Should Bungie's Destiny be 100% exclusive to the Xbox platform.

The reasons why this is a great idea.

It would allow the developers to maximize every inch of power that the 360 and 720 can muster. They wouldn't be wasting resources on other platforms they know nothing about.

The partnership of Bungie, MS, and Activision makes sense. They are so close intertwined together.

It would make the cows happy because it would make give Xbox more exclusives in which they have said MS needs. So its a win win for everyone.

and this is why i hate fanboys, instead of letting more people enjoy Bungies game, you have this weird mentatlity

Sure... I agree with you :)

Also I like your sig but this is a bit more accurate..

Microsoft:

6th gen: We fell flat on our faces.

7th gen: We got back up.

8th gen: We fell back down again.

:P

I dont think it matters since the majority of it's sales will end up being on the Xbox platform.

and this is why i hate fanboys, instead of letting more people enjoy Bungies game, you have this weird mentatlity

Chris_Williams

Aren't you a cow. That's what I gather from your past posts. Would bungie be able to maximize the game on one platform rather than 2. Yes or no. this is a test by the way.

Trash should stay on a trash console. But even if there is a slight chance that the PC will make "Destiny" rise above console standards and make it a somewhat decent game, it should be on PC.

I'm sure making less money, selling less copies and catering to only 1/4 of the potential market they could cater to is a great idea.

Like, why is there a McDonalds in every state? Obviously they should only stick to 1/4 of the states in the USA since reaching a wider consumer base and making more money is OVERRATED!

#Systemwarsfanboylogic

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

and this is why i hate fanboys, instead of letting more people enjoy Bungies game, you have this weird mentatlity

jimmypsn

Aren't you a cow. That's what I gather from your past posts. Would bungie be able to maximize the game on one platform rather than 2. Yes or no. this is a test by the way.

Another quality thread by jimmypsn.

[spoiler] /sarcasm. [/spoiler]

I'm sure making less money, selling less copies and catering to only 1/4 of the potential market they could cater to is a great idea.

Like, why is there a McDonalds in every state? Obviously they should only stick to 1/4 of the states in the USA since reaching a wider consumer base and making more money is OVERRATED!

#Systemwarsfanboylogic

SPYDER0416

[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

I'm sure making less money, selling less copies and catering to only 1/4 of the potential market they could cater to is a great idea.

Like, why is there a McDonalds in every state? Obviously they should only stick to 1/4 of the states in the USA since reaching a wider consumer base and making more money is OVERRATED!

#Systemwarsfanboylogic

jimmypsn

World class excuses from someone who can't save themselves from their fanboy logic backfiring.

also i never understood why microsoft just don't buy Bungie and get them as a first party dev, that would be very huge.

[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

I'm sure making less money, selling less copies and catering to only 1/4 of the potential market they could cater to is a great idea.

Like, why is there a McDonalds in every state? Obviously they should only stick to 1/4 of the states in the USA since reaching a wider consumer base and making more money is OVERRATED!

#Systemwarsfanboylogic

jimmypsn

[QUOTE="jimmypsn"]

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

and this is why i hate fanboys, instead of letting more people enjoy Bungies game, you have this weird mentatlity

Chris_Williams

Aren't you a cow. That's what I gather from your past posts. Would bungie be able to maximize the game on one platform rather than 2. Yes or no. this is a test by the way.

No.MonsieurX

[QUOTE="jimmypsn"]

[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

I'm sure making less money, selling less copies and catering to only 1/4 of the potential market they could cater to is a great idea.

Like, why is there a McDonalds in every state? Obviously they should only stick to 1/4 of the states in the USA since reaching a wider consumer base and making more money is OVERRATED!

#Systemwarsfanboylogic

AcidSoldner

Plus if "Xbox version would be easier to make/better" is your logic, then that would apply for them making it exclusive to ANY other system. Heck, why won't they make it PC exclusive and actually have it easier to make and better then if it were Xbox exclusive? These guys did make Marathon and them originally having Halo be an RTS for Mac means they have the chops to pull off a PC exclusive that would blow away anything they could do on just an Xbox.

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

[QUOTE="jimmypsn"]

Aren't you a cow. That's what I gather from your past posts. Would bungie be able to maximize the game on one platform rather than 2. Yes or no. this is a test by the way.

jimmypsn

The reason why most games are multiplat is because there is more money to do so. I know it might break your little lemming heart to hear it, but the fact remains that the gap between 360 and PS3 is very small, the whole "2nd place" thing is very overexaggerrated on here.

The two systems are literally neck and neck in world wide sales, and it's real hard to ignore that other piece of the pie. So it's very unlikely that Bungie would stay exlcusive to MS, only reason why there are so many exclusive devs for Sony is because Sony supports them (it also helps to have a more powerful system which means other systems are too weak to handle your games).

MS on the other hand does not care about supporting their devs, in fact if they had their way they would butcher them and make Bungie make Kinect games. So what does Bungie want more? Money and support? Or less money and no support? Ya they are going to go multiplatform. DEAL WITH IT!

[QUOTE="jimmypsn"][QUOTE="Chris_Williams"] I'm not a cow, I'm a ps3/360/pc user, i prefer my ps3/pc combo because the 360 isn't giving me a reason to turn it on. Also no, bungie would maximize profits on 2 platforms, thats what the gaming industry is, its a business its not a fanboy runned industry. The sooner you understand that the closer you are to growing up. Also the fact that their not a first party dev you can bet their not going to stick with just the 360, at most their next game is going to be a timed exclusive "which is dumb but then again i'm sure microsoft threw alot of money at them so i understand why they would agree to it if the rumors are true" but you should be prepared for a bungie game on the ps3 very soon.Chris_Williams

The reason why most games are multiplat is because there is more money to do so. I know it might break your little lemming heart to hear it, but the fact remains that the gap between 360 and PS3 is very small, the whole "2nd place" thing is very overexaggerrated on here.

The two systems are literally neck and neck in world wide sales, and it's real hard to ignore that other piece of the pie. So it's very unlikely that Bungie would stay exlcusive to MS, only reason why there are so many exclusive devs for Sony is because Sony supports them (it also helps to have a more powerful system which means other systems are too weak to handle your games).

MS on the other hand does not care about supporting their devs, in fact if they had their way they would butcher them and make Bungie make Kinect games. So what does Bungie want more? Money and support? Or less money and no support? Ya they are going to go multiplatform. DEAL WITH IT!

ShadowMoses900

No

None of the 360 games bungie has created have been technical showcases on the 360.

None of the 360 games bungie has created have been technical showcases on the 360.

super600

None of the 360 games bungie has created have been technical showcases on the 360.

super600

[QUOTE="super600"]

None of the 360 games bungie has created have been technical showcases on the 360.

tomarlyn

True.

[QUOTE="super600"]

None of the 360 games bungie has created have been technical showcases on the 360.

jimmypsn

All of bungie's halo games besides the first two halo's were exclusive.

[QUOTE="super600"]

None of the 360 games bungie has created have been technical showcases on the 360.

jimmypsn

I'm not a person to be dumbfounded by the tryhard trolls here, but you completely missing his point and going the opposite direction is literally a move so blinded by fanboyism and stupidity that I think the sheer idiocy you radiated gave me cancer.

I want it on Wii U to be honest.

[QUOTE="jimmypsn"]

[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

I'm sure making less money, selling less copies and catering to only 1/4 of the potential market they could cater to is a great idea.

Like, why is there a McDonalds in every state? Obviously they should only stick to 1/4 of the states in the USA since reaching a wider consumer base and making more money is OVERRATED!

#Systemwarsfanboylogic

AcidSoldner

Nah.

They can maximize the system if they stay only on 360, but they'll do that anyway if they go multiplat, plus they might be able to maximize the game as well.

They can maximize the system if they stay only on 360, but they'll do that anyway if they go multiplat, plus they might be able to maximize the game as well.

Pug-Nasty

[QUOTE="Pug-Nasty"]

They can maximize the system if they stay only on 360, but they'll do that anyway if they go multiplat, plus they might be able to maximize the game as well.

jimmypsn

[QUOTE="Pug-Nasty"]

They can maximize the system if they stay only on 360, but they'll do that anyway if they go multiplat, plus they might be able to maximize the game as well.

jimmypsn

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

The reason why most games are multiplat is because there is more money to do so. I know it might break your little lemming heart to hear it, but the fact remains that the gap between 360 and PS3 is very small, the whole "2nd place" thing is very overexaggerrated on here.

The two systems are literally neck and neck in world wide sales, and it's real hard to ignore that other piece of the pie. So it's very unlikely that Bungie would stay exlcusive to MS, only reason why there are so many exclusive devs for Sony is because Sony supports them (it also helps to have a more powerful system which means other systems are too weak to handle your games).

MS on the other hand does not care about supporting their devs, in fact if they had their way they would butcher them and make Bungie make Kinect games. So what does Bungie want more? Money and support? Or less money and no support? Ya they are going to go multiplatform. DEAL WITH IT!

jimmypsn

Actually most devs have no problem with it, here:

PS3 easier to develop for, claim Devs -Destructoid

Team Ninja Says PS3 Easier To Develop For

PS3 development was easy, says COD4 developer -- PlayStation...

Resident Evil 5 dev: PS3 is not hard to develop for -- PlayStation...

Epic Games' Mark Rein: PS3 as easy to develop for as Xbox 360

As you can see, many devs have no problems with developing for the PS3. This is even further proved in the fact that almost all multiplats are identical, if it truly was harder to develop for you would see most PS3 multiplats look significalnty worse, which is very rarely the case at all. In 99% multiplats you can't tell the difference between the two versions.

However the real advantage of the PS3 comes at the fact that it is more powerful than 360 and hasn't been maxed out yet like the 360 has. Devs are going to make bigger and bigger games, and they will have to put them on the more powerful consoles. The 360 will be struggling to keep up.

Here:

EA exec: 360 has already been 'maxed out' | Joystiq

PS3 Not Maxed Out By Killzone 3, says Devs - IndustryGamers

Now the first article was posted in 2009, the second in 2011 last year. That shows the 360 got maxed out A LONG time ago, this explains why there are no 360 games that look as good as some of the PS3 exclusives do. And all one has to do is take a look at KZ3 to know how advanced it is, yet the devs themselves are saying that it STILL wasn't maxed out by it. This is further prooved when you look at upcoming games for the PS3.

Here:

God of War Ascension - Multiplayer Gameplay - HD 720p - YouTube

The Last of Us - The Truck Ambush Trailer HD- IGN-YouTube

Those two games look even better than KZ3 and UC3. Proof that it hasn't been maxed out yet, if it was that wouldn't be possible. Those two games will be the new graphics king. And keep in mind they are still several months away from being finished (a year away in GOW A case) that means the graphics will be EVEN better when they get released.

And many devs have openly said there games are ONLY possible on the PS3 because the 360 isn't powerful enough.

Here:

Kojima Says MGS4Not Possible on Other Platforms

Uncharted 2 "impossible" on Xbox 360 News ? News ? PlayStation 3 ...

Why God of War III is only possible on PS3 | GamesRadar

Guerrilla Devs - "Killzone 2 impossible on 360" ? Gaming ? PS3 ...

Infamous 2 'can't be done on Xbox' -Says Devs ...

And here arte the console hardware facts, you can see for yourself which console is more powerful. It's the PS3.

Here:

Xbox 360 vs. PlayStation 3: The Hardware Throwdown - IGN

I have provided all the evidence to support my claims. I've proven it, you did not. The court listens to evidence and proof, not baseless claims. Listen to your brain, use logic, don't listen to your emotions. PS3 is the more powerful system, FACT. Most devs do not find it hard to develop for, FACT. Many PS3 games simply cannot be done on 360 because it's not powerful enough to handle them, FACT.

Also you better enjoy your 2nd place while it lasts, it's only a matter of time before PS3 over takes 360 as it has been selling at a much faster rate.

Here:

Why PlayStation 3 Will Outsell Xbox 360 - PS3 Feature at IGN

From the article

"There are a number of reasons on why the gap is rapidly closing. PlayStation 3 has many more high quality exclusive games than Xbox 360 and a great free online service. One could easily use the old fallback that Xbox 360's insanely high failure rate earlier in its lifecycle contributed to more consoles being sold."

Now start your damage control. :cool:

[QUOTE="jimmypsn"][QUOTE="Pug-Nasty"]

They can maximize the system if they stay only on 360, but they'll do that anyway if they go multiplat, plus they might be able to maximize the game as well.

Chris_Williams

[QUOTE="Pug-Nasty"]

They can maximize the system if they stay only on 360, but they'll do that anyway if they go multiplat, plus they might be able to maximize the game as well.

jimmypsn

I probably wouldn't touch it either since it is a Bungie game, and all I've ever played by them is Halo. But, can't really tell what the game would be like without giving it a shot.

Bethesda is a great developer, but their ambition exceeds their talent (not a bad thing). Their games are buggy and run AFU on all platforms. The only difference between the platforms is that PC gamers will eventually be able to play a near bug-free version of Bethesda games.

[QUOTE="jimmypsn"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

The reason why most games are multiplat is because there is more money to do so. I know it might break your little lemming heart to hear it, but the fact remains that the gap between 360 and PS3 is very small, the whole "2nd place" thing is very overexaggerrated on here.

The two systems are literally neck and neck in world wide sales, and it's real hard to ignore that other piece of the pie. So it's very unlikely that Bungie would stay exlcusive to MS, only reason why there are so many exclusive devs for Sony is because Sony supports them (it also helps to have a more powerful system which means other systems are too weak to handle your games).

MS on the other hand does not care about supporting their devs, in fact if they had their way they would butcher them and make Bungie make Kinect games. So what does Bungie want more? Money and support? Or less money and no support? Ya they are going to go multiplatform. DEAL WITH IT!

ShadowMoses900

Actually most devs have no problem with it, here:

PS3 easier to develop for, claim Devs -Destructoid

Team Ninja Says PS3 Easier To Develop For

PS3 development was easy, says COD4 developer -- PlayStation...

Resident Evil 5 dev: PS3 is not hard to develop for -- PlayStation...

Epic Games' Mark Rein: PS3 as easy to develop for as Xbox 360

As you can see, many devs have no problems with developing for the PS3. This is even further proved in the fact that almost all multiplats are identical, if it truly was harder to develop for you would see most PS3 multiplats look significalnty worse, which is very rarely the case at all. In 99% multiplats you can't tell the difference between the two versions.

However the real advantage of the PS3 comes at the fact that it is more powerful than 360 and hasn't been maxed out yet like the 360 has. Devs are going to make bigger and bigger games, and they will have to put them on the more powerful consoles. The 360 will be struggling to keep up.

Here:

EA exec: 360 has already been 'maxed out' | Joystiq

PS3 Not Maxed Out By Killzone 3, says Devs - IndustryGamers

Now the first article was posted in 2009, the second in 2011 last year. That shows the 360 got maxed out A LONG time ago, this explains why there are no 360 games that look as good as some of the PS3 exclusives do. And all one has to do is take a look at KZ3 to know how advanced it is, yet the devs themselves are saying that it STILL wasn't maxed out by it. This is further prooved when you look at upcoming games for the PS3.

Here:

God of War Ascension - Multiplayer Gameplay - HD 720p - YouTube

The Last of Us - The Truck Ambush Trailer HD- IGN-YouTube

Those two games look even better than KZ3 and UC3. Proof that it hasn't been maxed out yet, if it was that wouldn't be possible. Those two games will be the new graphics king. And keep in mind they are still several months away from being finished (a year away in GOW A case) that means the graphics will be EVEN better when they get released.

And many devs have openly said there games are ONLY possible on the PS3 because the 360 isn't powerful enough.

Here:

Kojima Says MGS4Not Possible on Other Platforms

Uncharted 2 "impossible" on Xbox 360 News ? News ? PlayStation 3 ...

Why God of War III is only possible on PS3 | GamesRadar

Guerrilla Devs - "Killzone 2 impossible on 360" ? Gaming ? PS3 ...

Infamous 2 'can't be done on Xbox' -Says Devs ...

And here arte the console hardware facts, you can see for yourself which console is more powerful. It's the PS3.

Here:

Xbox 360 vs. PlayStation 3: The Hardware Throwdown - IGN

I have provided all the evidence to support my claims. I've proven it, you did not. The court listens to evidence and proof, not baseless claims. Listen to your brain, use logic, don't listen to your emotions. PS3 is the more powerful system, FACT. Most devs do not find it hard to develop for, FACT. Many PS3 games simply cannot be done on 360 because it's not powerful enough to handle them, FACT.

Also you better enjoy your 2nd place while it lasts, it's only a matter of time before PS3 over takes 360 as it has been selling at a much faster rate.

Here:

Why PlayStation 3 Will Outsell Xbox 360 - PS3 Feature at IGN

From the article

"There are a number of reasons on why the gap is rapidly closing. PlayStation 3 has many more high quality exclusive games than Xbox 360 and a great free online service. One could easily use the old fallback that Xbox 360's insanely high failure rate earlier in its lifecycle contributed to more consoles being sold."

Now start your damage control.

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"][QUOTE="jimmypsn"] This is possible but I just wouldn't touch a the first Bungie game on PS architecture. Especially since they have no experience on it. Just look at Bethesda. They are one of the best developers on Earth and still can do sh*t with the PS3. jimmypsn