Reasons Why Killzone 2 deserves HYPE

I know what the first argument will be... " You fail haha killzone 1 got 6.9 hahaha, im fat and stupid." Well the reasons why it got a bad score was because bad graphics. And just incase you guys didn't know, the first killzone was suppose to be PC exclusive. Sony paid for the game and Guerilla did not have any experience with PS2 hardware.

Alright back to topic.

1. Killzone 2 deserves hype because of it's graphics. I'm sure there is no arguments here. The pre alpha looke better than Halo 3 already. I think it's because it is not even in hd. 640p garbage.

2. Gameplay i know i haven't played it but a direct quote from gamespot said it plays just as good as it looks and ign said they has a ball with it.

And those who think resistance2 can compete with GeoW2 just because GeoW got 9.6 and Resistance 1 got 8.6 are smoking somthing nice. Your comparing a launch title to a game that was worked on for 3 years.

The pre alpha looke better than Halo 3 already. I think it's because it is not even in hd. 640p garbage.manystylez

I love how Halo 3 is the standard even for its weakest element.

And those who think resistance2 can compete with GeoW2 just because GeoW got 9.6 and Resistance 1 got 8.6 are smoking somthing nice. Your comparing a launch title to a game that was worked on for 3 years.

manystylez

but a direct quote from gamespot said it plays just as good as it looks and ign said they has a ball with it.manystylez

Question: Where is that "direct quote"?

[QUOTE="manystylez"]

And those who think resistance2 can compete with GeoW2 just because GeoW got 9.6 and Resistance 1 got 8.6 are smoking somthing nice. Your comparing a launch title to a game that was worked on for 3 years.

JPOBS

No but you have to admit GeoW was worked on much longer than resistance, but still resistance 2 will not get as good as score as GeoW2 (I guessing anyways)

[QUOTE="manystylez"] but a direct quote from gamespot said it plays just as good as it looks and ign said they has a ball with it.Bansheesdie

Question: Where is that "direct quote"?

look at preview from gamespot.

[QUOTE="manystylez"] but a direct quote from gamespot said it plays just as good as it looks and ign said they has a ball with it.Bansheesdie

Question: Where is that "direct quote"?

check e3 previews on this site. pretty much most media reported that the game was "jaw dropping"

[QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="manystylez"]

And those who think resistance2 can compete with GeoW2 just because GeoW got 9.6 and Resistance 1 got 8.6 are smoking somthing nice. Your comparing a launch title to a game that was worked on for 3 years.

dackchaar

No but you have to admit GeoW was worked on much longer than resistance, but still resistance 2 will not get as good as score as GeoW2 (I guessing anyways)

im betting both will be given grat scores, as both will be great games. im guessing 9.0 at least for both

[QUOTE="Bansheesdie"]

[QUOTE="manystylez"] but a direct quote from gamespot said it plays just as good as it looks and ign said they has a ball with it.manystylez

Question: Where is that "direct quote"?

look at preview from gamespot.

This is your thread many, don't you think that quote would only increase your point and thusly the validity of this thread?

[QUOTE="dackchaar"][QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="manystylez"]

And those who think resistance2 can compete with GeoW2 just because GeoW got 9.6 and Resistance 1 got 8.6 are smoking somthing nice. Your comparing a launch title to a game that was worked on for 3 years.

ski11buzz

No but you have to admit GeoW was worked on much longer than resistance, but still resistance 2 will not get as good as score as GeoW2 (I guessing anyways)

im betting both will be given grat scores, as both will be great games. im guessing 9.0 at least for both

Yes. Totally. Resistance MP sounds amazing, and Gears of War 2 is just a bad*** game.

[QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="manystylez"]

And those who think resistance2 can compete with GeoW2 just because GeoW got 9.6 and Resistance 1 got 8.6 are smoking somthing nice. Your comparing a launch title to a game that was worked on for 3 years.

dackchaar

No but you have to admit GeoW was worked on much longer than resistance, but still resistance 2 will not get as good as score as GeoW2 (I guessing anyways)

I just realised something... 6.9 is almost like 69. lolz. :lol: :P

That was irrelevant/irreverent/immature. :P

[QUOTE="dackchaar"][QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="manystylez"]

And those who think resistance2 can compete with GeoW2 just because GeoW got 9.6 and Resistance 1 got 8.6 are smoking somthing nice. Your comparing a launch title to a game that was worked on for 3 years.

JPOBS

No but you have to admit GeoW was worked on much longer than resistance, but still resistance 2 will not get as good as score as GeoW2 (I guessing anyways)

launch titles arnt typically worked on for 3 years. that means that the game was in devolpment for 3 years before the ps3 was even realised. 2003...

Wasn't Lair hyped for graphics as well? It's not exactly the best way to hype a game.dkhw

lair lost because of bad motion controls. kind of unfair to people who hyped it (even though it was hyped way to much) killzone 2 wont have motion controls shoved down gamers throats.

Hype help sell games,but also ultimately makes them dissapointing.

Halo3 is a great fragfest of a game,but hype killed it

Killzone was on ok gamee hyped buried it

no, those are totaly noob reasons. but it deserves hype.Always-Honest

I wish I could think of a way to word this so it wouldn't sound like a challenge, but why does KZ2 deserve the AA+ (I believe) hype?

To be quite honest, I think Resistance pretty much stole Killzone's hype.

I know what the first argument will be... " You fail haha killzone 1 got 6.9 hahaha, im fat and stupid." Well the reasons why it got a bad score was because bad graphics. And just incase you guys didn't know, the first killzone was suppose to be PC exclusive. Sony paid for the game and Guerilla did not have any experience with PS2 hardware.

Alright back to topic.

1. Killzone 2 deserves hype because of it's graphics. I'm sure there is no arguments here. The pre alpha looke better than Halo 3 already. I think it's because it is not even in hd. 640p garbage.

2. Gameplay i know i haven't played it but a direct quote from gamespot said it plays just as good as it looks and ign said they has a ball with it.

And those who think resistance2 can compete with GeoW2 just because GeoW got 9.6 and Resistance 1 got 8.6 are smoking somthing nice. Your comparing a launch title to a game that was worked on for 3 years.

manystylez

[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]no, those are totaly noob reasons. but it deserves hype.Bansheesdie

I wish I could think of a way to word this so it wouldn't sound like a challenge, but why does KZ2 deserve the AA+ (I believe) hype?

when we see things in normal life, it's because of the way things refract light. not because of how detailed textures are. and what killzone does realy good is using lighting in a good and realistic way. The character movement animations are also very very good (different reactions dependiing on where they get shot).

These two things combined with the new first person cover sytem, the art direction, 7.1 surround and general chaos will make this game very immersive. and that deserves some hype.. immersion is good in shooters (CoD4 was a big step in the right direction))

I can not understand how a gamer that likes shooters is not hyped for killzone 2 after looking at some gameplay vids. Just watching an enemy get shot is almost worth the hype...

ofcourse we know nothing yet about level design , etc.. so that's just waitng and hoping for the best. i'm not saying this game will be AAA, i'm just saying that from what i've seen, i'm hyped without a single doubt.

I know what the first argument will be... " You fail haha killzone 1 got 6.9 hahaha, im fat and stupid." Well the reasons why it got a bad score was because bad graphics. And just incase you guys didn't know, the first killzone was suppose to be PC exclusive. Sony paid for the game and Guerilla did not have any experience with PS2 hardware.

Alright back to topic.

1. Killzone 2 deserves hype because of it's graphics. I'm sure there is no arguments here. The pre alpha looke better than Halo 3 already. I think it's because it is not even in hd. 640p garbage.

2. Gameplay i know i haven't played it but a direct quote from gamespot said it plays just as good as it looks and ign said they has a ball with it.

And those who think resistance2 can compete with GeoW2 just because GeoW got 9.6 and Resistance 1 got 8.6 are smoking somthing nice. Your comparing a launch title to a game that was worked on for 3 years.

manystylez

[QUOTE="manystylez"]

I know what the first argument will be... " You fail haha killzone 1 got 6.9 hahaha, im fat and stupid." Well the reasons why it got a bad score was because bad graphics. And just incase you guys didn't know, the first killzone was suppose to be PC exclusive. Sony paid for the game and Guerilla did not have any experience with PS2 hardware.

Alright back to topic.

1. Killzone 2 deserves hype because of it's graphics. I'm sure there is no arguments here. The pre alpha looke better than Halo 3 already. I think it's because it is not even in hd. 640p garbage.

2. Gameplay i know i haven't played it but a direct quote from gamespot said it plays just as good as it looks and ign said they has a ball with it.

And those who think resistance2 can compete with GeoW2 just because GeoW got 9.6 and Resistance 1 got 8.6 are smoking somthing nice. Your comparing a launch title to a game that was worked on for 3 years.

LibertySaint

First of all ps3 dev kits did not come till 2005 and name one way i trashed GeoW. Just so you know i played geow and loved it. I clearly stated do not say resistance 2 can't compete with geow 2.

Reason's why Killzone 2 DOESN'T deserve HYPE.

1. The falsified CGI vids sony showcased during E3 2k5. Sony should've been up front with the public and waited until the game was ready to be demo'd.

2. Guerilla has yet to release a good game on a console.. Don't give me that PSP nonsense... Working with console's is an entirely different atmosphere.

3. There are shooters with Far more potential coming out on the PS3 like Resistance 2.

Reason's why Killzone 2 DOESN'T deserve HYPE.

1. The falsified CGI vids sony showcased during E3 2k5. Sony should've been up front with the public and waited until the game was ready to be demo'd.

2. Guerilla has yet to release a good game on a console.. Don't give me that PSP nonsense... Working with console's is an entirely different atmosphere.

3. There are shooters with Far more potential coming out on the PS3 like Resistance 2.

OhSnapitz

1. It was a target vid and it was close to it and it was just the pre alpha

2. Maybe it's because they only made one... and again was rushed and was suppose to be on pc.

3. Yup there is but i don't see how this has to do with anything

[QUOTE="OhSnapitz"]

Reason's why Killzone 2 DOESN'T deserve HYPE.

1. The falsified CGI vids sony showcased during E3 2k5. Sony should've been up front with the public and waited until the game was ready to be demo'd.

2. Guerilla has yet to release a good game on a console.. Don't give me that PSP nonsense... Working with console's is an entirely different atmosphere.

3. There are shooters with Far more potential coming out on the PS3 like Resistance 2.

manystylez

1. It was a target vid and it was close to it and it was just the pre alpha

2. Maybe it's because they only made one... and again was rushed and was suppose to be on pc.

3. Yup there is but i don't see how this has to do with anything

Target vid? It was a straight up lie on Sony's part. They said that the game would look like that when it's finished. It looks good but not as good as the E3 2k5 vid.

Acutally NO. They made Killzone and Nam 67 and BOTH games tanked!

It means... There other options that deserve more attention than Killzone... Insomniac created a very solid FPS, The sequel is added a lot more options and it deserves hype. Hyping a game from a dev house who's last two consoel efforts were complete *** , is silly.

[QUOTE="manystylez"][QUOTE="OhSnapitz"]

Reason's why Killzone 2 DOESN'T deserve HYPE.

1. The falsified CGI vids sony showcased during E3 2k5. Sony should've been up front with the public and waited until the game was ready to be demo'd.

2. Guerilla has yet to release a good game on a console.. Don't give me that PSP nonsense... Working with console's is an entirely different atmosphere.

3. There are shooters with Far more potential coming out on the PS3 like Resistance 2.

OhSnapitz

1. It was a target vid and it was close to it and it was just the pre alpha

2. Maybe it's because they only made one... and again was rushed and was suppose to be on pc.

3. Yup there is but i don't see how this has to do with anything

Target vid? It was a straight up lie on Sony's part. They said that the game would look like that when it's finished. It looks good but not as good as the E3 2k5 vid.

Acutally NO. They made Killzone and Nam 67 and BOTH games tanked!

It means... There other options that deserve more attention than Killzone... Insomniac created a very solid FPS, The sequel is added a lot more options and it deserves hype. Hyping a game from a dev house who's last two consoel efforts were complete *** , is silly.

Is it finished... nope will it looke better yep

and two games wow

[QUOTE="OhSnapitz"][QUOTE="manystylez"][QUOTE="OhSnapitz"]

Reason's why Killzone 2 DOESN'T deserve HYPE.

1. The falsified CGI vids sony showcased during E3 2k5. Sony should've been up front with the public and waited until the game was ready to be demo'd.

2. Guerilla has yet to release a good game on a console.. Don't give me that PSP nonsense... Working with console's is an entirely different atmosphere.

3. There are shooters with Far more potential coming out on the PS3 like Resistance 2.

manystylez

1. It was a target vid and it was close to it and it was just the pre alpha

2. Maybe it's because they only made one... and again was rushed and was suppose to be on pc.

3. Yup there is but i don't see how this has to do with anything

Target vid? It was a straight up lie on Sony's part. They said that the game would look like that when it's finished. It looks good but not as good as the E3 2k5 vid.

Acutally NO. They made Killzone and Nam 67 and BOTH games tanked!

It means... There other options that deserve more attention than Killzone... Insomniac created a very solid FPS, The sequel is added a lot more options and it deserves hype. Hyping a game from a dev house who's last two consoel efforts were complete *** , is silly.

Is it finished... nope will it looke better yep

and two games wow

It's still not going to look like that. Thus, a lie.

Two games are enough to judge the talent of the devs to a certain degree. They sucked on both, so why bank on this one?

I just realised something... 6.9 is almost like 69. lolz. :lol: :P

That was irrelevant/irreverent/immature. :P

dewmandew7

it was neccesary though. I was about to say it :P

OhSnapitz put it best. I don't see many reasons to hype KZ2 much. The game may have been incredible if it had come out already, maybe back when Gears originally shipped, but by the time it ships it will be just another shooter. Pretty visuals, maybe, but nothing mind blowing above and beyond what we've already seen. PS3 fanboys' time would be better spent sinking their hype in to Resistance 2. At least Insomniac has a winning track record.

Blah...

I wish we didn't find out about games until three months before they're ready to be pressed.

All of this crap about "hype" is childish. There's not a game out there that could live up to three years of "hype".

:|

:|

:|

:|