Saints Row 4

As long as It's made by Volition, yes. I'v surprisingly had a lot of fun with Saints Row 3 and I'm hoping the 4th one(If It's going to be made) will be just as good as the third one.

QuebecNationale

[QUOTE="jessejay420"]The Jet Airplanes are a Blast to Fly in Saints Row ;)faizan_faizan

[QUOTE="EliteM0nk3y"][QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]

wait he said the game/tron part was wack? Yeaaaaa no.

finalfantasy94

Also a sour note ending? Guess he didint see both endings. 

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"] Further: Saints Row 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>> any GTA game in everything gameplay-relatedCherokee_Jack

Shooting - GTA 4 had average shooting and in the previous ones it was crap. Trying to compare a previous previous gen game to previous gen game i see?

Driving model - SR3 had one of the best in any non-racer. GTA's is adequate. I don't even know what you're trying to say, GTA IV had the most accurate Damage model, GTA IV had realistic car handling.

Story missions - SR3's variety is obviously unmatched, and the design of the missions was solid throughout. GTA is inconsistent. You played it, You liked it, Opinions

Side missions - GTA side missions flatly suck. Most of SR3s were fun, including Genki (I know I'm in the minority) Opinons.

Character customization - no contest. GTA V will have it most probably, Also MODS.

Weapon selection - no contest. Mods, SR is trying to be a MOD for console players, GTA is trying to be realistic, You have to GO BUY A WEAPON.

Vehicle selection - no contest. Mods

I'm really at a loss as to what GTA does better in gameplay. A lot of things, First you have to tell me what things SR does better gameplay wise.

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="jessejay420"]The Jet Airplanes are a Blast to Fly in Saints Row ;)Cherokee_Jack

You are missing the point, SR is basically a MOD for GTA with stupid Car Handling and unrealistic physics, Do hover bikes exist in real life? SR is a joke, GTA IV is trying to be realistic as well as fun, I don't think i will EVER have fun with a game like SR which tries to be funny i don't know how even.faizan_faizan

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="faizan_faizan"] GTA V.faizan_faizan

By letting me do this

And this

And this

And this :D

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"] will not have sick hover bikes.wis3boi

By letting me do this

And this

And this

And this :D

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"] will not have sick hover bikes.wis3boi

By letting me do this

And this

And this

And this :D

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"] Taking it too far.faizan_faizan

Shooting - GTA 4 had average shooting <------------- Trying to compare a previous previous gen game to previous gen game i see? 

Driving model - SR3 had one of the best in any non-racer. GTA's is adequate. I don't even know what you're trying to say, GTA IV had the most accurate Damage model, GTA IV had realistic car handling. Realistic handling is the opposite of fun, unless you're a car nut or something. In which case go play GTR which is actually realistic, not just comparatively. 

Story missions - SR3's variety is obviously unmatched, and the design of the missions was solid throughout. GTA is inconsistent. You played it, You liked it, Opinions like everything else we're discussing.

Side missions - GTA side missions flatly suck. Most of SR3s were fun, including Genki (I know I'm in the minority) Opinons. ibid

Character customization - no contest. GTA V will have it most probably (we already know it won't be on the level of SR3, your characters are set), Also MODS. If it needs mods to measure up, then obviously it's inferior. The game itself can't be praised for its mods, especially since it has no official mod tools.

Weapon selection - no contest. Mods, SR is trying to be a MOD for console players, ibid GTA is trying to be realistic in like 1 aspect out of 100, You have to GO BUY A WEAPON. Oh joy, it's inconvenient to use good weapons when you want to.

Vehicle selection - no contest. Mods ibid

I'm really at a loss as to what GTA does better in gameplay. A lot of things, First you have to tell me what things SR does better gameplay wise. Shooting, driving, missions.

Maybe. I heard that Volition had a bunch of layoffs, so I worry about it. Oh, by the way, check this: Saints Row 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saints Row 2 Further: Saints Row 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>> any GTA game in everything gameplay-relatedCherokee_Jack

QFT!!!!

GTA pales in comparision to SR, especially SR3. The sheer amount of fun to be had in SR3 is unbelievable. GTA takes itself too serious. its too boring. 

Hell yeah. SR3 is a blast in co-op

wis3boi

Yes. If Volition makes it. SR3 was one of my favorite games of the year.

Cherokee_Jack

Maybe. I heard that Volition had a bunch of layoffs, so I worry about it. Cherokee_Jack

Not what I heard. Koch was supposed to keep everyone on payroll.

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]faizan_faizan

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]Maybe. I heard that Volition had a bunch of layoffs, so I worry about it. ChubbyGuy40

Not what I heard. Koch was supposed to keep everyone on payroll.

Yes, since Volition is still making it.

Thefatness16

I liked SR3 but the main problem I have with the series is that the world itself isn't really all that interesting. The reason I love the GTA series so much is because Rockstar seems to know how to create a sandbox with a convincing sense of PLACE. All of the cities in the GTA games starting with Liberty City in GTA3 all feel like real places (well as real as video game cities can get). Saints Row seems to be missing something. I love all of the crazy stuff you can do but the place that you do it in is incredibly dull. 

Saints Row the Third was a big disappointment for me, I thought 2 was superior in almost every way. I would be hesitant for 4. monkeytoes61

Saints Row 2 was better in almost every way. World design was bigger and better, stories were better, missions and activities weren't as repetitive or boring, and there was more customization. I also liked how SR2 was an even mix of surrealism and grounded reality, it was a nice balance. SR3 got boring quick since it was nothing but crazy action 100% of the time. It was like watching a Michael Bay movie, it starts to wear on you after awhile.

Only thing SR3 did better than SR2 is optimization. SR2 runs bad on every platform, especially PC.

:lol: No, Saints Row is what GTA used to be. GTA 4 was a good game but it was a really really bad GTA game. Fart in a Jar>>>>>>mems_1224

"Oh, GTA4 isn't the game I wanted it to be, therefore it wasn't very good. I can always embrace the different direction it took, but I think I'd rather play a game that basically aspires to be a San Andreas clone"

Why would Rockstar bother competing with a series that's heavily influenced from their own? GTA4 was a breath of fresh air, a change of pace. It's painfully obvious that it wasn't trying to retread in the same territory, and the fact that people still don't see this is genuinely puzzling.

If you're going to criticize the game, do so for the right reasons.

Hell no, SR3 was so boring.

Why the hell would I do that? GTA V already has me covered and then more. SRTT was trying to be fun as "Meet the Spartans" was trying to be funny; it just ended up being so, soooo stupid. I seriously doubt I would even take a look at the series again. "OMG111. dis game lets me be naked n i can wack lifeless peds with giant purple ****s. so much pwnnage!!"   :roll: