Riddick Xbox360vsPs3vs2005 PC(56k)

[QUOTE="McdonaIdsGuy"][QUOTE="aroxx_ab"]

As usual when lemmings post fake pictures

More like fake because they look the same in reality

[QUOTE="aroxx_ab"]

[QUOTE="McdonaIdsGuy"] Yeah fake because they dont favor your console of choice?Phazevariance

More like fake because they look the same in reality

[QUOTE="Phazevariance"][QUOTE="aroxx_ab"]

More like fake because they look the same in reality

Messiahbolical-

Go sue Eurogamer then.

[QUOTE="Phazevariance"][QUOTE="aroxx_ab"]

More like fake because they look the same in reality

Messiahbolical-

Then go watch the video someone posted on the first page, the PS3 version looks like crap compared to the 360, get over it. SEE I CAN DO IT TOO EL OH EL

You must be incredibly ignorant if you can't open your eyes and see that this is the fakest multiplat comparison to date. IT'S JUST THE SAME EXACT PICTURE EDITED TWICE TO LOOK CRAPPY, IT DOESN'T TAKE A GENIUS TO NOTICE THATMessiahbolical-

It doesn't take a genius to notice the fence, the floor and the gun are different in the PC shot either.

[QUOTE="Phazevariance"][QUOTE="aroxx_ab"]

More like fake because they look the same in reality

Messiahbolical-

LOL, people mocking the lens of truth comparisons when in fact Eurogamers comparison is the laughing stock, did they adjust the gamma settings for the ps3 version? Well in the Lens of truth comparisons they did after showing compairing the default settings of the 360 and ps3 and guess what the ps3 and 360 versions are practically the same.

You lemmings are getting crazy, some saying if the ps3 version was that bad we would have heard by now lol, the reason you didn't hear is because the lens of truth showed that they were the same, and they actually picked the ps3 version cause it had more atmosphere in its graphics, and the 360 version atmospheric qualities wasn't no where to be found in the game.

But the 2 games are practically identical so go ahead and jump off of that bandwagon now lol.

Also lol @ Eurogamer once again.

GreyFoXX4

So....Xbox1.5 over perform mighty PS3 again!!!!

This never gets old :lol:

LOL, people mocking the lens of truth comparisons when in fact Eurogamers comparison is the laughing stock, did they adjust the gamma settings for the ps3 version? Well in the Lens of truth comparisons they did after showing compairing the default settings of the 360 and ps3 and guess what the ps3 and 360 versions are practically the same.

You lemmings are getting crazy, some saying if the ps3 version was that bad we would have heard by now lol, the reason you didn't hear is because the lens of truth showed that they were the same, and they actually picked the ps3 version cause it had more atmosphere in its graphics, and the 360 version atmospheric qualities wasn't no where to be found in the game.

But the 2 games are practically identical so go ahead and jump off of that bandwagon now lol.

Also lol @ Eurogamer once again.

Also what game dev is doing Game versioncomparisons? Like to know so I don't happen to buy one of their games by mistake with such horrible use of the tech they supposedly use according to some in here lol.

Now im a lemming :Dloco145

the ps3 version is certainly blurier than the 360 version, something to do with the ps3 using a different AA technique that lays a blur over the screen.sonny2dap

Like Ratchet blur

that PS3 screenshot looks altered. no way it's that much different from the other versions.Doolz2024

If you actually look at the pictures... you'll realize that it's just the same picture edited twice using photoshop to make it look really crappy. :|

People on here are so gullible.

Messiahbolical-

[QUOTE="Doolz2024"]that PS3 screenshot looks altered. no way it's that much different from the other versions.dylanmcc

:lol: at lemmings avoiding the lens of truth link.

:lol: at lemmings avoiding the lens of truth link.

-Reggaeton-

Funny how my demo vershion on my ps3 looks better then all 3 of them :lol:

Hmm, well something isn't right for sure. Look at this.

Riddick: EFBB PC

Riddick: AODA PC


You're telling me a 2009 PC game has trouble competing with a 2004 one? Hmmm.

Hmm, well something isn't right for sure. Look at this.

Riddick: EFBB PC

Riddick: AODA PC


You're telling me a 2009 PC game has trouble competing with a 2004 one? Hmmm.

ZimpanX

:lol: at lemmings avoiding the lens of truth link.

-Reggaeton-

2005 pc specs still trump consoles. Had the first Riddick on the xbox and didnt like it much. The movies are great though.

clyde46

Hahaha the Xbox 360 is more powerful then a PC from that time period.

[QUOTE="ZimpanX"]

Hmm, well something isn't right for sure. Look at this.

Riddick: EFBB PC

Riddick: AODA PC


You're telling me a 2009 PC game has trouble competing with a 2004 one? Hmmm.

McdonaIdsGuy

lol who gives a crap? Everyone goes around on this forum goin this gamne looks better on this system, when in reality, graphics don't even make the game that much more enjoyable. The funny thing is both systems graphics look the same, so what if the 360's is a tiny bit better for a few multiplat games? Its not going to enhance the game play more then the ps3's graphics. I say the graphics of a game make up about 10% of how enjoyable the game is, the rest is game play.

Nick3306