Red Orchestra 2 > BF3

Idk, this doesn't seem as intense as BF3.

el3m2tigre

Idk, this doesn't seem as intense as BF3.

el3m2tigre

RO has always been more intense then the BF series on the single basis that weapons are much more deadly, knowing that a single shot is all it takes to kill changes the dynamics of play considerably, it means you can no longer run out in the open and you have to rely much more heavily on your teammates.

From the video you posted... can't see how you came to that conclusion.

I've seen plenty of gameplay so I can vouche for RO2, being a potentially amazing FPS title, but the TC started the topic off in a weak manner.

I'll be getting both even if they come out the same day since Red Orchestra 2 will most likely be cheap. Then I'll put down both when ArmA 3 comes 8)

I've seen plenty of gameplay so I can vouche for RO2, being a potentially amazing FPS title, but the TC started the topic off in a weak manner.

Mystic-G

Both will be amazing and im looking forward to both.

But im giving RO2 the edge because WW2 > all for me XD

[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="cobrax55"]

lol what? Have you actually played either of these games? They fall on the complete opposite end of any spectrum you could possibly put them on.

That entire comparison is just laughable :lol:

cobrax55

Because one is one of the most realistic shooters out there and the other is one of the most unrealistic shooters out there. There is litterally nothing in common beyond them both being ****d based and taking place in WW2.

[QUOTE="cobrax55"]

[QUOTE="Birdy09"] And how have you come to that conclusion? Birdy09

Because one is one of the most realistic shooters out there and the other is one of the most unrealistic shooters out there. There is litterally nothing in common beyond them both being ****d based and taking place in WW2.

the game is made for people who like realistic games, if your basis of comparison is ET, then its clearly not made for you anyway.

Thats exactly what I said though. realism =I better, its a borefest in comparison to ET. and no. I can appreciate a realistic shooter, just not that bloody damn average niche cult followed mod.Birdy09

[QUOTE="Birdy09"]Thats exactly what I said though. realism =I better, its a borefest in comparison to ET. and no. I can appreciate a realistic shooter, just not that bloody damn average niche cult followed mod.skrat_01

One is focusing on realism, other is on arcade gameplay. Not a valid comparison, aside from that they both use large amounts of players (on PC) and utilize vehicles.the_ChEeSe_mAn2

[QUOTE="the_ChEeSe_mAn2"]One is focusing on realism, other is on arcade gameplay. Not a valid comparison, aside from that they both use large amounts of players (on PC) and utilize vehicles.ferret-gamer

[QUOTE="the_ChEeSe_mAn2"]One is focusing on realism, other is on arcade gameplay. Not a valid comparison, aside from that they both use large amounts of players (on PC) and utilize vehicles.ferret-gamer

Well, I can't say BF3 is super realistic when I can revive players like I was GOD.

im sick of WW2 games

killing nazi's got old in 2005, playing as soviet scum got old aswelll

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="the_ChEeSe_mAn2"]One is focusing on realism, other is on arcade gameplay. Not a valid comparison, aside from that they both use large amounts of players (on PC) and utilize vehicles.Bebi_vegeta

Well, I can't say BF3 is super realistic when I can revive players like I was GOD.

[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

Idk, this doesn't seem as intense as BF3.

lawlessx

Agreed. The retail RO is a 6 year old game now? I think. It's still as intense to me as a game of Rush in BC2. BC2 has the advantage of loads of dust and stuff literally blowing up in your face to add to the feeling of intensity, but RO has a kind of raw energy behind it.

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"] One is focused on being realistic, one is focused on being more realistic. I don't really see how people keep coming out and saying Battlefield games are focused on arcade gameplay, they aren't a sim, but they aren't an arcade shooter either.millerlight89

Well, I can't say BF3 is super realistic when I can revive players like I was GOD.

It's in between, it has elements of both.

im sick of WW2 games

killing nazi's got old in 2005, playing as soviet scum got old aswelll

HaloinventedFPS

I like this game a lot the way it looks and plays, the animations are a little clunky but im sure they will fix that by the time the game ships. Still ill get this and BF3 and play them both equally.

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="Birdy09"]Thats exactly what I said though. realism =I better, its a borefest in comparison to ET. and no. I can appreciate a realistic shooter, just not that bloody damn average niche cult followed mod.Birdy09

At least it has bots, something BF3 may lack though I'm sure it'll be in co-op if it's like BF2.

I was rather underwhelmed by the BF3 demo and trailers they showed.

In case people have already forgotten, a new Red Orchestra game, entitled "Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad" is launching in a few months. This game absolutely crushes BF3 in terms of gameplay mechanics. There is suppressive fire, fire while in cover, and so much more.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUVoPbmooTo

This game could seriously give BF3 a run for the money - and it requires less computer to run, too!

The_Capitalist

I can't wait for Red Orchestra 2 as well. Very glad it's remaining PC exclusive. I don't care if it's ported later just so long as PC development isn't hindered in any way by the consoles being in there. Granted, all games are made on a PC anyway, but you get my point. BF3 looks incredible as well to me. So I'm getting both on PC as it is. But RO2 looks incredible.

meh was that a CGI trailer? if not, still meh.

noxboxlive

Judging by graphics gj

[QUOTE="noxboxlive"]

meh was that a CGI trailer? if not, still meh.

Cloud567kar

Judging by graphics gj

What else if there to judge with the video OT linked?

Looks epic! I imagine this being one of the most intense online games