Re5 PC Benchmark released! Superior framerates and screens! (56k)

  • 180 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts

Download it here.

Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

Nvidia GTX 280 alone costs more then 360 elite. also whats is RE5? the game that i beat 10 times about 3 months ago?

Avatar image for ReaperV7
ReaperV7

6756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ReaperV7
Member since 2008 • 6756 Posts
i never did like RE5's graphic. way to ...dusty, rubbery, and stiff.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
They should put the camera in his glasses like in Mario 64.
Avatar image for Dead-Memories
Dead-Memories

6587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 190

User Lists: 0

#5 Dead-Memories
Member since 2008 • 6587 Posts

Downloading right now xD, thanks for that.

Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts

Nvidia GTX 280 alone costs more then 360 elite. also whats is RE5? the game that i beat 10 times about 3 months ago?

sikanderahmed

oh man, your post perfectly illustrates then difference between PC and console gamers and their respective attention-spans lol. So a game is no good now if its 3 months old? Wait, wait, no, games are like clothing and fashion, you're only cool if you play the latest games, amIrite?

Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#7 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts
Didn't like RE4 or Dead Space so it's unlikely I would like this either, but out of curiousity I'll give it a shot. It mentions something about 3D glasses, but those aren't required for this benchmark right?
Avatar image for aero250
aero250

3613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 aero250
Member since 2009 • 3613 Posts
Nice visuals.
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
Played the demo on the 360. I couldn't even finish the demo without putting myself to sleep so I think I'll pass.
Avatar image for purple_MAN1832
purple_MAN1832

2125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 purple_MAN1832
Member since 2004 • 2125 Posts

Played the demo on the 360. I couldn't even finish the demo without putting myself to sleep so I think I'll pass.KHAndAnime

Or you kept getting owned and quit out of despair and now hold a grudge against a good game because it's demo was too hard

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#11 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Looking good!

RE5 was alot of fun to! A heck of alot better then RE4 was!

Avatar image for OPuniverse
OPuniverse

1943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 OPuniverse
Member since 2009 • 1943 Posts
downloading, cant wait =D.
Avatar image for IuriBarcelos
IuriBarcelos

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 IuriBarcelos
Member since 2008 • 31 Posts

Downloading, thanks!

Avatar image for urdead18
urdead18

3630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 urdead18
Member since 2008 • 3630 Posts

Hmm, this should be interesting. I've got a GTX 275 which is slightly faster than your 280 but I have a weaker CPU. I'll let you know what kind of FPS i get.

Avatar image for mo0ksi
mo0ksi

12337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 mo0ksi
Member since 2007 • 12337 Posts
DLing now. Honestly I forgot about RE5 on PC for a bit.
Avatar image for crushed25
crushed25

107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 crushed25
Member since 2009 • 107 Posts

[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]Played the demo on the 360. I couldn't even finish the demo without putting myself to sleep so I think I'll pass.purple_MAN1832

Or you kept getting owned and quit out of despair and now hold a grudge against a good game because it's demo was too hard

or he played the demo and decided to pass on a game with bad controls, gameplay that fell way short of it's five year old predecessor, bad story, boring enemies ect.....i say he made a good move by passing.

Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts

[QUOTE="purple_MAN1832"]

[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]Played the demo on the 360. I couldn't even finish the demo without putting myself to sleep so I think I'll pass.crushed25

Or you kept getting owned and quit out of despair and now hold a grudge against a good game because it's demo was too hard

or he played the demo and decided to pass on a game with bad controls, gameplay that fell way short of it's five year old predecessor, bad story, boring enemies ect.....i say he made a good move by passing.

I hope that being on PC auto-fixes the bad controls. At least aiming will be much better.

Avatar image for Adamantium4k2
Adamantium4k2

896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Adamantium4k2
Member since 2009 • 896 Posts

Dont you love it when the lemmings come into the thread and start downplaying the game (I beat it months ago already) now that they cant brag about 'RE5 being superior on Xbox 360' . :lol:

PCs will always have the better multiplats!

