Resistance is garbage.

  • 151 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for NavigatorsGhost
NavigatorsGhost

6483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 NavigatorsGhost
Member since 2006 • 6483 Posts
[QUOTE="NavigatorsGhost"][QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]

I can't stand it. The checkpoints nearing the end of the game are just stupid. You will play 20 minute streaches, and not a single checkpoint will come up.

The multiplayer "matchmaking" will pair up people so that the teams are uneven, or put five people on a 32 player map. Yeah, best PS3 game yet by butt. Sigma FTW.

NAPK1NS

Actually matchmaking fixed the problem of uneven teams that existed before. Games no longer start unless they have even teams or maybe one team will have a single extra player, which is actually a disadvantage. Before the first patch, the games didn't even have a time limit. It would put 2 people against 10 in a 32 player map for example. They fixed all that crap. The only reason teams become unfairly balanced now is when a team of random players goes against a clan or party in a ranked team game. Most of the randoms will quit and the game does not break up clans or parties to balance the teams after the first round. If two teams of randoms go against each other and the teams are unbalanced after the first round, then the game will shuffle players appropriately. So quit lying, you've been called on it.

I'm sorry but the fact that Halo 2's matchmaking (a last generation game) is better then the problematic Resistance matchmaking is just sad.

What part of "there is no matchmaking problem anymore" don't you understand?

Avatar image for ganon546
ganon546

2942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 ganon546
Member since 2007 • 2942 Posts

I've never played it, but I was thinking about getting it when I get my PS3.

Avatar image for Magical_Zebra
Magical_Zebra

7960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#53 Magical_Zebra
Member since 2003 • 7960 Posts

Well kids, Had a chance to play the game again, didn't play much of it in the past but i have to admit....the game just sucks. The story/gameplay/weapons everything about it is just pathetic.

An old World war type game with aliens? come on....Insomniac could of done better..

Those silly weapons they added were cheap hated using them, the whole rachent and clank type of look (concerning weapons) they tryed to add into the shooter failed, IMO.

The gameplay was dull and boring...just the feel of shooting something and blowing them up felt weak, Don't know if it was the missing rumble...but it felt bad, the explosions wern't there and the animations were even worse...same goes for A.I.

The only positive thing i can say about it..was some of the level designs and overall many things going on at once. Yes i know its an old game..but i feel the need to get it out.

Even tho it was a bad game, Nothing can take the crown of WORST shooter than Perfect dark Zero...now that my E-friends is rubbish, and only way it scored high was because it was one of the FIRST Nextgen shooters and gamespot fell into the nextgen excitement and went overboard with the score...boy, they must feel stupid now.

Anyways, thoughts..opinion...spit it out-Maddog-

Resistance is a decent all around shooter. Could have been better imo with rumble... :shock:

Avatar image for DOC105
DOC105

307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 DOC105
Member since 2007 • 307 Posts
i dare you to play 4 on 4 deathmatch useing rpgs and then tell me it sucks. I have all three well 4 and trust me this game is addictive
Avatar image for ff7isnumbaone
ff7isnumbaone

5352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 ff7isnumbaone
Member since 2005 • 5352 Posts

I think its a complete rip off. They took Half-Life 1/2+Halo series+Call of Duty and glued it together to get Resistance...

[QUOTE="-Maddog-"]

[QUOTE="SpaceDragonMan"]I think its a complete rip off. They took Half-Life 1/2+Halo series+Call of Duty and glued it together to get Resistance...SpaceDragonMan

not what i heard, can't wait to try it.

Tell me about it...they tried to pull it off, but failed badley, IMO.

Avatar image for amorbis1001
amorbis1001

2281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 amorbis1001
Member since 2007 • 2281 Posts
omg at last someone that shares my views, resistance was crap out of the pot. the gameplay suks and then there is the multiplayer, which is nothing close to average. rtfim was good on the first level but trickled down to crap really quickly.
Avatar image for Mordred19
Mordred19

8259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Mordred19
Member since 2007 • 8259 Posts

I think its a complete rip off. They took Half-Life 1/2+Halo series+Call of Duty and glued it together to get Resistance...SpaceDragonMan

you're accusing Insomniac games of ripping off shooters? if it's a ripoff of Halo, what exactly is it ripping off? please explain.

Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts
A.I. was bad? :? The A.I. was amazing. Those guys always flank when they have the chance. Play on normal or hard and you'll know what I mean.
Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts
One of my favorite console FPS and really good when compared to other FPS in the PS brand. I can understand no liking the bland main characters because he was not only silent but two dimensional in the game. However, the weapons we freaking awesome. Auger, Hedgehog grenade, shield grenade, Halistorm, Sapper....All weird guns or grenades that are definitely fun in my opinion. They give a chance to actually change it up every now and then. So i guess I couldn't disagree with you more.
Avatar image for amorbis1001
amorbis1001

2281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 amorbis1001
Member since 2007 • 2281 Posts

A.I. was bad? :? The A.I. was amazing. Those guys always flank when they have the chance. Play on normal or hard and you'll know what I mean.leviathan91

what were you smoking to say the ai was amazing. the ai was worthless garbage.

