Should console exclusives be released for the PC too?

  • 157 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

They would look vastly better on it, get the option for mods, the devs wouldn't be as limitied by the hardware anymore, ect.

The PC is not direct competition for the consoles so they could still claim "console exclusivity".

What you think?

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62017 Posts

inb4 "no salezzz!1!!"

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

Examples of "console exclusives" released on the PC:

Halo 1 & 2, Gears 1, Alan Wake, ect.

I can see Gran Turismo, Uncharted, God of War and Last of Us all looking vastly better on the PC...

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#4 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

Absolutely not.

That doesn't even make sense.

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

inb4 "no salezzz!1!!"

lundy86_4

Not neccessarily.

CoD is on the PC too but it has the best sales on the consoles.

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#6 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

I mean, games like Uncharted shouldn't.

Games like Halo and Alan Wake were ported for a reason, they have solid gameplay that would easily work on PC.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52548 Posts
God no. Not these mainstream, peasant games. PC is too good for those. Bleh!
Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#8 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]God no. Not these mainstream, peasant games. PC is too good for those. Bleh!

Nah, PC is too bad for those, they are console experiences that are strictly for consoles. Like putting an RTS on consoles, look what that gave us.
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

Absolutely not.

That doesn't even make sense.

parkurtommo

Turok+2+of+Evil+Seeds.jpg

turok+2+PC.jpg

halo-combat-evolved.jpg

halo-combat-evolved-pc-retail-box.jpg

I think Forza and the newer Halo games should come to the PC (as well as Gears of War).

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52548 Posts
[QUOTE="parkurtommo"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"]God no. Not these mainstream, peasant games. PC is too good for those. Bleh!

Nah, PC is too bad for those, they are console experiences that are strictly for consoles. Like putting an RTS on consoles, look what that gave us.

GODLO WARS!
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

I mean, games like Uncharted shouldn't.

parkurtommo

Why not?

The PC gamers who don't have a PS3 yet won't buy it just for Uncharted or The Last of Us.

But if it were ported over they might be interested in getting it (meaning more sales).

Avatar image for rilpas
rilpas

8161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 rilpas
Member since 2012 • 8161 Posts
yes they should and anyone who is says otherwise is wrong :)
Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#13 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="parkurtommo"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"]God no. Not these mainstream, peasant games. PC is too good for those. Bleh!

Nah, PC is too bad for those, they are console experiences that are strictly for consoles. Like putting an RTS on consoles, look what that gave us.

GODLO WARS!

I mean RTS ports, like Red Alert 3. :P
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52548 Posts
[QUOTE="parkurtommo"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="parkurtommo"] Nah, PC is too bad for those, they are console experiences that are strictly for consoles. Like putting an RTS on consoles, look what that gave us.

GODLO WARS!

I mean RTS ports, like Red Alert 3. :P

It doesn't work. Much like simulators.
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]God no. Not these mainstream, peasant games. PC is too good for those. Bleh!parkurtommo
Nah, PC is too bad for those, they are console experiences that are strictly for consoles.

That's a rubbish excuse tbh.

Gamepads exist for the PC too you know...

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
Some games I'd love to come to PC.
Avatar image for Obviously_Right
Obviously_Right

5331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Obviously_Right
Member since 2011 • 5331 Posts

Nope.

They would make a loss just like MS did with Halo 1 and 2.

PC gamers just don't buy as many games as we do. Deal with it.

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#18 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

[QUOTE="parkurtommo"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"]God no. Not these mainstream, peasant games. PC is too good for those. Bleh!nameless12345

Nah, PC is too bad for those, they are console experiences that are strictly for consoles.

That's a rubbish excuse tbh.

Gamepads exist for the PC too you know...

Yeah.. but it just doesn't seem like it would feel right. Imagine watching the same movie on your monitor on a desk, and then watching it on your TV from your couch, do you see what I mean? And even if someone is using a gamepad, and has their PC hooked up toan HDTV, it still loses the plug and play implications that consoles have... I don''t know. It's really just about how you would feel while playing, it just wouldn't be the same thing. I have nothing against the Pc as a gaming platform though, obviously.
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

Nope.

They would make a loss just like MS did with Halo 1 and 2.

PC gamers just don't buy as many games as we do. Deal with it.

Obviously_Right

More sales = loss?

Wut?

Avatar image for Obviously_Right
Obviously_Right

5331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Obviously_Right
Member since 2011 • 5331 Posts

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

Nope.

They would make a loss just like MS did with Halo 1 and 2.

PC gamers just don't buy as many games as we do. Deal with it.

nameless12345

More sales = loss?

Wut?

Do you think it costs nothing to port a game?

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

Nope.

They would make a loss just like MS did with Halo 1 and 2.

PC gamers just don't buy as many games as we do. Deal with it.

Obviously_Right
Tell that to Steam.
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52548 Posts

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

Nope.

They would make a loss just like MS did with Halo 1 and 2.

PC gamers just don't buy as many games as we do. Deal with it.

nameless12345

More sales = loss?

Wut?

Porting isn't free.
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

[QUOTE="parkurtommo"] Nah, PC is too bad for those, they are console experiences that are strictly for consoles.parkurtommo

That's a rubbish excuse tbh.

Gamepads exist for the PC too you know...

Yeah.. but it just doesn't seem like it would feel right. Imagine watching the same movie on your monitor on a desk, and then watching it on your TV from your couch, do you see what I mean? And even if someone is using a gamepad, and has their PC hooked up toan HDTV, it still loses the plug and play implications that consoles have... I don''t know. It's really just about how you would feel while playing, it just wouldn't be the same thing. I have nothing against the Pc as a gaming platform though, obviously.

They said for Alan Wake that it won't come to PC because "it's a console experience".

They later released it for the PC and said something like "the publisher prevented the PC release".

MS thought PC gamers will buy the 360 just for Alan Wake and that obviously didn't happen... (especially after the fact that it was originally ment to be a PC exclusive but then went console-only)

Avatar image for Obviously_Right
Obviously_Right

5331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Obviously_Right
Member since 2011 • 5331 Posts

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

Nope.

They would make a loss just like MS did with Halo 1 and 2.

PC gamers just don't buy as many games as we do. Deal with it.

clyde46

Tell that to Steam.

Is this the same service that refuses to disclose its sales numbers?

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#25 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

[QUOTE="parkurtommo"][QUOTE="nameless12345"]

That's a rubbish excuse tbh.

Gamepads exist for the PC too you know...

nameless12345

Yeah.. but it just doesn't seem like it would feel right. Imagine watching the same movie on your monitor on a desk, and then watching it on your TV from your couch, do you see what I mean? And even if someone is using a gamepad, and has their PC hooked up toan HDTV, it still loses the plug and play implications that consoles have... I don''t know. It's really just about how you would feel while playing, it just wouldn't be the same thing. I have nothing against the Pc as a gaming platform though, obviously.

They said for Alan Wake that it won't come to PC because "it's a console experience".

They later released it for the PC and said something like "the publisher prevented the PC release".

MS thought PC gamers will buy the 360 just for Alan Wake and that obviously didn't happen... (especially after the fact that it was originally ment to be a PC exclusive but then went console-only)

I know, Alan Wake is awesome on PC, the graphics are definitely so much better, the improved performance, etc. all makes it better. But imagine if these factors didn't exist, it would be better on the 360.
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

Nope.

They would make a loss just like MS did with Halo 1 and 2.

PC gamers just don't buy as many games as we do. Deal with it.

Obviously_Right

Tell that to Steam.

Is this the same service that refuses to disclose its sales numbers?

Fair point but they are still a relevant source of legit games at great prices.
Avatar image for MrYaotubo
MrYaotubo

2885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 MrYaotubo
Member since 2012 • 2885 Posts

Nope.

They would make a loss just like MS did with Halo 1 and 2.

PC gamers just don't buy as many games as we do. Deal with it.