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

I wish I knew about PC specs, We need a PCs for dummies sticky :P .

Avatar image for Trmpt
Trmpt

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Trmpt
Member since 2008 • 2381 Posts

That graphics card by itself costs $500.

Avatar image for urdead18
urdead18

3630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 urdead18
Member since 2008 • 3630 Posts

That graphics card by itself costs $500.

Trmpt
Really? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814187073 $204 for a better card than the 280 and it comes with CoD5 for free. I hope you were being sarcastic.
Avatar image for I_AM_MEGATRON
I_AM_MEGATRON

427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 I_AM_MEGATRON
Member since 2008 • 427 Posts
ok i got (AMD 4200 + 9800GT 1GB) all high + 2xAA + 1920x1080 => 36.2 frames
Avatar image for deathtarget04
deathtarget04

2266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#23 deathtarget04
Member since 2009 • 2266 Posts

[QUOTE="sikanderahmed"]

Nvidia GTX 280 alone costs more then 360 elite. also whats is RE5? the game that i beat 10 times about 3 months ago?

DAZZER7

oh man, your post perfectly illustrates then difference between PC and console gamers and their respective attention-spans lol. So a game is no good now if its 3 months old? Wait, wait, no, games are like clothing and fashion, you're only cool if you play the latest games, amIrite?

why buy a different version when you have already played it?

Avatar image for urdead18
urdead18

3630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 urdead18
Member since 2008 • 3630 Posts

Nvidia GTX 280 alone costs more then 360 elite. also whats is RE5? the game that i beat 10 times about 3 months ago?

sikanderahmed
I find this funny coming from a lemming when Halo 3 is still the most played game on XBL and it came out in 2007.
Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts

That graphics card by itself costs $500.

Trmpt

Im sure I got it for cheaper.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

Hmm, this should be interesting. I've got a GTX 275 which is slightly faster than your 280 but I have a weaker CPU. I'll let you know what kind of FPS i get.

urdead18

What? I think you got it all wrong... it's like equal.

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#27 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

That graphics card by itself costs $500.

Trmpt
no it cost about $300 and you dont need a gtx280 to play it at max settings. I get 44fps with an nvidia 8800gt ,intel q6600 everything max and 16xAA at 1440x900
Avatar image for urdead18
urdead18

3630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 urdead18
Member since 2008 • 3630 Posts

[QUOTE="urdead18"]

Hmm, this should be interesting. I've got a GTX 275 which is slightly faster than your 280 but I have a weaker CPU. I'll let you know what kind of FPS i get.

Bebi_vegeta

What? I think you got it all wrong...

Believe it or not, the 275 is faster than the 280. I know, strange. But the 275 was released after the 280 to be a middle-card between the 260 and the 285.
Avatar image for Trmpt
Trmpt

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Trmpt
Member since 2008 • 2381 Posts

[QUOTE="Trmpt"]

That graphics card by itself costs $500.

urdead18

Really? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814187073 $204 for a better card than the 280 and it comes with CoD5 for free. I hope you were being sarcastic.

Link to something that plays RE5 and many others with no problem for cheaper.

Avatar image for McJugga
McJugga

9453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 McJugga
Member since 2007 • 9453 Posts

Meh... I am not going to be getting this. I was never interested in it.

Avatar image for deathtarget04
deathtarget04

2266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#31 deathtarget04
Member since 2009 • 2266 Posts

[QUOTE="Trmpt"]

That graphics card by itself costs $500.

adamosmaki

no it cost about $300 and you dont need a gtx280 to play it at max settings. I get 44fps with an nvidia 8800gt ,intel q6600 everything max and 16xAA at 1440x900

does it actully cost that much?

Avatar image for Threebabycows
Threebabycows

1086

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Threebabycows
Member since 2008 • 1086 Posts

[QUOTE="sikanderahmed"]

Nvidia GTX 280 alone costs more then 360 elite. also whats is RE5? the game that i beat 10 times about 3 months ago?

urdead18

I find this funny coming from a lemming when Halo 3 is still the most played game on XBL and it came out in 2007.

