Which one is the better version?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
The 360 versions runs better and displays at a higher native resolution. The PS3 version has a little extra content, I think an extra hideout and an extra outfit.
I'd go with the 360 version. The extra content is very minimal and the dlc for the game decreases the margin between content even more.
360 version no questions asked.
Animal-Mother
Do you have XBLG?
Played both, not that much of a difference, Lens of truth captures at 740, if you have a 1080p HDTV.. with up scaling, you might not be able to tell the difference.
... and that's the truth... or ya can listen to lems.. *shrug* dont care.
360version looks better, runs better, higher resolution.
Install it and its load times obliterate ps3 load times on the game.
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]
360 version no questions asked.
FragTycoon
Do you have XBLG?
Played both, not that much of a difference, Lens of truth captures at 740, if you have a 1080p HDTV.. with up scaling, you might not be able to tell the difference.
... and that's the truth... or ya can listen to lems.. *shrug* dont care.
Uhh well I don't capture and i've only played the 360 version. So from what i've seen and heard 360 is the way to go. And my GT is hellserge360 is pretty superior. If you have the option to buy either you definitely wanna go with the 360. If you only have a PS3 it's certainly not worth going out and buying a 360 for it, but there is a noticeable difference.
360 is pretty superior. If you have the option to buy either you definitely wanna go with the 360. If you only have a PS3 it's certainly not worth going out and buying a 360 for it, but there is a noticeable difference.
TacticalDesire
Pretty much this. It's not like the differences will make you enjoy the game a lot more, but it's noticeable. Personally, I'd get the 360 version for the peace of mind knowing I have the technically superior version. If the extra content was anything special I would have gotten the PS3 version but as it is I'd prefer the extra stability over a few meaningless additions. I guess according to some that would make me a Lem though, so you may want to listen to them.
I got the Ps3 version first, got the platinum trophy, and later got the 360 version to play multiplayer with some friends. From my experience the 360 version is better overall; higher resolution, better textues, longer draw distance, and a more stable framerate.
This Face-off article from Digital Foundry compares the two versions well: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-red-dead-redemption-face-off
I got the Ps3 version first, got the platinum trophy, and later got the 360 version to play multiplayer with some friends. From my experience the 360 version is better overall; higher resolution, better textues, longer draw distance, and a more stable framerate.
This Face-off article from Digital Foundry compares the two versions well: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-red-dead-redemption-face-off
AcidSoldner
Xbox360 is better.
For future reference 90% of multiplats look better on Xbox 360 the other 10% they are equal.
360 easily. for better AA and higher resolution, better draw distance and more objects on screen ect.
[QUOTE="AcidSoldner"]
I got the Ps3 version first, got the platinum trophy, and later got the 360 version to play multiplayer with some friends. From my experience the 360 version is better overall; higher resolution, better textues, longer draw distance, and a more stable framerate.
This Face-off article from Digital Foundry compares the two versions well: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-red-dead-redemption-face-off
Deevoshun
Xbox360 is better.
For future reference 90% of multiplats look better on Xbox 360 the other 10% they are equal.
please refrain from pulling percentages out of your ***.
EDIT: just so you know, quite a few multiplats are better on the ps3.
360 has superior graphics but PS3 has one more hideout, they're both pretty much 99% identical; it's a great game no matter what systme you buy it on.
[QUOTE="Deevoshun"]
[QUOTE="AcidSoldner"]
I got the Ps3 version first, got the platinum trophy, and later got the 360 version to play multiplayer with some friends. From my experience the 360 version is better overall; higher resolution, better textues, longer draw distance, and a more stable framerate.
This Face-off article from Digital Foundry compares the two versions well: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-red-dead-redemption-face-off
theuncharted34
Xbox360 is better.
For future reference 90% of multiplats look better on Xbox 360 the other 10% they are equal.
please refrain from pulling percentages out of your ***.
Looks like someone can't handle the truth. It's a well known fact that most multiplats like this game are better on 360.
Link.
360version looks better, runs better, higher resolution.
Install it and its load times obliterate ps3 load times on the game.WilliamRLBaker
lolwut... I thought lems were against installs. :roll:
Wait PS3 has more content? Go for the PS3 one. The differences in graphics between the 2 are marginal at best.
Looks like someone can't handle the truth. It's a well known fact that most multiplats like this game are better on 360.Link.
garland51
Not really. Let's look at the multiplats that definitively look better on the 360. Now, compare that to the amount of multiplats available for each system. I'm pretty sure you'll find the number to be far below 90%. I'd frankly be surprised if it was even 1%.
[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]
[QUOTE="Deevoshun"]
Xbox360 is better.
For future reference 90% of multiplats look better on Xbox 360 the other 10% they are equal.
garland51
please refrain from pulling percentages out of your ***.
Looks like someone can't handle the truth. It's a well known fact that most multiplats like this game are better on 360.
Link.
But 90 percent are better and the other 10 percent are equal. NO. not a fact . please no
he just said that RDR looked better, what did your link prove? That RDR looks better? like everyone else on this board said? Cmon bruh
[QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]360 /threadmillerlight89Am I the only one who finds your sig racist? :lol: Not that I'm griping. To TC, 360
holy crap
I actually thought that it was about the Rebecca Black song...
Wow... That is freakkiing funny/messed up at the same time
WHen given the choice, get the 360 version, when RDR is concerned... it has better visuals and better framerate... also some objects are removed from the PS3 version.
It should work in this instance, the PS3 version is definitely inferior to the 360 version, and this is coming from a guy who never plays his 360 and plays the hell out of his PS3.PS3
/thread
(when has /thread ever really worked?)
FragTycoon
Am I the only one who finds your sig racist? :lol: Not that I'm griping. To TC, 360[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]360 /threadSnakemaster9
holy crap
I actually thought that it was about the Rebecca Black song...
