RE5 PC vs 360 graphics comparison 56k*

  • 139 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

360 PC  360 PC  360 PC

More graphical comparisons http://www.eurogamer.net/gallery.php?game_id=5106&article_id=713141

Avatar image for Camer999
Camer999

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Camer999
Member since 2009 • 1729 Posts

Nearly identical.

Avatar image for tester962
tester962

2881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#3 tester962
Member since 2004 • 2881 Posts

The PC looks slightly better. The water looks alot better on the PC and the background items(the meat hanging in the store is more clear). Overall it doesnt, in my opinion, have very much difference between the 2.

Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
-Thumbs up- Pretty much identical. Slightly different color pallet and the PC version has better depth of field (imo).
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

Don't see much of a difference, inb4Ibeatthisalreadylul

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#6 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Is that the PC version maxed out? If so, then wow...

Avatar image for mythrol
mythrol

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 mythrol
Member since 2005 • 5237 Posts
PC is sharper. other than that, not much.
Avatar image for Camer999
Camer999

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Camer999
Member since 2009 • 1729 Posts

Is that the PC version maxed out? If so, then wow...

mitu123

wow, what?

Avatar image for caughtjoo
caughtjoo

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#9 caughtjoo
Member since 2009 • 975 Posts
PC hair and maybe slightly better shadows.
Avatar image for Next-Gen-Tec
Next-Gen-Tec

4623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Next-Gen-Tec
Member since 2009 • 4623 Posts
Makes 360 version look like a PS3 game.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#11 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

Is that the PC version maxed out? If so, then wow...

Camer999

wow, what?

It's not that much better than the 360 version, though it still looks better overall. I should had known Capcom would do this, ever played some of their games on PC, look at SFIV.
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

New PC trailer was also released http://news.bigdownload.com/2009/08/19/resident-evil-5-pc-trailer-unleashes-a-special-surprise/

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts
[QUOTE="Camer999"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

Is that the PC version maxed out? If so, then wow...

mitu123

wow, what?

It's not that much better than the 360 version, though it still looks better overall. I should had known Capcom would do this, ever played some of their games on PC, look at SFIV.

CAPCOM did not make any improvements in the graphics sadly. the good news is that it looks sharper and will run at 60 FPS.
Avatar image for 93soccer
93soccer

4602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 93soccer
Member since 2009 • 4602 Posts

Nearly identical with the screenshot

Avatar image for dxmcat
dxmcat

3385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 dxmcat
Member since 2007 • 3385 Posts

so a game made for consoles, does not look substantially better on a PC. what else is new?

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#16 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="Camer999"]

wow, what?

JangoWuzHere

It's not that much better than the 360 version, though it still looks better overall. I should had known Capcom would do this, ever played some of their games on PC, look at SFIV.

CAPCOM did not make any improvements in the graphics sadly. the good news is that it looks sharper and will run at 60 FPS.

Yep, I agree on that.

Avatar image for Frozzik
Frozzik

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Frozzik
Member since 2006 • 3914 Posts

Pc version looks qa little better. I'm sure the much higher resolutions, more FPS and added AA/AF will also set it apart from the 360 version more than is apparent in those shots.

Avatar image for freakbabyblues-
freakbabyblues-

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 freakbabyblues-
Member since 2009 • 665 Posts

PC version has better lighting and depth of field. 360 version is now fail.

PC version also hasa better gun, so thatmakes the 360 version a failtoo...

Avatar image for Brainhunter
Brainhunter

2201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Brainhunter
Member since 2003 • 2201 Posts
PC is simply using a higher resolution, and consequently, sharper textures (more AA, more AF, etc.). Outside of that, the 360 holds up pretty well against its maxed out PC counterpart. Very impressive console optimization Capcom.
Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

PC version looks slightly better. Now when someone has the video walkthrough for the PC version, I can look that up on Youtube & record that one instead of the 360 version.

Avatar image for Mr_Ditters
Mr_Ditters

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#21 Mr_Ditters
Member since 2008 • 1920 Posts

Yeah well lets see what it looks like in motion. The pc version is probably running at 100 fps.

Avatar image for Frozzik
Frozzik

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Frozzik
Member since 2006 • 3914 Posts

PC is simply using a higher resolution, and consequently, sharper textures (more AA, more AF, etc.). Outside of that, the 360 holds up pretty well against its maxed out PC counterpart. Very impressive console optimization Capcom.Brainhunter

Erm, just a min, as far as i'm aware the PC version is basically a port of the 360 version, not the other way around. What i mean is there is not going to be much difference other than res/aa/af as with most multiplats.

Avatar image for Mr_Ditters
Mr_Ditters

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#23 Mr_Ditters
Member since 2008 • 1920 Posts

[QUOTE="Brainhunter"]PC is simply using a higher resolution, and consequently, sharper textures (more AA, more AF, etc.). Outside of that, the 360 holds up pretty well against its maxed out PC counterpart. Very impressive console optimization Capcom.Frozzik

Erm, just a min, as far as i'm aware the PC version is basically a port of the 360 version, not the other way around. What i mean is there is not going to be much difference other than res/aa/af as with most multiplats.

Yeah 360 owners will use any sort of backwards logic so that they can convince themselves that their console is some sort of powerful machine.

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

[QUOTE="Brainhunter"]PC is simply using a higher resolution, and consequently, sharper textures (more AA, more AF, etc.). Outside of that, the 360 holds up pretty well against its maxed out PC counterpart. Very impressive console optimization Capcom.Frozzik

Erm, just a min, as far as i'm aware the PC version is basically a port of the 360 version, not the other way around. What i mean is there is not going to be much difference other than res/aa/af as with most multiplats.

No Capcom made the game for PC and ported it to consoles. Its how their engine works and its a great way to optimize the game.
Avatar image for Camer999
Camer999

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Camer999
Member since 2009 • 1729 Posts

[QUOTE="Frozzik"]

[QUOTE="Brainhunter"]PC is simply using a higher resolution, and consequently, sharper textures (more AA, more AF, etc.). Outside of that, the 360 holds up pretty well against its maxed out PC counterpart. Very impressive console optimization Capcom.Mr_Ditters

Erm, just a min, as far as i'm aware the PC version is basically a port of the 360 version, not the other way around. What i mean is there is not going to be much difference other than res/aa/af as with most multiplats.

Yeah 360 owners will use any sort of backwards logic so that they can convince themselves that their console is some sort of powerful machine.

No the engine makes the game on PC first, then it makes the X360 and PS3 version, like cryengine 3. Why are you so defensive, it is close, give credit when credit is due.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29845 Posts

looks a bit sharper. TC also said it will run at 60 FPS. good for PC gamers. its a great game.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 R4gn4r0k  Online
Member since 2004 • 49149 Posts

PC is simply using a higher resolution, and consequently, sharper textures (more AA, more AF, etc.). Outside of that, the 360 holds up pretty well against its maxed out PC counterpart. Very impressive console optimization Capcom.Brainhunter


Very unimpressive PC port Capcom.

What kind of resolution is 1024 × 576 ?

Avatar image for Mr_Ditters
Mr_Ditters

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#29 Mr_Ditters
Member since 2008 • 1920 Posts

[QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]

[QUOTE="Frozzik"]

Erm, just a min, as far as i'm aware the PC version is basically a port of the 360 version, not the other way around. What i mean is there is not going to be much difference other than res/aa/af as with most multiplats.

Camer999

Yeah 360 owners will use any sort of backwards logic so that they can convince themselves that their console is some sort of powerful machine.

No the engine makes the game on PC first, then it makes the X360 and PS3 version, like cryengine 3. Why are you so defensive, it is close, give credit when credit is due.

#1 prove that statement with a link. #2 This isn't cryengine 3, besides cryengine 3 was designed (and gimped) so that it could be ported to the weak consoles #3 its annoying to see 360 fanboys trying to compare PC to 360 and come to the conclusion that they are somehow even close to being in the same ballbark.

Avatar image for killa4lyfe
killa4lyfe

3849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#30 killa4lyfe
Member since 2008 • 3849 Posts

Makes 360 version look like a PS3 game.Next-Gen-Tec

Avatar image for Frozzik
Frozzik

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Frozzik
Member since 2006 • 3914 Posts

[QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]

[QUOTE="Frozzik"]

Erm, just a min, as far as i'm aware the PC version is basically a port of the 360 version, not the other way around. What i mean is there is not going to be much difference other than res/aa/af as with most multiplats.

Camer999

Yeah 360 owners will use any sort of backwards logic so that they can convince themselves that their console is some sort of powerful machine.

No the engine makes the game on PC first, then it makes the X360 and PS3 version, like cryengine 3. Why are you so defensive, it is close, give credit when credit is due.

no i agree with him. The whole point of this thread seems to be to say 360 can match a PC. Now, im no expert here but im sure capcom, like 99% of other devs make all versions almost identical. This saves time and hassle. The difference from console to PC is almost always resolutions, framerates AA and AF. Thats it, on thje odd occasion slightly higher res textures.

Have you any idea the amount of horsepower needed to run games at resolutions at or higher than 1080p with 4-8xAA and 16xAF asnd get 60fps? The gap in tech is huge. These games may look the same in tiny screenshots but if you saw them running side by side the difference would be much much more obvious.

Avatar image for Camer999
Camer999

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Camer999
Member since 2009 • 1729 Posts

[QUOTE="Camer999"]

[QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]

Yeah 360 owners will use any sort of backwards logic so that they can convince themselves that their console is some sort of powerful machine.

Mr_Ditters

No the engine makes the game on PC first, then it makes the X360 and PS3 version, like cryengine 3. Why are you so defensive, it is close, give credit when credit is due.

#1 prove that statement with a link. #2 This isn't cryengine 3, besides cryengine 3 was designed (and gimped) so that it could be ported to the weak consoles #3 its annoying to see 360 fanboys trying to compare PC to 360 and come to the conclusion that they are somehow even close to being in the same ballbark.

Wow.... I will find you a link, and Cryengine 3 isn't gimped it will run better and look better than 2 on your PC. Overall they are not in the same ballpark, but in this game they are face facts. Elitism at its finest.

Well, here is an article. Also, why do you think the PC version of lost planet 2 was shown first? Because it was made first.

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=919807&postcount=116

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

[QUOTE="Camer999"]

[QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]

Yeah 360 owners will use any sort of backwards logic so that they can convince themselves that their console is some sort of powerful machine.

Mr_Ditters

No the engine makes the game on PC first, then it makes the X360 and PS3 version, like cryengine 3. Why are you so defensive, it is close, give credit when credit is due.

#1 prove that statement with a link. #2 This isn't cryengine 3, besides cryengine 3 was designed (and gimped) so that it could be ported to the weak consoles #3 its annoying to see 360 fanboys trying to compare PC to 360 and come to the conclusion that they are somehow even close to being in the same ballbark.

Cryengine 3 was in no way gimped... Its basically Cryengine 2 with some minor and major improvements.
Avatar image for Nokanhav
Nokanhav

520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Nokanhav
Member since 2009 • 520 Posts

AA/AF, resolution, and smooth frame rate will make plenty of difference.

Avatar image for Mr_Ditters
Mr_Ditters

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#35 Mr_Ditters
Member since 2008 • 1920 Posts

[QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]

[QUOTE="Camer999"]

No the engine makes the game on PC first, then it makes the X360 and PS3 version, like cryengine 3. Why are you so defensive, it is close, give credit when credit is due.

Camer999

#1 prove that statement with a link. #2 This isn't cryengine 3, besides cryengine 3 was designed (and gimped) so that it could be ported to the weak consoles #3 its annoying to see 360 fanboys trying to compare PC to 360 and come to the conclusion that they are somehow even close to being in the same ballbark.

Wow.... I will find you a link, and Cryengine 3 isn't gimped it will run better and look better than 2 on your PC. Overall they are not in the same ballpark, but in this game they are face facts. Elitism at its finest.

You are right. It is elitism for some to be so religiously devoted to their gaming console that they lose their common sense. Im glad you see they arent in the same ballbark but others in this thread dont seem to grasp that.

Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#36 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts
The biggest difference is made by resolution, AA, AF (and framerate in case the 360 vers doesn't run 60fps). But you won't really notice them before you put the game up on a display. It's teh case with most multiplats that target consoles first.
Avatar image for Camer999
Camer999

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Camer999
Member since 2009 • 1729 Posts

[QUOTE="Camer999"]

[QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"] #1 prove that statement with a link. #2 This isn't cryengine 3, besides cryengine 3 was designed (and gimped) so that it could be ported to the weak consoles #3 its annoying to see 360 fanboys trying to compare PC to 360 and come to the conclusion that they are somehow even close to being in the same ballbark.

Mr_Ditters

Wow.... I will find you a link, and Cryengine 3 isn't gimped it will run better and look better than 2 on your PC. Overall they are not in the same ballpark, but in this game they are face facts. Elitism at its finest.

You are right. It is elitism for some to be so religiously devoted to their gaming console that they lose their common sense. Im glad you see they arent in the same ballbark but others in this thread dont seem to grasp that.

No that is PS3 owners, who think the cell can do everything. You seem to be very devoted to proving your PC is best. Yes the graphics are better, but it still isn't like PS2 graphics to Xbox 360 graphics so it isn't anything to right home about.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#38 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

Ilmost the same. Its impressive how 360 can still make PC quality graphics with its 4 years old tecnology!! :)

Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 ogvampire
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts

PC version looks a little sharper

Avatar image for Frozzik
Frozzik

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Frozzik
Member since 2006 • 3914 Posts

Ilmost the same. Its impressive how 360 can still make PC quality graphics with its 4 years old tecnology!! :)

PAL360

Personally i think its the PC running 360 quality graphics. PC quality are games like Empire, CoH, etc.

Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#41 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts

Here are bigger shots so you can see some differences better, still not much, mostly AA and AF.

360

PC

Avatar image for chrizz1
chrizz1

326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 chrizz1
Member since 2006 • 326 Posts

none of this matter, as they could have easily made the pc version much much better becasue its a much more powerful ,achine than the 360.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#44 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Ilmost the same. Its impressive how 360 can still make PC quality graphics with its 4 years old tecnology!! :)

Frozzik

Personally i think its the PC running 360 quality graphics. PC quality are games like Empire, CoH, etc.

Yeah, we all know consoles hold back PCs. Still the game looks almost identical from the pics.

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

They are pretty much using the same assets as the console versions, it's visual benefit on PC comes from the higher image clarity.

What these comparisons don't show is the PC version can easily push 16x AF, 8x AA and 1920x1200 on a single 8800GT.

Avatar image for freakbabyblues-
freakbabyblues-

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 freakbabyblues-
Member since 2009 • 665 Posts

@ManicAce

The top screen looks like the PS3 version... :? I thought the360 version had AA...

Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#48 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts
Also the pics are jpeg, png would make both look better, for e.g. that chain fence in the pics i posted, can't believe it would look like that, at least on PC if you have AA and AF cranked up it should be crisp clear.
Avatar image for mo0ksi
mo0ksi

12337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#49 mo0ksi
Member since 2007 • 12337 Posts
Looks sharper than the 360 version, but aside from that the screens show that they're rather identical. But 60FPS, and more monsters on screen in Mercenaries mode is a a much bigger plus than just slightly better graphics. I'd love to play it with 3D Vision.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

Here are bigger shots so you can see some differences better, still not much, mostly AA and AF.

360

PC

ManicAce

Why did you post a 1080p "360 screen" when the 360 version runs at 720p?