Ryse now featuring screentearing!

[QUOTE="superclocked"]You do realize that screen tearing happens when the framerate exceeds a tv's refresh rate, and is forced to show 2 images at once? That would mean that the framerate is actually higher than 60fps.. LOLcasharmy

lol, higher than 60 he says and yet...

900p (1600 x 900) upscaled to 1080p (1920 x 1080).

Confirmed now is Forza 5 at 1080p/60fps, Ryse at 900p/30fps, Killer Instinct at 720p/60fps and unconfirmed is Dead Rising supposedly having a dynamic resolution at 30fps.


Clarification of resolutions.

Originally Posted by nib95 

720p | 1280 x 720 | 921,600 pixels
900p | 1600 x 900 | 1,440,000 pixels - 56% more pixels than 720p
1080p | 1920 x 1080 | 2,073,600 pixels - 125% more pixels than 720p, 44% more pixels than 900p

 

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=679469

Clownzone has input lag. LA-Nighthawk

Where is the screen-tearing?

Where is the screen-tearing?

lundy86_4

[QUOTE="LA-Nighthawk"]Clownzone has input lag. Nengo_Flow

"A strong trace of input lag is felt when turning the analogue sticks - a quirk that hangs over from the Killzone 2 days. It's a delay in response that is impossible to ignore after playing snappier low-latency shooters, and at the default 50 per cent sensitivity for the X and Y axis proved tricky to adapt to. Migrating to the new and more shooter-friendly Dual Shock 4 controller isn't the cause here, as this is the only game we test with such problems. Rather, the issue is likely to be the result of latency being built up over the course of a long and complex rendering pipeline."

IGN said that after playing Titanfall it's impossible to go back to Killzone. 

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Where is the screen-tearing?

mitu123

Oh my God! Now I see it. Wow, that was annoying me.

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]

[QUOTE="bayboydray"]

Is it just me? or are cows the only immature idiots here that constantly start these pointless debates? and what sense does it make to judge a game that is kinda far from being released? 900p bullshit! that and screen tearing have nothing to do with the finished copy of the game... if I really had as much time on my hands as the loser ass cow who started this thread, im sure I could find some bugs about killzone on google.....

oh wait the last 2 killzone games had a bug that couldn't be cured...thats the shitty ass gamplay and shitty ass story bug...cows being as idiotic as they are think good graphics will save the killzone franchise hahaha cows wanna laugh...laugh at that sorry f4gs Lets be realistic here...like the ps3! the ps4 will only have its amazing hardware..but no games! lol kinda defeats the purpose wouldnt ya think cow?

clone01

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]How is it pointless? This is pure systemwars material :twisted:bayboydray

Who are you, Killzowned24?

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="superclocked"]You do realize that screen tearing happens when the framerate exceeds a tv's refresh rate, and is forced to show 2 images at once? That would mean that the framerate is actually higher than 60fps.. LOLsuperclocked

lol, higher than 60 he says and yet...

900p (1600 x 900) upscaled to 1080p (1920 x 1080).

Confirmed now is Forza 5 at 1080p/60fps, Ryse at 900p/30fps, Killer Instinct at 720p/60fps and unconfirmed is Dead Rising supposedly having a dynamic resolution at 30fps.


Clarification of resolutions.

Originally Posted by nib95 

720p | 1280 x 720 | 921,600 pixels
900p | 1600 x 900 | 1,440,000 pixels - 56% more pixels than 720p
1080p | 1920 x 1080 | 2,073,600 pixels - 125% more pixels than 720p, 44% more pixels than 900p

 

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=679469

Exactly, there has been no word on fps at all, here we have ample evidence that thr framerate is at, near or tinkering over 60fps and yet people still come out of the woodwork with this 900p/30fps.  I've been saying all along, they probably scaled down to 900p to hit a smooth 60fps comfortably.

Not buying the damage control. Ryse 900p and struggling to hot 30fps...with terrible gameplay. A joke of a game.

Not buying the damage control. Ryse 900p and struggling to hot 30fps...with terrible gameplay. A joke of a game.

StrongBlackVine

Not buying the damage control. Ryse 900p and struggling to hot 30fps...with terrible gameplay. A joke of a game.

StrongBlackVine

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

Not buying the damage control. Ryse 900p and struggling to hot 30fps...with terrible gameplay. A joke of a game.

percech

So far every game that even attempting to hit 60fps has publicly stated. The fact there is no news that that Ryse will run at 60fps or even aiming for 60fps(like Drive Club developers have stated) leads to the logical conclusion that it will run at 30fps and graphical downgrade was needed to achieve.

Dead Rising 3 is only running a 30fps with variable resolution! Ryse is in the same position.

[QUOTE="percech"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

Not buying the damage control. Ryse 900p and struggling to hot 30fps...with terrible gameplay. A joke of a game.

StrongBlackVine

So far every game that even attempting to hit 60fps has publicly stated. The fact there is no news that that Ryse will run at 60fps or even aiming for 60fps(like Drive Club developers have stated) leads to the logical conclusion that it will run at 30fps and graphical downgrade was needed to achieve.

Dead Rising 3 is only running a 30fps with variable resolution! Ryse is in the same position.

[QUOTE="percech"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

Not buying the damage control. Ryse 900p and struggling to hot 30fps...with terrible gameplay. A joke of a game.

StrongBlackVine

So far every game that even attempting to hit 60fps has publicly stated. The fact there is no news that that Ryse will run at 60fps or even aiming for 60fps(like Drive Club developers have stated) leads to the logical conclusion that it will run at 30fps and graphical downgrade was needed to achieve.

Dead Rising 3 is only running a 30fps with variable resolution! Ryse is in the same position.

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

[QUOTE="percech"] Prove that it is 30 fps.OhSnapitz

So far every game that even attempting to hit 60fps has publicly stated. The fact there is no news that that Ryse will run at 60fps or even aiming for 60fps(like Drive Club developers have stated) leads to the logical conclusion that it will run at 30fps and graphical downgrade was needed to achieve.

Dead Rising 3 is only running a 30fps with variable resolution! Ryse is in the same position.

Lems have no proof either. Just getting owned as usual followed by damage control.

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

[QUOTE="percech"] Prove that it is 30 fps.percech

So far every game that even attempting to hit 60fps has publicly stated. The fact there is no news that that Ryse will run at 60fps or even aiming for 60fps(like Drive Club developers have stated) leads to the logical conclusion that it will run at 30fps and graphical downgrade was needed to achieve.

Dead Rising 3 is only running a 30fps with variable resolution! Ryse is in the same position.

Truth hurts. Dead Rising 3 and Ryse running sub-1080p at 30fps.

[QUOTE="percech"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

So far every game that even attempting to hit 60fps has publicly stated. The fact there is no news that that Ryse will run at 60fps or even aiming for 60fps(like Drive Club developers have stated) leads to the logical conclusion that it will run at 30fps and graphical downgrade was needed to achieve.

Dead Rising 3 is only running a 30fps with variable resolution! Ryse is in the same position.

StrongBlackVine

Truth hurts. Dead Rising 3 and Ryse running sub-1080p at 30fps.

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

[QUOTE="percech"] Either you're talking out of your ass, or you're just plain ugly. :)OhSnapitz

Truth hurts. Dead Rising 3 and Ryse running sub-1080p at 30fps.

Dead Rising 3 is FACT. Ryse is logical deductipn

[QUOTE="superclocked"][QUOTE="casharmy"]

lol, higher than 60 he says and yet...

900p (1600 x 900) upscaled to 1080p (1920 x 1080).

Confirmed now is Forza 5 at 1080p/60fps, Ryse at 900p/30fps, Killer Instinct at 720p/60fps and unconfirmed is Dead Rising supposedly having a dynamic resolution at 30fps.


Clarification of resolutions.

Originally Posted by nib95 

720p | 1280 x 720 | 921,600 pixels
900p | 1600 x 900 | 1,440,000 pixels - 56% more pixels than 720p
1080p | 1920 x 1080 | 2,073,600 pixels - 125% more pixels than 720p, 44% more pixels than 900p

 

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=679469

Spartan070

Exactly, there has been no word on fps at all, here we have ample evidence that thr framerate is at, near or tinkering over 60fps and yet people still come out of the woodwork with this 900p/30fps.  I've been saying all along, they probably scaled down to 900p to hit a smooth 60fps comfortably.

[QUOTE="bayboydray"][QUOTE="clone01"]  So you're proud of being an idiot?clone01

Who are you, Killzowned24?

[QUOTE="Spartan070"]

[QUOTE="superclocked"]I see no confirmation of framerate in anything that you posted. Screen tearing happens when the tv is forced to show 2 images at once, as a result of high framerates. If that is a 60Hz HDTV, then the framerate in that image is rising above 60 frames per second...superclocked

Exactly, there has been no word on fps at all, here we have ample evidence that thr framerate is at, near or tinkering over 60fps and yet people still come out of the woodwork with this 900p/30fps.  I've been saying all along, they probably scaled down to 900p to hit a smooth 60fps comfortably.

[QUOTE="superclocked"][QUOTE="Spartan070"]

Exactly, there has been no word on fps at all, here we have ample evidence that thr framerate is at, near or tinkering over 60fps and yet people still come out of the woodwork with this 900p/30fps. I've been saying all along, they probably scaled down to 900p to hit a smooth 60fps comfortably.

bayboydray

Why isn't Dead Rising 3 running at 60fps then? Face lems Xflop can't even handle 1080p/30fps for most launch games.

[QUOTE="Spartan070"]

[QUOTE="superclocked"]I see no confirmation of framerate in anything that you posted. Screen tearing happens when the tv is forced to show 2 images at once, as a result of high framerates. If that is a 60Hz HDTV, then the framerate in that image is rising above 60 frames per second...superclocked

Exactly, there has been no word on fps at all, here we have ample evidence that thr framerate is at, near or tinkering over 60fps and yet people still come out of the woodwork with this 900p/30fps.  I've been saying all along, they probably scaled down to 900p to hit a smooth 60fps comfortably.

Screen tearing occurs when the source feed isn't in sync with the display, resulting in two or more frames being displayed at once. As long as it's not in sync the framerate could be 59, 61, 90, 30 or whatever and you could get screen tearing at any time.

[QUOTE="bayboydray"][QUOTE="superclocked"]Yeah, the evidence does seem to indicate that Ryse is running at 60fps or more. That's the only explanation for screen tearing on a 60Hz screen...StrongBlackVine

Why isn't Dead Rising 3 running at 60fps then? Face lems Xflop can't even handle 1080p/30fps for most launch games.

Haterz hating on ryse whats new.

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

[QUOTE="bayboydray"]Cows wont admit thatbayboydray

Why isn't Dead Rising 3 running at 60fps then? Face lems Xflop can't even handle 1080p/30fps for most launch games.

I know because the people developing the game said so. I didn't say Xflop can run games at 1080p/30fps. I said it can't for the majority of its launch exclusives...which is true.

So do they have to downgrade the resolution even further now?? This is really bad news

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="bayboydray"]

Is it just me? or are cows the only immature idiots here that constantly start these pointless debates?and what sense does it make to judge a game that is kinda far from being released? 900p bullshit! that and screen tearing have nothing to do with the finished copy of the game... if I really had as much time on my hands as the loser ass cow who started this thread, im sure I could find some bugs about killzone on google.....

oh wait the last 2 killzone games had a bug that couldn't be cured...thats the shitty ass gamplay and shitty ass story bug...cows being as idiotic as they are think good graphics will save the killzone franchise hahaha cows wanna laugh...laugh at that sorry f4gs Lets be realistic here...like the ps3! the ps4 will only have its amazing hardware..but no games! lol kinda defeats the purpose wouldnt ya think cow?

casharmy

not the only ones...just the ones who do it the most.

lol...lemmings and their hypocritical BS 

Can the PS3 be defended...

by CaseyWegner

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/topic/25958354/can-the-ps3-be-defended...?page=0

Xbox fanboys are always crying and talking about fanboys when are the biggest offenders.  I swear Lemmings are the biggest winners here, talking the most garbage when your favorite platform is on top but then pointing fingers and claiming foul when there are factual drawbacks to the platform or games that you guys praise then those same arguments you guys used are suddenly then dumb and idiotic. 

I can say for a fact that this thread isn't half as immature and idiotic as the one I have linked in this post, yeah.

wat?

Don't worry it's not out yet.

You do realize that screen tearing happens when the framerate exceeds a tv's refresh rate, and is forced to show 2 images at once? That would mean that the framerate is actually higher than 60fps.. LOLsuperclocked

Fail DC. Screen tearing also happens when you're getting lower FPS than your TV's refresh rate.

Ryse = 30FPS - TV = 60 Hz = Screen tearing.

[QUOTE="NationProtector"]Wait, were is the screen tearing at? It looks aligned to me. Also, this is Crytek making a console only game. Of course they are going to have issues. They aren't a gameplay or performance company their an eyecandy company.superclocked

Wow and you claim to be a hermit? I thoguht they're smarter than that but then again you claim your $500 PC outperorms the PS4 and X1 combinded, so it's pretty obvious that you're not very bright.

Screen tearing happens whenever your FPS is out of sync with the TV's refresh rate, that means you also get screen tearing if you're getting less FPS than your TV's refresh rate. For example, I get screen tearing in GTA V on PS3, my TV is 60Hz, so you wanna tell me that the PS3 runs GTA V above 60 FPS?

So do they have to downgrade the resolution even further now?? This is really bad news

Davekeeh

[QUOTE="Davekeeh"]

So do they have to downgrade the resolution even further now?? This is really bad news

mitu123

They can't do that without getting a steady 60 FPS.

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="Davekeeh"]

So do they have to downgrade the resolution even further now?? This is really bad news

SchnabbleTab

They can't do that without getting a steady 60 FPS.

It's brand new technology. This happens. Don't worry about it.

It's like people looking at forthcoming 16bit generation and complaining about the graphics in Flicky. Or people saying "I don't see the point of PS2. Look at Fantavision!"

The gen's not out. These early games are COD2.  

It shows an example of the beauty of PC gaming.

On consoles, you can't adjust things at all. You just have to deal with what is given to you, even when devs have low standards.

It shows an example of the beauty of PC gaming.

On consoles, you can't adjust things at all. You just have to deal with what is given to you, even when devs have low standards.

Cyberdot

You get what you pay for. PCs are more complicated. There is more potential, but they are more expensive for it. Most people just want a simple console to play good games on and aren't sat next to their screens counting individual pixels.

[QUOTE="Cyberdot"]

It shows an example of the beauty of PC gaming.

On consoles, you can't adjust things at all. You just have to deal with what is given to you, even when devs have low standards.

DocSanchez

You get what you pay for. PCs are more complicated. There is more potential, but they are more expensive for it. Most people just want a simple console to play good games on and aren't sat next to their screens counting individual pixels.

More complicated and counting individual pixels?

Haha, yeah right. That's console fanboyism right there.

You're wrong. PC is simple enough, just boost a game and adjust the settings for your hardware and off you go. If you think it's still complicated, then you must be having a hard time in life - such as driving a car, doing some DIY work in your house, etc.

[QUOTE="DocSanchez"]

[QUOTE="Cyberdot"]

It shows an example of the beauty of PC gaming.

On consoles, you can't adjust things at all. You just have to deal with what is given to you, even when devs have low standards.

Cyberdot

You get what you pay for. PCs are more complicated. There is more potential, but they are more expensive for it. Most people just want a simple console to play good games on and aren't sat next to their screens counting individual pixels.

More complicated and counting individual pixels?

Haha, yeah right. That's console fanboyism right there.

You're wrong. PC is simple enough, just boost a game and adjust the settings for your hardware and off you go. If you think it's still complicated, then you must be having a hard time in life - such as driving a car, doing some DIY work in your house, etc.

Sounds like you can't argue with someone without compartmentalising them into some sort of box first.

I game on a PC more often than not. 

Not sure what this proves. Vsync could be disabled, for all we know.

If Crytek can't pull the 'bone out of the fire, no one can.

[QUOTE="clone01"]

[QUOTE="bayboydray"] Im not a cow so how am I an idiot?bayboydray

Who are you, Killzowned24?

It shows an example of the beauty of PC gaming.

On consoles, you can't adjust things at all. You just have to deal with what is given to you, even when devs have low standards.

Cyberdot

[QUOTE="DocSanchez"]

[QUOTE="Cyberdot"]

It shows an example of the beauty of PC gaming.

On consoles, you can't adjust things at all. You just have to deal with what is given to you, even when devs have low standards.

Cyberdot

You get what you pay for. PCs are more complicated. There is more potential, but they are more expensive for it. Most people just want a simple console to play good games on and aren't sat next to their screens counting individual pixels.

More complicated and counting individual pixels?

Haha, yeah right. That's console fanboyism right there.

You're wrong. PC is simple enough, just boost a game and adjust the settings for your hardware and off you go. If you think it's still complicated, then you must be having a hard time in life - such as driving a car, doing some DIY work in your house, etc.

[QUOTE="Cyberdot"]

[QUOTE="DocSanchez"]

You get what you pay for. PCs are more complicated. There is more potential, but they are more expensive for it. Most people just want a simple console to play good games on and aren't sat next to their screens counting individual pixels.

chrisrooR

More complicated and counting individual pixels?

Haha, yeah right. That's console fanboyism right there.

You're wrong. PC is simple enough, just boost a game and adjust the settings for your hardware and off you go. If you think it's still complicated, then you must be having a hard time in life - such as driving a car, doing some DIY work in your house, etc.

Hey, Killzowned. Proud to be an idiot, are we?clone01

:lol: