R&C: A Crack in Time, IGN Review

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="Meowmixxvi"] TOD wasnt a bad game. i enjoyed the game and put countless of hours into it. i've upgraded every single weapon to the max level, and collected all the skill points. imo it deserves atleast 8.5. ACIT should only be better. bleehum

I just hope this isnt the end of the R&C series.. been a huge fan since the first game on ps2 and since then i bought every single game of R&C

[QUOTE="darthogre"][QUOTE="deleterguy"]I don't get why this is unexpected, it's an awesome franchise.nhh18

[QUOTE="bleehum"][QUOTE="nhh18"]R&C TOD was a sterile game interms of the R&C series. It really was lets not do anything to improve the series but make a HD R&C game. R&C ACIT actually attempts to change the formula and it really has helped the platforming out caused the game to be based more on exploration, and made the game alot better. However, one game was considered the best of franchise 9.4 with 9.5 graphics. While the other is considered a rehash. It is like stupid town in ign world. I wonder what the editor was thinking.

Giancar

"- Aging Formula"

i never liked this 'negative', if its fun then the formula works, so who cares if it 'aging'?

What I don't understand is why no other games get knocked for doing the same formula over and over (GTA, Halo, WoW, CoD, etc).

Derek240

bwhahahahahahahahahahah!!!! First day here?

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="Meowmixxvi"] TOD wasnt a bad game. i enjoyed the game and put countless of hours into it. i've upgraded every single weapon to the max level, and collected all the skill points. imo it deserves atleast 8.5. ACIT should only be better. bleehum

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="darthogre"] Last one got 7.5 here on GS. It'll be intresting if it gets the same score (if I remember IGN gave that one an even higher score than 9.0)darthogre

[QUOTE="bleehum"][QUOTE="nhh18"]R&C TOD was a sterile game interms of the R&C series. It really was lets not do anything to improve the series but make a HD R&C game. R&C ACIT actually attempts to change the formula and it really has helped the platforming out caused the game to be based more on exploration, and made the game alot better. However, one game was considered the best of franchise 9.4 with 9.5 graphics. While the other is considered a rehash. It is like stupid town in ign world. I wonder what the editor was thinking.

II_Seraphim_II

a 8.5 here. unless its the same reviewer with the last two games then 7 for "too much variate" lmao

a 8.5 here. unless its the same reviewer with the last two games then 7 for "too much variate" lmao

Revolution316

He really emphasised that the game doesnt do much different from the R&C series. With that, i think its going to score 7.5 or 8.0 here. shutdown_202

[QUOTE="shutdown_202"]

He really emphasised that the game doesnt do much different from the R&C series. With that, i think its going to score 7.5 or 8.0 here. nervmeister

[QUOTE="nervmeister"]

[QUOTE="shutdown_202"]

He really emphasised that the game doesnt do much different from the R&C series. With that, i think its going to score 7.5 or 8.0 here. bleehum

He really emphasised that the game doesnt do much different from the R&C series. With that, i think its going to score 7.5 or 8.0 here. Which is solid.

I wonder what the IGN equivalent of SW is like. Compared to here, seems like every system gets a new AAA title by the week.

shutdown_202

I'm thinking around a 8.5 or 9.

[QUOTE="bleehum"][QUOTE="nervmeister"]If it's the same reviewer who did Tools of Destruction, then yeah.

Ratchet_Fan8

What reviews of his dont u approve?

Well they gave the first one a 9 too and look at how that ended up.

great review i wanted 9.5 like tod but 9.0 is a great score, too. anyway it would be unfair if gs give it 7.5 like tod

Because most reviewers were wrong nhh18

[QUOTE="nhh18"] Because most reviewers were wrong Stumpt25

wow thats unexpected. do anyone know if you can start the game in a higher difficulty?Meowmixxvi

Written review is up now. It got a 9

Kinda surprised the graphics got an 8.5

I guess Uncharted 2 has set the bar extremely high.

JMR09

Well I don't know if there's a bar across IGN because another reviewer gave borderlands a 9 the other day. Just what this guy thinks.

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]i knew they would still rinse and repeat the formula...without bringing back mp..... oh well I'm sold on the hope of disco ball, and the fact that i can color my guns. Muave with a hint of eggshell white. nhh18

Expecting it so get 8.0 here. Can't wait to play it either way, although I wish Sony would have let them use the original name it was going to be given :P

Good score about what I expected.

After the prior R&C games here, people saying AAA are being a bit over-hopeful IMO. SpruceCaboose

I can't see it getting any thing more than an 8.5...IGN just seems to love R&C.

No way its getting AAA here.

IGN dishes out the AAA scores like candy, not to mention R&C is being ridiculously milked over the last few years.

The series is becoming stale.

[QUOTE="bleehum"]Just finished watching it. Verdict: + Awesome Gunplay + Great Puzzles + Plenty of Humor - Aging Formula Score: 9nhh18

Beautiful :P

If this gets AAAE...what are lemmings going to do? That'll be like 5 AAAEs to 1 :D

urdead18

It'll be 8.5 at the most and Forza 3 is pretty much confirmed AAAE. Also, the episodes of liberty city have a chance at AAAE.

Not trying to sound like a lem or anything, I admit the PS3 has had a better year overall.

im really anoyed that it doesnt have online, becuase of that AA is what im thinking the game deserves, The 3rd R&C on ps2 had an awesome multiplyer (offline) putting that component on ps3 would make it an instant AAA title, why the hell didnt Insomniac think of this :?

i'm so sick of the ps3 right now, i'm not a bank i can't just go and buy every great game that comes out, i wish i had a 360 or wii, i'll be saving more money

last R&C flopped cuz the game didnt do much different than the ps2 version? ouch

someone plz tell me what did ODSD do over halo1-3 to get AAA? lol

i'm so sick of the ps3 right now, i'm not a bank i can't just go and buy every great game that comes out, i wish i had a 360 or wii, i'll be saving more money

da_illest101

last R&C flopped cuz the game didnt do much different than the ps2 version? ouch

someone plz tell me what did ODSD do over halo1-3 to get AAA? lol

ZoomZoom2490

i thought it was because it 'had too much variety'

[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"]

last R&C flopped cuz the game didnt do much different than the ps2 version? ouch

someone plz tell me what did ODSD do over halo1-3 to get AAA? lol

i thought it was because it 'had too much variety'

last R&C flopped cuz the game didnt do much different than the ps2 version? ouch

someone plz tell me what did ODSD do over halo1-3 to get AAA? lol

ZoomZoom2490

[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"]

last R&C flopped cuz the game didnt do much different than the ps2 version? ouch

someone plz tell me what did ODSD do over halo1-3 to get AAA? lol

i thought it was because it 'had too much variety'

[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"]

last R&C flopped cuz the game didnt do much different than the ps2 version? ouch

someone plz tell me what did ODSD do over halo1-3 to get AAA? lol

ogvampire

i thought it was because it 'had too much variety'

Nice, I enjoyed the demo of the game :D

DAMN IT :evil:

Another game I need to buy :(.My poor wallet :cry:

DAMN IT :evil:

Another game I need to buy :(.My poor wallet :cry:

MJPK

thats why i rent...