That just goes to show how good it is..:|

Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts

[QUOTE="urdead18"][QUOTE="Trmpt"]

That graphics card by itself costs $500.

Trmpt

Really? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814187073 $204 for a better card than the 280 and it comes with CoD5 for free. I hope you were being sarcastic.

Link to something that plays RE5 and many others with no problem for cheaper.

You get what you pay for...

Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="urdead18"]

Hmm, this should be interesting. I've got a GTX 275 which is slightly faster than your 280 but I have a weaker CPU. I'll let you know what kind of FPS i get.

urdead18

What? I think you got it all wrong...

Believe it or not, the 275 is faster than the 280. I know, strange. But the 275 was released after the 280 to be a middle-card between the 260 and the 285.

The 280 is not much slower than the 285. About 10%.

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#35 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="Trmpt"]

That graphics card by itself costs $500.

deathtarget04

no it cost about $300 and you dont need a gtx280 to play it at max settings. I get 44fps with an nvidia 8800gt ,intel q6600 everything max and 16xAA at 1440x900

does it actully cost that much?

well you dont need a gtx280. gtx 260 core 216 or ATi 4870 which are about 80% of the gtx performance cost about $140-170 but yes the gtx280 it cost that much ( at least here where i live)
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="urdead18"]

Hmm, this should be interesting. I've got a GTX 275 which is slightly faster than your 280 but I have a weaker CPU. I'll let you know what kind of FPS i get.

urdead18

What? I think you got it all wrong...

Believe it or not, the 275 is faster than the 280. I know, strange. But the 275 was released after the 280 to be a middle-card between the 260 and the 285.

It's like exaclty the same... not one is faster then the other.

Avatar image for urdead18
urdead18

3630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 urdead18
Member since 2008 • 3630 Posts

[QUOTE="urdead18"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

What? I think you got it all wrong...

loco145

Believe it or not, the 275 is faster than the 280. I know, strange. But the 275 was released after the 280 to be a middle-card between the 260 and the 285.

The 280 is not much slower than the 285. About 10%.

I know, I was speaking about the 280 vs the 275. They're practically even but the 275 overclocks better and is $100 cheaper, so why did you go with the 280? Unless you're playing at 1080p or more?
Avatar image for karasill
karasill

3155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 karasill
Member since 2007 • 3155 Posts
[QUOTE="Trmpt"]

[QUOTE="urdead18"][QUOTE="Trmpt"]

That graphics card by itself costs $500.

Really? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814187073 $204 for a better card than the 280 and it comes with CoD5 for free. I hope you were being sarcastic.

Link to something that plays RE5 and many others with no problem for cheaper.

Maybe some people dont have a problem with money and do value better graphics, framerate, and their preferance of kb/m controls. The 360 arcade is cheaper, but you get what you pay for and you pay a premium price for games while PC gamers can get them for $10-$20 cheaper.
Avatar image for urdead18
urdead18

3630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 urdead18
Member since 2008 • 3630 Posts

[QUOTE="urdead18"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

What? I think you got it all wrong...

Bebi_vegeta

Believe it or not, the 275 is faster than the 280. I know, strange. But the 275 was released after the 280 to be a middle-card between the 260 and the 285.

It's like exaclty the same... not one is faster then the other.

Only the 275 is $100 cheaper.
Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts

[QUOTE="loco145"]

[QUOTE="urdead18"] Believe it or not, the 275 is faster than the 280. I know, strange. But the 275 was released after the 280 to be a middle-card between the 260 and the 285.urdead18

The 280 is not much slower than the 285. About 10%.

so why did you go with the 280?

Because I built my rig last summer? :)

Avatar image for swazidoughman
swazidoughman

3520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 91

User Lists: 0

#42 swazidoughman
Member since 2008 • 3520 Posts

ok i got (AMD 4200 + 9800GT 1GB) all high + 2xAA + 1920x1080 => 36.2 framesI_AM_MEGATRON

Nice, your system isn't even super high end and yet it was still able to completely own the console versions.

Avatar image for urdead18
urdead18

3630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 urdead18
Member since 2008 • 3630 Posts

[QUOTE="urdead18"][QUOTE="loco145"]The 280 is not much slower than the 285. About 10%.

loco145

so why did you go with the 280?

Because I built my rig last summer? :)

Ahhh, ok :P.
Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="urdead18"]

Hmm, this should be interesting. I've got a GTX 275 which is slightly faster than your 280 but I have a weaker CPU. I'll let you know what kind of FPS i get.

urdead18

What? I think you got it all wrong...

Believe it or not, the 275 is faster than the 280. I know, strange. But the 275 was released after the 280 to be a middle-card between the 260 and the 285.

The performance between the 2 are almost identical... but if both cards are overclocked the the 280 will beat it out. But for the price the ATI 4890 is the best card out right now. Just look at my link http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3539&p=16

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#45 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="urdead18"][QUOTE="Trmpt"]

That graphics card by itself costs $500.

Trmpt

Really? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814187073 $204 for a better card than the 280 and it comes with CoD5 for free. I hope you were being sarcastic.

Link to something that plays RE5 and many others with no problem for cheaper.

Link to something that cost a 1/3 of 360 price will still play RE5 at 720p with max settings and with 4xAA

Avatar image for urdead18
urdead18

3630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 urdead18
Member since 2008 • 3630 Posts

[QUOTE="urdead18"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

What? I think you got it all wrong...

GTSaiyanjin2

Believe it or not, the 275 is faster than the 280. I know, strange. But the 275 was released after the 280 to be a middle-card between the 260 and the 285.

The performance between the 2 are almost identical... but if both cards are overclocked the the 280 will beat it out. But for the price the ATI 4890 is the best card out right now. Just look at my link http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3539&p=16

Crysis Warhead 2500x1600 Gamer(Enthusiast Shaders)

4890 - 20.2 GTX 275 - 21.1

Bwahahahha :D But really, the cards are ridiculously close, I just prefer Nvidia if they were to be within $20 because of PhysX and CUDA.

Avatar image for Trmpt
Trmpt

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Trmpt
Member since 2008 • 2381 Posts

[QUOTE="Trmpt"]

[QUOTE="urdead18"] Really? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814187073 $204 for a better card than the 280 and it comes with CoD5 for free. I hope you were being sarcastic.adamosmaki

Link to something that plays RE5 and many others with no problem for cheaper.

Link to something that cost a 1/3 of 360 price will still play RE5 at 720p with max settings and with 4xAA

Really? You fail because you cant play a game on the card itself. I know wht your trying to prove but the other components needed will still cost more than my example.
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="urdead18"] Believe it or not, the 275 is faster than the 280. I know, strange. But the 275 was released after the 280 to be a middle-card between the 260 and the 285.urdead18

It's like exaclty the same... not one is faster then the other.

Only the 275 is $100 cheaper.

But this has nothing to do with price... since we are comparing the fastest card.

Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]

[QUOTE="Trmpt"]

Link to something that plays RE5 and many others with no problem for cheaper.

Trmpt

Link to something that cost a 1/3 of 360 price will still play RE5 at 720p with max settings and with 4xAA

Really? You fail because you cant play a game on the card itself. I know wht your trying to prove but the other components needed will still cost more than my example.

Everyone needs a PC this days anyway.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]

[QUOTE="Trmpt"]

Link to something that plays RE5 and many others with no problem for cheaper.

Trmpt

Link to something that cost a 1/3 of 360 price will still play RE5 at 720p with max settings and with 4xAA

Really? You fail because you cant play a game on the card itself. I know wht your trying to prove but the other components needed will still cost more than my example.

Some people want to play at the fullest... so they pay more.