Resistance Vs Killzone: Which is the better PS3 exclusive FPS franchise?

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="dracolich55"]Whats so bad about the KZ2 controls? In case you didn't know, they were SUPPOSED to be like that.mems_1224

also, this thread is old as f*** :|

[QUOTE="mems_1224"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] Noobs don't like heavy controls.kuraimen

also, this thread is old as f*** :|

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] no, people dont like terrible controls. if they intended their game to have crappy unresponsive controls then mission accomplished

also, this thread is old as f*** :|

mems_1224

[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Just because you're a bad player doesn't mean the controls are bad.kuraimen

No it just sucks. That's why its dead online and a commercial disaster.

because you're used to inferior shooters.mems_1224

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] im not bad at any fps i play. bad controls are bad controls, has absolutely nothing to do with skill.JohnnyCageMK

No it just sucks. That's why its dead online and a commercial disaster.

[QUOTE="mems_1224"]because you're used to inferior shooters.kuraimen

[QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] Well you seem to be pretty bad if you think those controls are broken. Real players have no problem with them.kuraimen

No it just sucks. That's why its dead online and a commercial disaster.

So why does GT have more players than Forza despite getting worse reviews?

*sits back and wait for double standards*

[QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] Well you seem to be pretty bad if you think those controls are broken. Real players have no problem with them.kuraimen

No it just sucks. That's why its dead online and a commercial disaster.

Cows will pick Killzone because it sells better and has teh pretty graphics, and this is why the world hates them.

Resistance is by far the more consistent franchise, both in campaign and multiplayer.

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"]

No it just sucks. That's why its dead online and a commercial disaster.

JohnnyCageMK

So why does GT have more players than Forza despite getting worse reviews?

*sits back and wait for double standards*

you talking about double standards? :|

What a comedy you guys are....:lol:

Killzone because it's more fun than Resistance. Both are still mediocre though, many games out there are better.

Cows will pick Killzone because it sells better, and this is why the world hates them.

Resistance is by far the more consistent franchise, both in campaign and multiplayer.

Master_ShakeXXX

KZ doesn't even sell better. Its really not popular at all and for some reason Sony keeps pouring money into it.

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="mems_1224"]because you're used to inferior shooters.mems_1224

is there a way to make Mods ban kuraimen, johnnyMK and mems from this board? They are getting boring with their spamming and pointless fights on every thread. =/

Their trolling has to be the weakest trolling I have ever seen in my life.

I enjoy both, but I find Killzone to be the overall better game. It's graphics are jaw dropping, it has superior gameplay than just about every other shooter out there, the guns feel solid to shoot and the AI is great, and it has a kick ass multiplayer.

Resistance is a pretty solid shooter and it's weapons are more creative than Killzone, with the Bulls Eye that "paints" an enemy and your shots will follow them where the go, the gun that allows you to shoot through walls etc....it also features up to 60 player epic battles and an excellent 8 player co-op mode.

I know the games get a lot of hate here because they are high scoring exclusives that make the 360 fanboys jelly, but I encourage anyone who is more level minded to check these games out.

I highly doubt most of the haters have even played the games before.

Resistance.

I enjoy both, but I find Killzone to be the overall better game. It's graphics are jaw dropping, it has superior gameplay than just about every other shooter out there, the guns feel solid to shoot and the AI is great, and it has a kick ass multiplayer.

Resistance is a pretty solid shooter and it's weapons are more creative than Killzone, with the Bulls Eye that "paints" an enemy and your shots will follow them where the go, the gun that allows you to shoot through walls etc....it also features up to 60 player epic battles and an excellent 8 player co-op mode.

I know the games get a lot of hate here because they are high scoring exclusives that make the 360 fanboys jelly, but I encourage anyone who is more level minded to check these games out.

I highly doubt most of the haters have even played the games before.

ShadowMoses900

Neither are as good as Halo or COD or BF. If they were then more people would care about them.

is there a way to make Mods ban kuraimen, johnnyMK and mems from this board? They are getting boring with their spamming and pointless fights on every thread. =/

Their trolling has to be the weakest trolling I have ever seen in my life.

Gue1

is there a way to make Mods ban kuraimen, johnnyMK and mems from this board? They are getting boring with their spamming and pointless fights on every thread. =/

Their trolling has to be the weakest trolling I have ever seen in my life.

Gue1

Who the hell are you?

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I enjoy both, but I find Killzone to be the overall better game. It's graphics are jaw dropping, it has superior gameplay than just about every other shooter out there, the guns feel solid to shoot and the AI is great, and it has a kick ass multiplayer.

Resistance is a pretty solid shooter and it's weapons are more creative than Killzone, with the Bulls Eye that "paints" an enemy and your shots will follow them where the go, the gun that allows you to shoot through walls etc....it also features up to 60 player epic battles and an excellent 8 player co-op mode.

I know the games get a lot of hate here because they are high scoring exclusives that make the 360 fanboys jelly, but I encourage anyone who is more level minded to check these games out.

I highly doubt most of the haters have even played the games before.

JohnnyCageMK

Neither are as good as Halo or COD or BF. If they were then more people would care about them.

Cool opinion bro.

I find them to be better than Halo and BF. And these are both fairly new titles, of course they don't have Halo sale records, however they both do have pretty good sized fanbases.

Nothing in Halo or BF will ever be better than 60 player battles in Resistance 2, you have to experience it for yourself. It's jaw droppingly awesome!

[QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I enjoy both, but I find Killzone to be the overall better game. It's graphics are jaw dropping, it has superior gameplay than just about every other shooter out there, the guns feel solid to shoot and the AI is great, and it has a kick ass multiplayer.

Resistance is a pretty solid shooter and it's weapons are more creative than Killzone, with the Bulls Eye that "paints" an enemy and your shots will follow them where the go, the gun that allows you to shoot through walls etc....it also features up to 60 player epic battles and an excellent 8 player co-op mode.

I know the games get a lot of hate here because they are high scoring exclusives that make the 360 fanboys jelly, but I encourage anyone who is more level minded to check these games out.

I highly doubt most of the haters have even played the games before.

ShadowMoses900

Neither are as good as Halo or COD or BF. If they were then more people would care about them.

Cool opinion bro.

I find them to be better than Halo and BF. And these are both fairly new titles, of course they don't have Halo sale records, however they both do have pretty good sized fanbases.

Nothing in Halo or BF will ever be better than 60 player battles in Resistance 2, you have to experience it for yourself. It's jaw droppingly awesome!

Halo was incredibly popular since the moment it came out and that was on a system that only sold like 25 million units. KZ and Resistance have both had 3 main games and neither are popular. Halo is big enough to share the spotlight with COD. KZ and Resistance came and went last year and nobody even noticed.

^are you 2 seriously fighting over opinions?:lol:

I enjoy both, but I find Killzone to be the overall better game. It's graphics are jaw dropping, it has superior gameplay than just about every other shooter out there, the guns feel solid to shoot and the AI is great, and it has a kick ass multiplayer.

Resistance is a pretty solid shooter and it's weapons are more creative than Killzone, with the Bulls Eye that "paints" an enemy and your shots will follow them where the go, the gun that allows you to shoot through walls etc....it also features up to 60 player epic battles and an excellent 8 player co-op mode.

I know the games get a lot of hate here because they are high scoring exclusives that make the 360 fanboys jelly, but I encourage anyone who is more level minded to check these games out.

I highly doubt most of the haters have even played the games before.

ShadowMoses900

I wonder when you'll be more open to other platforms... If it's anything on PS3, you'd think they are the world's best. If it's on PC or 360, you'd say they suck.

You hyped PS All-Stars and LBP Karting, thinking they're the best ever. But they flopped hard.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"]

Neither are as good as Halo or COD or BF. If they were then more people would care about them.

JohnnyCageMK

Cool opinion bro.

I find them to be better than Halo and BF. And these are both fairly new titles, of course they don't have Halo sale records, however they both do have pretty good sized fanbases.

Nothing in Halo or BF will ever be better than 60 player battles in Resistance 2, you have to experience it for yourself. It's jaw droppingly awesome!

Halo was incredibly popular since the moment it came out and that was on a system that only sold like 25 million units. KZ and Resistance have both had 3 main games and neither are popular. Halo is big enough to share the spotlight with COD. KZ and Resistance came and went last year and nobody even noticed.

Why are you always so obsessed with sales?

KZ and Resistance are popular, they both sold over a million copies, that's quite a large fanbase. Just because a game doesn't sale Halo numbers doesn't mean it's bad, Halo does not sell COD numbers, using your logic it's a bad game. Some people prefer BF over Halo and COD, the series isn't as popular, but using your logic it must be bad game right?