Avatar image for niall077
niall077

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 niall077
Member since 2006 • 1729 Posts
I never finished sigle player but have been playing online mostly while I take a break from oblivion
Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts

It's a servicable shooter. I didn't and still don't think it was worthy of all the porn suicides and anti-Gamespot comments that followed its review score.

It's not on Halo's level

It's not on UT's level

Great but not superb, you know? Cows will find out what a "superb" shooter is when they finally play UT3 and CoD4. Resistance who?

Avatar image for amorbis1001
amorbis1001

2281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 amorbis1001
Member since 2007 • 2281 Posts

[QUOTE="SpaceDragonMan"]I think its a complete rip off. They took Half-Life 1/2+Halo series+Call of Duty and glued it together to get Resistance...Mordred19

you're accusing Insomniac games of ripping off shooters? if it's a ripoff of Halo, what exactly is it ripping off? please explain.

the health system was a complete ripoff of halo and fyi it suks, the rebounding health in those short gauges were just crappy, after playing great fps like halflife halo 2 and fear how could resistance ever be even average the games is certainly mediocre.

Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]A.I. was bad? :? The A.I. was amazing. Those guys always flank when they have the chance. Play on normal or hard and you'll know what I mean.amorbis1001

what were you smoking to say the ai was amazing. the ai was worthless garbage.

:lol::roll: And you said you played the game... The enemy A.I. were hardly worthless garbage.

Avatar image for amorbis1001
amorbis1001

2281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 amorbis1001
Member since 2007 • 2281 Posts
[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]A.I. was bad? :? The A.I. was amazing. Those guys always flank when they have the chance. Play on normal or hard and you'll know what I mean.leviathan91

what were you smoking to say the ai was amazing. the ai was worthless garbage.

:lol::roll: And you said you played the game... The enemy A.I. were hardly worthless garbage.

you don't believe I play the game. omg the ai was worthless, THEY DIDN'T FLANK AND the slow walking creatures just walked straight up to you, oh and I DO HAVE THE GAME AND A PS3 WHICH I REGRET GETTING.

EDIT: NOT TO METION THOSE CREATURE THAT JUST STOOD THERE AND SHOOT THROUGH WALLS.

Avatar image for Mordred19
Mordred19

8259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Mordred19
Member since 2007 • 8259 Posts
[QUOTE="Mordred19"]

[QUOTE="SpaceDragonMan"]I think its a complete rip off. They took Half-Life 1/2+Halo series+Call of Duty and glued it together to get Resistance...amorbis1001

you're accusing Insomniac games of ripping off shooters? if it's a ripoff of Halo, what exactly is it ripping off? please explain.

the health system was a complete ripoff of halo and fyi it suks, the rebounding health in those short gauges were just crappy, after playing great fps like halflife halo 2 and fear how could resistance ever be even average the games is certainly mediocre.

you say the health was a ripoff of halo, yet you don't like it becuase it was DIFFERENT from halo? you just said it was different from halo's so how can it be a complete ripoff? a lot of shooters today have regenerating health meters BECAUSE of halo. so do you think those shooters are a ripoff of halo as well?

Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#67 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts
[QUOTE="leviathan91"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"]

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]A.I. was bad? :? The A.I. was amazing. Those guys always flank when they have the chance. Play on normal or hard and you'll know what I mean.amorbis1001

what were you smoking to say the ai was amazing. the ai was worthless garbage.

:lol::roll: And you said you played the game... The enemy A.I. were hardly worthless garbage.

you don't believe I play the game. omg the ai was worthless, THEY DIDN'T FLAND AND the slow walking creatures just walked straight up to you, oh and I DO HAVE THE GAME AND A PS3 WHICH I REGRET GETTING.

They did flank and wait, wait,slow? :? They were fast depending on the type of chirmera. And the Chirmera shoot at you when they run at you. Maybe you should play it on hard or Extreme.

Avatar image for tman93
tman93

7769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#68 tman93
Member since 2006 • 7769 Posts

One of my favorite games this gen. I loved it.

And I havent even played online yet.

Avatar image for NavigatorsGhost
NavigatorsGhost

6483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 NavigatorsGhost
Member since 2006 • 6483 Posts
[QUOTE="leviathan91"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"]

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]A.I. was bad? :? The A.I. was amazing. Those guys always flank when they have the chance. Play on normal or hard and you'll know what I mean.amorbis1001

what were you smoking to say the ai was amazing. the ai was worthless garbage.

:lol::roll: And you said you played the game... The enemy A.I. were hardly worthless garbage.

you don't believe I play the game. omg the ai was worthless, THEY DIDN'T FLANK AND the slow walking creatures just walked straight up to you, oh and I DO HAVE THE GAME AND A PS3 WHICH I REGRET GETTING.

EDIT: NOT TO METION THOSE CREATURE THAT JUST STOOD THERE AND SHOOT THROUGH WALLS.

If you own the game, why don't you know they are called Chimera? You're probably not following the story and getting owned in the first level. OMG the Steelhead has an auger and can shoot through walls!!!! THIS GAME SUCKS. OMFG where is the Laark, I can't kill stuff with the standard carbine!!!!!

Just stop.

Put the game on Hard and if you can actually beat the game, put it on Superhuman. Then tell me the AI is garbage. They flank, they grenade you, they'll dodge grenades. They take cover. They'll rush you and melee you. Stop embarrassing yourself.

Avatar image for ragrdoll21
ragrdoll21

6048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 ragrdoll21
Member since 2006 • 6048 Posts

[QUOTE="ragrdoll21"][QUOTE="SpaceDragonMan"]I think its a complete rip off. They took Half-Life 1/2+Halo series+Call of Duty and glued it together to get Resistance...MassiveKaos

What in R:tfom was like Halo?

Throwing grenades? :lol:

This guy doesnt know good games. Ok so what if its world war 2 with a twist. Tell me how many games that are already ot have done something similar to that. They could have done better? Ok so they should have just amde a normal wwii or modern fps like everybody else?

Yeah...he's just talking out his butt.
Avatar image for luggymeister
luggymeister

499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 luggymeister
Member since 2005 • 499 Posts
I just recently started playing it a few days ago. At first I didn't like it. But once you get past the first hour or so in the campaign it get's pretty good. The Multiplayer is also really good (better then GoW imo). I know the topics not to compare the two but GoW had so many damn glitches in the MP. The bad lag and the fact their wasn't any system to match people on their skill lvl sorta sucked.
Avatar image for X_CAPCOM_X
X_CAPCOM_X

9625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#72 X_CAPCOM_X
Member since 2004 • 9625 Posts

All you're saying is that you felt bad. It doesn't make the game garbage if you felt bad.

Avatar image for amorbis1001
amorbis1001

2281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 amorbis1001
Member since 2007 • 2281 Posts
[QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="Mordred19"]

[QUOTE="SpaceDragonMan"]I think its a complete rip off. They took Half-Life 1/2+Halo series+Call of Duty and glued it together to get Resistance...Mordred19

you're accusing Insomniac games of ripping off shooters? if it's a ripoff of Halo, what exactly is it ripping off? please explain.

the health system was a complete ripoff of halo and fyi it suks, the rebounding health in those short gauges were just crappy, after playing great fps like halflife halo 2 and fear how could resistance ever be even average the games is certainly mediocre.

you say the health was a ripoff of halo, yet you don't like it becuase it was DIFFERENT from halo? you just said it was different from halo's so how can it be a complete ripoff? a lot of shooters today have regenerating health meters BECAUSE of halo. so do you think those shooters are a ripoff of halo as well?

regerating health of halo 2 not one, halo one regenrating health was horibble thats why bungie scrapped it and added the regentarting health in 2.

Avatar image for amorbis1001
amorbis1001

2281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 amorbis1001
Member since 2007 • 2281 Posts
[QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="Mordred19"]

[QUOTE="SpaceDragonMan"]I think its a complete rip off. They took Half-Life 1/2+Halo series+Call of Duty and glued it together to get Resistance...Mordred19

you're accusing Insomniac games of ripping off shooters? if it's a ripoff of Halo, what exactly is it ripping off? please explain.

the health system was a complete ripoff of halo and fyi it suks, the rebounding health in those short gauges were just crappy, after playing great fps like halflife halo 2 and fear how could resistance ever be even average the games is certainly mediocre.

you say the health was a ripoff of halo, yet you don't like it becuase it was DIFFERENT from halo? you just said it was different from halo's so how can it be a complete ripoff? a lot of shooters today have regenerating health meters BECAUSE of halo. so do you think those shooters are a ripoff of halo as well?

regerating health of halo 2 not one, halo one regenrating health was horibble thats why bungie scrapped it and added the regentarting health in 2.

Avatar image for amorbis1001
amorbis1001

2281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 amorbis1001
Member since 2007 • 2281 Posts
[QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="leviathan91"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"]

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]A.I. was bad? :? The A.I. was amazing. Those guys always flank when they have the chance. Play on normal or hard and you'll know what I mean.NavigatorsGhost

what were you smoking to say the ai was amazing. the ai was worthless garbage.

:lol::roll: And you said you played the game... The enemy A.I. were hardly worthless garbage.

you don't believe I play the game. omg the ai was worthless, THEY DIDN'T FLANK AND the slow walking creatures just walked straight up to you, oh and I DO HAVE THE GAME AND A PS3 WHICH I REGRET GETTING.

EDIT: NOT TO METION THOSE CREATURE THAT JUST STOOD THERE AND SHOOT THROUGH WALLS.

If you own the game, why don't you know they are called Chimera? You're probably not following the story and getting owned in the first level. OMG the Steelhead has an auger and can shoot through walls!!!! THIS GAME SUCKS. OMFG where is the Laark, I can't kill stuff with the standard carbine!!!!!

Just stop.

Put the game on Hard and if you can actually beat the game, put it on Superhuman. Then tell me the AI is garbage. They flank, they grenade you, they'll dodge grenades. They take cover. They'll rush you and melee you. Stop embarrassing yourself.

wtf i beat the game on hard already. and I only remebder games that is worth remembering,the wordchimera isn't worth my braincells cuz the game suks. AND FYI the ai suks on hard as it does on easy. and I kno cuz i had to force myself to beat it on hard.

Avatar image for Clock_Ticking
Clock_Ticking

485

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Clock_Ticking
Member since 2007 • 485 Posts
rfom's graphics are so last gen
Avatar image for NavigatorsGhost
NavigatorsGhost

6483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 NavigatorsGhost
Member since 2006 • 6483 Posts
[QUOTE="NavigatorsGhost"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="leviathan91"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"]

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]A.I. was bad? :? The A.I. was amazing. Those guys always flank when they have the chance. Play on normal or hard and you'll know what I mean.amorbis1001

what were you smoking to say the ai was amazing. the ai was worthless garbage.

:lol::roll: And you said you played the game... The enemy A.I. were hardly worthless garbage.

you don't believe I play the game. omg the ai was worthless, THEY DIDN'T FLANK AND the slow walking creatures just walked straight up to you, oh and I DO HAVE THE GAME AND A PS3 WHICH I REGRET GETTING.

EDIT: NOT TO METION THOSE CREATURE THAT JUST STOOD THERE AND SHOOT THROUGH WALLS.

If you own the game, why don't you know they are called Chimera? You're probably not following the story and getting owned in the first level. OMG the Steelhead has an auger and can shoot through walls!!!! THIS GAME SUCKS. OMFG where is the Laark, I can't kill stuff with the standard carbine!!!!!

Just stop.

Put the game on Hard and if you can actually beat the game, put it on Superhuman. Then tell me the AI is garbage. They flank, they grenade you, they'll dodge grenades. They take cover. They'll rush you and melee you. Stop embarrassing yourself.

wtf i beat the game on hard already. and I only remebder games that is worth remembering,the wordchimera isn't worth my braincells cuz the game suks. AND FYI the ai suks on hard as it does on easy. and I kno cuz i had to force myself to beat it on hard.

Whats the ending then? I'll give you time to look it up.

Avatar image for Solid_Link22
Solid_Link22

5698

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#78 Solid_Link22
Member since 2006 • 5698 Posts

rfom's graphics are so last genClock_Ticking

WHy do you always come in to these threads and spread your fanboyism?

Avatar image for ShmenonPie
ShmenonPie

1117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 ShmenonPie
Member since 2007 • 1117 Posts

LOL, Resistance is great. It has a superb story, beautiful graphics, great weapons, brilliant online, a ton of replayability, intelligent enemies, good level design, etc, etc... There isn't much it doesn't have... 8.6 from GameSpot is an insult, it deserves 9.2 at least.

Avatar image for Mordred19
Mordred19

8259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Mordred19
Member since 2007 • 8259 Posts

rfom's graphics are so last genClock_Ticking

they are not last gen. it was a very good looking launch game for the PS3. and don't ignore the fact that this game had more enemies on screen than any shooter on the 360 at the time.

Avatar image for NAPK1NS
NAPK1NS

14870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#81 NAPK1NS
Member since 2004 • 14870 Posts
[QUOTE="NAPK1NS"][QUOTE="NavigatorsGhost"][QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]

I can't stand it. The checkpoints nearing the end of the game are just stupid. You will play 20 minute streaches, and not a single checkpoint will come up.

The multiplayer "matchmaking" will pair up people so that the teams are uneven, or put five people on a 32 player map. Yeah, best PS3 game yet by butt. Sigma FTW.

NavigatorsGhost

Actually matchmaking fixed the problem of uneven teams that existed before. Games no longer start unless they have even teams or maybe one team will have a single extra player, which is actually a disadvantage. Before the first patch, the games didn't even have a time limit. It would put 2 people against 10 in a 32 player map for example. They fixed all that crap. The only reason teams become unfairly balanced now is when a team of random players goes against a clan or party in a ranked team game. Most of the randoms will quit and the game does not break up clans or parties to balance the teams after the first round. If two teams of randoms go against each other and the teams are unbalanced after the first round, then the game will shuffle players appropriately. So quit lying, you've been called on it.

I'm sorry but the fact that Halo 2's matchmaking (a last generation game) is better then the problematic Resistance matchmaking is just sad.

What part of "there is no matchmaking problem anymore" don't you understand?

I played a few nights ago, and I still had the same problems. Fixed indeed...

Get it through your head, Resistance is just a sub-par shooter AT BEST. Nothing is outstanding about it, and it goes the "safe route" with everything that it does. Resistance borrows tiny mechanics from other (more successful) shooters. However, it never seems to do them better. Resistance is just another forgettable FPS, what else is new...

Avatar image for NavigatorsGhost
NavigatorsGhost

6483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 NavigatorsGhost
Member since 2006 • 6483 Posts
[QUOTE="NavigatorsGhost"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="leviathan91"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"]

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]A.I. was bad? :? The A.I. was amazing. Those guys always flank when they have the chance. Play on normal or hard and you'll know what I mean.amorbis1001

what were you smoking to say the ai was amazing. the ai was worthless garbage.

:lol::roll: And you said you played the game... The enemy A.I. were hardly worthless garbage.

you don't believe I play the game. omg the ai was worthless, THEY DIDN'T FLANK AND the slow walking creatures just walked straight up to you, oh and I DO HAVE THE GAME AND A PS3 WHICH I REGRET GETTING.

EDIT: NOT TO METION THOSE CREATURE THAT JUST STOOD THERE AND SHOOT THROUGH WALLS.

If you own the game, why don't you know they are called Chimera? You're probably not following the story and getting owned in the first level. OMG the Steelhead has an auger and can shoot through walls!!!! THIS GAME SUCKS. OMFG where is the Laark, I can't kill stuff with the standard carbine!!!!!

Just stop.

Put the game on Hard and if you can actually beat the game, put it on Superhuman. Then tell me the AI is garbage. They flank, they grenade you, they'll dodge grenades. They take cover. They'll rush you and melee you. Stop embarrassing yourself.

wtf i beat the game on hard already. and I only remebder games that is worth remembering,the wordchimera isn't worth my braincells cuz the game suks. AND FYI the ai suks on hard as it does on easy. and I kno cuz i had to force myself to beat it on hard.

and looking at your post history, you've claimed several times you own a PS3 but have never posted in the PS3 forum or said anything good about the PS3. I doubt you even own the system. I think you just enjoy hanging out in System Wars, posting crap, laughing to yourself after doing so, until someone responds to your garbage posts and calls you on it.

Avatar image for Caseytappy
Caseytappy

2199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Caseytappy
Member since 2005 • 2199 Posts
[QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="leviathan91"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"]

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]A.I. was bad? :? The A.I. was amazing. Those guys always flank when they have the chance. Play on normal or hard and you'll know what I mean.NavigatorsGhost

what were you smoking to say the ai was amazing. the ai was worthless garbage.

:lol::roll: And you said you played the game... The enemy A.I. were hardly worthless garbage.

you don't believe I play the game. omg the ai was worthless, THEY DIDN'T FLANK AND the slow walking creatures just walked straight up to you, oh and I DO HAVE THE GAME AND A PS3 WHICH I REGRET GETTING.

EDIT: NOT TO METION THOSE CREATURE THAT JUST STOOD THERE AND SHOOT THROUGH WALLS.

If you own the game, why don't you know they are called Chimera? You're probably not following the story and getting owned in the first level. OMG the Steelhead has an auger and can shoot through walls!!!! THIS GAME SUCKS. OMFG where is the Laark, I can't kill stuff with the standard carbine!!!!!

Just stop.

Put the game on Hard and if you can actually beat the game, put it on Superhuman. Then tell me the AI is garbage. They flank, they grenade you, they'll dodge grenades. They take cover. They'll rush you and melee you. Stop embarrassing yourself.

I enjoyed Resistance so bite me !

IMO, no game on the 360 matches Lair yet..NOTHING!

-Maddog-

You piss on Resistance but hyped Lair to no end :lol:

Avatar image for Mordred19
Mordred19

8259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Mordred19
Member since 2007 • 8259 Posts
[QUOTE="NavigatorsGhost"][QUOTE="NAPK1NS"][QUOTE="NavigatorsGhost"][QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]

I can't stand it. The checkpoints nearing the end of the game are just stupid. You will play 20 minute streaches, and not a single checkpoint will come up.

The multiplayer "matchmaking" will pair up people so that the teams are uneven, or put five people on a 32 player map. Yeah, best PS3 game yet by butt. Sigma FTW.

NAPK1NS

Actually matchmaking fixed the problem of uneven teams that existed before. Games no longer start unless they have even teams or maybe one team will have a single extra player, which is actually a disadvantage. Before the first patch, the games didn't even have a time limit. It would put 2 people against 10 in a 32 player map for example. They fixed all that crap. The only reason teams become unfairly balanced now is when a team of random players goes against a clan or party in a ranked team game. Most of the randoms will quit and the game does not break up clans or parties to balance the teams after the first round. If two teams of randoms go against each other and the teams are unbalanced after the first round, then the game will shuffle players appropriately. So quit lying, you've been called on it.

I'm sorry but the fact that Halo 2's matchmaking (a last generation game) is better then the problematic Resistance matchmaking is just sad.

What part of "there is no matchmaking problem anymore" don't you understand?

I played a few nights ago, and I still had the same problems. Fixed indeed...

Get it through your head, Resistance is just a sub-par shooter AT BEST. Nothing is outstanding about it, and it goes the "safe route" with everything that it does. Resistance borrows tiny mechanics from other (more successful) shooters. However, it never seems to do them better. Resistance is just another forgettable FPS, what else is new...

sub-par? that's just harsh. it's an above average shooter.

Avatar image for AIH_PSP
AIH_PSP

2318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 AIH_PSP
Member since 2005 • 2318 Posts
I liked it. The story was good. The gameplay was good. The AI was okay and the multiplayer is fun. The ending is good though. Makes me wonder about a second one.
Avatar image for FusionApex
FusionApex

1151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 FusionApex
Member since 2006 • 1151 Posts
It was good as a launch title.
Avatar image for NavigatorsGhost
NavigatorsGhost

6483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 NavigatorsGhost
Member since 2006 • 6483 Posts
[QUOTE="NavigatorsGhost"][QUOTE="NAPK1NS"][QUOTE="NavigatorsGhost"][QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]

I can't stand it. The checkpoints nearing the end of the game are just stupid. You will play 20 minute streaches, and not a single checkpoint will come up.

The multiplayer "matchmaking" will pair up people so that the teams are uneven, or put five people on a 32 player map. Yeah, best PS3 game yet by butt. Sigma FTW.

NAPK1NS

Actually matchmaking fixed the problem of uneven teams that existed before. Games no longer start unless they have even teams or maybe one team will have a single extra player, which is actually a disadvantage. Before the first patch, the games didn't even have a time limit. It would put 2 people against 10 in a 32 player map for example. They fixed all that crap. The only reason teams become unfairly balanced now is when a team of random players goes against a clan or party in a ranked team game. Most of the randoms will quit and the game does not break up clans or parties to balance the teams after the first round. If two teams of randoms go against each other and the teams are unbalanced after the first round, then the game will shuffle players appropriately. So quit lying, you've been called on it.

I'm sorry but the fact that Halo 2's matchmaking (a last generation game) is better then the problematic Resistance matchmaking is just sad.

What part of "there is no matchmaking problem anymore" don't you understand?

I played a few nights ago, and I still had the same problems. Fixed indeed...

Get it through your head, Resistance is just a sub-par shooter AT BEST. Nothing is outstanding about it, and it goes the "safe route" with everything that it does. Resistance borrows tiny mechanics from other (more successful) shooters. However, it never seems to do them better. Resistance is just another forgettable FPS, what else is new...

If the teams are unbalanced in RANKED games online, the game cancels out of the staging screen and you put back into the lobby. If its 10-11 the game will probably start. If its 10-7 or 10-2 it will no longer start. It does not happen.

Nobody said this game was outstanding. Its a competent FPS with an excellent online component. Comparing it to PC FPS is stupid, I wouldn't do that.

And yes it goes the safe route. It has brand new weapons and 40 player maps. Both of which are standard fare in all FPS games. :roll:

Avatar image for mistervengeance
mistervengeance

6769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#88 mistervengeance
Member since 2006 • 6769 Posts
you're completely wrong. resistance was awesome. my guess is that you ACTUALLY just played it for five minutes, know the ps3 is ragged on a lot, and just decided to jump on the bandwagon of saying ps3 and all it's games sucks. in my opinion, resistance is better than gears in everything but graphics, a main selling point being DEDICATED SERVERS.
Avatar image for mijkil
mijkil

546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 mijkil
Member since 2004 • 546 Posts

Fanboys try to claim that Halo is "generic", but Resistence has to be the most generic FPs ive ever played. If it was icecream it would taste of vanilla.

Still, while i found the SP to be so boring it was virtually unplayable, the MP is pretty fun, and just about the best thing on PS3 (pre - warhawk)

Avatar image for amorbis1001
amorbis1001

2281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 amorbis1001
Member since 2007 • 2281 Posts
[QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="NavigatorsGhost"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="leviathan91"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"]

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]A.I. was bad? :? The A.I. was amazing. Those guys always flank when they have the chance. Play on normal or hard and you'll know what I mean.NavigatorsGhost

what were you smoking to say the ai was amazing. the ai was worthless garbage.

:lol::roll: And you said you played the game... The enemy A.I. were hardly worthless garbage.

you don't believe I play the game. omg the ai was worthless, THEY DIDN'T FLANK AND the slow walking creatures just walked straight up to you, oh and I DO HAVE THE GAME AND A PS3 WHICH I REGRET GETTING.

EDIT: NOT TO METION THOSE CREATURE THAT JUST STOOD THERE AND SHOOT THROUGH WALLS.

If you own the game, why don't you know they are called Chimera? You're probably not following the story and getting owned in the first level. OMG the Steelhead has an auger and can shoot through walls!!!! THIS GAME SUCKS. OMFG where is the Laark, I can't kill stuff with the standard carbine!!!!!

Just stop.

Put the game on Hard and if you can actually beat the game, put it on Superhuman. Then tell me the AI is garbage. They flank, they grenade you, they'll dodge grenades. They take cover. They'll rush you and melee you. Stop embarrassing yourself.

wtf i beat the game on hard already. and I only remebder games that is worth remembering,the wordchimera isn't worth my braincells cuz the game suks. AND FYI the ai suks on hard as it does on easy. and I kno cuz i had to force myself to beat it on hard.

and looking at your post history, you've claimed several times you own a PS3 but have never posted in the PS3 forum or said anything good about the PS3. I doubt you even own the system. I think you just enjoy hanging out in System Wars, posting crap, laughing to yourself after doing so, until someone responds to your garbage posts and calls you on it.

fyi warhawk suks too.

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/yor1001/IMAG0029.jpg

lol and yeah I regret buy a ps3 ohh and I have 2 360 u should kno if you read my posting history, oh and I like SH cuz it is funy, oh and I regret buying the ps3 thats why I bash it. oh and halo 3 owns,

I could uplload to gs so here you go

Avatar image for Clock_Ticking
Clock_Ticking

485

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Clock_Ticking
Member since 2007 • 485 Posts

[QUOTE="Clock_Ticking"]rfom's graphics are so last genMordred19

they are not last gen. it was a very good looking launch game for the PS3. and don't ignore the fact that this game had more enemies on screen than any shooter on the 360 at the time.

more enemies on screen? like Lair? :lol:

Avatar image for sneekite
sneekite

1599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#92 sneekite
Member since 2004 • 1599 Posts
I thought the beginning of the game was below-average, but once you get all the different weapons (which are the only truly unique aspect to the game) it becomes MUCH better. The environments also become more impressive artistically and technically, so people who quit after the first couple of levels are missing out on a much better experience, imo.
Avatar image for Clock_Ticking
Clock_Ticking

485

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Clock_Ticking
Member since 2007 • 485 Posts

[QUOTE="Clock_Ticking"]rfom's graphics are so last genSolid_Link22

WHy do you always come in to these threads and spread your fanboyism?

wow, i'm sorry for having an opinion :roll:

Avatar image for NavigatorsGhost
NavigatorsGhost

6483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 NavigatorsGhost
Member since 2006 • 6483 Posts
[QUOTE="NavigatorsGhost"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="NavigatorsGhost"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="leviathan91"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"]

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]A.I. was bad? :? The A.I. was amazing. Those guys always flank when they have the chance. Play on normal or hard and you'll know what I mean.amorbis1001

what were you smoking to say the ai was amazing. the ai was worthless garbage.

:lol::roll: And you said you played the game... The enemy A.I. were hardly worthless garbage.

you don't believe I play the game. omg the ai was worthless, THEY DIDN'T FLANK AND the slow walking creatures just walked straight up to you, oh and I DO HAVE THE GAME AND A PS3 WHICH I REGRET GETTING.

EDIT: NOT TO METION THOSE CREATURE THAT JUST STOOD THERE AND SHOOT THROUGH WALLS.

If you own the game, why don't you know they are called Chimera? You're probably not following the story and getting owned in the first level. OMG the Steelhead has an auger and can shoot through walls!!!! THIS GAME SUCKS. OMFG where is the Laark, I can't kill stuff with the standard carbine!!!!!

Just stop.

Put the game on Hard and if you can actually beat the game, put it on Superhuman. Then tell me the AI is garbage. They flank, they grenade you, they'll dodge grenades. They take cover. They'll rush you and melee you. Stop embarrassing yourself.

wtf i beat the game on hard already. and I only remebder games that is worth remembering,the wordchimera isn't worth my braincells cuz the game suks. AND FYI the ai suks on hard as it does on easy. and I kno cuz i had to force myself to beat it on hard.

and looking at your post history, you've claimed several times you own a PS3 but have never posted in the PS3 forum or said anything good about the PS3. I doubt you even own the system. I think you just enjoy hanging out in System Wars, posting crap, laughing to yourself after doing so, until someone responds to your garbage posts and calls you on it.

fyi warhawk suks too.

