ROFL at GeOW vs RFoM threads

  • 59 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for DoctorBunny
DoctorBunny

2660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 DoctorBunny
Member since 2005 • 2660 Posts
[QUOTE="Snugenz"][QUOTE="Mordred19"][QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="Mordred19"]so 4 is an exaggeration. the truth is that Resistance has way more enemies on screen at once. this, with it's interactive enviorments put it on par with Gears in terms of overall power.Mordred19

Your point ?

Do you really think i care about R:FoM having more enemies and interactive environments ?

Only reason i'm in this thread is to silence bashers, i couldnt care less which game is better.

your tone seems to imply that you want Gears to be better.

No, i really really dont care.

But you seem to really care, feeling insecure about your PS3 purchase, trying to make the most one of one of your only good games ?

See i can make assumptions too, arent they fun :roll:

why are you attacking me? All I've done is present a side of an issue while not denying the other. That's a low blow, saying I'm an insecure fanboy. I am an informed gamer who just happens to be a PS3 owner and not a 360 owner.

You haven't owned both games. Without going through both sides, you will always favor the side you have. Gears of war was amazing. RFoM I was so hyped up for. Waited in line for 3 days for my ps3, picked that up and couldn't believe how horrible it was. The graphics, the animations, it was all so dissapointing. It felt like I had played the game 500 times before. Maybe b/c I am majorly a PC FPS player 

Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts
[QUOTE="Snugenz"][QUOTE="Mordred19"][QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="Mordred19"]so 4 is an exaggeration. the truth is that Resistance has way more enemies on screen at once. this, with it's interactive enviorments put it on par with Gears in terms of overall power.Mordred19

Your point ?

Do you really think i care about R:FoM having more enemies and interactive environments ?

Only reason i'm in this thread is to silence bashers, i couldnt care less which game is better.

your tone seems to imply that you want Gears to be better.

No, i really really dont care.

But you seem to really care, feeling insecure about your PS3 purchase, trying to make the most out of one of your only good games ?

See i can make assumptions too, arent they fun :roll:

why are you attacking me? All I've done is present a side of an issue while not denying the other. That's a low blow, saying I'm an insecure fanboy. I am an informed gamer who just happens to be a PS3 owner and not a 360 owner.

Notice the big part were i said "assumptions are fun" then the ( :roll: ) smily, of course i didnt mean it and wasnt attacking you, i was just pointing out how you made a silly assumption about me. Get me?

Avatar image for Roushrsh
Roushrsh

3351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Roushrsh
Member since 2005 • 3351 Posts

your right 40 player online with no lag does nothing to further the gaming community :roll:downPlayDemon

lol 

Avatar image for Big_T-Mac
Big_T-Mac

6973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 Big_T-Mac
Member since 2005 • 6973 Posts

yes and i guess gears does so much with gaming

with its short, boring campaign

its 4vs4 multiplayer with 4 modes and 3 of which are the same and only one of them is actually fun.....

 

this game is a graphical showcase and you still cant experience the graphics because theres not much to do in it.

 

resistance actually has multiplayer that lasts, gears.........................theres really nothing more to do in the multiplayer

mish55
is that why theres more ppl still playin gears over resistence, even tho 360 has much much much much more competition?
Avatar image for scorch-62
scorch-62

29763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 scorch-62
Member since 2006 • 29763 Posts
[QUOTE="Utensilman"]

These games are not comparable. Gears is a 2nd year release that's a Great game and Resistance is an above average generic FPS that does Nothing to further the gaming community, if anything it sets it back.

There are Soooooo many better FPS's out there than the trash known as PS3's Only decent exclusive title. So quit comparing RFoM graphics to the amazing GeOW graphics. It's just sad...

 

DoctorBunny

Gears of war was released in 360's FIRST year, not its 2nd

Xbox 360 Launch: Nov 22, 2005

GeOW Release: Nov 7, 2006

You my friend have been OWNED

1st gen means that it is a LAUNCH TITLE! 2nd+ gen means every year after that.

Gears wasn't released as a LAUNCH TITLE, but it was almost a year after the 360 came out making it SECOND GEN...

Utensilman = un-owned
DoctorBunny = uberly pwned n00b

Avatar image for Utensilman
Utensilman

1571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 Utensilman
Member since 2006 • 1571 Posts
[QUOTE="DoctorBunny"][QUOTE="Utensilman"]

These games are not comparable. Gears is a 2nd year release that's a Great game and Resistance is an above average generic FPS that does Nothing to further the gaming community, if anything it sets it back.

There are Soooooo many better FPS's out there than the trash known as PS3's Only decent exclusive title. So quit comparing RFoM graphics to the amazing GeOW graphics. It's just sad...

 

scorch-62

Gears of war was released in 360's FIRST year, not its 2nd

Xbox 360 Launch: Nov 22, 2005

GeOW Release: Nov 7, 2006

You my friend have been OWNED

1st gen means that it is a LAUNCH TITLE! 2nd+ gen means every year after that.

Gears wasn't released as a LAUNCH TITLE, but it was almost a year after the 360 came out making it SECOND GEN...

Utensilman = un-owned
DoctorBunny = uberly pwned n00b

 

ty, finally someone that knows how it goes

Avatar image for DoctorBunny
DoctorBunny

2660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 DoctorBunny
Member since 2005 • 2660 Posts
[QUOTE="DoctorBunny"][QUOTE="Utensilman"]

These games are not comparable. Gears is a 2nd year release that's a Great game and Resistance is an above average generic FPS that does Nothing to further the gaming community, if anything it sets it back.

There are Soooooo many better FPS's out there than the trash known as PS3's Only decent exclusive title. So quit comparing RFoM graphics to the amazing GeOW graphics. It's just sad...

 

scorch-62

Gears of war was released in 360's FIRST year, not its 2nd

Xbox 360 Launch: Nov 22, 2005

GeOW Release: Nov 7, 2006

You my friend have been OWNED

1st gen means that it is a LAUNCH TITLE! 2nd+ gen means every year after that.

Gears wasn't released as a LAUNCH TITLE, but it was almost a year after the 360 came out making it SECOND GEN...

Utensilman = un-owned
DoctorBunny = uberly pwned n00b

Where does it say second GEN, it says second YEAR

Double Ownage FTW

 

Avatar image for bearbones
bearbones

1332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 bearbones
Member since 2006 • 1332 Posts

I absolutely hate playing MP games where you have 30 or more people in a map.  Its makes it impossible for your team to do anything meaningful except run, get shot, respawn, shoot, repeat.lhughey

...Isn't that the point?

Avatar image for istreakforfood
istreakforfood

7781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#60 istreakforfood
Member since 2004 • 7781 Posts
[QUOTE="Mordred19"][QUOTE="Snugenz"][QUOTE="Mordred19"][QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="Mordred19"]so 4 is an exaggeration. the truth is that Resistance has way more enemies on screen at once. this, with it's interactive enviorments put it on par with Gears in terms of overall power.DoctorBunny

Your point ?

Do you really think i care about R:FoM having more enemies and interactive environments ?

Only reason i'm in this thread is to silence bashers, i couldnt care less which game is better.

your tone seems to imply that you want Gears to be better.

No, i really really dont care.

But you seem to really care, feeling insecure about your PS3 purchase, trying to make the most one of one of your only good games ?

See i can make assumptions too, arent they fun :roll:

why are you attacking me? All I've done is present a side of an issue while not denying the other. That's a low blow, saying I'm an insecure fanboy. I am an informed gamer who just happens to be a PS3 owner and not a 360 owner.

You haven't owned both games. Without going through both sides, you will always favor the side you have. Gears of war was amazing. RFoM I was so hyped up for. Waited in line for 3 days for my ps3, picked that up and couldn't believe how horrible it was. The graphics, the animations, it was all so dissapointing. It felt like I had played the game 500 times before. Maybe b/c I am majorly a PC FPS player

 

thats how i felt when i played resistance. i couldnt get into cause it felt like i played it before cause i played a lot of fps games on pc/console over the years. IMO the fun experience might be there for ppl who are new to shooters or havent played as much as you and i did. gameplay single and multiplayer were so generic, but i will admit resistance is worth checking out on campaign if you are into good/decent stories. 

Avatar image for scorch-62
scorch-62

29763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 scorch-62
Member since 2006 • 29763 Posts
[QUOTE="scorch-62"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"][QUOTE="Utensilman"]

These games are not comparable. Gears is a 2nd year release that's a Great game and Resistance is an above average generic FPS that does Nothing to further the gaming community, if anything it sets it back.

There are Soooooo many better FPS's out there than the trash known as PS3's Only decent exclusive title. So quit comparing RFoM graphics to the amazing GeOW graphics. It's just sad...DoctorBunny

Gears of war was released in 360's FIRST year, not its 2nd

Xbox 360 Launch: Nov 22, 2005

GeOW Release: Nov 7, 2006

You my friend have been OWNED

1st gen means that it is a LAUNCH TITLE! 2nd+ gen means every year after that.

Gears wasn't released as a LAUNCH TITLE, but it was almost a year after the 360 came out making it SECOND GEN...

Utensilman = un-owned
DoctorBunny = uberly pwned n00b

Where does it say second GEN, it says second YEAR

Double Ownage FTW

well if you paid attention to what he replied to my post, you'll know that he meant "Gen"