What games are better is a completely subjective opinion. Perhaps you should actually play the games first before you judge them? I can bet you if KZ and Resistance were multiplats, these same 360 fanboys that diss them all the time would be praising them. But that is impossible because the 360 could not handle those games.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I enjoy both, but I find Killzone to be the overall better game. It's graphics are jaw dropping, it has superior gameplay than just about every other shooter out there, the guns feel solid to shoot and the AI is great, and it has a kick ass multiplayer.

Resistance is a pretty solid shooter and it's weapons are more creative than Killzone, with the Bulls Eye that "paints" an enemy and your shots will follow them where the go, the gun that allows you to shoot through walls etc....it also features up to 60 player epic battles and an excellent 8 player co-op mode.

I know the games get a lot of hate here because they are high scoring exclusives that make the 360 fanboys jelly, but I encourage anyone who is more level minded to check these games out.

I highly doubt most of the haters have even played the games before.

GamerwillzPS

I wonder when you'll be more open to other platforms... If it's anything on PS3, you'd think they are the world's best. If it's on PC or 360, you'd say they suck.

You hyped PS All-Stars and LBP Karting, thinking they're the best ever. But they flopped hard.

I am open to all platforms, if there is a good game I don't care what system it's for. When have I said these games sucked on 360 or PC? Not once.

Flop is just an opinion, it might flop in SW but I don't care about that, only my opinion. If a game is a great to me then it's not a flop to me.

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] i am, i just dont have a reason to play it when there are so many other fps games that are better and more fun. if i wanted to play cod i'd play cod, not crappy cod knock off like killzone.mems_1224

You living in denial doesn't make you a better player either...

[QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Cool opinion bro.

I find them to be better than Halo and BF. And these are both fairly new titles, of course they don't have Halo sale records, however they both do have pretty good sized fanbases.

Nothing in Halo or BF will ever be better than 60 player battles in Resistance 2, you have to experience it for yourself. It's jaw droppingly awesome!

ShadowMoses900

Halo was incredibly popular since the moment it came out and that was on a system that only sold like 25 million units. KZ and Resistance have both had 3 main games and neither are popular. Halo is big enough to share the spotlight with COD. KZ and Resistance came and went last year and nobody even noticed.

Why are you always so obsessed with sales?

KZ and Resistance are popular, they both sold over a million copies, that's quite a large fanbase. Just because a game doesn't sale Halo numbers doesn't mean it's bad, Halo does not sell COD numbers, using your logic it's a bad game. Some people prefer BF over Halo and COD, the series isn't as popular, but using your logic it must be bad game right?

What games are better is a completely subjective opinion. Perhaps you should actually play the games first before you judge them? I can bet you if KZ and Resistance were multiplats, these same 360 fanboys that diss them all the time would be praising them. But that is impossible because the 360 could not handle those games.

Neither are popular. Most games sell a million copies so I don't know why you think that's impressive. Especially for a big budget heavily promoted franchise like Killzone.

I've played the demos for KZ 2/3 and Resistance 3 and there's nothing special about them. I can get KZ 2 for 2 bucks at any time and and I just don't feel its worth it. They are so brown and gray and uninteresting to look at. KZ feels like a poor mans COD with sci fi thrown in and Resistance just flatout sucks. And if they were multiplat you wouldn't even be talking about them. They would be like Medal of Honor or Homefront and fade away like they were nothing. Being exclusive is the only thing that does get them a tiny bit of discussion.

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I enjoy both, but I find Killzone to be the overall better game. It's graphics are jaw dropping, it has superior gameplay than just about every other shooter out there, the guns feel solid to shoot and the AI is great, and it has a kick ass multiplayer.

Resistance is a pretty solid shooter and it's weapons are more creative than Killzone, with the Bulls Eye that "paints" an enemy and your shots will follow them where the go, the gun that allows you to shoot through walls etc....it also features up to 60 player epic battles and an excellent 8 player co-op mode.

I know the games get a lot of hate here because they are high scoring exclusives that make the 360 fanboys jelly, but I encourage anyone who is more level minded to check these games out.

I highly doubt most of the haters have even played the games before.

ShadowMoses900

I wonder when you'll be more open to other platforms... If it's anything on PS3, you'd think they are the world's best. If it's on PC or 360, you'd say they suck.

You hyped PS All-Stars and LBP Karting, thinking they're the best ever. But they flopped hard.

I am open to all platforms, if there is a good game I don't care what system it's for. When have I said these games sucked on 360 or PC? Not once.

Flop is just an opinion, it might flop in SW but I don't care about that, only my opinion. If a game is a great to me then it's not a flop to me.

Honestly, I bet if Halo is PS3's franchise, your whole "Killzone > Halo" arguments would be different. It's only the name "PlayStation 3" that you care about. If a 5 year old made a simple game by using tools and just throw colours and objects in it randomly, and slapped "PS3" on the top of the case and call it a PS3 exclusive, you'd hype it to the max and make a hype thread. :lol:

It's quite sad that some people have an attachment to the system and refuse to praise games on other systems. It's called fanboys.

I may have a preference on my PS3 over the 360, but I would still admit that Halo 4 is a better game than Killzone 3 because of awesome multiplayer and it's something that you would spend your time on longer than other games. You only said Killzone is better just because it's on PS3.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"]

Halo was incredibly popular since the moment it came out and that was on a system that only sold like 25 million units. KZ and Resistance have both had 3 main games and neither are popular. Halo is big enough to share the spotlight with COD. KZ and Resistance came and went last year and nobody even noticed.

JohnnyCageMK

Why are you always so obsessed with sales?

KZ and Resistance are popular, they both sold over a million copies, that's quite a large fanbase. Just because a game doesn't sale Halo numbers doesn't mean it's bad, Halo does not sell COD numbers, using your logic it's a bad game. Some people prefer BF over Halo and COD, the series isn't as popular, but using your logic it must be bad game right?

What games are better is a completely subjective opinion. Perhaps you should actually play the games first before you judge them? I can bet you if KZ and Resistance were multiplats, these same 360 fanboys that diss them all the time would be praising them. But that is impossible because the 360 could not handle those games.

Neither are popular. Most games sell a million copies so I don't know why you think that's impressive. Especially for a big budget heavily promoted franchise like Killzone.

I've played the demos for KZ 2/3 and Resistance 3 and there's nothing special about them. I can get KZ 2 for 2 bucks at any time and and I just don't feel its worth it. They are so brown and gray and uninteresting to look at. KZ feels like a poor mans COD with sci fi thrown in and Resistance just flatout sucks. And if they were multiplat you wouldn't even be talking about them. They would be like Medal of Honor or Homefront and fade away like they were nothing. Being exclusive is the only thing that does get them a tiny bit of discussion.

All that is just your opinion. Mine is I enjoy them, in fact I enjoy them more than Halo and BF. If that rustles your jimmies too bad, learn to handle different opinions. You cannot "prove" game X to be better than game Y, it's completely subjective.

[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Getting owned is not anything to be shameful for but living in denial is. You should just embrace your noobishness.kuraimen

You living in denial doesn't make you a better player either...

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

I wonder when you'll be more open to other platforms... If it's anything on PS3, you'd think they are the world's best. If it's on PC or 360, you'd say they suck.

You hyped PS All-Stars and LBP Karting, thinking they're the best ever. But they flopped hard.

GamerwillzPS

I am open to all platforms, if there is a good game I don't care what system it's for. When have I said these games sucked on 360 or PC? Not once.

Flop is just an opinion, it might flop in SW but I don't care about that, only my opinion. If a game is a great to me then it's not a flop to me.

Honestly, I bet if Halo is PS3's franchise, your whole "Killzone > Halo" arguments would be different. It's only the name "PlayStation 3" that you care about. If a 5 year old made a simple game by using tools and just throw colours and objects in it randomly, and slapped "PS3" on the top of the case and call it a PS3 exclusive, you'd hype it to the max and make a hype thread. :lol:

It's quite sad that some people have an attachment to the system and refuse to praise games on other systems. It's called fanboys.

I may have a preference on my PS3 over the 360, but I would still admit that Halo 4 is a better game than Killzone 3 because of awesome multiplayer and it's something that you would spend your time on longer than other games. You only said Killzone is better just because it's on PS3.

No it's because I legitmently prefer KZ. I have played Halo plenty of times, it's ok but not great. That is my opinion, now quit being a dumbass.

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I am open to all platforms, if there is a good game I don't care what system it's for. When have I said these games sucked on 360 or PC? Not once.

Flop is just an opinion, it might flop in SW but I don't care about that, only my opinion. If a game is a great to me then it's not a flop to me.

ShadowMoses900

Honestly, I bet if Halo is PS3's franchise, your whole "Killzone > Halo" arguments would be different. It's only the name "PlayStation 3" that you care about. If a 5 year old made a simple game by using tools and just throw colours and objects in it randomly, and slapped "PS3" on the top of the case and call it a PS3 exclusive, you'd hype it to the max and make a hype thread. :lol:

It's quite sad that some people have an attachment to the system and refuse to praise games on other systems. It's called fanboys.