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/yor1001/IMAG0029.jpg

lol and yeah I regret buy a ps3 ohh and I have 2 360 u should kno if you read my posting history, oh and I like SH cuz it is funy, oh and I regret buying the ps3 thats why I bash it. oh and halo 3 owns,

I could uplload to gs so here you go

lol, you own Motorstorm.

Avatar image for amorbis1001
amorbis1001

2281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 amorbis1001
Member since 2007 • 2281 Posts
[QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="NavigatorsGhost"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="NavigatorsGhost"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="leviathan91"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"]

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]A.I. was bad? :? The A.I. was amazing. Those guys always flank when they have the chance. Play on normal or hard and you'll know what I mean.NavigatorsGhost

what were you smoking to say the ai was amazing. the ai was worthless garbage.

:lol::roll: And you said you played the game... The enemy A.I. were hardly worthless garbage.

you don't believe I play the game. omg the ai was worthless, THEY DIDN'T FLANK AND the slow walking creatures just walked straight up to you, oh and I DO HAVE THE GAME AND A PS3 WHICH I REGRET GETTING.

EDIT: NOT TO METION THOSE CREATURE THAT JUST STOOD THERE AND SHOOT THROUGH WALLS.

If you own the game, why don't you know they are called Chimera? You're probably not following the story and getting owned in the first level. OMG the Steelhead has an auger and can shoot through walls!!!! THIS GAME SUCKS. OMFG where is the Laark, I can't kill stuff with the standard carbine!!!!!

Just stop.

Put the game on Hard and if you can actually beat the game, put it on Superhuman. Then tell me the AI is garbage. They flank, they grenade you, they'll dodge grenades. They take cover. They'll rush you and melee you. Stop embarrassing yourself.

wtf i beat the game on hard already. and I only remebder games that is worth remembering,the wordchimera isn't worth my braincells cuz the game suks. AND FYI the ai suks on hard as it does on easy. and I kno cuz i had to force myself to beat it on hard.

and looking at your post history, you've claimed several times you own a PS3 but have never posted in the PS3 forum or said anything good about the PS3. I doubt you even own the system. I think you just enjoy hanging out in System Wars, posting crap, laughing to yourself after doing so, until someone responds to your garbage posts and calls you on it.

fyi warhawk suks too.

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/yor1001/IMAG0029.jpg

lol and yeah I regret buy a ps3 ohh and I have 2 360 u should kno if you read my posting history, oh and I like SH cuz it is funy, oh and I regret buying the ps3 thats why I bash it. oh and halo 3 owns,

I could uplload to gs so here you go

lol, you own Motorstorm.

haven't you read my sig I wont lie to myself, all 3 games I own for ps3 suks warhawk was pretty fun while it last but again like all ps3 games i got boring really quik.

Avatar image for Mordred19
Mordred19

8259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Mordred19
Member since 2007 • 8259 Posts
[QUOTE="Mordred19"]

[QUOTE="Clock_Ticking"]rfom's graphics are so last genClock_Ticking

they are not last gen. it was a very good looking launch game for the PS3. and don't ignore the fact that this game had more enemies on screen than any shooter on the 360 at the time.

more enemies on screen? like Lair? :lol:

there you go again, bringing up stuff that has nothing to do with the topic at hand. you are making no sense. your mindless rabble is not adding anything to this discussion.

Avatar image for Mordred19
Mordred19

8259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 Mordred19
Member since 2007 • 8259 Posts
why are we even arguing about this? Resistance proved itself as a great shooter in November of 06. why are people bashing it now? what's the point? are fanboys running out of ammo against the PS3?
Avatar image for Fraquelli
Fraquelli

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Fraquelli
Member since 2005 • 688 Posts

I thought the game was great
not mind blowing but still very good
what else would you expect from a lauch title?

there is a rumour that Insomniac is making a sequel, supposeably called Resistance: Rise of Man
hope it ends up better now that Insomniac has more expirience thanks to the original and R&CF ToD

oh and I disagree about the guns XD
I thought that the R&C influence was refreshing
I mean cmon arent you guys tired of always using an AK47?

Avatar image for J_Swayze
J_Swayze

493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 J_Swayze
Member since 2007 • 493 Posts

I love it and I'm not a big fan of FPS

My friends come over every weekend to get a MP Tournment Going. Every Weekend

Avatar image for hydrophoboe
hydrophoboe

444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#100 hydrophoboe
Member since 2004 • 444 Posts

Gears of War and Resistance were very generic shooters, in my opinion. There was absolutely nothing innovative about them.

PD:Z actually had a nice "cover/Winback" system long before GoW. And for that, I'd actually say it's better than both of them. At least it tried to be "different"...


(Sue me. I'm not wowed by amazing graphics in Gears of War, or the fact that R was the only semi-decent PS3 title at launch).