Sheep, stop scapegoating Ubisoft

I've been seeing some harsh hate against Ubisoft by sheep lately.

In that case, you might as well hate the whole industry for your lack of third party support. But for some reason you sheep seem to be scapegoating Ubisoft?

Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway

Far Cry 2

EndWar

H.A.W.X

Prince of Persia

Beyond Good & Evil 2

Splinter Cell: Conviction

Just a few examples upcoming games for 2008.

More succesfull franchises such as Ghost Recon, RainbowSix and Myst.

What exactly are you trying to achieve by scapegoating Ubisoft?

Ubi has been doing teribble lately everywhere, they deserve some hate.

They stole a pirated software to fix a rainbow six vegas 2 problem on pc , breaking their own rules.

i thought they where only talking about the half assed games they are making on the on wii..kingjazziephiz

[QUOTE="kingjazziephiz"]i thought they where only talking about the half assed games they are making on the on wii..Bigboi500

3rd party?

On the wii?

:lol:

Red Steel is a 1 million seller. A low budget trash game sold well enough for them to develop a sequel. Ubisoft is not to be blame for your own failures.

[QUOTE="Bigboi500"][QUOTE="kingjazziephiz"]i thought they where only talking about the half assed games they are making on the on wii..SSCyborg

3rd party?

On the wii?

:lol:

omg TOS...

How many of those are on the Wii?air_wolf_cubed

What? You don't have a gaming PC... or a 360 or PS3?

Thats not an argument to hate Ubisoft. Most of those games cannot be developed on the Wii. Or do you expect ''special treatment'' just because Nintendo chose to go with a low tech console? Blame nintendo.

[QUOTE="kingjazziephiz"]i thought they where only talking about the half assed games they are making on the on wii..Bigboi500

Defending the Wii's third party support is like trying to defend a murderer when the prosecution has his DNA, multiple eyewitnesses, video, the suspect's diary and a jury comprised of his victims' relatives.

[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"]How many of those are on the Wii?PullTheTricker

What? You don't have a gaming PC... or a 360 or PS3?

Thats not an argument to hate Ubisoft. Most of those games cannot be developed on the Wii. Or do you expect ''special treatment'' just because Nintendo chose to go with a low tech console? Blame nintendo.

and it's not our falt that they are making half assed games... on the wii

Red Steel is a 1 million seller. A low budget trash game sold well enough for them to develop a sequel. Ubisoft is not to be blame for your own failures.

PullTheTricker

[QUOTE="Bigboi500"][QUOTE="kingjazziephiz"]i thought they where only talking about the half assed games they are making on the on wii..PullTheTricker

Defending the Wii's third party support is like trying to defend a murderer when the prosecution has his DNA, multiple eyewitnesses, video, the suspect's diary and a jury comprised of his victims' relatives.

Win.

How many of those are on the Wii?air_wolf_cubed

dont dis them just because you cant play them.

[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"]How many of those are on the Wii?PullTheTricker

What? You don't have a gaming PC... or a 360 or PS3?

Thats not an argument to hate Ubisoft. Most of those games cannot be developed on the Wii. Or do you expect ''special treatment'' just because Nintendo chose to go with a low tech console? Blame nintendo.

[QUOTE="Bigboi500"][QUOTE="kingjazziephiz"]i thought they where only talking about the half assed games they are making on the on wii..PullTheTricker

Defending the Wii's third party support is like trying to defend a murderer when the prosecution has his DNA, multiple eyewitnesses, video, the suspect's diary and a jury comprised of his victims' relatives.

[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"]How many of those are on the Wii?insanejedi

dont dis them just because you cant play them.

[QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"]How many of those are on the Wii?air_wolf_cubed

What? You don't have a gaming PC... or a 360 or PS3?

Thats not an argument to hate Ubisoft. Most of those games cannot be developed on the Wii. Or do you expect ''special treatment'' just because Nintendo chose to go with a low tech console? Blame nintendo.

Oh excuse me, I wasn't aware such fundamentalist/extremistic Nintendo gamers actually existed. Oh wait, there is a term for that... a fanboy.

Isn't sheep a term used in SW to identify the gamers among us?

ubisoft have some cool games and franchises...

the wii is their toilet

[QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

Red Steel is a 1 million seller. A low budget trash game sold well enough for them to develop a sequel. Ubisoft is not to be blame for your own failures.

gamecubepad

Actually, I rented Red Steel and was able to see how much it sucked so I wasn't victimized. I see if 1 million out of 30 million people buy a game then it's justification that the game should suck in the first place. Nice logic. BTW Splinter Cell was on the GC and received a 8.4 score. Double Agent was released across multiple platforms and scored similarly, but on the Wii it gets a 6.2 because Ubi puts out half-assed games for the Wii.

lol well at least someone agrees that they are putting half assed games out..

[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"][QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"]How many of those are on the Wii?PullTheTricker

What? You don't have a gaming PC... or a 360 or PS3?

Thats not an argument to hate Ubisoft. Most of those games cannot be developed on the Wii. Or do you expect ''special treatment'' just because Nintendo chose to go with a low tech console? Blame nintendo.

Oh excuse me, I wasn't aware such fundamentalist/extremistic Nintendo gamers actually existed. Oh wait, there is a term for that... a fanboy.

Isn't sheep a term used in SW to identify the gamers among us?

[QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

Red Steel is a 1 million seller. A low budget trash game sold well enough for them to develop a sequel. Ubisoft is not to be blame for your own failures.

gamecubepad

Actually, I rented Red Steel and was able to see how much it sucked so I wasn't victimized. I see if 1 million out of 30 million people buy a game then it's justification that the game should suck in the first place. Nice logic. BTW Splinter Cell was on the GC and received a 8.4 score. Double Agent was released across multiple platforms and scored similarly, but on the Wii it gets a 6.2 because Ubi puts out half-assed games for the Wii.

So you do expect special treatment? Nintendo is to be blame for their decision to go with outdated hardware. The Wii has a much different architecture compared to the higher tech systems. Why scapegoat Ubisoft for it? What exactly are you trying to achieve?

So you do expect special treatment? Nintendo is to be blame for their decision to go with outdated hardware. The Wii has a much different architecture compared to the higher tech systems. Why scapegoat Ubisoft for it? What exactly are you trying to achieve?

PullTheTricker

if it's outdated, shouldn't it logically be easier to make things for?

I have no sympathy for Wii gamers. No one made you buy a Wii so don't get angry about what games come out for it.Jade_Monkey

[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"]How many of those are on the Wii?PullTheTricker

What? You don't have a gaming PC... or a 360 or PS3?

Thats not an argument to hate Ubisoft. Most of those games cannot be developed on the Wii. Or do you expect ''special treatment'' just because Nintendo chose to go with a low tech console? Blame nintendo.

by sheep you mean people only owning a wii and maybe combines it with the word fanboy too.

those people DONT want or have a gaming pc ,360 or ps3 , so if you ask why they think ubisoft is crap or whatever they only thinking about all the games they produced on the wii.

my question now is. do YOU think that ubisoft games on the wii are good ?

[QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

So you do expect special treatment? Nintendo is to be blame for their decision to go with outdated hardware. The Wii has a much different architecture compared to the higher tech systems. Why scapegoat Ubisoft for it? What exactly are you trying to achieve?

Hewkii

if it's outdated, shouldn't it logically be easier to make things for?

I guess you sheep are also pissed off about Crytek not porting Crysis to the Wii?

Downgrading is not a very practical solution when the architecture is so different. A complete overhaul of the design has to be done. You expect ''special treatment'' just because Nintendo chose to go with a low tech console. Once again, Ubisoft is not be blamed for this.

[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

So you do expect special treatment? Nintendo is to be blame for their decision to go with outdated hardware. The Wii has a much different architecture compared to the higher tech systems. Why scapegoat Ubisoft for it? What exactly are you trying to achieve?

PullTheTricker

if it's outdated, shouldn't it logically be easier to make things for?

I guess you sheep are also pissed off about Crytek not porting Crysis to the Wii?

Downgrading is not a very practical solution when the architecture is so different. A complete overhaul of the design has to be done. You expect ''special treatment'' just because Nintendo chose to go with a low tech console. Once again, Ubisoft is not be blamed for this.

I have a Wii and enjoy a few games but I don't expect I'll be having a huge library of games for it anytime soon if ever. :?

I guess you sheep are also pissed off about Crytek not porting Crysis to the Wii?

Downgrading is not a very practical solution when the architecture is so different. A complete overhaul of the design has to be done. You expect ''special treatment'' just because Nintendo chose to go with a low tech console. Once again, Ubisoft is not be blamed for this.

PullTheTricker

they might be blamed for not putting any effort into exclusives, though.

Red Steel is a 1 million seller. A low budget trash game sold well enough for them to develop a sequel. Ubisoft is not to be blame for your own failures.

PullTheTricker

[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

So you do expect special treatment? Nintendo is to be blame for their decision to go with outdated hardware. The Wii has a much different architecture compared to the higher tech systems. Why scapegoat Ubisoft for it? What exactly are you trying to achieve?

PullTheTricker

if it's outdated, shouldn't it logically be easier to make things for?

I guess you sheep are also pissed off about Crytek not porting Crysis to the Wii?

Downgrading is not a very practical solution when the architecture is so different. A complete overhaul of the design has to be done. You expect ''special treatment'' just because Nintendo chose to go with a low tech console. Once again, Ubisoft is not be blamed for this.

[QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

Red Steel is a 1 million seller. A low budget trash game sold well enough for them to develop a sequel. Ubisoft is not to be blame for your own failures.

gamer620

A High Budget trash game? That makes matter even worse. Doesn't that that mean that alot of effort was put into the game during the development process?

[QUOTE="gamer620"][QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

Red Steel is a 1 million seller. A low budget trash game sold well enough for them to develop a sequel. Ubisoft is not to be blame for your own failures.

PullTheTricker

A High Budget trash game? That makes matter even worse. Doesn't that that mean that alot of effort was put into the game during the development process?

yeah and still it was bad...

The thing I find most hilarious is that Nintendo are actively promoting Ubisoft shovelware (see E3). Ubisoft have said that Nintndo treats them like a first party studio

Nintendo WANTS crap on their system and they have no interet in standards. they are not investing in amazing new IPs like Sony/Microsoft. They are not promoting or helping developers (such as Sega or Namco) that are doing a good job on their system like Sony and Microsoft

Nintendo hates sheep and they love Ubisoft and Shovelware. That's the irony

Ubisoft is doing the exact same thing as Nintendo. They cater to both the casual and hardcore market but the difference is Ubisoft sees the Wii owners as the casual market and PS3, 360 and PC owners as the hardcore market.

It makes perfect sense from a business perspevtive. Why did every sheep defend Nintendo at E3 and claimed that Nintendo has the right show whatever they want because it made sense from a business perspective but Ubisoft has not the right to do so?
JLF1

lolz man most people on the wii forums where bashing e3 but w/e

The thing I fuind most hilarious is that Nintendo are actively promoting Ubisoft shovelware (see E3). Ubisoft have said that Nintndo treats them like a first party studio

Nintendo WANTS crap on their system and they have no interet in standards. they are not investing in amazing new IPs like Sony/Microsoft. They are not promoting or helping developers like Sega or Namco that are doing a good job on their system (unlike Sony and Microsoft)

Nintendo hates sheep and they love Ubisoft. That's the irony

vicmackey39

After the E3 incident... I think its very obvious that Nintendo is taking mainstream gaming to a new low. Even the most fundamentalist/Extremists sheep have admited this.

Sheep just have to accept this, and move on.

Ubisoft is doing the exact same thing as Nintendo. They cater to both the casual and hardcore market but the difference is Ubisoft sees the Wii owners as the casual market and PS3, 360 and PC owners as the hardcore market.

It makes perfect sense from a business perspevtive. Why did every sheep defend Nintendo at E3 and claimed that Nintendo has the right show whatever they want because it made sense from a business perspective but Ubisoft has not the right to do so?
JLF1

Thanks, that saves me from having to type it down. Agreed.

Ubisoft is doing the exact same thing as Nintendo. They cater to both the casual and hardcore market but the difference is Ubisoft sees the Wii owners as the casual market and PS3, 360 and PC owners as the hardcore market.

It makes perfect sense from a business perspevtive. Why did every sheep defend Nintendo at E3 and claimed that Nintendo has the right show whatever they want because it made sense from a business perspective but Ubisoft has not the right to do so?
JLF1

[QUOTE="JLF1"]Ubisoft is doing the exact same thing as Nintendo. They cater to both the casual and hardcore market but the difference is Ubisoft sees the Wii owners as the casual market and PS3, 360 and PC owners as the hardcore market.

It makes perfect sense from a business perspevtive. Why did every sheep defend Nintendo at E3 and claimed that Nintendo has the right show whatever they want because it made sense from a business perspective but Ubisoft has not the right to do so?
kingjazziephiz

lolz man most people on the wii forums where bashing e3 but w/e

Yes those people are the real Nintendo fans. Dedicated gamers, since their childhood. People like Blackbond and Subrosian for example.

A High Budget trash game? That makes matter even worse. Doesn't that that mean that alot of effort was put into the game during the development process?

PullTheTricker

which shows the quality of Ubisoft's development team, I suppose.