I may have a preference on my PS3 over the 360, but I would still admit that Halo 4 is a better game than Killzone 3 because of awesome multiplayer and it's something that you would spend your time on longer than other games. You only said Killzone is better just because it's on PS3.

No it's because I legitmently prefer KZ. I have played Halo plenty of times, it's ok but not great. That is my opinion, now quit being a dumbass.

Whats so bad about the KZ2 controls? In case you didn't know, they were SUPPOSED to be like that.dracolich55

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]

[QUOTE="mems_1224"] listen, you keep going around in circles and believe whatever helps you sleep at night. im gonna go play some games because, you know, i actually have systems to play on :lol: have fun posting your gibberish and please continue to make yourself look like the biggest moron on the planet. its quite entertaining mems_1224

You living in denial doesn't make you a better player either...

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Honestly, I bet if Halo is PS3's franchise, your whole "Killzone > Halo" arguments would be different. It's only the name "PlayStation 3" that you care about. If a 5 year old made a simple game by using tools and just throw colours and objects in it randomly, and slapped "PS3" on the top of the case and call it a PS3 exclusive, you'd hype it to the max and make a hype thread. :lol:

It's quite sad that some people have an attachment to the system and refuse to praise games on other systems. It's called fanboys.

I may have a preference on my PS3 over the 360, but I would still admit that Halo 4 is a better game than Killzone 3 because of awesome multiplayer and it's something that you would spend your time on longer than other games. You only said Killzone is better just because it's on PS3.

mems_1224

No it's because I legitmently prefer KZ. I have played Halo plenty of times, it's ok but not great. That is my opinion, now quit being a dumbass.

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I am open to all platforms, if there is a good game I don't care what system it's for. When have I said these games sucked on 360 or PC? Not once.

Flop is just an opinion, it might flop in SW but I don't care about that, only my opinion. If a game is a great to me then it's not a flop to me.

ShadowMoses900

Honestly, I bet if Halo is PS3's franchise, your whole "Killzone > Halo" arguments would be different. It's only the name "PlayStation 3" that you care about. If a 5 year old made a simple game by using tools and just throw colours and objects in it randomly, and slapped "PS3" on the top of the case and call it a PS3 exclusive, you'd hype it to the max and make a hype thread. :lol:

It's quite sad that some people have an attachment to the system and refuse to praise games on other systems. It's called fanboys.

I may have a preference on my PS3 over the 360, but I would still admit that Halo 4 is a better game than Killzone 3 because of awesome multiplayer and it's something that you would spend your time on longer than other games. You only said Killzone is better just because it's on PS3.

No it's because I legitmently prefer KZ. I have played Halo plenty of times, it's ok but not great. That is my opinion, now quit being a dumbass.

Okay, I see that it's your opinion.

But you're hyping PS All-Stars too much and you think it's great. But really, it's garbage. I played the beta and didn't like it at all. Is your opinion like that because it's on PS3? What would your opinion be if it's a 360 exclusive?

hey moses, can you see this post?

Why is it the only people that hate on Halo are the ones that can't prove they have a 360?

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Honestly, I bet if Halo is PS3's franchise, your whole "Killzone > Halo" arguments would be different. It's only the name "PlayStation 3" that you care about. If a 5 year old made a simple game by using tools and just throw colours and objects in it randomly, and slapped "PS3" on the top of the case and call it a PS3 exclusive, you'd hype it to the max and make a hype thread. :lol:

It's quite sad that some people have an attachment to the system and refuse to praise games on other systems. It's called fanboys.

I may have a preference on my PS3 over the 360, but I would still admit that Halo 4 is a better game than Killzone 3 because of awesome multiplayer and it's something that you would spend your time on longer than other games. You only said Killzone is better just because it's on PS3.

GamerwillzPS

No it's because I legitmently prefer KZ. I have played Halo plenty of times, it's ok but not great. That is my opinion, now quit being a dumbass.

Okay, I see that it's your opinion.

But you're hyping PS All-Stars too much and you think it's great. But really, it's garbage. I played the beta and didn't like it at all. Is your opinion like that because it's on PS3? What would your opinion be if it's a 360 exclusive?

That's your opinion, if the same game was only on 360 I would have the same opinion. I would probably buy a new 360 just to play it if that was the case.

There are good games on 360, for instance I like the Gears series and I rated it higher in my review than many PS3 exclusives such as Infamous, Star Hawk, Journey, and even Resistance (which I haven't gotten around to reviewing yet, but I would give Resitance 2 around an 8).