ROFL the Lemmings have been obliterated

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Ps1 cows have been obliterated... ff7 fans have been obliterated...

 

ff7 for ps1

http://www.gamespot.com/ps/rpg/finalfantasy7/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;reviews

 

ff7 for pc

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/finalfantasy7/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;reviews

Vandalvideo

big difference? i see no difference... I see a game scoring one score on one platform, then a year and a half or more later scoring lower on a completely different platform.

You might see a difference but I do not.

Doesn't mean the original game is bad. Release any game 3 years after the original and its going to score lower. And rightfully so. If Halo 2 came to the PC at the same time as it came to the Xbox the score would have been consideraby higher. Though not as high as the Xbox one because of the FPSes on the PC. 

Standing up on xbox live on the platform it came out for and not standing up to new PC standards is an ENTIRELY seperate thing. Halo simply cannot compare to recent PC entires. Its as simple as that, despite it getting face lifts. FF7 was worse on the PC, Halo 2 is better on the PC. The reasons it scord lower is simply because its old and can't keep up with today's PC standards.Vandalvideo

and you prove my point right there, My critique still stands, I made a post saying ff7 fans, and cows of the ps1 generation got obliterated because the pc version of a 9.5 scoring game only got an 8.0. Doesn't that sound stupid?

He is doing the exact same thing, He is saying lemmings have been obliterated because a game released 2 years after the one that got a 9.4 received an 7.0 on the pc. Doesn't that sound stupid? the arguement here isn't why a game got its score, its about comparing apples to oranges, and then saying the people that liked apples got owned.

P.S: standing up on ones own on xbox live is no different, The game is still massively popular to this day 2 years after it was released, the pc version has been out what? no wait its not even out yet they delayed it did they...so its a null point now isn't it.

The point still stands on it own, he is self owning him self, and its stupid to compare apples to oranges then say the apples got owned.

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Ps1 cows have been obliterated... ff7 fans have been obliterated...

 

ff7 for ps1

http://www.gamespot.com/ps/rpg/finalfantasy7/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;reviews

 

ff7 for pc

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/finalfantasy7/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;reviews

hazuki87

big difference? i see no difference... I see a game scoring one score on one platform, then a year and a half or more later scoring lower on a completely different platform.

You might see a difference but I do not.

Doesn't mean the original game is bad. Release any game 3 years after the original and its going to score lower. And rightfully so. If Halo 2 came to the PC at the same time as it came to the Xbox the score would have been consideraby higher. Though not as high as the Xbox one because of the FPSes on the PC.

Higher, for which version? 

Tosca: for the PC version

Vandal: Understood, I misread your post. 

William: Theres a HUGE problem with your comparison though. I'll make it as simple as possible. PS1 FF7 > PC ff7. The scores are justified. PC Halo 2> XBOX Halo 2. Despite this it scored lower on the PC. Why is this? PC standards combined with its age make it a relatively not as good game.Vandalvideo

and you obviously didn't get the comparison, I wasn't comparing the games I was using them as a base to say Look the cows got owned cause ff7 one of the most loved games on a sony system scored lower in the pc version.

P.S: The comparison that your talking about is fine, One scored lower then the other for certain reasons, 9.4-7.0 for halo 2 9.5-8.0 for ff7.

(by the way if you read the article the game is better every way except sound, and cut scenes was better then its PS1 counterpart, and the midi is fixed by not having a 2 dollar sound card, I owned the game when it first came out and my old soundblaster played the music as good as the tv did or a sound system, then you have the fact they scored it lower because pc gamers would have to get used to a console type rpg, some thing that is rare on a pc)

I would rather have a HUGE problem with my comparison then be unable to understand a simple critique as i was making, that you dont compare apples to oranges then say the apples got owned like the TC has done.

No lemmings hyped halo 2 vista, no one said it would score higher then halo 2 xbox, or any other pc fps, Yet he says because the pc version scored low that the lemmings have been owned, Can you not understand a simple concept as that?

Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0

 http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591

Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.

kornbone

Last time I checked, Lemmings were XBOX fanboys.

Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0

 http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591

Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.

kornbone

lmao halo 2 still scored aaa and halo 3 will still score aaa just something that happens buddy!

[QUOTE="kornbone"]

Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591

Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.

-KinGz-

Cows are really really grasping for straws.

ok you dogs, cats, and ferets.... make it rain, make it rain. 7.0 might mean 10.0 back in 2003 on the pc. so, 7.0 for 2003 might be about right. 

I have to agree with the review, the game kind of sucks compared to now. Fear, Shadow Chernobyl, COD2, RFOM, CS, and R6V are much better games online then halo 2. Halo 2 was a very average game if you considered it to todays games.drsports1980

Huh? Do you mean S.T.A.L.K.E.R.?

Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591

Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.

kornbone

How are the LEMMINGS obliterated when its the Hermits that got this game.

Phail/10

[QUOTE="drsports1980"]I have to agree with the review, the game kind of sucks compared to now. Fear, Shadow Chernobyl, COD2, RFOM, CS, and R6V are much better games online then halo 2. Halo 2 was a very average game if you considered it to todays games.BioShockOwnz

Huh? Do you mean S.T.A.L.K.E.R.?

Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591

Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.

kornbone

Look at the sig. 

Hermits = PC

Lemming = Xbox.

9.4? I think = Xbox

Hazuki: I'm not saying the original game was bad. What I am saying is that Halo 2 is better on the PC because of its facelifts, but despite that it simply can't keep up with today's standards for PC games. Its a three year old game with some face lifts. Thats obviously not enough. Final Fantasy on the PC, however, was a shoddy port that had horrible problems. Big difference.Vandalvideo

Halo 2 on PC is a shoddy port, simply by the nature of not having the Halo fans on that system. You don't have a community of millions of rapid opponents to play against, instead you have "other Vista owners who happen to buy Halo 2" - that's a shallow pool, and it drastically takes away from the experience.

Halo 2 on the Xbox was about LIVE - without the console verison of LIVE, without the friends, opponents, and clans that existed there, you don't have the same game. It's like playin CounterStrike on the Xbox, same issue -without the PC community, it's just another oudated shooter.

Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591

Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.

kornbone

How does this effect Lemming's?The xbox version got a really good score that probly was a little higher than it deserved but all around it was a very good game. Anyways its like 3 years old and I really wouldn't expect much from a game everyones already played. 

Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591

Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.

kornbone

Hahahahha, god thats funny......but whats even more funny is its better than any shooter on playstation!! 

9.4 says you have been owned. JPOBS

THPS3 Owns you in return. Perfect 10 

Claiming ownage on a three year-old game... where's the sense in that? >_>

[QUOTE="-KinGz-"][QUOTE="kornbone"]

Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591

Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.

F1sTDaCuffS

Cows are really really grasping for straws.

ok you dogs, cats, and ferets.... make it rain, make it rain. 7.0 might mean 10.0 back in 2003 on the pc. so, 7.0 for 2003 might be about right.

no... just no. 

Halo 2 for XBOX should've got 8.8 . . .deepdreamer256

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this a PC review?