Samsung should do their own console

  • 70 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for HFkami
HFkami

855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 HFkami
Member since 2009 • 855 Posts

seriously they have money enough to buy all 3 together go look for revenue. Samsung sponsors wcg and is a electronic power. They could establish a korean market for gaming, it would be cool because koreans are awesome, agree?

Avatar image for Joseph-425
Joseph-425

562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 Joseph-425
Member since 2010 • 562 Posts

They Should....But what would they call it :question:

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

No, my samsung TV broke, my Samsung phone broke, my Samsung Netbook's wireless driver died. Samsung make poor quailty stuff.

Avatar image for Zophar87
Zophar87

4344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 Zophar87
Member since 2008 • 4344 Posts

I smell another CDi.

Avatar image for JasonDarksavior
JasonDarksavior

9323

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#5 JasonDarksavior
Member since 2008 • 9323 Posts
Doubt anyone will buy it, with all the new and upcoming games coming for the current consoles.
Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
Samsung makes some of the best electronics around. I would love to see a Samsung console, but first they'd need developer support. Samsung obviously has no internal game studios. They'd have to buy out current developers and publishers to help with branding and exclusives. If Samsung made a console and all it got was the same third party titles Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft shared but no exclusives, nobody would buy it. I think it'd be cool to see Samsung buy out a bunch of small to moderately-large developers and publishers. Like Namco, SEGA, Atari, SNK-Playmore, Treasure, Crave, Platinum Games, Kuju, and maybe a few others. The losses of all of those brands and franchises would hurt the competition immediately. Samsung could easily afford to buy out all of those studios and set them to work for their platform. It'd be the only place you could play Sonic, Virtua Fighter, Tekken, Pac-Man, Shinobi, Phantasy Star, The King of Fighters, etc.
Avatar image for Everiez
Everiez

1946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Everiez
Member since 2006 • 1946 Posts

No thanks. I know it's optional but the last thing I need is another new console temptation.

Avatar image for dovberg
dovberg

3348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#8 dovberg
Member since 2009 • 3348 Posts

there have been many people who make consoles and most of them do a bad job at it....Really all I can say.

Avatar image for wiifan001
wiifan001

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#9 wiifan001
Member since 2007 • 18660 Posts
Samsung has the best TV's. But I wouldn't buy a console from them.
Avatar image for Blade8Aus
Blade8Aus

1819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Blade8Aus
Member since 2006 • 1819 Posts

Again, you need to be able to develop high quality first-party titles or no-one would care.

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#11 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

Developer Support?

Avatar image for fastr
fastr

2100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 fastr
Member since 2010 • 2100 Posts
Ya know, I was gonna say I hate samsung, their quality and reliability sucks.. then I realized that the 360's reliability use to be dismal, and it was still the best console around. So i'll just stick with the, no first party devs theory :)
Avatar image for LovePotionNo9
LovePotionNo9

4751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 LovePotionNo9
Member since 2010 • 4751 Posts

Unless they bring something new to the table I don't see why they would be good for us. Otherwise they're just taking all the talent we have in the industry now shared among the consoles and PC and diluting to yet another console. Yet another platform for multiplats. Hardly exciting to be sure, even if they're superior on that platform. Wouldn't matter because it's the same thing, same exact thing. Very boring. No, they would need to have excellent "first party" titles like Nintendo to stand a chance. Don't need another multiplat box.

Avatar image for Einhanderkiller
Einhanderkiller

13259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 Einhanderkiller
Member since 2003 • 13259 Posts
It would make more sense for EA to partner with Samsung and make a console than for Samsung to go in all by themselves.
Avatar image for SoraX64
SoraX64

29221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#15 SoraX64
Member since 2008 • 29221 Posts
I personally think that it would be incredibly hard for a new company to get into the console business, since Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft have already established themselves as the best of the best. I could see a company like Samsung succeeding in the console business in the future, but it would take a few generations to establish themselves as a valid company for consoles.
Avatar image for Randoggy
Randoggy

3497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Randoggy
Member since 2003 • 3497 Posts

I smell another CDi.

Zophar87
That's the Philips.
Avatar image for NVIDIATI
NVIDIATI

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 NVIDIATI
Member since 2010 • 8463 Posts

Samsung has the best TV's. But I wouldn't buy a console from them.wiifan001
Not even close...

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

seriously they have money enough to buy all 3 together go look for revenue. Samsung sponsors wcg and is a electronic power. They could establish a korean market for gaming, it would be cool because koreans are awesome, agree?

HFkami

I'm not a big Samsung fan, they are decent at HDTV's though, but I don't see the point...then again, why not just make a thread on every electronic manufacturer getting into consoles (Toshiba, Panasonic yet again,Mitsubishi, Hitachi, Philips again,Sharp, etc)?

Did we forget how the 3DO and CDi did?

To me, they would have to have a good 1st party. Sony made SNES/PC games prior to PSONE, Nintendo made Arcade games prior to the NES, Sega made arcade games for the Master System...I would much rather see a software company like Konami or Capcom than I would just some company coming in for the heck of it. They need to have a vision as well, not just enter it just because they can, for the heck of it.

I wouldn't want Konami or Capcom to break off from being a 3rd Party as they are now either to be honest, but I don't want to see companies enter just because with no sense of direction...so, no, I don't agree with the topic.

Avatar image for dovberg
dovberg

3348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#19 dovberg
Member since 2009 • 3348 Posts

if capcom made a console I'd probably abandon everything else.

Avatar image for Jynxzor
Jynxzor

9313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 Jynxzor
Member since 2003 • 9313 Posts
Personally 3 is the best balance of companies to allow for competition but not spread the tallent far too thin within the industry, if Samsung was going to do so "I can't see why they would risk it as the market for hardware developers seems to rely alot on initially bleeding money for the first few years until you can establish yourself" it would have to be when one of the big 3 was being crippled in the market...no I don't mean "Bawww Sony is in third kill them" I mean in dire straights Sega could hardly hold itself together when the dreamcast collapsed ontop of them, and that was also just one of many, many blunders for the company in years past. Otherwise I can't see anyone running over to support them when they don't bring anything new to the market that the other 3 can't provide. Bottomless wallets? Microsoft Strong inhouse developers? Sony Innovation? Nintendo
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

no please...they just need to continue to make their awesome tvs and surround sound systems.

Avatar image for erglesmergle
erglesmergle

1769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 erglesmergle
Member since 2009 • 1769 Posts

if capcom made a console I'd probably abandon everything else.

dovberg

But then theyd charge you $4.99 to have access to the DVD tray.

Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts

if capcom made a console I'd probably abandon everything else.

dovberg
Maybe if they still had Platfinum/Clover and everyone who worked there. As it stands, Keiji Inafune is Capcom's only true iconic producer.
Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

seriously they have money enough to buy all 3 together go look for revenue. Samsung sponsors wcg and is a electronic power. They could establish a korean market for gaming, it would be cool because koreans are awesome, agree?

HFkami

Buy all 3 :lol:

Sony is a much larger(and better) electronic company (with large media sections)

Microsoft = $$$$

and Nintendo is an extremely large gaming company.

Avatar image for CleanPlayer
CleanPlayer

9822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#25 CleanPlayer
Member since 2008 • 9822 Posts
They could take Sony's place in the handheld market
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

seriously they have money enough to buy all 3 together go look for revenue. Samsung sponsors wcg and is a electronic power. They could establish a korean market for gaming, it would be cool because koreans are awesome, agree?

HFkami

Samsung 3DO says Hi. They have already attempted to enter the game console market and failed.

The PC already covers the clone gaming system business model.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#27 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

They Should....But what would they call it :question:

Joseph-425
Samstation?
Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#28 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
....they're in partnership with MS for the windows phone 7, they help fund Rare. so not really focous on LED samsung.
Avatar image for edinsftw
edinsftw

4243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 edinsftw
Member since 2009 • 4243 Posts

No, my samsung TV broke, my Samsung phone broke, my Samsung Netbook's wireless driver died. Samsung make poor quailty stuff.

clyde46

Yea...because xbox360 is such high quality....

Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

Samsung will fail faster than Panasonic and Phillips.

Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#31 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts
It would be interesting, would give us something to talk about at least. I'm confident they could make a good system, if they timed it right, like for e.g. right now, they could make a system that's more powerful than the competition yet costs the same. I don't see software being an issue in the era of multiplat, and there's plenty of small independent studios to build a decent 1st party out of. But it would be a significant investment I don't see them doing.
Avatar image for Khoo1992
Khoo1992

2472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 68

User Lists: 0

#32 Khoo1992
Member since 2005 • 2472 Posts

No, because 3 consoles on the market is perfect

Avatar image for dovberg
dovberg

3348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#33 dovberg
Member since 2009 • 3348 Posts

until there is a another console phantasy star online game without extra fees I'm mostly play Capcom fighting games so for me it makes sense.

Avatar image for Einhanderkiller
Einhanderkiller

13259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 Einhanderkiller
Member since 2003 • 13259 Posts

[QUOTE="HFkami"]

seriously they have money enough to buy all 3 together go look for revenue. Samsung sponsors wcg and is a electronic power. They could establish a korean market for gaming, it would be cool because koreans are awesome, agree?

dercoo

Buy all 3 :lol:

Sony is a much larger(and better) electronic company (with large media sections)

Microsoft = $$$$

and Nintendo is an extremely large gaming company.

Samsung is much bigger than Sony and Nintendo. Just their electronics division is made up of 165,000 employees; Sony as a whole is around the same amount. Revenue is higher, too: Samsung's electronics division revenue is like $40 billion more than Sony. Nintendo does make a lot of money, but it's much less than Samsung and Sony. They're also a relatively small company with just around 4000 employees. Samsung is not wealthier than Microsoft, though.
Avatar image for catfishmoon23
catfishmoon23

5197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 catfishmoon23
Member since 2005 • 5197 Posts

Samsung makes great quality products (I using a samsung laptop right now and it's build quality is great, plus their TVs are great as well).

Still, their customer service isn't that great. Try going on their website and you'll see what I mean. Getting the free Windows 7 upgrade from them was just a disaster lol.

Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

Sony is a much larger(and better) electronic company (with large media sections)

dercoo

Samsung is much, much larger than Sony.

Avatar image for SapSacPrime
SapSacPrime

8925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 SapSacPrime
Member since 2004 • 8925 Posts

I would buy it if it was supported well, maybe a few korean mmo's would be nice too 8). Sammy make great quality kit at brilliant prices and they also supply parts like lcd screens to a lot of other companies (Bravia's use sammy LCD's).

Avatar image for svenus97
svenus97

2318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 svenus97
Member since 2009 • 2318 Posts

[QUOTE="HFkami"]

seriously they have money enough to buy all 3 together go look for revenue. Samsung sponsors wcg and is a electronic power. They could establish a korean market for gaming, it would be cool because koreans are awesome, agree?

dercoo

Buy all 3 :lol:

Sony is a much larger(and better) electronic company (with large media sections)

Microsoft = $$$$

and Nintendo is an extremely large gaming company.

Let's check that revenue part: Sony (79.61) + Nintendo (15.55) + Microsoft (62.48) = 157.64. Samsung has a 173.4 billion revenue
Avatar image for soapandbubbles
soapandbubbles

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 soapandbubbles
Member since 2010 • 3412 Posts

No, my samsung TV broke, my Samsung phone broke, my Samsung Netbook's wireless driver died. Samsung make poor quailty stuff.

clyde46
Yet, Sony and MS get away with it..so whats the problem? I've had no issues with samsung products...hmmm
Avatar image for stereointegrity
stereointegrity

12151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 stereointegrity
Member since 2007 • 12151 Posts
they have the worst software support....there update to froyo was a snails pace..
Avatar image for mattacular
mattacular

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 mattacular
Member since 2007 • 363 Posts

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

[QUOTE="HFkami"]

seriously they have money enough to buy all 3 together go look for revenue. Samsung sponsors wcg and is a electronic power. They could establish a korean market for gaming, it would be cool because koreans are awesome, agree?

svenus97

Buy all 3 :lol:

Sony is a much larger(and better) electronic company (with large media sections)

Microsoft = $$$$

and Nintendo is an extremely large gaming company.

Let's check that revenue part: Sony (79.61) + Nintendo (15.55) + Microsoft (62.48) = 157.64. Samsung has a 173.4 billion revenue

Why do people always point to revenue as an indicator of a companies wealth. When taken out of context it is a meaningless statistic, I could set up a company and have revenues of £1000000 by selling expensive items, but if my expenditure eclipses that it would mean I was making a loss and my company would be irrelevant.

Avatar image for HFkami
HFkami

855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 HFkami
Member since 2009 • 855 Posts

[QUOTE="HFkami"]

seriously they have money enough to buy all 3 together go look for revenue. Samsung sponsors wcg and is a electronic power. They could establish a korean market for gaming, it would be cool because koreans are awesome, agree?

ronvalencia

Samsung 3DO says Hi. They have already attempted to enter the game console market and failed.

The PC already covers the clone gaming system business model.

thats the 3DO, 3DO sold the concept samsung was just one of the manufacture like goldstar or panasonic they did the same for the saturn in korea. Of course it failed having the samsung name on the console didnt make the console or library better.

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
what's in it for them? they already make heaps of the current consoles though components such as memory.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

[QUOTE="HFkami"]

seriously they have money enough to buy all 3 together go look for revenue. Samsung sponsors wcg and is a electronic power. They could establish a korean market for gaming, it would be cool because koreans are awesome, agree?

svenus97

Buy all 3 :lol:

Sony is a much larger(and better) electronic company (with large media sections)

Microsoft = $$$$

and Nintendo is an extremely large gaming company.

Let's check that revenue part: Sony (79.61) + Nintendo (15.55) + Microsoft (62.48) = 157.64. Samsung has a 173.4 billion revenue

Interesting. Now have your compared their market caps?

Nintendo:~$85B

Sony: ~$30B

Samsung: 92.8T Won (~$70B)

Microsoft: >$200B

Kinda paints a different picture, doesn't it? In any event, I don't think this matters much, either. Samsung may have capital, but it needs a foot in the door. Even Microsoft needed to start somewhere (in this case, Microsoft Game Studios, which dates back to the 90's). Unless they attempt to disrupt the market by making an open console spec, I don't see how Samsung would fit in.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
what's in it for them? they already make heaps of the current consoles though components such as memory. imprezawrx500
Don't know about that. They certainly don't make either the CPUs (All POWER-based) nor the GPUs (those come from nVidia and AMD). Except for Sony and its XDRAM (a Rambus design), memory's a pretty open market. In addition to Samsung, you have Hynix, Micron, and Elpida, among others. And the other chips usually fall to a menagerie of specialists.
Avatar image for Mythomniac
Mythomniac

1695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Mythomniac
Member since 2009 • 1695 Posts
They would to to buy out plenty of first party developers, starting with ones that no longer exist like Pandemic and Ensemble. (What I mean is, they hire the people who used to work there)
Avatar image for brown_flame
brown_flame

598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 brown_flame
Member since 2005 • 598 Posts

seriously they have money enough to buy all 3 together go look for revenue. Samsung sponsors wcg and is a electronic power. They could establish a korean market for gaming, it would be cool because koreans are awesome, agree?

HFkami
well, interesting statement, although i wonder what is stopping all the other electronic giants such as: toshiba, panasonic (yes i kno the failed with 3do in the past), Sharp, Philips, Sega (yes they could make a comeback , maybe ?), and and ofcourse LOL Apple.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
Samsung obviously has no internal game studios. savebattery
I wouldn't be so sure about that. Samsung is a real giant in Korea, they have segments of pretty much every market, it would be unlike them to miss out video games. They're much more than just the electronics company we see in the west, they're also the world's largest construction company, the second largest ship manufacturer, a major financial power in asia and they've owned various small businesses including a line of department stores, hotel chain and theme park. All these Asian conglomerates make much more than the west ever sees. Like Kawasaki which is famous for their bikes makes most of the trains in Japan and LG who is famous for electronics is a major supplier of hepatitis vaccines.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
[QUOTE="imprezawrx500"]what's in it for them? they already make heaps of the current consoles though components such as memory. HuusAsking
Don't know about that. They certainly don't make either the CPUs (All POWER-based) nor the GPUs (those come from nVidia and AMD). Except for Sony and its XDRAM (a Rambus design), memory's a pretty open market. In addition to Samsung, you have Hynix, Micron, and Elpida, among others. And the other chips usually fall to a menagerie of specialists.

Incorrect. IBM, Nvidia and AMD design the chips, they don't actually make most of them. A lot of the actual production will be done by TSMC, Samsung owns their own manufacturing facilities too and AMD has recently been developing their own under the name Global Foundries.
Avatar image for -The-G-Man-
-The-G-Man-

6414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 -The-G-Man-
Member since 2007 • 6414 Posts
consoles are a cash vacuum. look at the Xbox...it lost money, and the 360 still lost money until just a few years ago