Rookie in charge, Gaming on a decline.

  • 116 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts

Yeah, Microsoft has a long ways to go when it comes to video gaming. 360 fans say they have the games, but comparing it to 2 systems that been out for 6 months, of course they will. Let's compare them to past generations and see how they stand.

First 18 months Playstation 2  AAA titles = 20
Tekken Tag Tournament
Fifa 2001
SSX
NFL Madden 2001
Guitar Freaks 3rd Mix
Rayman 2 Revolution
Twisted Metal Black
NBA Street
Gran Turismo 3: A-spec
Madden NFL 2002
Resident Evil: Code Verinoca
Devil May Cry
Grand Theft Auto III
Tony Hawk Pro Skater 3 (10)
SSX Tricky
Metal Gear Sold 2: Sons of Liberty
NFL 2k2
Final Fantasy X
NBA 2k2
Virtua Fighter 4

First 18 months of Gamecube   AAA titles = 8
Star Wars Rouge Squadron
Tony Hawk 3
Eternal Darkness
NFL 2k3
Super Monkey Ball 2
Tony Hawk 4
Metriod Prime
Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker

 
First 18 months of Dreamcast  AAA titles = 20
Soul Calibur (10)
NFL 2k
NFL 2k1
Tony Hawk 2
NBA 2k1
Test Drive LeMans
Resident Evil: Code Veronica
Tony Hawk
Rayman 2
Quake 3 Arena
Skies of Arcadia
Ultimate Fighting Championship
Dead or Alive
F355 Challenge
NFL Blitz 2001
Jet Grind Radio
Samba de Amigo
Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver
Street Fighter Alpha 3
Marvel vs. Capcom

First 18 months of Xbox360   AAA titles = 5
Gears of War
Oblivion
Ghost Recon Advance Warfighter
Rainbow Six Vegas
Perfect Dark Zero

 

Notice two things about the charts. First, look how far behind Xbox360 is compare to Dreamcast and PS2, yet 360 fans say they have a "bunch" of great games. I think the standards of "bunch" has fallen. Secondly, look at the diversity library of the PS2, Gamecube, and the Dreamcast. Every genre is there on the list. Now, look at 360 list..."bang, bang I shot you down. bang, bang you hit the ground"

 

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
How did the Xbox do its first 18 months? It seems suspect that you left it out.
Avatar image for lazzordude
lazzordude

6685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 lazzordude
Member since 2003 • 6685 Posts
yet if you look at of its AA games that would have been AAA if it was reviewed by last gens standards,it has a great lineup
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts

How did the Xbox do its first 18 months? It seems suspect that you left it out.Jandurin

Trust me...if you a 360 fan you glad that I did. 

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#5 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Thats more the fault of the developers than the platform makers. You can't control the ammount of AAA titles you make unless you pump out a ton of first party titles. Microsoft's lead has nothing to do with the ammount of AAA titles. Just look at all the other platforms. AAA titles are in an extreme drougth right now save on PCs. Its merely developers.
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts

yet if you look at of its AA games that would have been AAA if it was reviewed by last gens standards,it has a great lineuplazzordude

lol, I'm sure you know what this is...If, but, should've...lol 

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
Yeah, Microsoft has NOTHING to do with the AAA games that come out or what their genre is. That is up to the developers, so take up your tirade with them.
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts

Thats more the fault of the developers than the platform makers. You can't control the ammount of AAA titles you make unless you pump out a ton of first party titles. Microsoft's lead has nothing to do with the ammount of AAA titles. Just look at all the other platforms. AAA titles are in an extreme drougth right now save on PCs. Its merely developers.Vandalvideo

Good point. Does that mean the lack of AAA games on the PS3 is not Sony fault? 

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#9 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Thats more the fault of the developers than the platform makers. You can't control the ammount of AAA titles you make unless you pump out a ton of first party titles. Microsoft's lead has nothing to do with the ammount of AAA titles. Just look at all the other platforms. AAA titles are in an extreme drougth right now save on PCs. Its merely developers.shungokustasu

Good point. Does that mean the lack of AAA games on the PS3 is not Sony fault? 

The lack of EXCLUSIVE AAA games on the PS3 is sony's fault. The lack of AAA games on the PS3 is NOT son'y fault. I made a big distinction there. Sony has failed to secure the rights to tons of would be exclusive AAA games for the PS3 early on.
Avatar image for lazzordude
lazzordude

6685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 lazzordude
Member since 2003 • 6685 Posts

[QUOTE="lazzordude"]yet if you look at of its AA games that would have been AAA if it was reviewed by last gens standards,it has a great lineupshungokustasu

lol, I'm sure you know what this is...If, but, should've...lol 

what are you talking about?its a fact that they rate games this gen stricter just like they do every new gen.so i fail to see your point because games are expected to get better as technology grows.that why you only the classics are still good while the others have aged bad.
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts

Yeah, Microsoft has NOTHING to do with the AAA games that come out or what their genre is. That is up to the developers, so take up your tirade with them.Verge_6

I have to say, you can put the partial blame on Microsoft. Like most of you putting the blame on Sony for the PS3 not being worth $600 because it doesn't have game, right? 

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#12 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]Yeah, Microsoft has NOTHING to do with the AAA games that come out or what their genre is. That is up to the developers, so take up your tirade with them.shungokustasu

I have to say, you can put the partial blame on Microsoft. Like most of you putting the blame on Sony for the PS3 not being worth $600 because it doesn't have game, right? 

The PS3 is easily worth 600, as a multimedia device. Its not worth 600 as a gaming device at the momment though. That could all change.
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]Yeah, Microsoft has NOTHING to do with the AAA games that come out or what their genre is. That is up to the developers, so take up your tirade with them.shungokustasu

I have to say, you can put the partial blame on Microsoft. Like most of you putting the blame on Sony for the PS3 not being worth $600 because it doesn't have game, right?

And the same can be said for Sony for not securing enough games that could have been exclusive to their platform. It works both ways. 

Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts
[QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Thats more the fault of the developers than the platform makers. You can't control the ammount of AAA titles you make unless you pump out a ton of first party titles. Microsoft's lead has nothing to do with the ammount of AAA titles. Just look at all the other platforms. AAA titles are in an extreme drougth right now save on PCs. Its merely developers.Vandalvideo

Good point. Does that mean the lack of AAA games on the PS3 is not Sony fault?

The lack of EXCLUSIVE AAA games on the PS3 is sony's fault. The lack of AAA games on the PS3 is NOT son'y fault. I made a big distinction there. Sony has failed to secure the rights to tons of would be exclusive AAA games for the PS3 early on.

Right, in 6 months? Are you happy about Microsoft for having 2 exclusive AAA for 18 months? 

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#15 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Thats more the fault of the developers than the platform makers. You can't control the ammount of AAA titles you make unless you pump out a ton of first party titles. Microsoft's lead has nothing to do with the ammount of AAA titles. Just look at all the other platforms. AAA titles are in an extreme drougth right now save on PCs. Its merely developers.shungokustasu

Good point. Does that mean the lack of AAA games on the PS3 is not Sony fault?

The lack of EXCLUSIVE AAA games on the PS3 is sony's fault. The lack of AAA games on the PS3 is NOT son'y fault. I made a big distinction there. Sony has failed to secure the rights to tons of would be exclusive AAA games for the PS3 early on.

Right, in 6 months? Are you happy about Microsoft for having 2 exclusive AAA for 18 months? 

I'm not saying Microsoft has done any better. Its their fault for not securing exclusive games either. Its just almost everyone, including Ninty, has blundered up.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#16 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Thats more the fault of the developers than the platform makers. You can't control the ammount of AAA titles you make unless you pump out a ton of first party titles. Microsoft's lead has nothing to do with the ammount of AAA titles. Just look at all the other platforms. AAA titles are in an extreme drougth right now save on PCs. Its merely developers.shungokustasu

Good point. Does that mean the lack of AAA games on the PS3 is not Sony fault? 

yeah it isnt there fault, same with the wii. Well they actually did make a AAA (zelda is the real one, lets get real. FOR SW its Warioware, but in reality its Zelda). But only fanboys are dume enough to blame the console maker for third party not making AAA games. But yeah the library isnt as dominant as it is made out to be. 360s library is really week when compared to all those PS2, GC, and DC games. the problem most people dont understand is that this "next gen" has been a total flop so far. We havent seen anything special except for Gears. And IMO that game doestn rank anywhere near the top 10, 15 heck top 20 or 30.
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts
[QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]Yeah, Microsoft has NOTHING to do with the AAA games that come out or what their genre is. That is up to the developers, so take up your tirade with them.Verge_6

I have to say, you can put the partial blame on Microsoft. Like most of you putting the blame on Sony for the PS3 not being worth $600 because it doesn't have game, right?

And the same can be said for Sony for not securing enough games that could have been exclusive to their platform. It works both ways.

but in your original post you said it didn't work both ways. You said Microsoft had NOTHING to do with AAA titles comes out on their system. So which one is it?

Avatar image for Solid-CELL
Solid-CELL

5910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Solid-CELL
Member since 2006 • 5910 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Thats more the fault of the developers than the platform makers. You can't control the ammount of AAA titles you make unless you pump out a ton of first party titles. Microsoft's lead has nothing to do with the ammount of AAA titles. Just look at all the other platforms. AAA titles are in an extreme drougth right now save on PCs. Its merely developers.shungokustasu

Good point. Does that mean the lack of AAA games on the PS3 is not Sony fault?

again, good point. But i see how your trying to move "fault" out of Sony's way. Its everyone fault. Sony, for not aiding publishers/developers. Publishers for being to money hungry to REJECT the releases of some of their games on a PS3 (Rainbow 6 anyone?). And finally Developers for doing poor jobs on porting and/or not extracting enough of this "potential powa!" found on the Ps3.
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]Yeah, Microsoft has NOTHING to do with the AAA games that come out or what their genre is. That is up to the developers, so take up your tirade with them.shungokustasu

I have to say, you can put the partial blame on Microsoft. Like most of you putting the blame on Sony for the PS3 not being worth $600 because it doesn't have game, right?

And the same can be said for Sony for not securing enough games that could have been exclusive to their platform. It works both ways.

but in your original post you said it didn't work both ways. You said Microsoft had NOTHING to do with AAA titles comes out on their system. So which one is it?

You had implied that it was entirely Microsoft's fault that all thier AA games now are shooter-based. They aren't entirely innocent in this matter, you are right. But the developers are the ones that are to blame for this.

Avatar image for JPOBS
JPOBS

9675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 JPOBS
Member since 2007 • 9675 Posts
what does that have to do with microsoft ?
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts
[QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Thats more the fault of the developers than the platform makers. You can't control the ammount of AAA titles you make unless you pump out a ton of first party titles. Microsoft's lead has nothing to do with the ammount of AAA titles. Just look at all the other platforms. AAA titles are in an extreme drougth right now save on PCs. Its merely developers.jg4xchamp

Good point. Does that mean the lack of AAA games on the PS3 is not Sony fault?

yeah it isnt there fault, same with the wii. Well they actually did make a AAA (zelda is the real one, lets get real. FOR SW its Warioware, but in reality its Zelda). But only fanboys are dume enough to blame the console maker for third party not making AAA games. But yeah the library isnt as dominant as it is made out to be. 360s library is really week when compared to all those PS2, GC, and DC games. the problem most people dont understand is that this "next gen" has been a total flop so far. We havent seen anything special except for Gears. And IMO that game doestn rank anywhere near the top 10, 15 heck top 20 or 30.

That was the point of this thread. To prove that this gen is not up to par with past gens. I have to say the reason for that is because Microsoft is ahead of the pack right now. People are "satisfied" for what they're doing instead of asking for better. They rather bash Sony for coming with expensive ideas for next gen, and remain content with a lacklusting library that Microsoft has. 

Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts

what does that have to do with microsoft ? JPOBS

Microsoft has absolutely no control over the matter of lack-lusting AAA library? 

Avatar image for TREAL_Since
TREAL_Since

11946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 TREAL_Since
Member since 2005 • 11946 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Thats more the fault of the developers than the platform makers. You can't control the ammount of AAA titles you make unless you pump out a ton of first party titles. Microsoft's lead has nothing to do with the ammount of AAA titles. Just look at all the other platforms. AAA titles are in an extreme drougth right now save on PCs. Its merely developers.shungokustasu

Good point. Does that mean the lack of AAA games on the PS3 is not Sony fault?

Lol, that's a good point.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts

[QUOTE="JPOBS"]what does that have to do with microsoft ? shungokustasu

Microsoft has absolutely no control over the matter of lack-lusting AAA library? 

While DOAX Volleyball game may not be AAA material, it does not lack in the lust department.

I think you were looking for lackluster.  :P

Avatar image for deactivated-618bc23e9b1c9
deactivated-618bc23e9b1c9

7339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 deactivated-618bc23e9b1c9
Member since 2007 • 7339 Posts
You are right (tc) about gaming going on a decline. As systems advance technologically they seem to loose focus on why they were originally conceived in the first place, TO BE FUN. That's why as the systems move forward, you see less and less AAA titles and why people who play video games expect less and less from the system providers and from developers.
Avatar image for JPOBS
JPOBS

9675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 JPOBS
Member since 2007 • 9675 Posts

[QUOTE="JPOBS"]what does that have to do with microsoft ? shungokustasu

Microsoft has absolutely no control over the matter of lack-lusting AAA library?

No they dont. 

and because the 360 doesnt have 20 AAA's is 18 months gaming is on a decline?

Thats doesnt make sense. The ps3 and wii arent exactly racking em up either, and as technology gets better, it takes longer/harder to make games. Not to mention, microsoft has little control over how well 3rd parties make games.  

Avatar image for Solid-CELL
Solid-CELL

5910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Solid-CELL
Member since 2006 • 5910 Posts
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Thats more the fault of the developers than the platform makers. You can't control the ammount of AAA titles you make unless you pump out a ton of first party titles. Microsoft's lead has nothing to do with the ammount of AAA titles. Just look at all the other platforms. AAA titles are in an extreme drougth right now save on PCs. Its merely developers.shungokustasu

Good point. Does that mean the lack of AAA games on the PS3 is not Sony fault?

yeah it isnt there fault, same with the wii. Well they actually did make a AAA (zelda is the real one, lets get real. FOR SW its Warioware, but in reality its Zelda). But only fanboys are dume enough to blame the console maker for third party not making AAA games. But yeah the library isnt as dominant as it is made out to be. 360s library is really week when compared to all those PS2, GC, and DC games. the problem most people dont understand is that this "next gen" has been a total flop so far. We havent seen anything special except for Gears. And IMO that game doestn rank anywhere near the top 10, 15 heck top 20 or 30.

That was the point of this thread. To prove that this gen is not up to par with past gens. I have to say the reason for that is because Microsoft is ahead of the pack right now. People are "satisfied" for what they're doing instead of asking for better. They rather bash Sony for coming with expensive ideas for next gen, and remain content with a lacklusting library that Microsoft has.

but they are leading the pack with the largest library. And for ONCE MS is taking a solid stand on getting more genre's on their console.

You say your threads point is to prove this gen aint up to par with past gen. But then again THIS gen has only lasted for less than 2 YEARS! Give it more time. As of now your thread is pointless.

Avatar image for demoralizer
demoralizer

2023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 demoralizer
Member since 2002 • 2023 Posts
Yeah but the fact is the PS3 cost more and has less AAA games. Is it wrong to tell people to maybe wait before making a PS3 purchase? Seems like valid point not to get a PS3 right now. I wouldn't consider saying that the PS3 is not worth the price atm as a bashing comment.
Avatar image for TREAL_Since
TREAL_Since

11946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 TREAL_Since
Member since 2005 • 11946 Posts
[QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]Yeah, Microsoft has NOTHING to do with the AAA games that come out or what their genre is. That is up to the developers, so take up your tirade with them.Vandalvideo

I have to say, you can put the partial blame on Microsoft. Like most of you putting the blame on Sony for the PS3 not being worth $600 because it doesn't have game, right?

The PS3 is easily worth 600, as a multimedia device. Its not worth 600 as a gaming device at the momment though. That could all change.

That will all change this fall :D.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#30 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Thats more the fault of the developers than the platform makers. You can't control the ammount of AAA titles you make unless you pump out a ton of first party titles. Microsoft's lead has nothing to do with the ammount of AAA titles. Just look at all the other platforms. AAA titles are in an extreme drougth right now save on PCs. Its merely developers.shungokustasu

Good point. Does that mean the lack of AAA games on the PS3 is not Sony fault?

yeah it isnt there fault, same with the wii. Well they actually did make a AAA (zelda is the real one, lets get real. FOR SW its Warioware, but in reality its Zelda). But only fanboys are dume enough to blame the console maker for third party not making AAA games. But yeah the library isnt as dominant as it is made out to be. 360s library is really week when compared to all those PS2, GC, and DC games. the problem most people dont understand is that this "next gen" has been a total flop so far. We havent seen anything special except for Gears. And IMO that game doestn rank anywhere near the top 10, 15 heck top 20 or 30.

That was the point of this thread. To prove that this gen is not up to par with past gens. I have to say the reason for that is because Microsoft is ahead of the pack right now. People are "satisfied" for what they're doing instead of asking for better. They rather bash Sony for coming with expensive ideas for next gen, and remain content with a lacklusting library that Microsoft has. 

I dont think its MSs fault. Xbox library wasnt special in terms of exclusives. also 360 launched while PS2 was still strong, heck even now its still strong. Microsoft has shown improvement with the 360 IMO. At first the launch games were good and promising. then giant drough filled with 2 big games in GRAW and Oblivion. Finally gears came around and other games started going multiplat. THus the future lineup started looking a lot better. Also there were those AA gems in Dead Rising, Saints Row, and Lost Planet. I never expected much from 360 in the short run, because xboxs library was limited IMO because all of it was on PS2 also. I personally thought the gamecube was better than Xbox considering Halo and Ninja Gaiden were the only games i truly loved on xbox. 360 has shown improvements IMO. And the other 2 were gonna start of slow anyway. All 3 are gonna finish this year strong. But you are right this gen has just been shallow eye candy. Not like last gen. Last gen the games had character, soul, a great story, gameplay. Last gen was awesome.
Avatar image for waynehead895
waynehead895

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 waynehead895
Member since 2005 • 18660 Posts
So what's taking Sony so long to regain the lead so they can "save" gaming?
Avatar image for JPOBS
JPOBS

9675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 JPOBS
Member since 2007 • 9675 Posts
also, what if the 360's second 18 months is more productive than last gen's, what will you say then?
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#33 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts
I just think it means there were a lot of overrated games in that era. Tony Hawk getting a 10 proves that. And how do you figure gaming is on the decline? From the looks of things gaming has never been better. Don't get mad because Sony isn't on top.
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts
[QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Thats more the fault of the developers than the platform makers. You can't control the ammount of AAA titles you make unless you pump out a ton of first party titles. Microsoft's lead has nothing to do with the ammount of AAA titles. Just look at all the other platforms. AAA titles are in an extreme drougth right now save on PCs. Its merely developers.Solid-CELL

Good point. Does that mean the lack of AAA games on the PS3 is not Sony fault?

yeah it isnt there fault, same with the wii. Well they actually did make a AAA (zelda is the real one, lets get real. FOR SW its Warioware, but in reality its Zelda). But only fanboys are dume enough to blame the console maker for third party not making AAA games. But yeah the library isnt as dominant as it is made out to be. 360s library is really week when compared to all those PS2, GC, and DC games. the problem most people dont understand is that this "next gen" has been a total flop so far. We havent seen anything special except for Gears. And IMO that game doestn rank anywhere near the top 10, 15 heck top 20 or 30.

That was the point of this thread. To prove that this gen is not up to par with past gens. I have to say the reason for that is because Microsoft is ahead of the pack right now. People are "satisfied" for what they're doing instead of asking for better. They rather bash Sony for coming with expensive ideas for next gen, and remain content with a lacklusting library that Microsoft has.

but they are leading the pack with the largest library. And for ONCE MS is taking a solid stand on getting more genre's on their console.

You say your threads point is to prove this gen aint up to par with past gen. But then again THIS gen has only lasted for less than 2 YEARS! Give it more time. As of now your thread is pointless.

What!? 12 months PS2 was solo and churned out more AAA did than Xbox360. 12 months Dremcast was solo and churned out more AAA than Xbox360 did. You are the prime example of being satisfied with the little Xbox360 has done. I never compare the whole gen to this gen. I did the first 18 months, and as you can totally see this gen is wayyyyyy behind.

Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts

So what's taking Sony so long to regain the lead so they can "save" gaming?waynehead895

Simple, media and their image. They now have to work on image to get the respect back from the consumer. Do you believe that? 

Avatar image for JPOBS
JPOBS

9675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 JPOBS
Member since 2007 • 9675 Posts

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]So what's taking Sony so long to regain the lead so they can "save" gaming?shungokustasu

Simple, media and their image. They now have to work on image to get the respect back from the consumer. Do you believe that?

what does that have to do with AAA games?
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]So what's taking Sony so long to regain the lead so they can "save" gaming?shungokustasu

Simple, media and their image. They now have to work on image to get the respect back from the consumer. Do you believe that? 

The problem is that they have as few "AAA" games as the other consoles.  Basically, I tend to agree that none of them are really worth purchasing as gaming devices, though the 360 is close.  The Wii, being cheaper, is also an easier decision, but it really lacks the games at this point.
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts
[QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]So what's taking Sony so long to regain the lead so they can "save" gaming?JPOBS

Simple, media and their image. They now have to work on image to get the respect back from the consumer. Do you believe that?

what does that have to do with AAA games?

The question wasn't about AAA games, but why is it taking so long for Sony to save gaming. Sony will save gaming from Microsoft. You can bet your last dollar on that. 

Avatar image for waynehead895
waynehead895

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 waynehead895
Member since 2005 • 18660 Posts

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]So what's taking Sony so long to regain the lead so they can "save" gaming?shungokustasu

Simple, media and their image. They now have to work on image to get the respect back from the consumer. Do you believe that?

Nope. 

Avatar image for ZebethOrZebes
ZebethOrZebes

5997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#40 ZebethOrZebes
Member since 2004 • 5997 Posts
I'm sure I'm not the only one who's noticed that Gamespot's standards have risen sharply since 2001.
Avatar image for ZebethOrZebes
ZebethOrZebes

5997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#41 ZebethOrZebes
Member since 2004 • 5997 Posts
[QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]So what's taking Sony so long to regain the lead so they can "save" gaming?shungokustasu

Simple, media and their image. They now have to work on image to get the respect back from the consumer. Do you believe that?

what does that have to do with AAA games?

The question wasn't about AAA games, but why is it taking so long for Sony to save gaming. Sony will save gaming from Microsoft. You can bet your last dollar on that. 

So you think a move from Microsoft to Sony is a step up? Based on what?
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts

Sony will save gaming from Microsoft. You can bet your last dollar on that. shungokustasu
Sorry.  My money is on Nintendo this time around.

Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts
[QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]So what's taking Sony so long to regain the lead so they can "save" gaming?waynehead895

Simple, media and their image. They now have to work on image to get the respect back from the consumer. Do you believe that?

Nope.

Sadly, I think you already had an answer to your own question. 

Avatar image for spinecaton
spinecaton

8986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 spinecaton
Member since 2003 • 8986 Posts
[QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]So what's taking Sony so long to regain the lead so they can "save" gaming?shungokustasu

Simple, media and their image. They now have to work on image to get the respect back from the consumer. Do you believe that?

what does that have to do with AAA games?

The question wasn't about AAA games, but why is it taking so long for Sony to save gaming. Sony will save gaming from Microsoft. You can bet your last dollar on that.

I think I have a better chance if I put this dollar in a slot machine... 

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
[QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]So what's taking Sony so long to regain the lead so they can "save" gaming?shungokustasu

Simple, media and their image. They now have to work on image to get the respect back from the consumer. Do you believe that?

what does that have to do with AAA games?

The question wasn't about AAA games, but why is it taking so long for Sony to save gaming. Sony will save gaming from Microsoft. You can bet your last dollar on that.

Yep, Microsoft is the big bad wolf, out to ruin gaming for everyone, and Sony is the hunter, in it for the good of man. :roll:

If what Sony is doing right now is 'saving gaming', then I do not want to see what their idea would be of ruining it. 

Avatar image for demoralizer
demoralizer

2023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 demoralizer
Member since 2002 • 2023 Posts
It is a different gen now too. Games take longer to dev and cost more. It is slim pickins out there I agree, it makes AAA games even more valuable. Gaming isn't on a decline and there is no need for any saving.
Avatar image for JPOBS
JPOBS

9675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 JPOBS
Member since 2007 • 9675 Posts
[QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]So what's taking Sony so long to regain the lead so they can "save" gaming?shungokustasu

Simple, media and their image. They now have to work on image to get the respect back from the consumer. Do you believe that?

what does that have to do with AAA games?

The question wasn't about AAA games, but why is it taking so long for Sony to save gaming. Sony will save gaming from Microsoft. You can bet your last dollar on that.

but i thought your whole point was that gaming is dieing because 360 is leading and doesnt have as much AAA games as ps2/dreamcast etc.

Now, the ps3 isnt exactly a AAA machine so tell me again how sony will save gaming at this rate?  

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
tell me again how sony will save gaming at this rate?  JPOBS
Faith.  And nothing but.  That's my guess.
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
[QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"]

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]So what's taking Sony so long to regain the lead so they can "save" gaming?JPOBS

Simple, media and their image. They now have to work on image to get the respect back from the consumer. Do you believe that?

what does that have to do with AAA games?

The question wasn't about AAA games, but why is it taking so long for Sony to save gaming. Sony will save gaming from Microsoft. You can bet your last dollar on that.

but i thought your whole point was that gaming is dieing because 360 is leading and doesnt have as much AAA games as ps2/dreamcast etc.

Now, the ps3 isnt exactly a AAA machine so tell me again how sony will save gaming at this rate?

By showing that you CAN price your console outside of the casual price range, and STILL win. Don't you agree that this is the first step to saving gaming? 

Avatar image for Nike_Air
Nike_Air

19737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Nike_Air
Member since 2006 • 19737 Posts

Gamespot's standards have changed over the years and gotten tougher. That is just the reality. You can look at all the systems' games in the last 3 years to see the evidence.

Â