Sheep, stop scapegoating Ubisoft

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts
[QUOTE="JLF1"]Ubisoft is doing the exact same thing as Nintendo. They cater to both the casual and hardcore market but the difference is Ubisoft sees the Wii owners as the casual market and PS3, 360 and PC owners as the hardcore market.


It makes perfect sense from a business perspevtive. Why did every sheep defend Nintendo at E3 and claimed that Nintendo has the right show whatever they want because it made sense from a business perspective but Ubisoft has not the right to do so?
KungfuKitten

There's a difference between casual and crap.


Rayman Raving Rabbits scored 8.0 here on GS. That is not crap.

Red Steel scored 5.5 here on GS but Wii play scored 5.4 and Pokemon: Battle revolution 5.5, both from Nintendo.

Believe it or not but both Nintendo and Ubisoft has put out crap on the Wii.
Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts
[QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

A High Budget trash game? That makes matter even worse. Doesn't that that mean that alot of effort was put into the game during the development process?

Hewkii

which shows the quality of Ubisoft's development team, I suppose.

Did Wii sports and Wii play show the quality of Nintendo's development team?

Avatar image for Samurai_Xavier
Samurai_Xavier

4364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Samurai_Xavier
Member since 2003 • 4364 Posts
[QUOTE="JLF1"]Ubisoft is doing the exact same thing as Nintendo. They cater to both the casual and hardcore market but the difference is Ubisoft sees the Wii owners as the casual market and PS3, 360 and PC owners as the hardcore market.


It makes perfect sense from a business perspevtive. Why did every sheep defend Nintendo at E3 and claimed that Nintendo has the right show whatever they want because it made sense from a business perspective but Ubisoft has not the right to do so?
KungfuKitten

There's a difference between casual and crap.

Not for Ubisoft, both of those sell.

Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts
[QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

A High Budget trash game? That makes matter even worse. Doesn't that that mean that alot of effort was put into the game during the development process?

Hewkii

which shows the quality of Ubisoft's development team, I suppose.

Do you realise that they are catering to a whole different target audience?

If sheep are not satisfied, why not just buy a PC/360 or PS3 for optimal satisfaction?

Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts
[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

A High Budget trash game? That makes matter even worse. Doesn't that that mean that alot of effort was put into the game during the development process?

JLF1

which shows the quality of Ubisoft's development team, I suppose.

Did Wii sports and Wii play show the quality of Nintendo's development team?

Indeed. Wii sports was praised by sheep left and right last year. Isn't it obvious that Nintendo's focus lays in a whole different ball game now. Like I said, taking mainstream gaming to a new low.

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts

Do you realise that they are catering to a whole different target audience?

If sheep are not satisfied, why not just buy a PC/360 or PS3 for optimal satisfaction?

PullTheTricker

even if it was meant for a different audience, I don't see why they would have, quote "Numerous noticeable bugs and glitches."

Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts
[QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

Do you realise that they are catering to a whole different target audience?

If sheep are not satisfied, why not just buy a PC/360 or PS3 for optimal satisfaction?

Hewkii

even if it was meant for a different audience, I don't see why they would have, quote "Numerous noticeable bugs and glitches."

Did it ever occur to you that during the development process, they run out of time, and they obviously need to keep in reach within their budget.

Thats business. Do those same people blaming Ubisoft... blame Nintendo for their focus on their financial well-being and sales bragging in this years E3?

Avatar image for air_wolf_cubed
air_wolf_cubed

10233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#60 air_wolf_cubed
Member since 2004 • 10233 Posts
[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

A High Budget trash game? That makes matter even worse. Doesn't that that mean that alot of effort was put into the game during the development process?

PullTheTricker

which shows the quality of Ubisoft's development team, I suppose.

Do you realise that they are catering to a whole different target audience?

If sheep are not satisfied, why not just buy a PC/360 or PS3 for optimal satisfaction?

There you go again thinking everyone can just buy whatever they want and theres no money problems. Debt is a thing of the past
Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts
[QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

Do you realise that they are catering to a whole different target audience?

If sheep are not satisfied, why not just buy a PC/360 or PS3 for optimal satisfaction?

Hewkii

to Wii

even if it was meant for a different audience, I don't see why they would have, quote "Numerous noticeable bugs and glitches."


No one is defending Red Steel. It was a complete mess that was rushed out in time to the Wii release date.

What people are saying is that Ubisoft might have developed some crap games on the Wii but so have Nintendo. Ubisoft sees the Wii audience as casual gamers and for the most time they are right. Casual games sell extremely good on the Wii so Ubisoft are releasing casual games on it.
Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts
[QUOTE="PullTheTricker"][QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

A High Budget trash game? That makes matter even worse. Doesn't that that mean that alot of effort was put into the game during the development process?

air_wolf_cubed

which shows the quality of Ubisoft's development team, I suppose.

Do you realise that they are catering to a whole different target audience?

If sheep are not satisfied, why not just buy a PC/360 or PS3 for optimal satisfaction?

There you go again thinking everyone can just buy whatever they want and theres no money problems. Debt is a thing of the past

If due to financial reasons you cannot afford another system. You definitely need to keep your mouth shut, no offense. You get what you pay for. Thats not an argument to scapegoat Ubisoft.

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts

Did it ever occur to you that during the development process, they run out of time, and they obviously need to keep in reach within their budget.

PullTheTricker

if they ran out of time, that shows bad time management on their part, not exactly a plus.

Avatar image for air_wolf_cubed
air_wolf_cubed

10233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#64 air_wolf_cubed
Member since 2004 • 10233 Posts
[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"][QUOTE="PullTheTricker"][QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

A High Budget trash game? That makes matter even worse. Doesn't that that mean that alot of effort was put into the game during the development process?

PullTheTricker

which shows the quality of Ubisoft's development team, I suppose.

Do you realise that they are catering to a whole different target audience?

If sheep are not satisfied, why not just buy a PC/360 or PS3 for optimal satisfaction?

There you go again thinking everyone can just buy whatever they want and theres no money problems. Debt is a thing of the past

If due to financial reasons you cannot afford another system. You definitely need to keep your mouth shut, no offense. You get what you pay for. Thats not an argument to scapegoat Ubisoft.

Yes I get what I pay for and Ubisoft not giving anyone a fair share a quality is pretty BS. Idc I still got my awesomest great games that arent made by Ubisoft. Ubisoft sucks. My opinion. Not changing that
Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts
[QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

Did it ever occur to you that during the development process, they run out of time, and they obviously need to keep in reach within their budget.

Hewkii

if they ran out of time, that shows bad time management on their part, not exactly a plus.

Talk about bad time management. Super Smash Brawl still has just been released recently in my place. I live in the EU btw.

And please respond to my other qeustion. ''Do those same people blaming Ubisoft... blame Nintendo for their focus on their financial well-being and sales bragging in this years E3?''

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts
[QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

Indeed. Wii sports was praised by sheep left and right last year. Isn't it obvious that Nintendo's focus lays in a whole different ball game now. Like I said, taking mainstream gaming to a new low.

gamecubepad

I probably won't be the only one to remind you of last year's GOTY Mario Galaxy. What about Zelda:Twilight Princess, Mario Kart, WarioWare, Super Paper Mario, Metriod Prime 3, and SSBB? Those games are some of the best in the industry. All coming from Nintendo. Ubisoft makes Raving Rabbids for the Wii and they are somehow equal to Nintendo. Wow.


No one is saying that Ubisoft is equal to Nintendo but the fact that both of these companies have released crap on the Wii is true.

Why should Nintendo have a free pass because they also released a great game? If you hate on Ubisoft because they release crap games on the Wii you should also hate Nintendo for the same reason.
Avatar image for air_wolf_cubed
air_wolf_cubed

10233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#67 air_wolf_cubed
Member since 2004 • 10233 Posts
[QUOTE="gamecubepad"][QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

Indeed. Wii sports was praised by sheep left and right last year. Isn't it obvious that Nintendo's focus lays in a whole different ball game now. Like I said, taking mainstream gaming to a new low.

JLF1

I probably won't be the only one to remind you of last year's GOTY Mario Galaxy. What about Zelda:Twilight Princess, Mario Kart, WarioWare, Super Paper Mario, Metriod Prime 3, and SSBB? Those games are some of the best in the industry. All coming from Nintendo. Ubisoft makes Raving Rabbids for the Wii and they are somehow equal to Nintendo. Wow.


No one is saying that Ubisoft is equal to Nintendo but the fact that both of these companies have released crap on the Wii is true.

Why should Nintendo have a free pass because they also released a great game? If you hate on Ubisoft because they release crap games on the Wii you should also hate Nintendo for the same reason.

Nintendo made more great games than crap. Sony released some crap games go hate on them. All Ubisoft is making is crap. Theres no reason to call out Nintendo
Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts
[QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

Did it ever occur to you that during the development process, they run out of time, and they obviously need to keep in reach within their budget.

Hewkii

if they ran out of time, that shows bad time management on their part, not exactly a plus.


What do you mean "not a plus"?

Are you trying to trash talk one of the best developers in the industry? Ubisoft have put out some of the best games this gen and have some very good looking games to be released this year.
Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts
[QUOTE="PullTheTricker"][QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"][QUOTE="PullTheTricker"][QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="PullTheTricker"]

A High Budget trash game? That makes matter even worse. Doesn't that that mean that alot of effort was put into the game during the development process?

air_wolf_cubed

which shows the quality of Ubisoft's development team, I suppose.

Do you realise that they are catering to a whole different target audience?

If sheep are not satisfied, why not just buy a PC/360 or PS3 for optimal satisfaction?

There you go again thinking everyone can just buy whatever they want and theres no money problems. Debt is a thing of the past

If due to financial reasons you cannot afford another system. You definitely need to keep your mouth shut, no offense. You get what you pay for. Thats not an argument to scapegoat Ubisoft.

Yes I get what I pay for and Ubisoft not giving anyone a fair share a quality is pretty BS. Idc I still got my awesomest great games that arent made by Ubisoft. Ubisoft sucks. My opinion. Not changing that

Did you notice the list I posted in my OP first post?

Sorry but, we all know, what you have become is obvious. They are responsible for some of the best games in the industry.

Once again, stop goatscaping Ubisoft. They do exactly what Nintendo is doing, catering to both the Hardcore and Casual gamer. If you're not satisfied with their casual department of games their developer produce, then simply try and save some money for a more worthy gaming system that fits your needs for better satisfaction.

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

Yes I get what I pay for and Ubisoft not giving anyone a fair share a quality is pretty BS. Idc I still got my awesomest great games that arent made by Ubisoft. Ubisoft sucks. My opinion. Not changing that

air_wolf_cubed


So does Nintendo. My opinion. Not changing that.

You don't like Ubisoft because they don't release the games you want from them and I don't like Nintendo for the same reason. Nintendo does not need hardcore gamers? Well I don't need Nintendo.

Avatar image for magiciandude
magiciandude

9667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#72 magiciandude
Member since 2004 • 9667 Posts

Even when Ubisoft promised "Nintendo-like" quality games for the Wii?

*inb4 quote is taken out context*

Avatar image for air_wolf_cubed
air_wolf_cubed

10233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#73 air_wolf_cubed
Member since 2004 • 10233 Posts
I told you the Wii fits my needs. You sound like some anti-Nintendo commercial
Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

[QUOTE="JLF1"]
No one is saying that Ubisoft is equal to Nintendo but the fact that both of these companies have released crap on the Wii is true.

Why should Nintendo have a free pass because they also released a great game? If you hate on Ubisoft because they release crap games on the Wii you should also hate Nintendo for the same reason. gamecubepad

Nintendo released crap games? Like what? Wii Sports is a pack-in game that received a 7.8 rating. Wii Play is a pack-in game that comes with a controller. If Ubisoft released Red Steel with a Wiimote for $49.99 I would be stoked. Red Steel was definitely worth $10 at release. So enlighten me on the crap games.


If Red Steel(5.5) is crap game then Wii play(5.4) and Pokemon: Battle Revolution(5.5) is a crap game.
Avatar image for air_wolf_cubed
air_wolf_cubed

10233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#75 air_wolf_cubed
Member since 2004 • 10233 Posts

[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"] Yes I get what I pay for and Ubisoft not giving anyone a fair share a quality is pretty BS. Idc I still got my awesomest great games that arent made by Ubisoft. Ubisoft sucks. My opinion. Not changing that

JLF1


So does Nintendo. My opinion. Not changing that.

You don't like Ubisoft because they don't release the games you want from them and I don't like Nintendo for the same reason. Nintendo does not need hardcore gamers? Well I don't need Nintendo.

Fine go ahead and think that
Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts

[QUOTE="JLF1"]
No one is saying that Ubisoft is equal to Nintendo but the fact that both of these companies have released crap on the Wii is true.

Why should Nintendo have a free pass because they also released a great game? If you hate on Ubisoft because they release crap games on the Wii you should also hate Nintendo for the same reason. gamecubepad

Nintendo released crap games? Like what? Wii Sports is a pack-in game that received a 7.8 rating. Wii Play is a pack-in game that comes with a controller. If Ubisoft released Red Steel with a Wiimote for $49.99 I would be stoked. Red Steel was definitely worth $10 at release. So enlighten me on the crap games.

Mario Party 8?

Mario And Sonic at the Olympics

Fire Emblem

Pokemon Battle Revolution

Just a few that are on the same level as Red Steel.

Nintendo has the same focus plan as Ubisoft. they both develop games for the hardcore, and casual.

Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts


You don't like Ubisoft because they don't release the games you want from them

JLF1

Bingo!

Sheep have a demand from devs. They want special treatment.

When you buy a PS3 and 360 you essentially agree that you will have a poor supply of casual games to choose from.

Same can be said about the Wii vice versa. Ubisoft is not the one to blame for the cause of poor third party support.

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts
[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

[QUOTE="JLF1"]
No one is saying that Ubisoft is equal to Nintendo but the fact that both of these companies have released crap on the Wii is true.

Why should Nintendo have a free pass because they also released a great game? If you hate on Ubisoft because they release crap games on the Wii you should also hate Nintendo for the same reason. PullTheTricker

Nintendo released crap games? Like what? Wii Sports is a pack-in game that received a 7.8 rating. Wii Play is a pack-in game that comes with a controller. If Ubisoft released Red Steel with a Wiimote for $49.99 I would be stoked. Red Steel was definitely worth $10 at release. So enlighten me on the crap games.

Mario Party 8? Hudson

Mario And Sonic at the Olympics Sega

Fire Emblem If you think this sucks you need to open your eyes

Pokemon Battle Revolution Genius sorority

Just a few that are on the same level as Red Steel.

Nintendo has the same focus plan as Ubisoft. they both develop games for the hardcore, and casual.

fixed for you. None of those games were made by nintendo themselves.
Avatar image for Shinno441
Shinno441

2792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#80 Shinno441
Member since 2007 • 2792 Posts
[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

[QUOTE="JLF1"]
No one is saying that Ubisoft is equal to Nintendo but the fact that both of these companies have released crap on the Wii is true.

Why should Nintendo have a free pass because they also released a great game? If you hate on Ubisoft because they release crap games on the Wii you should also hate Nintendo for the same reason. PullTheTricker

Nintendo released crap games? Like what? Wii Sports is a pack-in game that received a 7.8 rating. Wii Play is a pack-in game that comes with a controller. If Ubisoft released Red Steel with a Wiimote for $49.99 I would be stoked. Red Steel was definitely worth $10 at release. So enlighten me on the crap games.

Mario Party 8?

Mario And Sonic at the Olympics

Fire Emblem

Pokemon Battle Revolution

Just a few that are on the same level as Red Steel.

Nintendo has the same focus plan as Ubisoft. they both develop games for the hardcore, and casual.

Woah woah woah, Fire Emblem = Bad?

Lark was 100% off on that review. I'm on my sixth play through and still haven't gotten bored or lost my addiction to it.

Avatar image for air_wolf_cubed
air_wolf_cubed

10233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#81 air_wolf_cubed
Member since 2004 • 10233 Posts
[QUOTE="JLF1"]

You don't like Ubisoft because they don't release the games you want from them

PullTheTricker

Bingo!

Sheep have a demand from devs. They want special treatment.

When you buy a PS3 and 360 you essentially agree that you will have a poor supply of casual games to choose from.

Same can be said about the Wii vice versa. Ubisoft is not the one to blame for the cause of poor third party support.

Ubisoft is not to blame for their poor Wii games? I thought they developed them? Did I miss something?
Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts
fixed for you. None of those games were made by nintendo themselves.Shinobishyguy

Neither is SSBB so why should Nintendo get the praise for that one?


Then there is Wii play (5.4) from nintendo.
Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts

Notice the Nintendo label? Don't just come dismiss my point by denying things.

These games are published by Nintendo. EA publishes Call of Duty 4, CoD4 is considered a EA product.

Ubisoft has montreal studios... do we go and deny that Red Steel was made by Ubisoft? No.

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]fixed for you. None of those games were made by nintendo themselves.JLF1

Neither is SSBB so why should Nintendo get the praise for that one?


Then there is Wii play (5.4) from nintendo.

Hal laboratory's is owned by nintendo.

The same can't be said for Hudson.,

The difference between nintendo and ubisoft is that nintendo actually makes great games for their system. More so than they make shovelware. Same can't be said for ubisoft.

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

Ubisoft is not to blame for their poor Wii games? I thought they developed them? Did I miss something?air_wolf_cubed

Ubisoft is to blame for their poor wii games but that does not make them a bad developer. Every dev develops crap games (Not Blizzard but that's it) even Nintendo.
Avatar image for air_wolf_cubed
air_wolf_cubed

10233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#86 air_wolf_cubed
Member since 2004 • 10233 Posts
[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]fixed for you. None of those games were made by nintendo themselves.JLF1

Neither is SSBB so why should Nintendo get the praise for that one?


Then there is Wii play (5.4) from nintendo.

Nintendo developed SMG though. GOTY :roll:
Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#87 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts
[QUOTE="PullTheTricker"][QUOTE="JLF1"]

You don't like Ubisoft because they don't release the games you want from them

air_wolf_cubed

Bingo!

Sheep have a demand from devs. They want special treatment.

When you buy a PS3 and 360 you essentially agree that you will have a poor supply of casual games to choose from.

Same can be said about the Wii vice versa. Ubisoft is not the one to blame for the cause of poor third party support.

Ubisoft is not to blame for their poor Wii games? I thought they developed them? Did I miss something?

Do you realise that they are not the only one responsible for producing these casual games on the Wii?

Nintendo does the exact same thing, and yet you blame Ubisoft exclusively for it.

Avatar image for BuryMe
BuryMe

22017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 104

User Lists: 0

#88 BuryMe
Member since 2004 • 22017 Posts

There's a difference between not getting any games at all and getting loads of crappy games. If Ubisoft isn't going to take the wii seriously, they shouldn't bother at all. Until they get their act together, I will criticise them

Avatar image for air_wolf_cubed
air_wolf_cubed

10233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#89 air_wolf_cubed
Member since 2004 • 10233 Posts
[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"]
Ubisoft is not to blame for their poor Wii games? I thought they developed them? Did I miss something?JLF1

Ubisoft is to blame for their poor wii games but that does not make them a bad developer. Every dev develops crap games (Not Blizzard but that's it) even Nintendo.

I dont see why every game they make for one system is crap. Thats kind of embarassing to them. Maybe the first Rabbids is an exception
Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

[QUOTE="JLF1"][QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]fixed for you. None of those games were made by nintendo themselves.Shinobishyguy


Neither is SSBB so why should Nintendo get the praise for that one?


Then there is Wii play (5.4) from nintendo.

Hal laboratory's is owned by nintendo.

The same can't be said for Hudson.,

The difference between nintendo and ubisoft is that nintendo actually makes great games for their system. More so than they make shovelware. Same can't be said for ubisoft.

According to Gamespot SSBB is developed by Game Arts. Game Arts is not owned by Nintendo.

What about Wii play? is that not a crap game?

Avatar image for BuryMe
BuryMe

22017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 104

User Lists: 0

#91 BuryMe
Member since 2004 • 22017 Posts
[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"][QUOTE="PullTheTricker"][QUOTE="JLF1"]
You don't like Ubisoft because they don't release the games you want from them PullTheTricker
Bingo!

Sheep have a demand from devs. They want special treatment.

When you buy a PS3 and 360 you essentially agree that you will have a poor supply of casual games to choose from.

Same can be said about the Wii vice versa. Ubisoft is not the one to blame for the cause of poor third party support.

Ubisoft is not to blame for their poor Wii games? I thought they developed them? Did I miss something?

Do you realise that they are not the only one responsible for producing these casual games on the Wii?

Nintendo does the exact same thing, and yet you blame Ubisoft exclusively for it.

the difference is at least nintendo makes a decent number of good wii games too.

Avatar image for air_wolf_cubed
air_wolf_cubed

10233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#92 air_wolf_cubed
Member since 2004 • 10233 Posts
[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"][QUOTE="PullTheTricker"][QUOTE="JLF1"]

You don't like Ubisoft because they don't release the games you want from them

PullTheTricker

Bingo!

Sheep have a demand from devs. They want special treatment.

When you buy a PS3 and 360 you essentially agree that you will have a poor supply of casual games to choose from.

Same can be said about the Wii vice versa. Ubisoft is not the one to blame for the cause of poor third party support.

Ubisoft is not to blame for their poor Wii games? I thought they developed them? Did I miss something?

Do you realise that they are not the only one responsible for producing these casual games on the Wii?

Nintendo does the exact same thing, and yet you blame Ubisoft exclusively for it.

Yes I blame Nintendo for marketing to casuals. No I dont blame Nintendo for making Ubisoft games suckville USA
Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#93 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts
[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"][QUOTE="PullTheTricker"][QUOTE="JLF1"]

You don't like Ubisoft because they don't release the games you want from them

PullTheTricker

Bingo!

Sheep have a demand from devs. They want special treatment.

When you buy a PS3 and 360 you essentially agree that you will have a poor supply of casual games to choose from.

Same can be said about the Wii vice versa. Ubisoft is not the one to blame for the cause of poor third party support.

Ubisoft is not to blame for their poor Wii games? I thought they developed them? Did I miss something?

Do you realise that they are not the only one responsible for producing these casual games on the Wii?

Nintendo does the exact same thing, and yet you blame Ubisoft exclusively for it.

Like I said...I can't think of one good ubisoft game for the wii.

Meanwhile I can think of quite a couple of good nintendo games for the wii.

Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#94 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts

[QUOTE="JLF1"][QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]fixed for you. None of those games were made by nintendo themselves.air_wolf_cubed

Neither is SSBB so why should Nintendo get the praise for that one?


Then there is Wii play (5.4) from nintendo.

Nintendo developed SMG though. GOTY :roll:

Ubisoft has made Ghost Recon Advanced War Fighter, 9.0 in Gamespot. Rainbow Six Vegas 9.4 in Gamespot. Assassins Creed 9.0 in Gamespot.

Your point?

Both Ubisoft and Nintendo produce their lesser and better games.

Avatar image for air_wolf_cubed
air_wolf_cubed

10233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#95 air_wolf_cubed
Member since 2004 • 10233 Posts
[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]

[QUOTE="JLF1"][QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]fixed for you. None of those games were made by nintendo themselves.JLF1


Neither is SSBB so why should Nintendo get the praise for that one?


Then there is Wii play (5.4) from nintendo.

Hal laboratory's is owned by nintendo.

The same can't be said for Hudson.,

The difference between nintendo and ubisoft is that nintendo actually makes great games for their system. More so than they make shovelware. Same can't be said for ubisoft.

According to Gamespot SSBB is developed by Game Arts. Game Arts is not owned by Nintendo.

What about Wii play? is that not a crap game?

SSBB is developed majorly by HAL. Youll see their logo on the back of the box and on the disc menu screen
Avatar image for air_wolf_cubed
air_wolf_cubed

10233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#96 air_wolf_cubed
Member since 2004 • 10233 Posts

[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"][QUOTE="JLF1"][QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]fixed for you. None of those games were made by nintendo themselves.PullTheTricker


Neither is SSBB so why should Nintendo get the praise for that one?


Then there is Wii play (5.4) from nintendo.

Nintendo developed SMG though. GOTY :roll:

Ubisoft has made Ghost Recon Advanced War Fighter, 9.0 in Gamespot. Rainbow Six Vegas 9.4 in Gamespot. Assassins Creed 9.0 in Gamespot.

Your point?

Both Ubisoft and Nintendo produce their lesser and better games.

But only one produces the better games for Wii
Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

[QUOTE="JLF1"][QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]fixed for you. None of those games were made by nintendo themselves.air_wolf_cubed

Neither is SSBB so why should Nintendo get the praise for that one?


Then there is Wii play (5.4) from nintendo.

Nintendo developed SMG though. GOTY :roll:


Does SMG make Wii play stop existing? I never said that Nintendo is not developing great games but are also developing bad games. Praise Nintendo for the great games and hate on them the same you hate on Ubisoft for the bad games they are releasing is all I'm saying.

Avatar image for Shinno441
Shinno441

2792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#98 Shinno441
Member since 2007 • 2792 Posts

[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"][QUOTE="JLF1"][QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]fixed for you. None of those games were made by nintendo themselves.PullTheTricker


Neither is SSBB so why should Nintendo get the praise for that one?


Then there is Wii play (5.4) from nintendo.

Nintendo developed SMG though. GOTY :roll:

Ubisoft has made Ghost Recon Advanced War Fighter, 9.0 in Gamespot. Rainbow Six Vegas 9.4 in Gamespot. Assassins Creed 9.0 in Gamespot.

Your point?

Both Ubisoft and Nintendo produce their lesser and better games.

Problem, Nintendo doesn't develop or publish for other systems. Ubisoft does. The Wii is capable of good graphics and good gameplay at the same time. Dead Rising, The Conduit, and Galaxy seem to support my graphics argument. How is it then that no Ubisoft developed game has scored an AAA on GS for the Wii? Sheep don't completely blame Ubisoft for the casual games, but I speak for many manticores and sheep when I say they are by far the largest contributor.

Avatar image for fishfake
fishfake

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 fishfake
Member since 2007 • 1135 Posts

I've been seeing some harsh hate against Ubisoft by sheep lately.

In that case, you might as well hate the whole industry for your lack of third party support. But for some reason you sheep seem to be scapegoating Ubisoft?

Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway

Far Cry 2

EndWar

H.A.W.X

Prince of Persia

Beyond Good & Evil 2

Splinter Cell: Conviction

Just a few examples upcoming games for 2008.

More succesfull franchises such as Ghost Recon, RainbowSix and Myst.

What exactly are you trying to achieve by scapegoating Ubisoft?

PullTheTricker

im sure that if we would replace those games on your list with the wii games made by ubisoft you would change your view.

the bad thing about ubisoft is people KNOW they can do better !!

if you think sheep are the only one saying that those ubisoft wii games are bad,why not try too find a cow or lemming saying something positive about those games:P

if developer dont put there soul into there games ,they dont deserves Anny respect but thats maybe just my view;)

Avatar image for air_wolf_cubed
air_wolf_cubed

10233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#100 air_wolf_cubed
Member since 2004 • 10233 Posts

[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"][QUOTE="JLF1"][QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]fixed for you. None of those games were made by nintendo themselves.JLF1


Neither is SSBB so why should Nintendo get the praise for that one?


Then there is Wii play (5.4) from nintendo.

Nintendo developed SMG though. GOTY :roll:


Does SMG make Wii play stop existing? I never said that Nintendo is not developing great games but are also developing bad games. Praise Nintendo for the great games and hate on them the same you hate on Ubisoft for the bad games they are releasing is all I'm saying.

Well at least their good games make me forget about stuff like Wii Play. I dont even think its that bad I love playing Pool on it