Ratchet and Clank is the Most Visually Impressive Game Ever

No game has ever had the combination of beauty from a graphical and artistic standpoint that it has.

I agree

Then i guess all the other R&C games are up there with the best looking games out, since they all have the same art style...
michael098

idk about r&c but i just played jak and daxter 2 yesterday after hours of cod4 and jak 2 wow still looks amazing to this day. some really great texture work for a last gen ps2 game

Play call of duty 4 or gears of war and then tell me that ratchet and clank is the most visually impressive game ever.You wont be able to.

of the combo maby, but eternal sonata takes the artistic crown :D

and crysis is the technical crown :D

Play call of duty 4 or gears of war and then tell me that ratchet and clank is the most visually impressive game ever.You wont be able to.

loudharley

Then i guess all the other R&C games are up there with the best looking games out, since they all have the same art style...
michael098

[QUOTE="Out_Kast3000"]

No game has ever had the combination of beauty from a graphical and artistic standpoint that it has.

hobbit93

African enslaved? Failure

I'm multi-racial btw.

kthxbi

of the combo maby, but eternal sonata takes the artistic crown :D

and crysis is the technical crown :D

shadow_hosi

Kameo looks just as good and it came out 2 years ago.Pro_wrestler

I disagree. Kameo is a beautiful game and perhaps if it had more time in development and wasn't rushed for launch it would look just as good. If you've played through both you'd see that Ratchet is the better looking game visually. Kameo is amazing though and it does some things that are actually on par with Ratchet visually, but as a complete package Ratchet delivers better quality in terms of graphics. Kameosays a lot about Rare's ability to produce stunning visuals though if you consider the fact that it was a launch title. That said, Ratchet is one of the better looking games to come out so far this gen, not the best, but it is up there.

Play call of duty 4 or gears of war and then tell me that ratchet and clank is the most visually impressive game ever.You wont be able to.

loudharley

Bright and Vibrant is a better art style then Brown and Glowing.

[QUOTE="Out_Kast3000"]

No game has ever had the combination of beauty from a graphical and artistic standpoint that it has.

hobbit93

It does look pretty damn good.

[QUOTE="michael098"]Then i guess all the other R&C games are up there with the best looking games out, since they all have the same art style...
Sir-Marwin105

According to the TC yes, thats what i was saying, its crazy.

Kameo? Are you guys kidding me? That game looks as if it could have been done easily on XBOX 1.Out_Kast3000

Sir-Marwin105 theres no way that youve played gears and call of duty and say that ratchet looks better.Anyways i agree that ratchet is a great looking ps3 game but it never blew me away like gears and cod4.Everyone has an opinion though so if that really is yours then ill respect it.loudharley

Kameo? Are you guys kidding me? That game looks as if it could have been done easily on XBOX 1.Out_Kast3000

Lol, and I'm the one that doesn't know what I'm talking about:roll:. And having colourful environments doesn't make a game more visually impressive, crysis, gears of war and many other games that arnt colourful are far more impressive If art style and some bright colours made a game visually superior then games like the original R&C would be considered more impressive than crysis.

[QUOTE="Out_Kast3000"]Kameo? Are you guys kidding me? That game looks as if it could have been done easily on XBOX 1.michael098

Lol, and I'm the one that doesn't know what I'm talking about:roll:. And having colourful environments doesn't make a game more visually impressive, crysis, gears of war and many other games that arnt colourful are far more impressive If art style and some bright colours made a game visually superior then games like the original R&C would be considered more impressive than crysis.

Having the right mix of vibrant colors is definitely better looking than extremely dark colors. Nobody said it automatically makes it look better, but it's definitely apart of what makes Ratchet and Clank the best looking game ever.

From a technical standpoint Ratchet and Clank looks just as good if not better than gears of war. Ratchet just isn't realist8ic.

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]Kameo looks just as good and it came out 2 years ago.Big_Boss465

I disagree. Kameo is a beautiful game and perhaps if it had more time in development and wasn't rushed for launch it would look just as good. If you've played through both you'd see that Ratchet is the better looking game visually. Kameo is amazing though and it does some things that are actually on par with Ratchet visually, but as a complete package Ratchet delivers better quality in terms of graphics. Kameosays a lot about Rare's ability to produce stunning visuals though if you consider the fact that it was a launch title. That said, Ratchet is one of the better looking games to come out so far this gen, not the best, but it is up there.

It should be better looking visually but its not so much that takes all the marvel away from Kameo..Kameo is 2 years older.

[QUOTE="loudharley"]

Play call of duty 4 or gears of war and then tell me that ratchet and clank is the most visually impressive game ever.You wont be able to.

Zeke129

Bright and Vibrant is a better art style then Brown and Glowing.

This shows what you know, color can't be an art sty-le. The color of something should compliment the point your trying to convey. Based on what your saying, Gears of War would have had a better art sty-le if it incorporated the rainbow.

People use "Art sty-le" to liberally here. Just because its pretty doesn't mean its art.

[QUOTE="loudharley"]Sir-Marwin105 theres no way that youve played gears and call of duty and say that ratchet looks better.Anyways i agree that ratchet is a great looking ps3 game but it never blew me away like gears and cod4.Everyone has an opinion though so if that really is yours then ill respect it.Sir-Marwin105

Lol, does frame rate and personal preference on colour now contribute to graphics? Crysis on max settings on my pc runs at about 5FPS. But does that mean R&C that runs at 60FPS looks better?? R&C clearly has a lot more bright colours than crysis but does that mean its visually superior? I'm sorry but no, it docent.

No game has ever had the combination of beauty from a graphical and artistic standpoint that it has.

Out_Kast3000

[QUOTE="Sir-Marwin105"][QUOTE="loudharley"]Sir-Marwin105 theres no way that youve played gears and call of duty and say that ratchet looks better.Anyways i agree that ratchet is a great looking ps3 game but it never blew me away like gears and cod4.Everyone has an opinion though so if that really is yours then ill respect it.michael098

Lol, does frame rate and personal preference on colour now contribute to graphics? Crysis on max settings on my pc runs at about 5FPS. But does that mean R&C that runs at 60FPS looks better?? R&C clearly has a lot more bright colours than crysis but does that mean its visually superior? I'm sorry but no, it docent.

And don't you think COD4 would look a little funny with brightly coloured buildings and rainbows?

[QUOTE="Sir-Marwin105"][QUOTE="loudharley"]Sir-Marwin105 theres no way that youve played gears and call of duty and say that ratchet looks better.Anyways i agree that ratchet is a great looking ps3 game but it never blew me away like gears and cod4.Everyone has an opinion though so if that really is yours then ill respect it.michael098

Lol, does frame rate and personal preference on colour now contribute to graphics? Crysis on max settings on my pc runs at about 5FPS. But does that mean R&C that runs at 60FPS looks better?? R&C clearly has a lot more bright colours than crysis but does that mean its visually superior? I'm sorry but no, it docent.

[QUOTE="michael098"]

[QUOTE="Sir-Marwin105"][QUOTE="loudharley"]Sir-Marwin105 theres no way that youve played gears and call of duty and say that ratchet looks better.Anyways i agree that ratchet is a great looking ps3 game but it never blew me away like gears and cod4.Everyone has an opinion though so if that really is yours then ill respect it.michael098

Lol, does frame rate and personal preference on colour now contribute to graphics? Crysis on max settings on my pc runs at about 5FPS. But does that mean R&C that runs at 60FPS looks better?? R&C clearly has a lot more bright colours than crysis but does that mean its visually superior? I'm sorry but no, it docent.

And don't you think COD4 would look a little funny with brightly coloured buildings and rainbows?

[QUOTE="Out_Kast3000"]

No game has ever had the combination of beauty from a graphical and artistic standpoint that it has.

hobbit93

Whoa racism. Why are you offending him for his opinion anyway?

I agree that R&C: ToD is a very visually impressive game, but the 360 game bashing wasn't needed, TC.BioShockOwnz

Whoa. For the first time ever, I completely agree with a BioShockOwnz post. The world must be ending.

I agree that R&C: ToD is a very visually impressive game, but the 360 game bashing wasn't needed, TC.BioShockOwnz

Actually it did. I'm so tired of seeing people say GEOW. That game is outdated graphically. Many games have better graphics on paper and visually. Tell me one graphic data (FPS, pologon count, draw distance, etc...)GEOW isbest in?

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I agree that R&C: ToD is a very visually impressive game, but the 360 game bashing wasn't needed, TC.excelR83

Whoa. For the first time ever, I completely agree with a BioShockOwnz post. The world must be ending.

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I agree that R&C: ToD is a very visually impressive game, but the 360 game bashing wasn't needed, TC.excelR83

Whoa. For the first time ever, I completely agree with a BioShockOwnz post. The world must be ending.

You don't say? I love ya'll!:cry:

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I agree that R&C: ToD is a very visually impressive game, but the 360 game bashing wasn't needed, TC.King_of_Sorrow

Actually it did. I'm so tired of seeing people say GEOW. That game is outdated graphically. Many games have better graphics on paper and visually. Tell me one graphic data (FPS, pologon count, draw distance, etc...)GEOW isbest in?

i hate to say it cuz i think gears overall has been topped but nothing has topped it in textures. but this is only due to the extremely linear, one open door on a city street type level design with not very many enemies on screen. but yea textures gears owns.

and to the people talking about kameo....i never thought that game was impressive even at launch...iwas like if this is next gen graphics this is crap cuz i was playing pc games a year prior looking better

[QUOTE="King_of_Sorrow"]

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I agree that R&C: ToD is a very visually impressive game, but the 360 game bashing wasn't needed, TC.blues3531

Actually it did. I'm so tired of seeing people say GEOW. That game is outdated graphically. Many games have better graphics on paper and visually. Tell me one graphic data (FPS, pologon count, draw distance, etc...)GEOW isbest in?

i hate to say it cuz i think gears overall has been topped but nothing has topped it in textures. but this is only due to the extremely linear, one open door on a city street type level design with not very many enemies on screen. but yea textures gears owns.

and to the people talking about kameo....i never thought that game was impressive even at launch...iwas like if this is next gen graphics this is crap cuz i was playing pc games a year prior looking better

Kameo is still gorgeous in HD....

It's not like R&C, but the particle effects and so on are still impressive. Very pretty. It is 2 year old, though.

This shows what you know, color can't be an art sty-le. The color of something should compliment the point your trying to convey. Based on what your saying, Gears of War would have had a better art sty-le if it incorporated the rainbow.

People use "Art sty-le" to liberally here. Just because its pretty doesn't mean its art.

Pro_wrestler

You're saying color has nothing to do with art? Color and form are the ONLY two things that comprise art.

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I agree that R&C: ToD is a very visually impressive game, but the 360 game bashing wasn't needed, TC.King_of_Sorrow

Actually it did. I'm so tired of seeing people say GEOW. That game is outdated graphically. Many games have better graphics on paper and visually. Tell me one graphic data (FPS, pologon count, draw distance, etc...)GEOW isbest in?

[QUOTE="michael098"]

[QUOTE="Sir-Marwin105"][QUOTE="loudharley"]Sir-Marwin105 theres no way that youve played gears and call of duty and say that ratchet looks better.Anyways i agree that ratchet is a great looking ps3 game but it never blew me away like gears and cod4.Everyone has an opinion though so if that really is yours then ill respect it.Sir-Marwin105

Lol, does frame rate and personal preference on colour now contribute to graphics? Crysis on max settings on my pc runs at about 5FPS. But does that mean R&C that runs at 60FPS looks better?? R&C clearly has a lot more bright colours than crysis but does that mean its visually superior? I'm sorry but no, it docent.

Nope, if i took a screenshot of a frame of crysis and a screenshot of R&C Crysis wil look better.

No game has ever had the combination of beauty from a graphical and artistic standpoint that it has.

Out_Kast3000

I totally agree with u, I mean the games art style and gameplay rival pixar movies. Insomniac did a great job with this game and I cant wait for another RAC game to come along. Also wanted to add that u arent the only one that thinks this game is one of the best looking games of its kind. This site below also agrees aswell. :)

http://www.kansascity.com/entertainment/story/352997.html

[QUOTE="King_of_Sorrow"]

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I agree that R&C: ToD is a very visually impressive game, but the 360 game bashing wasn't needed, TC.blues3531

Actually it did. I'm so tired of seeing people say GEOW. That game is outdated graphically. Many games have better graphics on paper and visually. Tell me one graphic data (FPS, pologon count, draw distance, etc...)GEOW isbest in?

i hate to say it cuz i think gears overall has been topped but nothing has topped it in textures. but this is only due to the extremely linear, one open door on a city street type level design with not very many enemies on screen. but yea textures gears owns.

and to the people talking about kameo....i never thought that game was impressive even at launch...iwas like if this is next gen graphics this is crap cuz i was playing pc games a year prior looking better

texture? Motorstorm had better texture.