Wow... That is freakkiing funny/messed up at the same time
Well I think it is, but it's relating it to when blacks had to ride in the back of the bus in the South. I agree with you though, it's one of those terrible things you can't help but chuckle at. Maybe we are just messed up :P[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]
[QUOTE="Deevoshun"]
Xbox360 is better.
For future reference 90% of multiplats look better on Xbox 360 the other 10% they are equal.
garland51
please refrain from pulling percentages out of your ***.
Looks like someone can't handle the truth. It's a well known fact that most multiplats like this game are better on 360.
http://misterslimm.wordpress.com/360-vs-ps3/xbox-360-vs-ps3-head-to-head-face-off-results/" title="http://misterslimm.wordpress.com/360-vs-ps3/xbox-360-vs-ps3-head-to-head-face-off-results/">Link.
I like how on the 2011 titles that list shows MvC3 as an x360 winner despite the references linking to LoT and DF saying that it's a PS3 winner. Homefront shows x360 winner as well despite the references calling it a draw. And that's just the mistakes in counting from the few 2011 titles alone (fixing them makes PS3 have twice the winners vs x360 this year, 4 to 2).
I guess I should make a similar webpage with the same links to references in LoT and DF and just put 90% of titles as PS3 victory and you will see it as true because it is on the internet and links to reliable sources?
Lets face it, in the last 2 years or so multiplats have been about 50/50. Only back in the stone age when devs still ported games was it different.
On topic, RDR is slightly better on x360 and has a bit of extra content on PS3. Just pick whatever you can find cheaper.
[QUOTE="garland51"]
Looks like someone can't handle the truth. It's a well known fact that most multiplats like this game are better on 360.
Link.
Snakemaster9
But 90 percent are better and the other 10 percent are equal. NO. not a fact . please no
he just said that RDR looked better, what did your link prove? That RDR looks better? like everyone else on this board said? Cmon bruh
Look at the whole list which Digital Foundry have reviewed. It's more than just RDR that is better on 360.
I like how on the 2011 titles that list shows MvC3 as an x360 winner despite the references linking to LoT and DF saying that it's a PS3 winner. Homefront shows x360 winner as well despite the references calling it a draw. And that's just the mistakes in counting from the few 2011 titles alone (fixing them makes PS3 have twice the winners vs x360 this year, 4 to 2).I guess I should make a similar webpage with the same links to references in LoT and DF and just put 90% of titles as PS3 victory and you will see it as true because it is on the internet and links to reliable sources?
Lets face it, in the last 2 years or so multiplats have been about 50/50. Only back in the stone age when devs still ported games was it different.SkaRy_RuLeZ
Lens of Truth? The same so called "comparison experts" that gave The PS3 version of Batman: Arkham Asylum the win due to extra content? LMAO! LoT doesn't exactly go into nearly as much depth as Eurogamer/Digital Foundry; you don't hear Lens of truth talking about stuff like "upscaled low resolution alpha textures", & Digital foundry really pick games apart when they do face offs.
Not to mention that DF (as well as B3D Forums) has had a whole lot of experience in multiplat comparisons than what LoT or IGN has, & have done comparisons on multiplats even before IGN or LoT were doing them. I would trust them before I trust anything from LoT. Plus it was DF that gave the 360 version of MvC 3 the win, not PS3. And no, fixing them does not make PS3 "twice the winner" of the 2011 comparisons or even before that. And there is absolutely no comparison of Homefront from LoT at all, nor does PS3 have 90% of wins. Stop making up stuff.
Digital Foundry & B3D >>>> LoT & IGN.
Look at the whole list which Digital Foundry have reviewed. It's more than just RDR that is better on 360.
[QUOTE="SkaRy_RuLeZ"]I like how on the 2011 titles that list shows MvC3 as an x360 winner despite the references linking to LoT and DF saying that it's a PS3 winner. Homefront shows x360 winner as well despite the references calling it a draw. And that's just the mistakes in counting from the few 2011 titles alone (fixing them makes PS3 have twice the winners vs x360 this year, 4 to 2).
I guess I should make a similar webpage with the same links to references in LoT and DF and just put 90% of titles as PS3 victory and you will see it as true because it is on the internet and links to reliable sources?
Lets face it, in the last 2 years or so multiplats have been about 50/50. Only back in the stone age when devs still ported games was it different.garland51
Lens of Truth? The same so called "comparison experts" that gave The PS3 version of Batman: Arkham Asylum the win due to extra content? LMAO! LoT doesn't exactly go into nearly as much depth as Eurogamer/Digital Foundry; you don't hear Lens of truth talking about stuff like "upscaled low resolution alpha textures", & Digital foundry really pick games apart when they do face offs.
Not to mention that DF (as well as B3D Forums) has had a whole lot of experience in multiplat comparisons than what LoT or IGN has, & have done comparisons on multiplats even before IGN or LoT were doing them. I would trust them before I trust anything from LoT. Plus it was DF that gave the 360 version of MvC 3 the win, not PS3. And no, fixing them does not make PS3 "twice the winner" of the 2011 comparisons or even before that. And there is absolutely no comparison of Homefront from LoT at all, nor does PS3 have 90% of wins. Stop making up stuff.
Digital Foundry & B3D >>>> LoT & IGN
That's kewl because I did mention DF as one of the references used by that list you linked under MvC3 as an X360 win when DF says its a PS3 win, and Homefront which DF considers a draw.
Also, LoT gave BAA a win for more than extra content. The camera was further back on the PS3 version which actually made the game better, because batman is so fat he covers a third of your screen, or 90% when he opens his wings, and sometimes I like to actually see what I'm doing and where I'm going.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment