ROFL at GeOW vs RFoM threads

[QUOTE="Snugenz"][QUOTE="Mordred19"][QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="Mordred19"]so 4 is an exaggeration. the truth is that Resistance has way more enemies on screen at once. this, with it's interactive enviorments put it on par with Gears in terms of overall power.Mordred19

Your point ?

Do you really think i care about R:FoM having more enemies and interactive environments ?

Only reason i'm in this thread is to silence bashers, i couldnt care less which game is better.

your tone seems to imply that you want Gears to be better.

No, i really really dont care.

But you seem to really care, feeling insecure about your PS3 purchase, trying to make the most one of one of your only good games ?

See i can make assumptions too, arent they fun :roll:

why are you attacking me? All I've done is present a side of an issue while not denying the other. That's a low blow, saying I'm an insecure fanboy. I am an informed gamer who just happens to be a PS3 owner and not a 360 owner.

You haven't owned both games. Without going through both sides, you will always favor the side you have. Gears of war was amazing. RFoM I was so hyped up for. Waited in line for 3 days for my ps3, picked that up and couldn't believe how horrible it was. The graphics, the animations, it was all so dissapointing. It felt like I had played the game 500 times before. Maybe b/c I am majorly a PC FPS player 

[QUOTE="Snugenz"][QUOTE="Mordred19"][QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="Mordred19"]so 4 is an exaggeration. the truth is that Resistance has way more enemies on screen at once. this, with it's interactive enviorments put it on par with Gears in terms of overall power.Mordred19

Your point ?

Do you really think i care about R:FoM having more enemies and interactive environments ?

Only reason i'm in this thread is to silence bashers, i couldnt care less which game is better.

your tone seems to imply that you want Gears to be better.

No, i really really dont care.

But you seem to really care, feeling insecure about your PS3 purchase, trying to make the most out of one of your only good games ?

See i can make assumptions too, arent they fun :roll:

why are you attacking me? All I've done is present a side of an issue while not denying the other. That's a low blow, saying I'm an insecure fanboy. I am an informed gamer who just happens to be a PS3 owner and not a 360 owner.

Notice the big part were i said "assumptions are fun" then the ( :roll: ) smily, of course i didnt mean it and wasnt attacking you, i was just pointing out how you made a silly assumption about me. Get me?

your right 40 player online with no lag does nothing to further the gaming community :roll:downPlayDemon

lol 

yes and i guess gears does so much with gaming

with its short, boring campaign

its 4vs4 multiplayer with 4 modes and 3 of which are the same and only one of them is actually fun.....

 

this game is a graphical showcase and you still cant experience the graphics because theres not much to do in it.

 

resistance actually has multiplayer that lasts, gears.........................theres really nothing more to do in the multiplayer

mish55

[QUOTE="Utensilman"]

These games are not comparable. Gears is a 2nd year release that's a Great game and Resistance is an above average generic FPS that does Nothing to further the gaming community, if anything it sets it back.

There are Soooooo many better FPS's out there than the trash known as PS3's Only decent exclusive title. So quit comparing RFoM graphics to the amazing GeOW graphics. It's just sad...

 

DoctorBunny

Gears of war was released in 360's FIRST year, not its 2nd

Xbox 360 Launch: Nov 22, 2005

GeOW Release: Nov 7, 2006

You my friend have been OWNED

1st gen means that it is a LAUNCH TITLE! 2nd+ gen means every year after that.

Gears wasn't released as a LAUNCH TITLE, but it was almost a year after the 360 came out making it SECOND GEN...

Utensilman = un-owned
DoctorBunny = uberly pwned n00b

[QUOTE="DoctorBunny"][QUOTE="Utensilman"]

These games are not comparable. Gears is a 2nd year release that's a Great game and Resistance is an above average generic FPS that does Nothing to further the gaming community, if anything it sets it back.

There are Soooooo many better FPS's out there than the trash known as PS3's Only decent exclusive title. So quit comparing RFoM graphics to the amazing GeOW graphics. It's just sad...

 

scorch-62

Gears of war was released in 360's FIRST year, not its 2nd

Xbox 360 Launch: Nov 22, 2005

GeOW Release: Nov 7, 2006

You my friend have been OWNED

1st gen means that it is a LAUNCH TITLE! 2nd+ gen means every year after that.

Gears wasn't released as a LAUNCH TITLE, but it was almost a year after the 360 came out making it SECOND GEN...

Utensilman = un-owned
DoctorBunny = uberly pwned n00b

ty, finally someone that knows how it goes

[QUOTE="DoctorBunny"][QUOTE="Utensilman"]

These games are not comparable. Gears is a 2nd year release that's a Great game and Resistance is an above average generic FPS that does Nothing to further the gaming community, if anything it sets it back.

There are Soooooo many better FPS's out there than the trash known as PS3's Only decent exclusive title. So quit comparing RFoM graphics to the amazing GeOW graphics. It's just sad...

 

scorch-62

Gears of war was released in 360's FIRST year, not its 2nd

Xbox 360 Launch: Nov 22, 2005

GeOW Release: Nov 7, 2006

You my friend have been OWNED

1st gen means that it is a LAUNCH TITLE! 2nd+ gen means every year after that.

Gears wasn't released as a LAUNCH TITLE, but it was almost a year after the 360 came out making it SECOND GEN...

Utensilman = un-owned
DoctorBunny = uberly pwned n00b

Where does it say second GEN, it says second YEAR

Double Ownage FTW

I absolutely hate playing MP games where you have 30 or more people in a map.  Its makes it impossible for your team to do anything meaningful except run, get shot, respawn, shoot, repeat.lhughey

...Isn't that the point?

[QUOTE="Mordred19"][QUOTE="Snugenz"][QUOTE="Mordred19"][QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="Mordred19"]so 4 is an exaggeration. the truth is that Resistance has way more enemies on screen at once. this, with it's interactive enviorments put it on par with Gears in terms of overall power.DoctorBunny

Your point ?

Do you really think i care about R:FoM having more enemies and interactive environments ?

Only reason i'm in this thread is to silence bashers, i couldnt care less which game is better.

your tone seems to imply that you want Gears to be better.

No, i really really dont care.

But you seem to really care, feeling insecure about your PS3 purchase, trying to make the most one of one of your only good games ?

See i can make assumptions too, arent they fun :roll:

why are you attacking me? All I've done is present a side of an issue while not denying the other. That's a low blow, saying I'm an insecure fanboy. I am an informed gamer who just happens to be a PS3 owner and not a 360 owner.

You haven't owned both games. Without going through both sides, you will always favor the side you have. Gears of war was amazing. RFoM I was so hyped up for. Waited in line for 3 days for my ps3, picked that up and couldn't believe how horrible it was. The graphics, the animations, it was all so dissapointing. It felt like I had played the game 500 times before. Maybe b/c I am majorly a PC FPS player

thats how i felt when i played resistance. i couldnt get into cause it felt like i played it before cause i played a lot of fps games on pc/console over the years. IMO the fun experience might be there for ppl who are new to shooters or havent played as much as you and i did. gameplay single and multiplayer were so generic, but i will admit resistance is worth checking out on campaign if you are into good/decent stories. 

[QUOTE="scorch-62"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"][QUOTE="Utensilman"]

These games are not comparable. Gears is a 2nd year release that's a Great game and Resistance is an above average generic FPS that does Nothing to further the gaming community, if anything it sets it back.

There are Soooooo many better FPS's out there than the trash known as PS3's Only decent exclusive title. So quit comparing RFoM graphics to the amazing GeOW graphics. It's just sad...DoctorBunny

Gears of war was released in 360's FIRST year, not its 2nd

Xbox 360 Launch: Nov 22, 2005

GeOW Release: Nov 7, 2006

You my friend have been OWNED

1st gen means that it is a LAUNCH TITLE! 2nd+ gen means every year after that.

Gears wasn't released as a LAUNCH TITLE, but it was almost a year after the 360 came out making it SECOND GEN...

Utensilman = un-owned
DoctorBunny = uberly pwned n00b

Where does it say second GEN, it says second YEAR

Double Ownage FTW

well if you paid attention to what he replied to my post, you'll know that he meant "Gen"