REAL Sony fans ....

  • 52 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#51 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="greg_splicer"]

What if gamers are NOT fanboys, and get the BEST there is for their gaming needs ?

greg_splicer

Sadly, you are not that gamer.

And how do you know ? Are you 100% sure that if PS3 would ever get a game looking like Fable 2 or Mass Effect or Lost ODyssey or Bioshock i would not buy one the moment those were released ?

Are you 100% sure i will not get a PS3 when FF13 is definatly confirmed not for 360 and the game is out ?

How are you so sure, when i have ALL console bar PS3 ? And when i say ALL i mean ALL, bar PS1 that i sold, since i could play all games on my PS2

What i am mostly mad about with PS3 is that had the nerve to make a 600$ console, with no FF13 in 2007 in US, garabge graphics comparing to the vastly better in textures/shaders 360, and in general make that disastewr in all areas called PS3 a huge gaming failure, just to promote ... the god damn BLUE RAY crap

Am i clear ? IF PS3 released without blue ray CRAP, and had a 8600GT inside, ans 1GB ram, i would pay up to 700$ to get my hands on it, and play Crysis in it too !!!

Now, why the HELL PS3 is what it is, is beyond me, do not expect me to buy one for no GOOD reason though, and stop bashing it for what it is, a machine that SHOULD not in any way cost 600$ but 400$ max

Wow you do seem to be upset over this. You should settle down a little. I am however 100% sure you are a console fanboy though.

Wrong again, i am "get what has the best price/games ratio available" with an emphasis in game, that is all. Eventually i plan to get a PS3 in 400$, BUT now that is 600$ i will have to wait for either a price drop OR FF13 is out, and i plan on a pc in late 2008, with the best of DX10 card and play Crysis in 200fps, and ALL games coming to pc, the ones that will CLEARLY look vastly better than what 360 does NOW, unlike games like Bioshock, Alan Wake etc that the 360 version will look about same with PC

Then why did you troll on the PC forums and post in the thread with all of the 2007 games listed and saying that all of those games suck and posting a list of console games that are "better"?

That is EXACTLY why i will not get a pc now, because console games NOW, look FAAAAAAR more impressive than all those mediocre looking pc games listed, bar Crysis and maybe Dragon Age, those are the only pc games to stand out for now, in 2008-2009 though, that DX10 will become common case, and games will surpass Alan Wake, Fable 2 visuals by far, THEN and only then a PC will be a must have

Is that enough for my motives for now ? I will not just move to DX10 for ... Crysis, if it was 3-4 RPG's with such graphics though, i would have a PC in an instant

BTW the PC forum trolling was not intented, i was linked to that thread by a ssystem wars one, and thought i was still in system wars, clear now ?

So basically you are a graphics whore. Thanks for the info. BTW, what is the point in bashing the PC now, if you know it is going to be better in the end...same can be said about the PS3.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts
[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"][QUOTE="JDW_games"]I'm very irritated by the front runners and bandwagon gamers who jumped ship and are going by the hype of the 360. It's a joke really! I'm still happy with my PS2 and I'm gearing up to buy a PS3 soon. By years end I guarantee all us real Sony fans will be happy with our nice Blu Ray players and an amazing upcoming series of games to play while all you 360 fans have is Halo 3. JDW_games
So let me get this straight, By years end you will be happy to have a BD player while 360 gamers have to suffer with Halo 3? Nice arguement.

My point is that the PS3 has a MUCH better lineup of original games coming. Sony is the better developer and since both systems have multi platform titles, I am much happier with the PS3 because of games like Metal Gear Solid, God Of War, Lair, and Drake's Fortune.

That logic would hold some water if every big 2008 PS3 title like MGS, GT, FF, and R&C did not have a number for a sequel behind it. "MUCH better lineup of original games coming". ??? Who are you trying to kid?