make a HD R&C game. R&C ACIT actually attempts to change the formula and it really has helped the platforming out caused the game to be based more on exploration, and made the game alot better. However, one game was considered the best of franchise 9.4 with 9.5 graphics. While the other is considered a rehash. It is like stupid town in ign world. I wonder what the editor was thinking. I actually from all the game footage I've played (got to play the space exploration which was awesome) this is by far the biggest improvement in the R&C franchise.[QUOTE="darthogre"] Last one got 7.5 here on GS. It'll be intresting if it gets the same score (if I remember IGN gave that one an even higher score than 9.0)Meowmixxvi
TOD wasnt a bad game. i enjoyed the game and put countless of hours into it. i've upgraded every single weapon to the max level, and collected all the skill points. imo it deserves atleast 8.5. ACIT should only be better. R&C TOD was a sterile game interms of the R&C series. It really was lets not do anything to improve the series but make a HD R&C game. R&C ACIT actually attempts to change the formula and it really has helped the platforming out caused the game to be based more on exploration, and made the game alot better. However, one game was considered the best of franchise 9.4 with 9.5 graphics. While the other is considered a rehash. It is like stupid town in ign world. I wonder what the editor was thinking. Yeah, it seems like the scores for ACIT and TOD should be switched. During the video review, he said it was the best in the series, then why did he score it lower than TOD? Doesn't make sense. Improvements were made, yet it gets a lower score?[QUOTE="Meowmixxvi"][QUOTE="nhh18"]The 7.5 was deserved. It was a bad game. I don't understand how scores come into the matter if the game is bad. I would give gta 4 a 7.5 too. R&C ACIT is a good game and deserves a good score.
nhh18
[QUOTE="nhh18"]R&C TOD was a sterile game interms of the R&C series. It really was lets not do anything to improve the series but make a HD R&C game. R&C ACIT actually attempts to change the formula and it really has helped the platforming out caused the game to be based more on exploration, and made the game alot better. However, one game was considered the best of franchise 9.4 with 9.5 graphics. While the other is considered a rehash. It is like stupid town in ign world. I wonder what the editor was thinking. Yeah, it seems like the scores for ACIT and TOD should be reversed. During the video review, he said it was the best in the series, then why did he score it lower than TOD? Doesn't make sense. you got a point tharr![QUOTE="Meowmixxvi"] TOD wasnt a bad game. i enjoyed the game and put countless of hours into it. i've upgraded every single weapon to the max level, and collected all the skill points. imo it deserves atleast 8.5. ACIT should only be better. bleehum
[QUOTE="nhh18"]R&C TOD was a sterile game interms of the R&C series. It really was lets not do anything to improve the series but make a HD R&C game. R&C ACIT actually attempts to change the formula and it really has helped the platforming out caused the game to be based more on exploration, and made the game alot better. However, one game was considered the best of franchise 9.4 with 9.5 graphics. While the other is considered a rehash. It is like stupid town in ign world. I wonder what the editor was thinking. Yeah, it seems like the scores for ACIT and TOD should be reversed. During the video review, he said it was the best in the series, then why did he score it lower than TOD? Doesn't make sense.because back in 2007,TOD was awesome.Alot of time now passed..and its abit differenet now.IF acit was released last year,THEN it would get higher[QUOTE="Meowmixxvi"] TOD wasnt a bad game. i enjoyed the game and put countless of hours into it. i've upgraded every single weapon to the max level, and collected all the skill points. imo it deserves atleast 8.5. ACIT should only be better. bleehum
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment