Should games be cheaper than they are??

  • 81 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for cf002222
cf002222

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 cf002222
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
If games were like $15 dollars a pop i would spend more money buying games. I'm sure developers will love me but what do you think? I just don't buy a lot of games because they usually aren't worth $65 plus the dlc crap they are pulling now. If games were fifteen/twenty dollars i would give a lot of different companies my money. But i don't end up giving them anything. Maybe will buy a few games a year that go to just those companies. Since they are cutting our piracy and used games why not??
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62051 Posts

At $15 a pop, don't expect games to have much more content that XBLA/PSN titles. Budgets on games need to be reduced, without impacting the quality of games (heavily).

Avatar image for cf002222
cf002222

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 cf002222
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
Console gaming and downloadable retail games are still expensive though.
Avatar image for cf002222
cf002222

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 cf002222
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts

At $15 a pop, don't expect games to have much more content that XBLA/PSN titles. Budgets on games need to be reduced, without impacting the quality of games (heavily).

lundy86_4
I agree it's a mess. I can't really feel too sorry for these guys though. They built their own crap and now they are just jacking up prices and killing off the industry. Common logic would tell me not to be so greedy?
Avatar image for minh800
minh800

1166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 minh800
Member since 2011 • 1166 Posts

No, I'm fine with them. They rarely stay at their MSRPs for long anyways.

Avatar image for Basinboy
Basinboy

14560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#7 Basinboy
Member since 2003 • 14560 Posts

If you wait typically a few weeks or even a month, new release prices get slashed by close to 33% for console games. But it'll be hard to ever unseat games from that price point as long as development costs continue to escalate.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
developers get very little profit from the $60 publishers charge for games.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62051 Posts

I agree it's a mess. I can't really feel too sorry for these guys though. They built their own crap and now they are just jacking up prices and killing off the industry. Common logic would tell me not to be so greedy?cf002222

Unfortunately, between things like licensing fees, royalty fees, manufacturing/shipping, etc, prices will increase. Even with DD only games, we're seeing publishers release at the same price (some for $60 om Steam). Between greed and an actual need to cover cossts, we get screwed.

Avatar image for SW__Troll
SW__Troll

1687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 SW__Troll
Member since 2011 • 1687 Posts

At $15 a pop, don't expect games to have much more content that XBLA/PSN titles. Budgets on games need to be reduced, without impacting the quality of games (heavily).

lundy86_4

I just think it'd be better if games were priced based on their budget, and demand for it.

It doesn't make too much sense for every retail game to be $60, and at the same time there are some retail games I think could charge more than $60.

It should be treated like any other type of software. Not all computer software costs the same price, or all phone applications.

I'm not sure if it has anything to do with the console makers themselves though. PC doesn't have the same problem to the extent as the consoles. Not every new PC release gets a $50 price tag; you see $40, or $35, or $30 as well.

Avatar image for cf002222
cf002222

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 cf002222
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="cf002222"] I agree it's a mess. I can't really feel too sorry for these guys though. They built their own crap and now they are just jacking up prices and killing off the industry. Common logic would tell me not to be so greedy?lundy86_4

Unfortunately, between things like licensing fees, royalty fees, manufacturing/shipping, etc, prices will increase. Even with DD only games, we're seeing publishers release at the same price (some for $60 om Steam). Between greed and an actual need to cover cossts, we get screwed.

that's what i mean though. everyone wants their two cents. Then they just jack up prices and b lame used game sales and piracy for being pretty much successful. It's a mess. And they wonder why this stuff is coming to a head. they sue everyone else out. The average consumer isn't going to buy a ton of games at that price so everyone is shut out. They basically made their own mess. Now they are trying to change the laws where people have no say in how the industry should be. I'm not advocating piracy here, but it's kind of funny.
Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts
Yes games should be cheaper. They should be no more than $40 when released. I will not buy any game for my PS3 until it drops to below $30. This same rule also applies to PC games unless it is something that I really want such as Guild Wars 2 and Diablo 3.
Avatar image for genocidecu
genocidecu

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 genocidecu
Member since 2011 • 103 Posts

Hell yes the should be cheaper

Avatar image for Ryan_Som
Ryan_Som

2474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 Ryan_Som
Member since 2009 • 2474 Posts

I see people complain about the price of games a lot, and I don't get it. I say this for 2 reasons: 1) Games aren't any more expensive now than they were 10 years ago (Games for the Nintendo 64 were around $70. Neo Geo games were twice as expensive as current games) and 2) I don't make that much money (I work 40 hours a week making $10/hr) and I can still afford the games that I want if I want them. It comes down to prioritizing. Every game doesn't have to be a day one. Hell, I bought RAGE day one. I STILL haven't beaten it because I haven't invested enough time in it. Do you know how much it goes for now new? $30. That's half of the original asking price. Had I just waited I could've saved that money, but I wanted it and I could afford it. Plenty of games fall on my "back burner list": Games that I eventually want to buy and play, but I'm not pressed on them so I have no problem waiting until further price drops.

Plus, as the first commenter posted, Steam has incredible deals...especially around holidays. I bought BioShock for $4.99, Left 4 Dead 1 and 2 for $7.49 each, Dead Space 2 for $4.99, and Orcs Must Die! for $3.84 all on Halloween sales. Video games drop faster in price these days than any other medium (third party games mostly). Most console games that come out are $20-30 cheaper new within 2-3 months. If you don't like used games then this is the best way to save money. It's even easier to wait if you have a backlog to go through.

Deals are out there, you just have to look for them.

Avatar image for bbkkristian
bbkkristian

14971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#15 bbkkristian
Member since 2008 • 14971 Posts
It seems in the NES era, games were around $30 and the wages were lower, about $4.25 (federal in US). Now the minimum wage has nearly doubled and games are $60. Seems about right. So yes games are expensive, but they were also expensive back then. :D Standard of Living has increased. I learned this in my economics class today, glad to see it applied. :P
Avatar image for AutoPilotOn
AutoPilotOn

8655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 AutoPilotOn
Member since 2010 • 8655 Posts
[QUOTE="bbkkristian"]It seems in the NES era, games were around $30 and the wages were lower, about $4.25 (federal in US). Now the minimum wage has nearly doubled and games are $60. Seems about right. So yes games are expensive, but they were also expensive back then. :D Standard of Living has increased. I learned this in my economics class today, glad to see it applied. :P

Not sure about Nes but some snes and n64 games were 70 or more..
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#17 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
If anything, they should be way more expensive. The budget amounts during this gen have skyrocketed, and prices haven't changed. I wouldn't mind paying upwards of $100 for a game if I knew I was getting something well-made and worth my time/money. If you can't afford gaming, get a new hobby. Books are cheap.
Avatar image for DarthTuna
DarthTuna

707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 DarthTuna
Member since 2011 • 707 Posts

.

wis3boi

Just save up your money and buy it on steam sales. I got about 10 new games for about $70 after the last sale

Avatar image for bbkkristian
bbkkristian

14971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#19 bbkkristian
Member since 2008 • 14971 Posts
[QUOTE="AutoPilotOn"][QUOTE="bbkkristian"]It seems in the NES era, games were around $30 and the wages were lower, about $4.25 (federal in US). Now the minimum wage has nearly doubled and games are $60. Seems about right. So yes games are expensive, but they were also expensive back then. :D Standard of Living has increased. I learned this in my economics class today, glad to see it applied. :P

Not sure about Nes but some snes and n64 games were 70 or more..

Really? In the US? :o
Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
Development costs should be lower. Which would lead to lower retail prices.
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

no they shouldn't there is a reason developers and publishers are going under.

this is a hobby its not needful its not food, air or water one cannot complain about prices in a hobby.

Avatar image for AutoPilotOn
AutoPilotOn

8655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 AutoPilotOn
Member since 2010 • 8655 Posts
[QUOTE="bbkkristian"][QUOTE="AutoPilotOn"][QUOTE="bbkkristian"]It seems in the NES era, games were around $30 and the wages were lower, about $4.25 (federal in US). Now the minimum wage has nearly doubled and games are $60. Seems about right. So yes games are expensive, but they were also expensive back then. :D Standard of Living has increased. I learned this in my economics class today, glad to see it applied. :P

Not sure about Nes but some snes and n64 games were 70 or more..

Really? In the US? :o

Yes lol u forget how expensive some games were? With some games now we are getting a deal. I believe I paid at least 60 maybe more for Zelda and perfect dark on n64
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#23 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

You're a Level 2.D=

Avatar image for bbkkristian
bbkkristian

14971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#24 bbkkristian
Member since 2008 • 14971 Posts
[QUOTE="AutoPilotOn"][QUOTE="bbkkristian"][QUOTE="AutoPilotOn"] Not sure about Nes but some snes and n64 games were 70 or more..

Really? In the US? :o

Yes lol u forget how expensive some games were? With some games now we are getting a deal. I believe I paid at least 60 maybe more for Zelda and perfect dark on n64

That was a little bit before my time :lol: I played video games, but I didn't buy them :P I didn't start actually buying video games regularly until 2005. I still remember my first video game I bought with my own money was Zelda: Oracle of Ages. :D
Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts
If anything, they should be way more expensive. The budget amounts during this gen have skyrocketed, and prices haven't changedfoxhound_fox
Yes they have changed. Last gen the average PS2 game was $50 and the average PS1 game was $40.
Avatar image for Rick_Sure
Rick_Sure

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 Rick_Sure
Member since 2011 • 371 Posts

I would have no problem if we got a finished product on release.

9/10 We do not get that and hence the price of games is over the top.

(Yes I know we PC gamers can expect some problems due to the amount of hardware for us but things like the xbox/PS should not have such problems. Even for PC gamers how many of the problems are caused by the DRM rather then the product itself?)

Avatar image for Spartan070
Spartan070

16497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Spartan070
Member since 2004 • 16497 Posts
Not really, I think they are fairly priced all things considered.
Avatar image for Spartan070
Spartan070

16497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Spartan070
Member since 2004 • 16497 Posts
[QUOTE="bbkkristian"][QUOTE="AutoPilotOn"][QUOTE="bbkkristian"] Really? In the US? :o

Yes lol u forget how expensive some games were? With some games now we are getting a deal. I believe I paid at least 60 maybe more for Zelda and perfect dark on n64

That was a little bit before my time :lol: I played video games, but I didn't buy them :P I didn't start actually buying video games regularly until 2005. I still remember my first video game I bought with my own money was Zelda: Oracle of Ages. :D

Paid $79.99 for DK64 and Goldeneye, in Philadelphia.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts
[QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="bbkkristian"][QUOTE="AutoPilotOn"] Yes lol u forget how expensive some games were? With some games now we are getting a deal. I believe I paid at least 60 maybe more for Zelda and perfect dark on n64

That was a little bit before my time :lol: I played video games, but I didn't buy them :P I didn't start actually buying video games regularly until 2005. I still remember my first video game I bought with my own money was Zelda: Oracle of Ages. :D

Paid $79.99 for DK64 and Goldeneye, in Philadelphia.

^ this.
Avatar image for GamerwillzPS
GamerwillzPS

8531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 GamerwillzPS
Member since 2012 • 8531 Posts
In a perfect world, low quality games with bugs and framerate problems like Skyrim and Black Ops should be sold cheaper. Even when they have just released. High quality games like Uncharted, Killzone, Halo, Gears of War, inFamous, etc are worth their £40 price tags. In the real world, there is no way for developers to sell games below £20 due to development costs. They need profit to keep their balls rolling.
Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

Games should be priced on a case by case basis.

It doesn't really matter though, as the market tends to force publishers to price things properly rather quickly if they're charging more than they're worth.

Avatar image for AutoPilotOn
AutoPilotOn

8655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 AutoPilotOn
Member since 2010 • 8655 Posts
[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]In a perfect world, low quality games with bugs and framerate problems like Skyrim and Black Ops should be sold cheaper. Even when they have just released. High quality games like Uncharted, Killzone, Halo, Gears of War, inFamous, etc are worth their 40 pound price tags. In the real world, there is no way for developers to sell games below 20 pounds due to development costs. They need profit to keep their balls rolling.

Skyrim is awesome no frame rate problem and is well worth. 60
Avatar image for GamerwillzPS
GamerwillzPS

8531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 GamerwillzPS
Member since 2012 • 8531 Posts
[QUOTE="AutoPilotOn"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]In a perfect world, low quality games with bugs and framerate problems like Skyrim and Black Ops should be sold cheaper. Even when they have just released. High quality games like Uncharted, Killzone, Halo, Gears of War, inFamous, etc are worth their 40 pound price tags. In the real world, there is no way for developers to sell games below 20 pounds due to development costs. They need profit to keep their balls rolling.

Skein is awesome no frame rate problem and is well worth. 60

Well, you must be playing the game on a different platform. PS3 version is just pure awful. By the way, by 'Skein', did you mean Skyrim?
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts
[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"][QUOTE="AutoPilotOn"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]In a perfect world, low quality games with bugs and framerate problems like Skyrim and Black Ops should be sold cheaper. Even when they have just released. High quality games like Uncharted, Killzone, Halo, Gears of War, inFamous, etc are worth their 40 pound price tags. In the real world, there is no way for developers to sell games below 20 pounds due to development costs. They need profit to keep their balls rolling.

Skein is awesome no frame rate problem and is well worth. 60

Well, you must be playing the game on a different platform. PS3 version is just pure awful. By the way, by 'Skein', did you mean Skyrim?

PC version works as intended since release basically
Avatar image for HaloPimp978
HaloPimp978

7329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#35 HaloPimp978
Member since 2005 • 7329 Posts
Steam is cheap has it's gonna get. Next gen games might be 65 bucks.
Avatar image for Goyoshi12
Goyoshi12

9687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#36 Goyoshi12
Member since 2009 • 9687 Posts

You're a Level 2.D=

mitu123

...zzZZZZzzzzZZZZzzzz-huh? What? :|

Oh, low level post thread? Damn it...sleeping on the job. Well better late than never. :P

I need new gifs...:(

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

Steam is cheap has it's gonna get. Next gen games might be 65 bucks.HaloPimp978

Lately amazon has been giving steam the smackdown on sale prices.

Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

You're a Level 2.D=

Goyoshi12

...zzZZZZzzzzZZZZzzzz-huh? What? :|

Oh, low level post thread? Damn it...sleeping on the job. Well better late than never. :P

I need new gifs...:(

That gif cracks me up because it is wrong. He is coming out, not in.

Avatar image for Vraeth
Vraeth

1208

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Vraeth
Member since 2005 • 1208 Posts

$50 was pretty solid; $60, for whatever reason, makes me hesitate buying at launch. They're the ones with people doing the marketting math, though, so maybe it's worth it.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#41 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Yes they have changed. Last gen the average PS2 game was $50 and the average PS1 game was $40.AmazonTreeBoa
"This gen." And I remember some SNES/N64 games costing on the order of $100 in Canada. So no, even if you were responding to the right context, you would be wrong. I remember, distinctly, paying $60+ CAD for many PS games (I've probably still got the receipts in the cases). Games have barely fluctuated in price... and in absolutely NO way do they reflect the increases in budget (how much did those $80 SNES games cost to make? It certainly wasn't $50M).
Avatar image for HCMBusiness_89
HCMBusiness_89

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 HCMBusiness_89
Member since 2009 • 140 Posts
Should cars, boats, gas, food? wis3boi ended the thread on the first post! haha :D
Avatar image for Warhawk_
Warhawk_

1497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Warhawk_
Member since 2006 • 1497 Posts

If anything, they should be way more expensive. The budget amounts during this gen have skyrocketed, and prices haven't changed. I wouldn't mind paying upwards of $100 for a game if I knew I was getting something well-made and worth my time/money. If you can't afford gaming, get a new hobby. Books are cheap.foxhound_fox

Some games are over $100 and that's if you buy the game and its day one dlcs :P

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#44 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Some games are over $100 and that's if you buy the game and its day one dlcs :PWarhawk_
Which ones? I don't recall any $60 games getting $40+ worth of DLC on the first day.
Avatar image for immortality20
immortality20

8546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#45 immortality20
Member since 2005 • 8546 Posts

49.99 seems like a stronger price point, but games are very very expensive to make this gen, and not every one makes a huge profit that a CoD does. I can't even imagine the budge anext gen game will cost.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#46 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
I can't even imagine the budge anext gen game will cost.immortality20
I can. Either less or the same as they cost now. If a developer wants to survive, especially on consoles, they are going to have to make the budget tighter next gen, or face failure and possibly bankruptcy (about half of the console-oriented developers this gen have closed their doors). And I really don't see the PS4 or Nextbox being that much more powerful than the PS3/360. There is a point where resolution increases are meaningless to 99.9% of the market... and for right now, that is anything beyond 1080p.
Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#47 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts

.

wis3boi

Steam sales, otherwise you will pay the same (more in a lot of cases)

Avatar image for Zelgadiss
Zelgadiss

1712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Zelgadiss
Member since 2003 • 1712 Posts

50$ was fine no need to go to 60$plus tax like **** 65 dollars for a game this is crazy! What's even worse most of the games are not even worth it.

Avatar image for arkephonic
arkephonic

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 arkephonic
Member since 2006 • 7221 Posts

Honestly, publishers could probably push much harder DRM and shady business tactics than they are now, and still get away with it. They could probably charge $100 a game, lock half the content on disc as $30 DLC, included online passes for $10 to lock the other half, and force you to be logged into an account and remain online in order to play online and offline games alike, just so they can make sure that you actually bought their product, similar to what Blizzard does with Starcraft II.

Unfortunately, this is just the beginning. People that have a voice and disdain for these kinds of practices are in the minority. The majority of gamers in the world will simply not care, and continue to buy more and more games. As long as those people exist and continue to buy more and more games, the publishers will up the ante. I don't think it is nearly as bad now as what it could be and most likely will be in the future.

Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#50 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts
Meh. I'd like to see games price at $40-50, but that's just not possible. I don't really mind shelling out $60 if it's something I'll play a lot. I'd rather just wait on a price drop for something like Vanquish, which is 6-7 hours and priced at $60.