Obviously_Right
Must be why the best selling exclusive this gen between the PC,PS3 and 360 is a PC game lol. What PC gamer don´t buy as much as "you do" are multiplatform games,there´s a reason as to why about every single game from the best selling PC games of all were PC exclusives when they were released(and many still are). The PC market is grwoing now in a way that never did before,and as seen from many games in the last couple of years or so then sales numbers are increasing dramatically,wich is a no brainer,it has steam,wich is pretty much the biggest and best gaming servicce in the world,and it´s not even the only one.
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

Nope.

They would make a loss just like MS did with Halo 1 and 2.

PC gamers just don't buy as many games as we do. Deal with it.

freedomfreak

More sales = loss?

Wut?

Porting isn't free.

Remedy were satisfied with Alan Wake PC sales.

CliffyB wasn't satisfied with Gears PC sales but they could still have ported Gears 2 & 3 over for those extra sales.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52548 Posts

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="nameless12345"]

More sales = loss?

Wut?

nameless12345

Porting isn't free.

Remedy were satisfied with Alan Wake PC sales.

CliffyB wasn't satisfied with Gears PC sales but they could still have ported Gears 2 & 3 over for those extra sales.

Sure, it depends. Some developers find it worth it. Some don't.
Avatar image for Sushiglutton
Sushiglutton

10445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#31 Sushiglutton
Member since 2009 • 10445 Posts
For me personally that would be great, at least in the short run. But it would kill the console in the long run which would be horrible. The types of games that can survive exclusively on PC are sadly of a variety I don't particulary like and more and more often use business models I like even less. So no, overall it wouldn't be worth it.
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="nameless12345"]

More sales = loss?

Wut?

nameless12345

Porting isn't free.

Remedy were satisfied with Alan Wake PC sales.

CliffyB wasn't satisfied with Gears PC sales but they could still have ported Gears 2 & 3 over for those extra sales.

The reason for the poor Gears 1 sales on PC were due to MS forcing gamers to have a gold sub to play MP on the PC. That is the primary reason MS dropped the gold requirement to play MP on PC.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62017 Posts

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

Nope.

They would make a loss just like MS did with Halo 1 and 2.

PC gamers just don't buy as many games as we do. Deal with it.

Obviously_Right

Tell that to Steam.

Is this the same service that refuses to disclose its sales numbers?

Yes. The service that posts a 100% growth year-over-year

Avatar image for Jonwh18
Jonwh18

9350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Jonwh18
Member since 2009 • 9350 Posts

PC gamer ic jelly of console exclusives thread/

Avatar image for Nanomage
Nanomage

2371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 Nanomage
Member since 2011 • 2371 Posts

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="nameless12345"]

More sales = loss?

Wut?

nameless12345

Porting isn't free.

Remedy were satisfied with Alan Wake PC sales.

CliffyB wasn't satisfied with Gears PC sales but they could still have ported Gears 2 & 3 over for those extra sales.

And the reason why Gears didn´t do very well on the PC was simply because MS tried to push the paid GFWL service on the PC and everyone gave them the finger basically.
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

PC gamer ic jelly of console exclusives thread/

Jonwh18

Yea, I'm a PC gamer all right.

I rather play console games in superior graphics the PC offers. ;)

Avatar image for Jonwh18
Jonwh18

9350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Jonwh18
Member since 2009 • 9350 Posts

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"]

PC gamer ic jelly of console exclusives thread/

nameless12345

Yea, I'm a PC gamer all right.

I rather play console games in superior graphics the PC offers. ;)

Call em like I see um.

Avatar image for Stinger78
Stinger78

5846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Stinger78
Member since 2003 • 5846 Posts
Most games I play on PC are multiplats, so, the more chance for PC-only gamers to play them, the better.
Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#40 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

Examples of "console exclusives" released on the PC:

Halo 1 & 2, Gears 1, Alan Wake, ect.

I can see Gran Turismo, Uncharted, God of War and Last of Us all looking vastly better on the PC...

nameless12345

Well the big reason that none of those particular games will ever be on anything but a Sony console, is that they are all published/owned by Sony. As for whether or not they should... I don't really care. Multiplats are (almost) always better on PC, and PC gets plenty of exclusives. There's just not very console exclusive games that interest me. And the ones that do, are very much console games. Like, technically, they could look better on a PC, but that would be the only advantage.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
deactivated-5ac102a4472fe

7431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
Member since 2007 • 7431 Posts

Well, Nomatter how much Console Fanboys wail about it, it IS happening. How much PC Fanboys howl, it IS happening.

Basicly the age of Exclusives are comming to an end, most exclusives take a loss, or barely break even on console. Multiplats are the focus.

One is either ignorant, or living in their own dreamworld if they do not see the signs, and hear Devs and Console manufactors bring this up time and time again.

The only majority (as in nearly all) of exclusives we see now, are games too small to be considered multiplat, or one of the few Exclusives that really has a pull and can demand to be exclusive (sorry Sony fans, this pretty much means Nintendo only)

In the end it will be the end for a good chunk of the console buisness (Maybe xcept Nintendo, they have a very rare spot with their exclusives, they are the equalant of Walt Disney, as long as they do not go 3rd party, they would hold and justify a console, MS and Sony? Nope, the majority are multiplats across all major platforms anyways, and they have less and less exclusives. its an age going away.

Avatar image for ShadowriverUB
ShadowriverUB

5515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 ShadowriverUB
Member since 2009 • 5515 Posts
One of the reasons why people (including me) buy a consoles is fact that it has interesting games that you won't find on PC, if console exclusive would gone it would be big hit for this market and i bet all console manufacture do everything to keep it that way for there own sake..... you can see that in MS with Halo
Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
then ppl wont have much incentive to buy a ps3/360 if they can get it on PC...
Avatar image for 4dr1el
4dr1el

2380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 4dr1el
Member since 2012 • 2380 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

inb4 "no salezzz!1!!"

nameless12345

Not neccessarily.

CoD is on the PC too but it has the best sales on the consoles.

You are not very smart are you?

Avatar image for Obviously_Right
Obviously_Right

5331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Obviously_Right
Member since 2011 • 5331 Posts

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

inb4 "no salezzz!1!!"

4dr1el

Not neccessarily.

CoD is on the PC too but it has the best sales on the consoles.

You are not very smart are you?

No...he isn't.

Avatar image for Jonwh18
Jonwh18

9350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Jonwh18
Member since 2009 • 9350 Posts

then ppl wont have much incentive to buy a ps3/360 if they can get it on PC...campzor
Not true. people still buy 360's

[spoiler] :P [/spoiler]

Avatar image for rilpas
rilpas

8161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 rilpas
Member since 2012 • 8161 Posts

[QUOTE="campzor"]then ppl wont have much incentive to buy a ps3/360 if they can get it on PC...Jonwh18

Not true. people still buy 360's

[spoiler] :P [/spoiler]

in a way you're right, some people just don't like PCs, even if PCs and consoles had exactly the same games a lot of people would still buy consoles.

I'm not judging those people or anything, though personally, I'd stick with PC :P

Avatar image for Zubinen
Zubinen

2555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 Zubinen
Member since 2011 • 2555 Posts
Yes you can game on a dirt cheap PC if you're only looking for console level fidelity i.e low/no AA/AF 720p native 30 frames, but in practice very few people will accept that, hence what could have been a dirt cheap experience becomes substantially more expensive(albeit in cases like mine where I buy lots of games the cheaper game prices on PC more than make up the difference for the cost of several PC upgrades over the years) so I don't see what's the big deal with owning all the platforms when it's just a drop in the ocean.
Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#50 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts
yes, BUT i don't think you understand why microsoft/sony/nintendo pay for them to be made. They are made to help lure customers to the console it is for. They know they are going lose mass amount of sells because it's exclusive specially if it's a AAA game but they hope for that profit be made up by people who bought the console buy other games