Whoever thinks that reviewers get paid to give high scores is freaking dumb. No offence. It's always the easy way out so as not to admit that a game is actually good.
Do sites related to Xbox, PS or Nintendo tend to score their respective console's games higher than the average? Definitely. Does it really affect the aggregation? No. Game is great, but probably not a 10. Lems are still trying to damage control this by talking about price and paid reviews. That's pretty much it.
I see what you're saying about damage control, but there's a thing about the bolded:
Some 'journalists' actually do get paid to make better reviews, or at the very least pressured to. Without firsthand evidence, you can logically conclude so. It's not very difficult to conceive of this being in the interests of major corporations, especially ones like Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft. If they can conceive of it, they *will* do it. Just look at the fake comments internet service providers paid for against net neutrality for example. Or look at how Nvidia treated certain reviewers who concluded that RX 6000 Radeon GPUs are better at rasterization than the new 30 series GPUs from their own tests.
Log in to comment