This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Corey_Barlog_SM"]Both games's developers made the mistake of thinking that gamers really care about scale more than detail.Corey_Barlog_SM
True gamers care about gameplay, not detail or scale.
Right, it's wrong to pay attention to art, music, storyline, etc. To be honest, neither of them cross my mind when i purchase a game. If i wanted art, id go to a museum, Music, my iPod, and a story ... id read a book. What i want from a game, is great gameplay.No, it's current-gen. How could you miss that? Anyway, when was Halo 3 released? And how old is Resistance 2? Laughable thread.Is this not next-gen?
CB4McGusto
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="cuddlesofwar"] Id' say sales, critical reception, support, and fanbasecuddlesofwareverything but fanbase. The majority of the Halo fanbase is terrible. The best feature in halo3 is the ability to mute people :P But I do agree with you in that the halo franchise is better than the Resistance franchise. Dont get me wrong, I really enjoy resistance, but Halo games are just so much damn fun! :D It's impossible to judge a fan base on a few people, i just meant it had a larger fan base. Halo sucks imo ... I just cant get into it.
So because you can't get into it, it sucks?
Lol. Then you guys wonder why the rest of GameSpot laughs at you. Your opinions on what a bad game is, is laughable.
Do any of you even know what a bad game is? Do any of you even know that you can just not like a game? It doesn't have to be bad.
By the way, to the guy who brought up how Resistance 2 is better because of 60 player multiplayer, I guess MAG is going to be the best shooter ever then, correct? It saddens me to see how people love numbers so much. Do you guys actually play games or just sit on here making the most ridiculous statements ever?
[QUOTE="Zaibach"]youre comparing Resistance 2 toTHAT?.
krp008
Yes. He's actually comparing a game that sold a little over 1 million copies, if that, to a game that sold 2.5 million copies in its first NIGHT... Yea, thats not fair
BTW, Halo 3's textures arnt all that great but it has some of the best lighting and HDR is a game this gen
pssst hey look at the topic this isnt a who sold more discussion its a graphics contest, i'm playing halo 3 right now i've got to say very underwhelming!!!Eh?
I just got Resistance 2 and whilst its not the best looking game out there when you actually play the game its bloody impressive. The fact the game holds up with all the enemies on screen, I mean i was playing co-op online and here I am with 7 others, and 20-30 enemies.
And then theres the 60 player online, which I love.
It just ads so much to the game, instead of facing say 1 or 2 people waves now come in the form of around 10-20 enemies which is brilliant fun. It makes grenades much more fun :P
I think we need to stop hating on resistance 2, from what Ive seen it looks pretty good on my TV.
[QUOTE="cuddlesofwar"][QUOTE="Pariah_001"] How exactly does Halo make itself "superb" as opposed to "generic?" How exactly does Halo 3 "blow away" Resistance?Pariah_001Id' say sales, critical reception, support, and fanbase None of which actually alludes to the games themselves.
Huh? How does that not allude to the games? If game gets good reviews then that means its probably a good game. If it sells a lot and has a large fanbase it means people like the game and therefore it is frobably a good game.
[QUOTE="Pariah_001"][QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]Resistance 2 is more generic FPS with cool guns. While Halo 3 is a superb FPS with Generic guys. But halo 3 blows resistance away on every level from graphics to multiplayer.Gh0st_Of_0nyxHow exactly does Halo make itself "superb" as opposed to "generic?" How exactly does Halo 3 "blow away" Resistance?[/QUOTE Well the levels are better the Story is better. the MP is vastly better, the community and developer support is something the boys at insomniac WISH they could do. Halo 3 blows generic resistance 2 outta the water on pretty much every front. Halo 3 has done "generic" thinhs like weapons and made them better and balanaced and have a different feel to each one the MP levels are ripped from the SP they each have their own style and play differently.
ok, ive played both, my friend used to have a 360 (he just likes to buy things...plays with them until the return policy (like 90 days) is almost up then he returns the items...hes also had a Wi) and the only thing halo has on resistance MP is the inclusion of vehicles which would be great if the maps were bigger.... but the real difference in the way the two games play online ( im talking competitive only) is the difference in ho many players can be accomodated....and anyone who says bigger doesnt equal better then you dont realise that you CAN play 16 player matches in R/R2
no that i have that off my chest i ill say both games have their trade offs...h3 has better liting and mostly better textures....while running at sub-HD resolution and no AA (if there is AA then it might as well not have it) while reisistance looks like it has bloom lighting rather then HDR... But it runs at native 720P with (2?) x AA, both have fantasic dra distances....while h3 has more chances of showing this off,
but they are both more then compitent games (gameplay wise) and with as many enemy and friendy AI chars. being displayed at times its really is nice to see them actually act inteligent ( most of the time)
and imo insomic can push out a game every single year while being fun AND looking great is something Bungie only wishs they can do ghost ;)
Both games's developers made the mistake of thinking that gamers really care about scale more than detail.Corey_Barlog_SMI can't speak for R2, but have you seen all the little details in Halo 3? From the little labels on the storage crates to the writing engraved on the back of Chief's bullets, Halo 3 was one of the most graphically detailed games this gen imho.
Resistance 2s graphics are really good. Alot better than halo3s
like in the chicago level when like 30 or so of those aliens are doing the mad bolts at you like at the beggining of the level, no framerate drops and the colours are really vibrant
but thats on my hi def JVC plasma lol
if we are talking about graphics alone, R2 wins.
In terms of multiplayer, R2 also wins.
But the single player game in Halo 3 is better than in R2
[QUOTE="Corey_Barlog_SM"]Both games's developers made the mistake of thinking that gamers really care about scale more than detail.angelkimneI can't speak for R2, but have you seen all the little details in Halo 3? From the little labels on the storage crates to the writing engraved on the back of Chief's bullets, Halo 3 was one of the most graphically detailed games this gen imho. I would agree to some extend. People always bash Halo, but there is a lot of detail people miss
[QUOTE="SOedipus"][QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"] How exactly does Halo make itself "superb" as opposed to "generic?" How exactly does Halo 3 "blow away" Resistance?[/QUOTE Well the levels are better the Story is better. the MP is vastly better, the community and developer support is something the boys at insomniac WISH they could do. Halo 3 blows generic resistance 2 outta the water on pretty much every front. Halo 3 has done "generic" thinhs like weapons and made them better and balanaced and have a different feel to each one the MP levels are ripped from the SP they each have their own style and play differently.Gh0st_Of_0nyxYeah...no. Have you played the coop for Resistance or the large multiplayer maps? It's like two games in one. The story is better? That isn't opinion-based at all. And graphics? Give me a break. Halo 3 looks nice but technically, it's nothing to brag about at all. You don't even own a PS3, but bash it constantly so I don't even know why I'm bothering.So I Have to OWN something in order to correctly bash it now :? :roll: Idk why you cow's get all teary eyed over an opinion. You guys act like I just mindlessly bash theses things without trying them out or giving them a chance when In fact I do.
well usualy if someone were to say " i played it at a firends house" they would be laughed at nonstop. and im pretty sure looking at screens or videos that vary in quality wouldnt be a good way to judge a game either.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment